Modern vs. Classic: Performance Difference?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Roswell
Posts: 195
Bikes: Trek 610, Cannondale Bad Boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Modern vs. Classic: Performance Difference?
I've just committed to entering an international distance (1.5k swim, 40k bike, 10 k run) triathlon next spring. My boss, who's a big time triathlete, tells me I need to replace my '84 Trek 610 with something up to date. I rode it in a sprint distance tri (400m swim, 20k bike, 5 k run) last year and did fine, but that was against a bunch of first timers. Both he and my wife think I need some up to date piece of plastrickery for this, but I'm not so sure. On one hand, it would be nice to have indexed shifting, and a shorter low gear, but I'm not seeing that I'd gain that much by spending the money on a new ride. He keeps telling me that I'll be a lot fresher for the run, and I suspect he knows what he's talking about, but would like to get some other opinions. Anyone care to share your experiences on a new vs. a vintage ride, performance wise? The course I'll be riding is somewhat hilly.
#3
Dolce far niente
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 10,704
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
14 Posts
Meaningless platitude. We don't know what kind of motor he has.
What kind of terrain is that 40km? "somewhat hilly" means different things to different folks. 40km is just short of 25 miles, so all things being equal you're not going to lose much time in there no matter what bike you're riding.... unless half of the distance is a 10% grade climb and you have a lackluster motor.
What kind of terrain is that 40km? "somewhat hilly" means different things to different folks. 40km is just short of 25 miles, so all things being equal you're not going to lose much time in there no matter what bike you're riding.... unless half of the distance is a 10% grade climb and you have a lackluster motor.
__________________
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
"Love is not the dying moan of a distant violin, it’s the triumphant twang of a bedspring."
S. J. Perelman
Last edited by bigbossman; 10-18-11 at 07:52 PM.
#4
South Carolina Ed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greer, SC
Posts: 3,889
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 291 Times
in
138 Posts
Put some areo bars on your current ride + some lightweight tires and tubes and see if it makes you faster.
#6
incazzare.
You can change the gearing and get index shifting without getting a whole new bike, if that's all you really want.
I dunno, up to you. If you like this bike and are comfortable on it, I wouldn't change anything major right before a big race.
I dunno, up to you. If you like this bike and are comfortable on it, I wouldn't change anything major right before a big race.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,047
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3011 Post(s)
Liked 3,788 Times
in
1,405 Posts
Spend your money on training. You'll get the most bang for your buck.
After that, aerodynamics matters the most. Aero bars will provide the most. Then the helmet. Then a skin suit. I think aero booties are more beneficial than aero wheels. I could be wrong, I don't entirely remember the article. It was written by some engineers at Stanford. I think.
After that, aerodynamics matters the most. Aero bars will provide the most. Then the helmet. Then a skin suit. I think aero booties are more beneficial than aero wheels. I could be wrong, I don't entirely remember the article. It was written by some engineers at Stanford. I think.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
142 Posts
Too many variables.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
#9
Wookie Jesus inspires me.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
weigh out what is important to you. Do you like your classic ride or is whompin' plastics more important? I think you can still do both with the right kind of upgrades. I think the best investment to improve an older bike is in a nice set of wheels. Unless you do triathlons fairly often, then I wouldn't consider getting a new tri-specific bike.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Roswell
Posts: 195
Bikes: Trek 610, Cannondale Bad Boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Meaningless platitude. We don't know what kind of motor he has.
What kind of terrain is that 40km? "somewhat hilly" means different things to different folks. 40km is just short of 25 miles, so all things being equal you're not going to lose much time in there no matter what bike you're riding.... unless half of the distance is a 10% grade climb and you have a lackluster motor.
What kind of terrain is that 40km? "somewhat hilly" means different things to different folks. 40km is just short of 25 miles, so all things being equal you're not going to lose much time in there no matter what bike you're riding.... unless half of the distance is a 10% grade climb and you have a lackluster motor.
Looks like it's more rolling than anything else, say 50 ft/mile average gain over a couple of miles. Probably nothing more than 5 percent for a few hundred yards, then a little down, and then another little climb. Climb wise, it looks like less than what I have in my area. Last year's route: https://www.mapmyride.com/routes/view/54907156/ Certainly not a Burkhalter Gap Road: https://www.mapmyride.com/routes/view/32951358/
Last edited by FormerFF; 10-18-11 at 08:59 PM. Reason: Added MapMyRide link
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Roswell
Posts: 195
Bikes: Trek 610, Cannondale Bad Boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
About the motor: 54 years old, in good shape but not particularly strong. On the sprint tri, I had a great time passing lots of other cyclists, but we were all first timers and most of us were on hybrids. This time it will be with experienced tri athletes and won't be so easy.
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
My opinion, only:
I've yet to meet a real or self-proclaimed "big time" triathlete who didn't think you could buy speed.
I've never met one who didn't tell someone to get a newer, lighter, more aero tri-bike.
Bike shops love them. Better aero, Zipps, helmets, aero shoe covers, the whole nine yards, at retail.
The fact is, you can buy a faster bike. Another fact is that it doesn't always make you faster.
You still have to ride it, and be good at doing so.
Another fact is that it only matters if you're competing against people about as fast as you are.
The people that are faster than you are faster despite your bike, and despite their bikes.
There is a heirarchy to getting faster:
Gearing to your optimum range is money more efficiently spent.
An hour more a week in the pool is time more efficiently spent.
Add another hour a week running, and you'll gain there AND on the bike.
Add another hour practicing transitions, and you'll gain quite a bit.
Know your course and how to maintain momentum in the corners, etc.
Knowing how/when to shift without upsetting your pace is crucial.
Learning to balance the effort you put into each leg is crucial.
Adding a faster bike is far down on the list as far as getting out what you put in.
I see very few folks at the end of triathlons coming in with a photo finish.
About halfway through the run, where you finish is pretty much set.
The best triathlete I ever met rode a DT-shifted aluminum road bike with aero bars.
No one could touch him on the bike, and it really didn't matter what we had.
One of the best triathletes I know, right now, rides a DT-shifted Brew steel bike, full-time drops.
I helped a novice train on a steel bike. She won her age group the first two times out.
She traded the steel in for a carbon fiber road bike. She was no faster, and couldn't figure out why.
She bought a Cervelo P2K, and was no faster, and couldn't figure out why.
My explanation is that she thought she had a disadvantage on the steel bike, and pushed herself harder.
I still believe that. She is a lot more comfortable on her tri-bike, but no faster; actually a bit slower.
If that comfort helps her on the run, then good, but she never attacked with the steel, and never burned out.
On the tri-bike, she about does a hole shot the first 3 miles, can't figure out why she's in O2 debt by 20 miles.
Being relaxed at the start of the bike leg and the run leg, to me, is worth 5 minutes on the bike, 2 minutes on the run.
In longer triathlons, the bike legs simply go to the better riders, period. They turn and burn, no matter the bike.
Quite often, it's over for all but the top two or three by the end of the bike leg. It's hard to make up much time on the run.
At that Olympic distance, the #1 error is going out too fast on the bike, because it not only kills the 2nd half of the bike leg for you, it really kills the run. Get your swim out of the way, establish a decent pace on the bike, and start looking to run down other cyclists from about 13 miles on. Same with the run, get the first couple of miles under your belt, get your stride smooth, and then look ahead for someone to track down.
I've yet to meet a real or self-proclaimed "big time" triathlete who didn't think you could buy speed.
I've never met one who didn't tell someone to get a newer, lighter, more aero tri-bike.
Bike shops love them. Better aero, Zipps, helmets, aero shoe covers, the whole nine yards, at retail.
The fact is, you can buy a faster bike. Another fact is that it doesn't always make you faster.
You still have to ride it, and be good at doing so.
Another fact is that it only matters if you're competing against people about as fast as you are.
The people that are faster than you are faster despite your bike, and despite their bikes.
There is a heirarchy to getting faster:
Gearing to your optimum range is money more efficiently spent.
An hour more a week in the pool is time more efficiently spent.
Add another hour a week running, and you'll gain there AND on the bike.
Add another hour practicing transitions, and you'll gain quite a bit.
Know your course and how to maintain momentum in the corners, etc.
Knowing how/when to shift without upsetting your pace is crucial.
Learning to balance the effort you put into each leg is crucial.
Adding a faster bike is far down on the list as far as getting out what you put in.
I see very few folks at the end of triathlons coming in with a photo finish.
About halfway through the run, where you finish is pretty much set.
The best triathlete I ever met rode a DT-shifted aluminum road bike with aero bars.
No one could touch him on the bike, and it really didn't matter what we had.
One of the best triathletes I know, right now, rides a DT-shifted Brew steel bike, full-time drops.
I helped a novice train on a steel bike. She won her age group the first two times out.
She traded the steel in for a carbon fiber road bike. She was no faster, and couldn't figure out why.
She bought a Cervelo P2K, and was no faster, and couldn't figure out why.
My explanation is that she thought she had a disadvantage on the steel bike, and pushed herself harder.
I still believe that. She is a lot more comfortable on her tri-bike, but no faster; actually a bit slower.
If that comfort helps her on the run, then good, but she never attacked with the steel, and never burned out.
On the tri-bike, she about does a hole shot the first 3 miles, can't figure out why she's in O2 debt by 20 miles.
Being relaxed at the start of the bike leg and the run leg, to me, is worth 5 minutes on the bike, 2 minutes on the run.
In longer triathlons, the bike legs simply go to the better riders, period. They turn and burn, no matter the bike.
Quite often, it's over for all but the top two or three by the end of the bike leg. It's hard to make up much time on the run.
At that Olympic distance, the #1 error is going out too fast on the bike, because it not only kills the 2nd half of the bike leg for you, it really kills the run. Get your swim out of the way, establish a decent pace on the bike, and start looking to run down other cyclists from about 13 miles on. Same with the run, get the first couple of miles under your belt, get your stride smooth, and then look ahead for someone to track down.
Last edited by RobbieTunes; 10-18-11 at 08:47 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Roswell
Posts: 195
Bikes: Trek 610, Cannondale Bad Boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
weigh out what is important to you. Do you like your classic ride or is whompin' plastics more important? I think you can still do both with the right kind of upgrades. I think the best investment to improve an older bike is in a nice set of wheels. Unless you do triathlons fairly often, then I wouldn't consider getting a new tri-specific bike.
#14
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
70 Posts
Too many variables.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
Does anyone here have any notion of what constitutes a statistically valid experiment?
#15
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
Too many variables.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Spend your money on training. You'll get the most bang for your buck.
After that, aerodynamics matters the most. Aero bars will provide the most. Then the helmet. Then a skin suit. I think aero booties are more beneficial than aero wheels. I could be wrong, I don't entirely remember the article. It was written by some engineers at Stanford. I think.
After that, aerodynamics matters the most. Aero bars will provide the most. Then the helmet. Then a skin suit. I think aero booties are more beneficial than aero wheels. I could be wrong, I don't entirely remember the article. It was written by some engineers at Stanford. I think.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Weight is kinda-sorta important in the hills, but not nearly as important as most people think. And most of the people who think bike weight is super important could stand to loose a few pounds from the gut, in my experience.
Rolling resistance, according to recent studies, is quite a bit more important than most of us had thought. Investing in a great set of tires would almost certainly net you more speed than investing in a latest-greatest bicycle.
Aerodynamics is crucial - but the rider is the critical part, not the bike. An aero frameset is worth three one thousandths of a second in a theoretical time trial to Mars (IIRC ) but rider position can make or break you. Get those TT bars!
Some people say the stiffness of a carbon frame makes cyclists much more efficient as compared with a "flexible" steel frame. I think those people are FOS, but impartial research doesn't support either camp.
Index shifting is critical to the criterium racer. Less so to the road racer. To the time trialist? Essentially irrelevant, IMO.
Short version - I'd keep your current bike, add TT bars and the fastest tires you can lay your hands on, and spend the $10,000 you saved on training and diet.
Rolling resistance, according to recent studies, is quite a bit more important than most of us had thought. Investing in a great set of tires would almost certainly net you more speed than investing in a latest-greatest bicycle.
Aerodynamics is crucial - but the rider is the critical part, not the bike. An aero frameset is worth three one thousandths of a second in a theoretical time trial to Mars (IIRC ) but rider position can make or break you. Get those TT bars!
Some people say the stiffness of a carbon frame makes cyclists much more efficient as compared with a "flexible" steel frame. I think those people are FOS, but impartial research doesn't support either camp.
Index shifting is critical to the criterium racer. Less so to the road racer. To the time trialist? Essentially irrelevant, IMO.
Short version - I'd keep your current bike, add TT bars and the fastest tires you can lay your hands on, and spend the $10,000 you saved on training and diet.
Last edited by Six jours; 10-18-11 at 08:52 PM.
#18
I'm doing it wrong.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,875
Bikes: Rivendell Appaloosa, Rivendell Frank Jones Sr., Trek Fuel EX9, Kona Jake the Snake CR, Niner Sir9
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9742 Post(s)
Liked 2,812 Times
in
1,664 Posts
Who are you racing against? Yourself or are you trying to win the race? If it is yourself the equipment you choose doesn't really matter, just go out there and push yourself the most that you can. If you are trying to win the race, I suggest training more because the races I have been at the guy who wins usually does it professionally and you most probably will not be beating him.
I really think the biggest time difference you can make up in a tri is during the transitions. Figure a way to get those times down and you should do much better. If it were me, I would ride you steely.
I really think the biggest time difference you can make up in a tri is during the transitions. Figure a way to get those times down and you should do much better. If it were me, I would ride you steely.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,827 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Too many variables.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
My wife does these events.
She switched from a steel framed bike to a Felt B2.
Her time improved in one race by 15%.
This was from the previous year's time.
Was it the bike, better conditioning, the weather, overall wellness, and on and on?
Good question.
If I was to do a competitive event again, I would want, tubulars, 11 cogs in back, dual pivot or disc brakes if allowed, "clipless" pedals, brake / shift levers. Probably choose SRAM, and I guess do w/o one cog.
In a friendly competitive club ride setting, dual pivot brakes, tubulars and brake shift levers. Reasoning, one needs to brake with the bunch, index shifting allows shifting under load and in full control.
In any ONE gear, a classic bike is effort equal, but in the dynamics of competition, there are other things.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,047
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3011 Post(s)
Liked 3,788 Times
in
1,405 Posts
#21
Mostly Mischief
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times
in
142 Posts
Maybe the new bike fit better? Better selection of gears? Humans can put out decent power for a sustained length of time but, not lots of reserve power, so better gear selection is very helpful.
If I was to do a competitive event again, I would want, tubulars, 11 cogs in back, dual pivot or disc brakes if allowed, "clipless" pedals, brake / shift levers. Probably choose SRAM, and I guess do w/o one cog.
In a friendly competitive club ride setting, dual pivot brakes, tubulars and brake shift levers. Reasoning, one needs to brake with the bunch, index shifting allows shifting under load and in full control.
In any ONE gear, a classic bike is effort equal, but in the dynamics of competition, there are other things.
If I was to do a competitive event again, I would want, tubulars, 11 cogs in back, dual pivot or disc brakes if allowed, "clipless" pedals, brake / shift levers. Probably choose SRAM, and I guess do w/o one cog.
In a friendly competitive club ride setting, dual pivot brakes, tubulars and brake shift levers. Reasoning, one needs to brake with the bunch, index shifting allows shifting under load and in full control.
In any ONE gear, a classic bike is effort equal, but in the dynamics of competition, there are other things.
Her De Rosa fit her just as well, but she thinks the Felt is a "real" tri bike.
...and it fits her like a glove.
#24
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7346 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Another variable everyone else has forgotten: what kind of standing do you want to have, and how badly do you want it? If you want a high standing and want it badly, then yes, a new bike will make a big difference. Training and the other things mentioned above will make a bigger difference, but there's no doubt that a modern plastrickery bike (nice word) will make a difference. The stronger you are, the more of an advantage the bike will offer you. If the event is soon, the bike won't make much difference. But you may want to buy yourself some nice tires.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagler Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 1,959
Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the new bike will make him instantly better. Then there will be a stone wall that everyone hits where any gains are going to be misery to get. In competitive racing, any advantage one can get in the equipment, you want to take/buy, if winning is everything. I compare my vintage 12 speed to a modern 27 & 30 speed bikes. There are gear inches I simply will never have the legs/engine to get the fastest and optimal speeds from even with the 12 speed. But by the same token I definitely think there's a choice of gear inch setup in the range that the 27 or 30 speed bike that would make me faster for the overall ride, whether it's a short burst or a longer constant cadence of the ride. At that point it's a matter of cost-benefit. And yeah, you are buying a better game to win, it's not cheating because everyone plays by those rules & guidelines. The other thing, can you overcome it with what you have ? You can always use the older Trek as a trainer for the fitness aspect, then when you race the strength & endurance you built and improved upon by riding the iron sled accrues to the newer technology.
Last edited by fuji86; 10-19-11 at 12:16 AM.