Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help identifying Ciocc

    Hello, can someone help me identify this Ciocc? The geometry looks different than what I am used to, as it appears to have a very long top tube, with the head tube much more vertical than the seat tube. What would a frame with this type of geometry ride like? Also, any idea on which model frame this is and what tubing?

    Thanks!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Force; 08-07-10 at 09:55 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In searching a little bit more, it kind of looks like this frame from the catalog that I found - Tri-sport frame with Columbus Aelle.

    http://bulgier.net/pics/bike/Catalogs/ciocc(tsd)/7.jpg

  3. #3
    www.onecycles.com douchebagonwhlz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Western Slope, CO
    Posts
    917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is the long top tube for triathletes to keep aero? Their low end tubing frame (relative of course) was 475$ 20+ years ago!

  4. #4
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,481
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the pictures were taken with a very bad camera and the frame is bent. Cheap lenses tend to produce this distortion if they are used close in. If there is zoom on the camera, the best technique is to stand further back and zoom in. But I think in this case the frame is bent.

    There is no reason to have a bike with an incredibly steep head angle, it doesn't help anything.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My first thought was that the angles looked odd. What leads you to believe it is bent? I was wondering whether that was a bulge at the top of the down tube, right behind the head tube.

  6. #6
    Randomhead
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    12,481
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just downloaded the second picture and blew it way up. It does appear that there are dents on the bottom right at the end of the tt/ht lug and the dt/ht lug. Really hard to tell with pictures of this quality though.

    Starting to question my diagnosis of a bent frame. Check out these two pictures of the same frame, sorry for the blur


    I changed my second picture for a better one. The second picture was taken from pretty much dead-on, it's just from 5' away. First picture was taken from over 10 feet away with zoom. You can see the second picture makes the frame look bent.
    Last edited by unterhausen; 08-08-10 at 02:47 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unterhausen - thanks for the pics. That is very interesting about the effect of the camera. I went to see the frame tonight. Geometry did not look so strange in person - looks like it was the effect of the camera as in your second picture. However, the frame was bent, there was a bulge behind the headtube and what looked like stress fractures. Too bad.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •