Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 60
  1. #1
    Senior Member CICLISMO_URBANO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles,CA United States
    My Bikes
    1984 BATTAGLIN
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Is it illegal to reproduce decals for vintage frames????

    I am restoring vintage frames original paint re-chrome and I would also like to do decals of course to complete it. I was just wondering if you produce them yourself you need some kind of license or something or can you just do it since it is something you can just buy.
    Stuff for trade:
    http://thebicyclemasters.blogspot.co...lmo-nuovo.html

    In want:
    a 48 49 50 cm frame or frameset. No Tange Please.
    Any year Selle Italia SLR saddle
    Dura ace 7sp freewheel cassette
    Cinelli XA 80mm stem

  2. #2
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm sure you can find them on the net or eBay.

  3. #3
    www.theheadbadge.com cudak888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern Florida
    My Bikes
    http://www.theheadbadge.com
    Posts
    22,730
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Technically, it isn't legal to make them for profit, but not one-offs for your own use.

    Regardless, nobody has gone after Cyclemondo, HLloyd's, or Velocals - nobody in the legal departments of whoever might own the trademarks have put a stop to it, thank god. Lord knows the PR department would have an earful the next morning from irate C&V'ers demanding accurate decals directly from the present trademark holder.

    -Kurt

  4. #4
    vjp
    vjp is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,150
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is not illegal.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Drillium Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Seattle, WA - Center of the Universe
    My Bikes
    69 Masi Special, 71 Mondia Special, 74 Colnago Super, 78 Colnago Super, 78 Medici, 79 Dennis Sparrow, 80 Alpina, 83 Colnago Mexico, 85 Somec Super Corsa, 85 Casati Perfection, 85 Spinella (Olympia), 02 Bill Davidson custom
    Posts
    4,983
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    ^ And good thing it isn't - or shouldn't be - either. After waiting a month, I finally got an email back from Casati as to my query regarding obtaining a set of vintage decals from them for my restoration. Apparently, they have none; hard to believe, but straight from the horse's mouth, as it were. Bummer...

    Guess I'll have to trace them, then have them done up for me.

    DD

  6. #6
    Senior Member CICLISMO_URBANO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles,CA United States
    My Bikes
    1984 BATTAGLIN
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So is there any way to have permission to remake them? or would it be legal let say if you would offer paint and decals for the same price??
    Stuff for trade:
    http://thebicyclemasters.blogspot.co...lmo-nuovo.html

    In want:
    a 48 49 50 cm frame or frameset. No Tange Please.
    Any year Selle Italia SLR saddle
    Dura ace 7sp freewheel cassette
    Cinelli XA 80mm stem

  7. #7
    Large Member realestvin7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    2,736
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cudak888 View Post
    Technically, it isn't legal to make them for profit, but not one-offs for your own use.

    Regardless, nobody has gone after Cyclemondo, HLloyd's, or Velocals - nobody in the legal departments of whoever might own the trademarks have put a stop to it, thank god. Lord knows the PR department would have an earful the next morning from irate C&V'ers demanding accurate decals directly from the present trademark holder.

    -Kurt
    This^^

    Worked at a sign/decal shop.

  8. #8
    Riding like its 1990 thenomad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    IE, SoCal
    Posts
    3,635
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not for your own use.
    My blog about rides, bikes and builds: ridesgoneby.blogspot.com

  9. #9
    Large Member realestvin7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Tejas
    Posts
    2,736
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Technically, unless the decal reproduction companies have agreements with the original copyright holders, what they're doing IS illegal. I won't tell if you don't tell though.

  10. #10
    likes to ride an old bike
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In many cases, the legality of reproduction decals is going to be an incredibly complex issue that would probably require months of research to definitively answer 'yes' or 'no' to... Consider these example complicating factors:

    Many of the manufacturers have passed on in the meantime, which would cause the copyrights in the decals to revert to some other owner, who you'd have to track down. In the US that owner is going to be the artist who did the work (or their heirs or assigns), but who knows what it's like in Italy, Japan, or where-have you.

    Many of the manufacturers are located in other countries, so add on the complexity of the home country's copyright laws and the applicability of international copyright treaties. O_o

    +1 to what Kurt said; thank goodness nobody cares. The chance of somebody pressing charges or suing over C&V repop decals is basically zero. :-D

    If you start selling knockoff modern Cervelo decals, encouraging your buyers to use them to pass off other bikes as Cervelo bikes... then maybe you should worry!
    Last edited by MrEss; 01-19-11 at 12:44 AM. Reason: shorten this novel

  11. #11
    Senior Member AZORCH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Liberty, Missouri
    My Bikes
    1966 Paramount P-13 | 1971 Raleigh International | 1982 Gazelle AA Champion Mondial Special | 1980s Freschi Supreme Super Cromo | 1985 Katakura Silk | 1989 Waterford PDG Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2014 Cycles Toussaint Velo Routier
    Posts
    2,500
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MrEss View Post
    Many of the manufacturers have passed on in the meantime, which would cause the copyrights in the decals to revert to some other owner, who you'd have to track down. In the US that owner is going to be the artist who did the work (or their heirs or assigns), but who knows what it's like in Italy, Japan, or where-have you.
    This presumption is incorrect. The copyright will definitely not revert to the artist, unless specifically and contractually set up that way to begin with. Copyright ownership would remain in the hands of corporate or sole proprietor ownership and would pass on to legal heirs or to the individuals and entities who might later acquire said copyright, trademark, service mark, etc. A product trademark is a very, very valuable asset; modern corporations are often very aggressive in pursuing any instances they deem a "watering down" of, or infringement upon, their intellectual property and corporate image. When I was an art director at Hallmark, for instance, the company always went after groups who claimed to be "the Hallmark of bus lines" or "the Hallmark of ...whatever." Some went so far as to use the Hallmark logo, reasoning that do so was actually some kind of complimentary gesture! I'm certain Mercedes-Benz does the same thing. Closer to the topic, some companies in the bicycle world have been acquired by new owners - Rene Herse, for example. Along with the assets of the company, the new owners also have acquired the very valuable name, trademark, and logo. I feel confident in saying that they wouldn't want just any Tom, Dick or Harry applying their name onto the side of a Huffy. Now I know that this isn't the intention of folks in this group, but look at it from their point of view: such an act would negatively affect the opinion of someone who innocently purchased that hypothetical Herse/Huffy later on.

    In actual practice, the folks who are selling us those decals are violating copyright and trademark laws, domestically and internationally. Even I, in applying decals for my own personal use, am on somewhat shaky ground, particularly if I eventually sell my freshly signed bicycle. But - as pointed out above - this isn't the French Connection, and most litigators have bigger fish to fry; clearly the intention is legitimate restorations. Just don't be surprised if (more likely, "when") some enterprising young corporate attorney eventually sends out a "Cease and Desist" letter on fine corporate stationary to one of these decal makers. In the meantime, let's enjoy our ability to bring our vintage rides back to the finery they had when they originally rolled off the show room floor.
    The Early Morning Cyclist: marksbikes.wordpress.com
    Life's too dang short to ride ugly bikes.

  12. #12
    . bbattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Huntsville, Alabama
    My Bikes
    2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, '80's Gardin Shred?, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
    Posts
    11,823
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CICLISMO_URBANO View Post
    I am restoring vintage frames original paint re-chrome and I would also like to do decals of course to complete it. I was just wondering if you produce them yourself you need some kind of license or something or can you just do it since it is something you can just buy.
    It's technically illegal but if you are just restoring an old Colnago by putting Colnago decals on it, I wouldn't worry about it. If you were fixing up Huffys and putting Colnago decals on, that would be a big problem.

    Which bikes do you need decals for? we need pictures.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,228
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AZORCH View Post
    This presumption is incorrect. The copyright will definitely not revert to the artist, unless specifically and contractually set up that way to begin with. Copyright ownership would remain in the hands of corporate or sole proprietor ownership and would pass on to legal heirs or to the individuals and entities who might later acquire said copyright, trademark, service mark, etc. A product trademark is a very, very valuable asset; modern corporations are often very aggressive in pursuing any instances they deem a "watering down" of, or infringement upon, their intellectual property and corporate image. When I was an art director at Hallmark, for instance, the company always went after groups who claimed to be "the Hallmark of bus lines" or "the Hallmark of ...whatever." Some went so far as to use the Hallmark logo, reasoning that do so was actually some kind of complimentary gesture! I'm certain Mercedes-Benz does the same thing. Closer to the topic, some companies in the bicycle world have been acquired by new owners - Rene Herse, for example. Along with the assets of the company, the new owners also have acquired the very valuable name, trademark, and logo. I feel confident in saying that they wouldn't want just any Tom, Dick or Harry applying their name onto the side of a Huffy. Now I know that this isn't the intention of folks in this group, but look at it from their point of view: such an act would negatively affect the opinion of someone who innocently purchased that hypothetical Herse/Huffy later on.

    In actual practice, the folks who are selling us those decals are violating copyright and trademark laws, domestically and internationally. Even I, in applying decals for my own personal use, am on somewhat shaky ground, particularly if I eventually sell my freshly signed bicycle. But - as pointed out above - this isn't the French Connection, and most litigators have bigger fish to fry; clearly the intention is legitimate restorations. Just don't be surprised if (more likely, "when") some enterprising young corporate attorney eventually sends out a "Cease and Desist" letter on fine corporate stationary to one of these decal makers. In the meantime, let's enjoy our ability to bring our vintage rides back to the finery they had when they originally rolled off the show room floor.
    A nuance that is important to acknowledge is that if the trademark is not protected in every way, in every case, even from some little collector/restorer guy, then that fact can be used by other trademark violators in a court case. This is why corporations are constantly going after little guys for seemingly innocuous transgressions - if they let them slide, it could come back to haunt them. Overaggressive lawyers take it from there.

  14. #14
    my name is Jim BlueDevil63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City, Utah
    Posts
    833
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sciencemonster View Post
    A nuance that is important to acknowledge is that if the trademark is not protected in every way, in every case, even from some little collector/restorer guy, then that fact can be used by other trademark violators in a court case. This is why corporations are constantly going after little guys for seemingly innocuous transgressions - if they let them slide, it could come back to haunt them. Overaggressive lawyers take it from there.
    +1

    If you don't defend your trade or service marks aggressively you lose some of your rights.

  15. #15
    What??? Only 2 wheels? jimmuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Boston-ish, MA
    My Bikes
    '73 Raleigh Carlton Gran Sport, '72 Peugeot UO-8, '82 Peugeot TH8, '87 Bianchi Brava, '76? Masi Grand Criterium, '72 Bertin C32, '87 Centurion Ironman Expert, '74 Motobecane Champion Team, and lots of uncertainty on some
    Posts
    7,387
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    One more point often misunderstood is that "for profit" has nothing to do with it. Copyrighted material cannot be distributed to the public, either free or for profit. You cannot, for example, make a zillion copies of your favorite DVDs and distribute them for free. At least in the entertainment business private use is allowed for material you already own. "Publication", i.e. distribution to the public is not.
    Real cyclists use toe clips.
    jimmuller

  16. #16
    Fuji Fan beech333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oswego, Il
    My Bikes
    Fuji Collector: Professional Super Record, 2 x Professional, 2 x The Newest, 2 x Design Series, Special Road Racer, and Titanium Record.
    Posts
    1,535
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmuller View Post
    One more point often misunderstood is that "for profit" has nothing to do with it. Copyrighted material cannot be distributed to the public, either free or for profit. You cannot, for example, make a zillion copies of your favorite DVDs and distribute them for free. At least in the entertainment business private use is allowed for material you already own. "Publication", i.e. distribution to the public is not.
    +1 Napster

    Of course we are definitely walking a fine line. It is illegal for us to buy and use the "counterfeit" decals, but isn't it also illegal to post catalogs and such on sites like Velobase. The trick is, will the true owners of that material ever come after us. Personally, I doubt it.

    However, I won't be surprised if the people who own the Herse name go after Velocals or other decal makers.
    Last edited by beech333; 01-19-11 at 08:36 AM.
    Seeking a 165mm Sugino Super Mighty track crankset.

  17. #17
    Cottered Crank Amesja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wabbits is pwactically chickens!

    '74 Raleigh Carlton Competition w/ Ultegra | '97 Trek 720 Singletrack CX-er w/ 105 | '64 Raleigh LTD-3 modernized w/ all alloy components |'69 Raleigh Twenty | '54 Raleigh Sports

  18. #18
    Senior Member himespau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    7,591
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The question is, are you planning on selling the bike? Because even if you're restoring it with decals from the same bike as it is, if you go claiming it as original when you sell it, then no it's not legal. But no one here would do that anyway, right, so I guess that didn't need to be said.

  19. #19
    Fat Guy on a Little Bike KonAaron Snake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    Two wheeled ones
    Posts
    12,426
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cudak888 View Post
    Technically, it isn't legal to make them for profit, but not one-offs for your own use.

    Regardless, nobody has gone after Cyclemondo, HLloyd's, or Velocals - nobody in the legal departments of whoever might own the trademarks have put a stop to it, thank god. Lord knows the PR department would have an earful the next morning from irate C&V'ers demanding accurate decals directly from the present trademark holder.

    -Kurt
    Exactly right.

    In the real world a company would only be interested in going after you if selling the reproductions was interfering with their profits in some way...either by causing branding problems or undercutting their sale of their own decals. Since none of these companies sells their decals, there is no real motive for them to be interested. Actually I think it's quite the contrary...beautiful restorations with their branding adds to their value and makes it look like their current bikes might have classic status some day too...and stand up to the test of time.

    If a company were printing off Trek logos and applying them to old Huffys...Trek might be interested. If the people buying Trek logos were mostly applying them to old Huffys, they might be interested. They aren't going to have any reason to object to people restoring their Treks with Trek logos. Actually I'd think they'd encourage it.

  20. #20
    Cottered Crank Amesja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Harley Davidson doesn't sue any people for trademark infringement when they are tattooing the copyrighted logos on their bodies...
    '74 Raleigh Carlton Competition w/ Ultegra | '97 Trek 720 Singletrack CX-er w/ 105 | '64 Raleigh LTD-3 modernized w/ all alloy components |'69 Raleigh Twenty | '54 Raleigh Sports

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    7,780
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    These issues get batted around on the CR list fairly often. For example, here's Richard Sachs' take:

    http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.as...10212.0435.eml

    I do remember that a few years ago Cyclomondo/Greg Softley was shut down for a while due to some legal issues, apparently now resolved.

    Neal

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    7,780
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Amesja View Post
    Harley Davidson doesn't sue any people for trademark infringement when they are tattooing the copyrighted logos on their bodies...
    They call that free advertising!

    Neal

  23. #23
    vjp
    vjp is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,150
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If decals are NOT available commercially you can reproduce them legally for your own use. You don't have any rights to reproduce them for others uses, either for free or profit.

  24. #24
    Cottered Crank Amesja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nlerner View Post
    These issues get batted around on the CR list fairly often. For example, here's Richard Sachs' take:

    http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.as...10212.0435.eml

    Neal
    These days anyone with Photoshop and a color laser printer can make exact replicas of anything using waterslide decal paper. I wonder if Sachs is upset now that he's not the only one with the control over these decals and anyone can put them on the incorrect Masi (or a Schwinn, for that matter?)
    '74 Raleigh Carlton Competition w/ Ultegra | '97 Trek 720 Singletrack CX-er w/ 105 | '64 Raleigh LTD-3 modernized w/ all alloy components |'69 Raleigh Twenty | '54 Raleigh Sports

  25. #25
    FBoD Member at Large khatfull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Woodbury, MN
    Posts
    6,189
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Couldn't one make the argument that the restoration of a vintage bike has a "history" element? I mean, if I write a report on George Washington I'm not violating copyright by including his photo am I? Repro decals get made all the time for cars...why not bikes?

    I agree with the "small fish in a big pond" argument...God knows there are more important things in the grand scheme of life and business than a bunch of crazy guys making 20,30,40+ year old bicycles look nice. Geez, if anything I'd think the manufacturers should be honored that someone though so much of their product that they cared enough to do it!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •