Brooks B17 worth the weight?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 79
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brooks B17 worth the weight?
The lbs had a Brooks B17 on sale for about $60. I've been looking at these for some time online and excitedly picked it off the rack. Yikes! This thing feels heavy! I'm not looking to be a total weight weenie with my gaspipe Grand Prix, but it felt noticeably heavier than my free Kashima vinyl saddle. Is there anything that looks remotely as cool and offers comparable quality/comfort to the Brooks with slightly less ballast? Or should I just suck it up and drop a half pound somewhere else? Maybe if I shaved my head...
#3
Senior Member
if you're unwilling to pay the weight tax, go with another vinyl saddle. maybe a turbo, or the charge bucket.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
If weight is the OP's concern, get ride of the bike and forget the Brooks. If enjoying the ride is the goal, keep the Raleigh and get the Brooks. Personally, I love almost every Brooks saddle I have ever tried, with a single exception, the Brooks B15 which was, for me, the saddle from Hades.
In fact, I have had a Brooks B17 honey kicking around for about three years. The saddle is almost brand new and looks just great on my recently built up Motobécane Grand Jubileé. No picutes of that yet and it looks as though I will be hanging onto my Motobé for a while. I love that bicycle!
In fact, I have had a Brooks B17 honey kicking around for about three years. The saddle is almost brand new and looks just great on my recently built up Motobécane Grand Jubileé. No picutes of that yet and it looks as though I will be hanging onto my Motobé for a while. I love that bicycle!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
Last edited by randyjawa; 08-25-11 at 04:34 AM. Reason: forgot something
#5
Rustbelt Rider
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 9,104
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Liked 372 Times
in
177 Posts
The weight difference may be obvious in your hands but I really doubt you will notice that weight while you are on the bike. Some people like Brooks saddles and some don't, it's one of those things that you have to try for yourself. I do like the shape of a B17, they are nice and wide.
__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
|......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
|_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
"(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 740
Bikes: 1973 Mercian Pro, 1972-73 Peugeot Track, 1983 Lotus Competition, Early 1970s Bottecchia Pro/Giro, 2000 Bob Jackson Special Tourist, 2011 Rivendell A. Homer Hilsen; 1996 Franklin custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A happy rear end will make you go faster, thereby making up for the extra weight.
Honestly, I've been riding B-17s since the early 70s, and have tried many others, but always come back to it.
Yes, it's worth the weight.
Honestly, I've been riding B-17s since the early 70s, and have tried many others, but always come back to it.
Yes, it's worth the weight.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,128
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times
in
27 Posts
The Titanium railed Berthoud leather suspension saddle is supposed to weigh about the same as a typical Turbo saddle at around 300 grams. Maybe you should check that out.
Chombi
Chombi
#8
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
If you ride in an aggressive position the B17 may not be the optimal saddle... the B17 Imperial is a much better saddle for this due to the ergonomic cut out which allows for a more forward position.
As always YMMV.
As always YMMV.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
Hard to beat thick leather stretched over a steel frame in a good shape. But quality construction with steel and leather isn't light. Should become more comfortable than your vinyl saddle.
#10
Senior Member
The only saddle I've ridden that's more comfortable than a B17 is a B66 - now THAT'S heavy. Comfort is far more important than a few grams. Also it's not like you're riding an ultra-light bike now anyways, so style and comfort are the way to go. Any Raleigh Grand Prix (I actually really like them) would look way better with a Brooks than any other saddle I can imagine. I can say honestly going from 16lb bikes to 30lb bikes, weight has very little to do with ride quality or speed so don't obsess over it.
#11
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
For me it is, but everyone is different. The B-17 is my favorite saddle, closely followed by the Professional. Sixty fiver is right on...it's not the best saddle for the drops.
#12
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
The stock saddle on a lot of older Grand Prix models was a Wrights W35 which is a little narrower and better suited for a road bike.
Brooks saddles come in so many configurations that there is pretty much one for every kind of bike... a B66 is a great saddle but on a road bike it may not feel as wonderful as it would on a roadster where the sitting position is more upright.
Brooks saddles come in so many configurations that there is pretty much one for every kind of bike... a B66 is a great saddle but on a road bike it may not feel as wonderful as it would on a roadster where the sitting position is more upright.
#13
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
My B17 Imperial is pure awesomeness and I have been pretty happy with my Ideale Professional which is a wider saddle than the Brooks... also ride on a Wright's W35N and an older wrights W3N which is not as narrow and very comfortable on my drop bar bikes with fairly level saddle to bar relationships.
If one has a more upright position on a road bike with a level saddle to bar drop a B17 can work well.
#14
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I do have some drop to the bars and feel fine on a B-17...it's only when I'm on the drops that it becomes an issue. I don't really feel THAT much difference between the pro and B-17 in terms of width, most of the difference I feel is in the leather. I like Pros, but the B-17 is my favorite.
#16
Hopelessly addicted...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 4,955
Bikes: 1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
"Brooks B17 worth the weight?"
Yes.
Yes.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rosanky, Texas
Posts: 308
Bikes: Steel is real. All others need not apply.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Comfort is more important than weight. The Brooks B.17 is a very comfortable saddle. The titanium railed version will save you weight but will never be as light as the latest light weight saddle offerings.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 112
Bikes: Basso, No name 70's Columbus steel frame with Campy components, Fuji - The Finest, Raleigh Super Record, Giant Advanced TCR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The Brooks B17 is really worth the weight, both for the comfort, and more importantly, you can not get a better look than a Brooks on a classic Raleigh!
#19
Senior Member
How about spending $60 to find out for yourself?
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
#21
Cyclist
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
15 Posts
A really good deal. When you're actually riding, you won't notice the weight, but you'll notice the comfort (unless you end up not liking the way it feels, which is, at least theoretically, possible).
#22
incazzare.
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer: Yes, of course.
Long answer: Yes, of course.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#23
No one cares
b17 imperial was my favorite saddle until it sagged really bad and is not ridable.
a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box
i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box
i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.
is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box
i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box
i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.
is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
__________________
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
I prefer emails to private messages - holiday76@gmail.com
Jack Taylor Super Tourer Tandem (FOR SALE), Jack Taylor Tour of Britain, Px-10, Carlton Flyer, Fuji The Finest, Salsa Fargo, Santa Cruz Tallboy, Carver All-Road .
Last edited by -holiday76; 08-25-11 at 09:04 AM.
#24
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
b17 imperial was my favorite saddle until it sagged really bad and it not unridable.
a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box
i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box
i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.
is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
a regular b17 is really comfy for me out of the box
i have a swallow that is very comfortable out of the box
i have a pro that ranks last out of the box, however i'll still ride it over any non leather saddle and its getting better with age. I've done centuries on used pro's.
is it worth the weight? Depends. Are you so light and in shape and racing that it really matters? most people arent and if you were, you probably would know enough that you would be in c&v and asking about leather saddles.
My swallow is not good for longer rides, but I only have a few hundred on it...I'm hoping it breaks in. The B-17s are, for me, perfect from the moment they go on a post.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 1,044
Bikes: Schwinn, Bottecchia, Miyata, projects
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I love my b17. I spend my time about 50/50 on the hoods/in the drops and notice no discomfort in either position.
That said, my second-favorite saddle was my nasty old black vinyl Kashima. For whatever reason, it just felt good. If it's comfortable, maybe don't be so quick to discard it (or sell it to me if you really hate it!)
That said, my second-favorite saddle was my nasty old black vinyl Kashima. For whatever reason, it just felt good. If it's comfortable, maybe don't be so quick to discard it (or sell it to me if you really hate it!)