Stem length and bike fit/set up
#1
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,763
Bikes: See my signature
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
160 Posts
Stem length and bike fit/set up
Is there an optimal set up or length for the stem on a vintage bike?
I know a lot of it is subject to top tube length, frame fit, saddle height, body build, etc. but I've always gone on the impression that when I look down to the front hub on the bike while riding the stem/bar should block my view of the hub.
For all of "the riders" in my stable this principle is pretty much in effect. I also try to keep fairly consistent in my top tube + stem length at 64-66 cm. However, on my Gitane Sprint the top tube is 2 to 2+ cm shorter than the other bikes at 53 cm. When I look down to the front hub I can see the entire thing. I've already changed the stem once - it's now 95mm. It looks like I would need a 110mm or so.
Are there any inherent stability issues with the shorter stem and the center of weight distribution for the front being further back? Obviously my position is more upright which isn't all bad on some days.
I know a lot of it is subject to top tube length, frame fit, saddle height, body build, etc. but I've always gone on the impression that when I look down to the front hub on the bike while riding the stem/bar should block my view of the hub.
For all of "the riders" in my stable this principle is pretty much in effect. I also try to keep fairly consistent in my top tube + stem length at 64-66 cm. However, on my Gitane Sprint the top tube is 2 to 2+ cm shorter than the other bikes at 53 cm. When I look down to the front hub I can see the entire thing. I've already changed the stem once - it's now 95mm. It looks like I would need a 110mm or so.
Are there any inherent stability issues with the shorter stem and the center of weight distribution for the front being further back? Obviously my position is more upright which isn't all bad on some days.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
#2
FBoD Member at Large
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Woodbury, MN
Posts: 6,246
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
The right stem is whichever stem provides the proper fit. As you're discovering that might be a few cm different from bike to bike even at the same "frame size" depending on TT length, etc. Shorter stems will make steering a tad more twitchy but unless you're going from 130mm to 50mm you'd probably never notice.
Now IMHO there's an aesthetic right and wrong: The stem should rise no more than it's extension nor should its extension be more than double it's rise on a typically configured road bike. On other bike types that's really not a rule.
Did I really just type that gibberish?
Now IMHO there's an aesthetic right and wrong: The stem should rise no more than it's extension nor should its extension be more than double it's rise on a typically configured road bike. On other bike types that's really not a rule.
Did I really just type that gibberish?
#3
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,452
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
Now IMHO there's an aesthetic right and wrong: The stem should rise no more than it's extension nor should its extension be more than double it's rise on a typically configured road bike. On other bike types that's really not a rule.
Did I really just type that gibberish?
Did I really just type that gibberish?
If I adjusted my stems that way I'd never have been able to reach the handlebar even when I was so very much younger than I am now.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#4
Wood
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 2,304
Bikes: Raleigh Sports: hers. Vianelli Professional & Bridgestone 300: mine
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
I subscribe to the fit theory that I should be on the largest frame that I can mount.
Amazingly, that theory agrees with the nice bike that I was given.
So the top tube on my frame is slightly long and a 50mm stem has made a real difference in riding comfort.
The shorter stem does make steering slightly twitchy, but I can ride it hands free, so it doesn't bother me.
Amazingly, that theory agrees with the nice bike that I was given.
So the top tube on my frame is slightly long and a 50mm stem has made a real difference in riding comfort.
The shorter stem does make steering slightly twitchy, but I can ride it hands free, so it doesn't bother me.
#5
Curmudgeon in Training
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rural Retreat, VA
Posts: 1,962
Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Whether one rides hoods or drops should probably come in to play. So then not only does stem rise and length matter, but we can factor in the width of the bar, the depth of drops, etc.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
The shorter the stem, the more resonsive the steering becomes.
I like to set up my bars in this manner.
1. Level or no more than 1" below the saddle.
2. Place your elbow against the nose of the saddle, and extend your arm forward with fingers pointing towards the bar. Your longest finger should just graze the bar.
Doing this gives me the perfect fit for saddle to bar drop and reach.
I like to set up my bars in this manner.
1. Level or no more than 1" below the saddle.
2. Place your elbow against the nose of the saddle, and extend your arm forward with fingers pointing towards the bar. Your longest finger should just graze the bar.
Doing this gives me the perfect fit for saddle to bar drop and reach.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 1,631
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
14 Posts
I've just started paying more attention to measurements and have come up with a TT + stem length of 69cm. Most of my bikes are sized as ~58cm but that's the seat tube measurement. The top tubes (obviously more important) are normally 56 or 57, so I need a 120 or 130 stem. I think ideally I'd ride a TT length of 58 or 59 with a 100 or 110 stem.
#8
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Porter Square
Posts: 35
Bikes: Somec Promax, Philips 3-Speed, Spec. Crux
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you're not riding a 130 length stem slammed into the headtube you are doing it wrong
#9
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think stem rules regarding stem length/TT + stem length are a little arbitrary.
Obivously riding a 60mm stem tells you that the bike is too long.
In the 80-130 length, I think any "rules" (like stem blocking hub) doesn't make any sense. The higher you raise your stem, the less reach you need. The lower, the more reach you need. If you lower the stem all the way down, you increase your reach to the bars, but the hub view may not be obstructed anymore... so what do you do? You get an even longer stem. Doesn't seem like a good guideline to me.
Obivously riding a 60mm stem tells you that the bike is too long.
In the 80-130 length, I think any "rules" (like stem blocking hub) doesn't make any sense. The higher you raise your stem, the less reach you need. The lower, the more reach you need. If you lower the stem all the way down, you increase your reach to the bars, but the hub view may not be obstructed anymore... so what do you do? You get an even longer stem. Doesn't seem like a good guideline to me.
#10
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,763
Bikes: See my signature
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
160 Posts
It's definitely all subject to the rider. I always wondered, though, where the principle that the stem/bar should block out the view of the hub came from. Was it just a general - "here's a starting point, and then go from there."
I had clip on bars on this one for awhile and the stem is a little lower. I typically ride the hoods. Based on the measurements for the rest of the bikes I should be around a 110mm stem. This is the shortest bike I have so it's set up a little more aggressively than the rest.
And, yes, I need to adjust the height of the right brake level. I've been messing with that position a little and like where it is on the left side.
I had clip on bars on this one for awhile and the stem is a little lower. I typically ride the hoods. Based on the measurements for the rest of the bikes I should be around a 110mm stem. This is the shortest bike I have so it's set up a little more aggressively than the rest.
And, yes, I need to adjust the height of the right brake level. I've been messing with that position a little and like where it is on the left side.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
#11
Senior Member
scozim, The starting point for reference WRT a road (race) bike is when on the hoods the front axle is hidden by the handlebar, no rules are broken if stem length is then changed to suit you. Consideration has to be given for frames with lazier head tube angles and forks with more off set, which will place the front axle slightly ahead of the handlebars, depending on TT length.
Brad
Brad
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,387
Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 955 Post(s)
Liked 603 Times
in
388 Posts
This although I was taught fingertip should extend to centerline of bar. Either way, I tried this a few days ago and realized I've been riding on a much-too-long stem.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.
#14
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times
in
908 Posts
I've been able to fit a bike a little bigger than I should, using a short stem and zero-setback seat post.
I've never been able to make a smaller bike comfortable, despite pretty much dupliacating the dimensions of my "normal fit" bike.
Plus, the long stems freak me out.
I've never been able to make a smaller bike comfortable, despite pretty much dupliacating the dimensions of my "normal fit" bike.
Plus, the long stems freak me out.
#15
Curmudgeon in Training
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rural Retreat, VA
Posts: 1,962
Bikes: 1974 Gazelle Champion Mondial, 2010 Cannondale Trail SL, 1988 Peugeot Nice, 1992ish Stumpjumper Comp,1990's Schwinn Moab
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
#16
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My most comfortable go-fast race bike has my finger tips hitting somewhere close to the steer tube.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA
Posts: 24
Bikes: Trek 330, Raleigh Super Course
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The shorter the stem, the more resonsive the steering becomes.
I like to set up my bars in this manner.
1. Level or no more than 1" below the saddle.
2. Place your elbow against the nose of the saddle, and extend your arm forward with fingers pointing towards the bar. Your longest finger should just graze the bar.
Doing this gives me the perfect fit for saddle to bar drop and reach.
I like to set up my bars in this manner.
1. Level or no more than 1" below the saddle.
2. Place your elbow against the nose of the saddle, and extend your arm forward with fingers pointing towards the bar. Your longest finger should just graze the bar.
Doing this gives me the perfect fit for saddle to bar drop and reach.
On my best-fitting bike, the distance from fingertips to center of bar is 3 1/2." I've tried a lot of set-ups, and I need at least 2" to feel comfortable.
#20
Wood
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 2,304
Bikes: Raleigh Sports: hers. Vianelli Professional & Bridgestone 300: mine
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
This thread is going to wind around a lot 'till someone categorizes these rules for different riding positions.
Surely "Ricky racer" isn't going to follow the same fitment as "upright Clyde"?
Surely "Ricky racer" isn't going to follow the same fitment as "upright Clyde"?
#21
Hopelessly addicted...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 5,007
Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
#22
Senior Member
I've heard all these rules and used them as starting points over the years, but ime there's really no substitute for trial and error and miles on the bike.
The elbow against the saddle nose rule would depend, to some extent, on one having the same saddle on all bikes.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
+1 Also the reach of the bars themselves, which levers you're using and where you have them mounted on the bars.
I've heard all these rules and used them as starting points over the years, but ime there's really no substitute for trial and error and miles on the bike.
The elbow against the saddle nose rule would depend, to some extent, on one having the same saddle on all bikes.
I've heard all these rules and used them as starting points over the years, but ime there's really no substitute for trial and error and miles on the bike.
The elbow against the saddle nose rule would depend, to some extent, on one having the same saddle on all bikes.
All very true, but it's all just a starting point. Everyone is different and requires a different setup.
As far as saddle nose to bars, you do need to use the same saddle and a stem with the same amount of setback. There is just far too many variables to fit someone over the internet, it's hard enough to do it in person.
#24
Ellensburg, WA
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,763
Bikes: See my signature
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times
in
160 Posts
I swapped out the 95 mm stem for a 110mm and the bike doesn't feel so compact - makes sense with a longer stem. I'll mess with saddle position a little but this increase will stretch me out a little more. With this set up the bike now moves to 64 cm combined top tube and stem length which puts it 1 cm behind the Trek 510 and PX10 and 2 cm behind the Gitane TdF.
I love the flexibility of these tests and seeing how different bikes compare. The head and seat tube angles on the two Gitanes are identical. The seat tubes - 52 c-t-t vs. 54 c-t-t. However, top tube on the TdF is 2 cm longer than the Sprint's which. I would suspect because the TdF was more of the "Ricky Racer" bike.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Somewhere Between The Beginning And The End
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
This guy probably knows nothing about frame fitting.... https://davesbikeblog.blogspot.com/20...rearm-and.html