Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-06-10, 03:35 PM   #1
SoreFeet
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 2,058
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Rivendale fit? or "French Fit"

Lately I've been pondering my most comfortable bicycles. The largest bicycle that I can fit has always been the most comfortable. Even with little to no private part clearance I've had good results. My most comfortable bike had a 25 inch seat tube. I am merely six foot tall even...I do wear regular shoes with platform pedals.

As much as I want to use clipless pedals I can't find a shoe that works with my wide feet. Even the Sidi Mega is not wide enough for me. So with my shoes and taller souls my height is roughly six foot one...Perhaps a 62-63CM frame is too large but it seems to work for me.

Is anyone else here comfortable on large bikes? I was comfortable on a 56CM frame but I had lots of seatpost sticking out and had to use a 140 sized stem.

It seems that on the largest possible frame I have exactly one fist of seatpost. This also means the head tube is typically longer putting me more upright.

As I type this I'm nervous about bidding on a large frame on ebay. It just might be too big...but I might as well give it ago...Tange Prestige Baby! aww yeah!
SoreFeet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 03:46 PM   #2
big chainring 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wilmette, IL
Bikes:
Posts: 5,641
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 53 Post(s)
I am riding a larger frame also. I rode 58 and 59 cm frames for a long time. Now with age and less flexibility I ride anything from a 60-62cm. My favorite ride right now is a 62cm Gitane. Just a couple inches of post showing, but its a very comfortable ride.
big chainring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 03:46 PM   #3
poprad
Senior Member
 
poprad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In transit
Bikes: 07 Vanilla, 98 IRD road frame built up with 25th Ann DA, Surly cross check with 105 comp, 78 Raleigh Comp GS, 85 Centurionelli
Posts: 1,566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I concur, of all my bikes my largest frame (a 62cm) fits me best, but it's a custom with a short TT. I think my best move was to get a professional fit from a local Portland guy who really knows his business working with pro teams and such. He explained why I prefer the shorter TT, and convinced me to just try setting my bars a bit lower. After the session I walked away with a set of dimensions from contact point to contact point that works best for my body, and is independant of frame size, seatpost type, stem reach, crank length etc. Knowing what my personal numbers are I can now set up any of my bikes to have very similar point-to-point dimensions and feel very similar. It's really more having the relationship of saddle, pedal, and bar surfaces down pat than it is frame size, although an appropriately sized frame makes reaching that goal easier.

The session wasn't cheap, but nothing worth the time usually is.
poprad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 04:07 PM   #4
ScottRyder 
Senior Member
 
ScottRyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The other Cape, Cape Ann
Bikes: vintagefuji.posthaven.com
Posts: 2,932
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Same here, I grew up riding a 58 cm, now I'm on 60 to 62 cm. If I were to go to my LBS, they'd probably fit to a 56 cm or so. Seeing that I spend 99.9% of the time riding, rather than standing over the top tube, it's a good fit.

Scott
ScottRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 04:25 PM   #5
scozim 
Ellensburg, WA
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Bikes: See my signature
Posts: 2,786
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
I've typically ridden 53-54 cm frames - 30 in inseam. The latest is a 56cm (22" in Trek's terms) and has been a surprisingly nice fit. I just hope I don't have to do an emergency dismount very often as my voice could go up a couple of octaves.
__________________
1984 Gitane Sprint; 1984 Gitane Tour de France;1982 Trek 610; 1980's Univega Supra Sport (fixie); 1975 Teledyne Titan; 1968 Peugeot PL8; ;1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1972 Peugeot PX-10; 1987 Trek 800 Antelope (touring/commuting set up); 1981 Trek 510; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1996 Klein Pulse II mtb; 1997 Klein Pulse Comp mtb; 1989 Peugeot Limestone hybrid (for touring); 1989 Spectrum Titanium
scozim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 04:47 PM   #6
tugrul
Senior Member
 
tugrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 2,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm just shy of 6'1" and I had this 25" Fuji Espree briefly before giving it to a slightly shorter friend.



I really need to make room for a 25" bike in my current fleet of 24"/23.5"/23" bikes. Ideally it would have been my Raleigh Supercourse, but I have it in 23.5", and 25.5" might be a hair much. Prefer to find something with at most 23" top tube.
tugrul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 04:53 PM   #7
TurbineBlade
Kid A
 
TurbineBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yep. this is exactly what happened to me. I was fitted to a 56 by a bunch of roadies at my former LBS. Then I moved to DC and learned more about fit, and ride a 60cm surly. It's much, much more comfortable and I still can stand over it by 1". I'll back the notion that you should ride the largest bike you can that still fits.
'll
TurbineBlade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 05:17 PM   #8
auchencrow 
Senior Member
 
auchencrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Bikes:
Posts: 10,330
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Supposedly I should ride a 54-56 (and I sometimes do), but I am much more comfortable on a 60-62. The (usually) longer top tube and the taller head tube make riding much less tiring.

Conversely, if I find myself riding the hoods more than 10 or 20% of the time, I know the bike is too small.
__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 05:39 PM   #9
ftwelder
Senior Member
 
ftwelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermont
Bikes: Many
Posts: 3,092
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My most comfortable bike is a really big VoyageurII that has a malfunctioning shifter. I seem to pick that one when I head to the post office or hardware store, having forgotten it is tricky to shift.
ftwelder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 05:43 PM   #10
Rabid Koala
Chrome Freak
 
Rabid Koala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: 1971 Chrome Paramount P-13, 1973 Gitane Tour de France, 1974 Raleigh Professional
Posts: 3,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am 6'1" and ride large frames. Due to a deformed vertebrae in my neck, I find it painful to look up while riding a smaller frame. Most of my bikes have less than the fist full of seatpost, depending on what kind of seat I am using.
__________________
1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
1973 Gitane Tour De France
1974 Raleigh Professional
1991 Waterford Paramount
Litespeed Tuscany
Holland Titanium
Rabid Koala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 06:26 PM   #11
vettefrc2000
Senior Member
 
vettefrc2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere North of Detroit and moving fast!
Bikes: 1976 Fuji America 1980 Fuji America 1984 Fuji America TS V 1982 Fuji Royale II 1993 Trek 970 1997 Trek 5000 2004 Trek Calypso 2007 Trek Portland 2008 Surly LTH
Posts: 696
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tugrul View Post
I'm just shy of 6'1" and I had this 25" Fuji Espree briefly before giving it to a slightly shorter friend.



I really need to make room for a 25" bike in my current fleet of 24"/23.5"/23" bikes. Ideally it would have been my Raleigh Supercourse, but I have it in 23.5", and 25.5" might be a hair much. Prefer to find something with at most 23" top tube.
That looks like a 27" frame.
vettefrc2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 06:58 PM   #12
balindamood 
Wrench Savant
 
balindamood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 61 Degrees North
Bikes: www.2nd-cycles.com
Posts: 2,198
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I was racing as a junior, I had a 54cm Univega (Gran Premio). Just before I turned 18, I shot up about 3 inches and got a Peugeot PSN10. I got it large for me (60 cm) figuring I probably would probably grow into it. I never did (shoulda got an 58cm). Never the less, I road the snot out of it and raced for the next 4-5 years, and it always did seem a bit more comfy than the other bikes I raced that technically fit (3Rensho, and Guerciotti). Occasionally one of my racing mates would give me a bit of ribbing over it, but my coach never did.
__________________
"Where you come from is gone;
where you are headed weren't never there;
and where you are ain't no good unless you can get away from it."
balindamood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 07:22 PM   #13
tugrul
Senior Member
 
tugrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 2,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vettefrc2000 View Post
That looks like a 27" frame.


I'm sure that's where the seat post would be if I tried to ride that.
tugrul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 07:46 PM   #14
Flying Merkel
Senior Member
 
Flying Merkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Costa Mesa CA
Bikes:
Posts: 2,639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I prefer the Rivendell fit. Having the bars 5-6 inches below the seat just does not work for me. Willing to bet it's many riders pick the fit for style than practicality.
Flying Merkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 07:57 PM   #15
mickey85
perpetually frazzled
 
mickey85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Linton, IN
Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer
Posts: 2,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A 58cm gives me a "fistful" of seatpost at just shy of 6' tall. I find that I prefer the 58's, but I also have a 56 and a 62. The 62 is about at my limit for height, and the 56 is about at the limit the other way around. I simply couldn't do drops on anything smaller than 56.

That said, I've got a 21 and 22" Sports-style bike, both with uprights, and they're pretty nice...
mickey85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 08:06 PM   #16
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,412
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
I prefer a bit larger than what the LBS would recommend. Of course, the use of the bike makes a difference. A go-fast will be fine a bit smaller, while a distance rider is more comfortable a bit larger.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 08:11 PM   #17
top506
Death fork? Naaaah!!
 
top506's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The other Maine, north of RT 2
Bikes: '71 Gitane Super Corsa, '73 Atala Giro d'Italia, '73 Schwinn Super Sport, '76 Viscount Aerospace Pro, '81 Miyata 710, '81 Lotus Classique, '84 Ross Signature 290s, '85 Miele Gara, '87 Miyata 512, '89 Centurion Ironman, many more
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Odd how many of us ride frames that are 'too big'. I'm as guilty as anyone with 56-7 cm bikes in the stable and a 29" inseam. The only 54cm that feels just right is the Gitane, but I suspect that other factors are in play as well.

Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
top506 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 08:14 PM   #18
auchencrow 
Senior Member
 
auchencrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Bikes:
Posts: 10,330
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I am not sure why they call it the Rivendell fit... Isn't it just the traditional fit?

Based on what is most commonly available for sale here today, I'd have to say that the median size for a 70's-era English or French bike was 23-24", while the height of the average European male was 5'8" .

So why do I often hear people today (most of whom are slightly taller than 5'8") refer to the 24" bikes as "huge", or the 25" frames as "freakishly large"?
__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 08:51 PM   #19
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Bikes: 1954 Hetchins M.O., 1959 Viking Severn Valley, 1970 Raleigh Pro, 1972 Fuji "The Finest", 1974 Raleigh Superbe&Comp, 1976 Raleigh Team Pro, 1996 Giant Iguana, 2000 Bob Jackson Arrowhead
Posts: 14,412
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by auchencrow View Post
I am not sure why they call it the Rivendell fit... Isn't it just the traditional fit?

Based on what is most commonly available for sale here today, I'd have to say that the median size for a 70's-era English or French bike was 23-24", while the height of the average European male was 5'8" .

So why do I often hear people today (most of whom are slightly taller than 5'8") refer to the 24" bikes as "huge", or the 25" frames as "freakishly large"?
I'm 5' 9" and of rather "normal" proportions. I have a 23.5" bike, and that's at the limit of what I'd consider riding. To me, anything larger I might call "huge".
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 08:55 PM   #20
mudboy
Senior Member
 
mudboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Collegeville, PA
Bikes: Ruckelshaus Randonneur, Specialized Allez (early 90's, steel), Ruckelshaus Path Bomber currently being built
Posts: 1,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Having just sold a "Rivendell sized" actual Rivendell, I disagree. Too big is too big. I felt like I was riding a clown bike on the high wire.
mudboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 09:44 PM   #21
tugrul
Senior Member
 
tugrul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Bikes:
Posts: 2,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mudboy View Post
Having just sold a "Rivendell sized" actual Rivendell, I disagree. Too big is too big. I felt like I was riding a clown bike on the high wire.


How much larger than usual was the Rivendell?
tugrul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-10, 09:56 PM   #22
Sixty Fiver
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: YEG
Bikes: See my sig...
Posts: 27,262
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
I am partial to the French fit and most of my bikes fall into the 55/55 category while my Gran Sport is a 52/54 with a Merckx fit and more than a fist full of seatpost.

I am five foot nine and a bit and have a 32.5 inch riding inseam and do like to get stretched out on my bikes.
Sixty Fiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-10, 11:32 AM   #23
FrenchFit 
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 3,029
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
You called?

My bikes range from 54cm to 58cm. All fit perfectly. It's all in the set-up, stem length, rise, etc.

What your can't change is the relative location of the bottom bracket to the allowable seat adjustment, center of gravity, length and top heavy characteristics. Assuming you can get your knee position correct on a small or large frame, then you can size it for youself..though you might have to pop for a different stem.

One thing I'll admit, big/long bikes can't handle like small frames (and they're heavier). My ss urban rider is a 54, but my cafe racer, geared for long smooth drags and hammering, is a very comfortable 58cm.
FrenchFit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-10, 12:02 PM   #24
TurbineBlade
Kid A
 
TurbineBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I used Riv's sizing page, though I would never actually purchase a Riv bike when I can get a comparable bike for 1/3 the price. I'm starting to ease-up on Rivendell, and I dig a lot of what they say, but $ is $ -- that's another thread though.

The Riv sizing chart works quite well for sizing a Surly LHT though, that's for sure . I would think that it would pretty much get you in the ballpark of a comfortable frame that you don't have to jack the handelbars too much even on other bicycles....but I'm not sure honestly.
TurbineBlade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-10, 02:04 PM   #25
bigbossman 
Dolce far niente
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Bikes:
Posts: 10,777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by auchencrow View Post
.... if I find myself riding the hoods more than 10 or 20% of the time, I know the bike is too small.
Could you expound on this? Just curious what you mean......
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."

S. J. Perelman
bigbossman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 AM.