Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 45
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fuji touring series IV or Raleigh Technium 440?

    I've got a Raleigh technium 440 right now that I've been riding a bit, pretty good shape, mediocre components, not incredibly attached to it. I've now got a line on a Fuji touring series IV, I'll mostly be using it as a short distance commuter (5 miles a day or less), use for some longer rides for excercise (25-50 miles) and may do some actual overnight touring at some point,

    I don't really know much about bike geometry, will the fuji be a good all-arounder? Any insights on what you folks would want to have given the option of having one of the two? Experiences with either model?

  2. #2
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    18,870
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I've had two of the Fuji TS IV in the last year. Its one of the great, vintage touring bikes. Lots of value there, so if you can get it at a good price, I would be all over it regardless.

  3. #3
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,188
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zoo mob View Post
    I've got a Raleigh technium 440 right now that I've been riding a bit, pretty good shape, mediocre components, not incredibly attached to it. I've now got a line on a Fuji touring series IV, I'll mostly be using it as a short distance commuter (5 miles a day or less), use for some longer rides for excercise (25-50 miles) and may do some actual overnight touring at some point,

    I don't really know much about bike geometry, will the fuji be a good all-arounder? Any insights on what you folks would want to have given the option of having one of the two? Experiences with either model?
    I just finished up a Touring Series III and it's one sweet ride I can tell you. I wouldn't think twice (actually less than once) about a TS IV (or V )

  4. #4
    Senior Member afilado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chattanooga
    My Bikes
    '93 Bridgestone RB-1, '91 Specialized Allez Epic, '85 Raleigh Team Pro, '78 Andre Bertin, early '90s F. Moser Leader AX , '85 Centurion Equipe, '98 Litespeed Tuscany, '89 Klein Quantum, '80 Nishiki Superbe, '83 Peckham, '84 Fuji Opus III
    Posts
    1,172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What Bill says. It hardly gets better than the Fuji Touring IV. Get it even at "retail" and sell the Technium for some payback. You'll be happy. You'll likely become attached the Fuji and it will likely grow in value.

    As always condition matters.

    J
    Last edited by afilado; 08-08-10 at 10:29 PM. Reason: spell

  5. #5
    Senior Member CMC SanDiego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    San Diego
    My Bikes
    Ti Mongoose Pro-Cipressa w/DA, Giordana-XL Strada, Eddy Merckx OS Strada, Ti DBR-Mtn (hardtail), Fuji-Touring Series V, Raleigh SuperCourse X-tracycle, Burley Tandem
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got a Touring Series V, and used to have a Technium frame. Got rid of the Technium, and will never part with the Fuji. It is probably my favorite ride, used for commuting (when I commute), occasional group rides, riding with the kids, and touring (once I get to finally do some long distance rides). I vote for the Fuji. I've flipped 2-3Fuji's over the past year (have got a Royale right now) and I'm always impressed with the ride once I get them into selling condition.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well I went to look at the Fuji today fully intending to buy it, it was listed at $195 and I figured it would be super nice and I'd leave with it for $150. Not what I'd expected, the bike was fairly scratched up, had a replacement seat, replacement bar wrap, needed a tune-up etc. I don't think the wheels were original either, they were Ukai 27"ers. Tires were not great etc. He told me that he knew that he paid too much when he got it for $400, and I wholeheartedly agree. I didn't feel like I could pay any more than $100 for it, but left without making an offer because I didn't want to insult the guy. Also, what's up with the indentations on the bottom in the picture below? Is it dented, or are all of the frames like that? A little lost as what to do with it, make an offer? Walk away?
    What are thoughts?







  7. #7
    )) <> (( illwafer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,401
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    indentations are from some moron tightening a kickstand too much.

  8. #8
    Seņor Member 4Rings6Stars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Boston
    My Bikes
    Lots of em.
    Posts
    1,680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Edit: too slow on my kickstand comment.

    Edit #2: I think I found the bike on CL and she's too big for me (64cm). If it fits, go back and make an offer (or pay full price). It's a + - $400 bike in good condition.
    Last edited by 4Rings6Stars; 08-09-10 at 09:40 PM. Reason: too slow

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At less than $200, I think that's a good deal regardless of the dents from the kickstand. I don't think those kickstand dents will negatively affect frame strength at all. Those Fujis are nice old touring bikes and for what you want will be a far better bike than the Technium in my opinion. I'd be in favor of returning to the seller, offering $150, but paying up to the $195 he's asking to take it home.

    Also, I am fairly certain that those black anodized Ukai rims are the originals. I've seen other similar vintage Fuji tourers with the same rims on them.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So much for keeping a secret. I'll probably go back and give it another look. Maybe I just had higher hopes for a museum quality bike. I'll update tomorrow with how it went.

  11. #11
    Senior Member ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    8,196
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by digitalbicycle View Post
    At less than $200, I think that's a good deal regardless of the dents from the kickstand. I don't think those kickstand dents will negatively affect frame strength at all. Those Fujis are nice old touring bikes and for what you want will be a far better bike than the Technium in my opinion. I'd be in favor of returning to the seller, offering $150, but paying up to the $195 he's asking to take it home.

    Also, I am fairly certain that those black anodized Ukai rims are the originals. I've seen other similar vintage Fuji tourers with the same rims on them.
    +1

  12. #12
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,658
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Two different bikes. For commuting, the Fuji, by far. The Technium is light, and if you had some better components lying around, a fun build that ends up pretty light, just not a huge "in demand" bike, unless you can find a black/gold/red Pro or maybe Team Pro? model.

    The Fuji, as a commuter, is gonna look like that eventually, may as well start out that way.

    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻

    I'm not a doctor, but I watch them on TV.

    1982 Lotus Classique
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso) SLX
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2008 BMC Roadracer SL01
    2014 Wraith Hustle
    2014 Wraith Paycheck

  13. #13
    Iconoclast rat fink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    California
    My Bikes
    Colnago Super, Fuji Opus III, Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    3,148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khatfull View Post
    I just finished up a Touring Series III and it's one sweet ride I can tell you. I wouldn't think twice (actually less than once) about a TS IV (or V )
    Why does your signature make no mention of a Cannondale, Keith?
    "Winning is the best deodorant. Someone can look at your bike and say it stinks, but if you win with it, suddenly it's okay." - Jim Busby

  14. #14
    Senior Member ScottRyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The other Cape, Cape Ann
    My Bikes
    vintagefuji.posthaven.com
    Posts
    2,752
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Those are the original rims and nice ones to boot. If those are in good shape that's a plus.

    What kind of seat post is that? I can't tell by the photo but it doesn't look Japanese ...


    Scott

  15. #15
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,188
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rat fink View Post
    Why does your signature make no mention of a Cannondale, Keith?
    It's still hanging in the garage but it's going to get a run on CL this weekend.

  16. #16
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,188
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scottryder View Post
    Those are the original rims and nice ones to boot. If those are in good shape that's a plus.

    What kind of seat post is that? I can't tell by the photo but it doesn't look Japanese ...
    Can't tell about the post but the RD isn't original, according to the catalog pages anyway...'83 was speced with a Cyclone GT, '84-'86 with Mountech GTL...none with a Le Tech

  17. #17
    Senior Member ScottRyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    The other Cape, Cape Ann
    My Bikes
    vintagefuji.posthaven.com
    Posts
    2,752
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    mmmm, a Campagnolo seat post.. you don't see those to often on a Fuji

    Scott

  18. #18
    Fuji Fan beech333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oswego, Il
    My Bikes
    Fuji Collector: Professional Super Record, 2 x Professional, 2 x The Newest, 2 x Design Series, Special Road Racer, and Titanium Record.
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by digitalbicycle View Post
    Also, I am fairly certain that those black anodized Ukai rims are the originals. I've seen other similar vintage Fuji tourers with the same rims on them.
    +1 Here is mine, as I picked it up recently. Note the rims.

    Seeking a 165mm Sugino Super Mighty track crankset.

  19. #19
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,188
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wrk101 View Post
    I drove four hours one way to pick up this Touring Series IV. As you can tell, it needed some major love. Check the rust on the chrome fork crown. And the short cage 105 RD. Chain speaks for itself. How about the mis-matched brake levers? Check the cable routing of the aero lever. Sick. I had to pick up five bikes to get this one. Three of the five were total trash (straight to the curb), all of them in poor shape. I gladly paid quite a bit for this project.

    Here's the finished project.
    Whoa, nice recovery. Was there ANY chrome at all on the fork crown?? Makes me realize my TS III was danged near mint by comparison....
    Last edited by khatfull; 08-10-10 at 09:06 AM.

  20. #20
    Fuji Fan beech333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oswego, Il
    My Bikes
    Fuji Collector: Professional Super Record, 2 x Professional, 2 x The Newest, 2 x Design Series, Special Road Racer, and Titanium Record.
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^ Yes, I thought mine was rough, but I guess it isn't too bad.
    Seeking a 165mm Sugino Super Mighty track crankset.

  21. #21
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    18,870
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khatfull View Post
    Whoa, nice recovery. Was there ANY chrome at all on the fork crown?? Makes me realize my TS III was danged near mint by comparison....
    Yes, typical oxalic acid recovery. Of course, oxalic does not replace chrome where it is gone, nor does it fill in pitting. From a distance, it looked really good (versus the total rust look of the before pic). Up close, you can see the pitting, but most of the chrome was still there. Too much flash on this pic, I took it inside the garage. Bike moved on, or I would just take a better pic. At least it is taken from the same perspective as above.

    More Fiji 002..jpg

  22. #22
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,188
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wrk101 View Post
    Yes, typical oxalic acid recovery. Of course, oxalic does not replace chrome where it is gone, nor does it fill in pitting. From a distance, it looked really good (versus the total rust look of the before pic). Up close, you can see the pitting, but most of the chrome was still there. Too much flash on this pic, I took it inside the garage. Bike moved on, or I would just take a better pic. At least it is taken from the same perspective as above.
    Still a nice recovery. I've thought about what to do in those extreme cases. I thought maybe liquid paraffin wax wiped on when wiped off (wax on, wax off?!?! ) to leave wax only in the pits? Maybe that would seal them up somewhat?

  23. #23
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    18,870
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I used car wax after the treatment. Paraffin might be a better choice.

    The fork crown issue was kind of extreme, but if you look closely, pretty much all of the fasteners (seat post clamp, chain ring bolts, canti brake bolts, etc) were in similar condition. Some I just replaced (like the chain ring bolts, caught them on clearance at Niagara about a year ago and backed the truck up), others got the OA treatment. Paint on the frame was in remarkably good shape.

  24. #24
    Senior Member CMC SanDiego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    San Diego
    My Bikes
    Ti Mongoose Pro-Cipressa w/DA, Giordana-XL Strada, Eddy Merckx OS Strada, Ti DBR-Mtn (hardtail), Fuji-Touring Series V, Raleigh SuperCourse X-tracycle, Burley Tandem
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khatfull View Post
    Can't tell about the post but the RD isn't original, according to the catalog pages anyway...'83 was speced with a Cyclone GT, '84-'86 with Mountech GTL...none with a Le Tech
    My TSV came with a LeTech Front derailer and a Mountech rear. I wonder if there was some mid-year part changes going on. I'm very happy with my set up.

  25. #25
    Fuji Fan beech333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oswego, Il
    My Bikes
    Fuji Collector: Professional Super Record, 2 x Professional, 2 x The Newest, 2 x Design Series, Special Road Racer, and Titanium Record.
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CMC SanDiego View Post
    My TSV came with a LeTech Front derailer and a Mountech rear. I wonder if there was some mid-year part changes going on. I'm very happy with my set up.
    I've learned that some Fuji catalogs don't match up with bikes, so I am not surprised. Take the Opus III, the catalog says Superbe Pro when it comes with 1st gen Superbe. You can even see the Superbe RD in the photo. Of course, I wouldn't complain. I like the 1st gen over the Pro.

    http://classicfuji.com/OpusIII_1983_Page.htm
    Seeking a 165mm Sugino Super Mighty track crankset.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •