Hands hurt from being on hoods. What's wrong?
#26
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,525
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times
in
628 Posts
+1 I have developed a desired set up, and all of my bikes mimic this set up. Saddle position, bar width, distance from nose of saddle to bars, distance from saddle to center of bb, bar height vs saddle height, etc. Take some measurements on the bikes that "feel" comfortable, and see if there is a difference.
+1 I move my hands around just about continuously, that's one of the benefits of drop bars.
If you really need a 70mm stem, your bike may be too big.
+1 I move my hands around just about continuously, that's one of the benefits of drop bars.
If you really need a 70mm stem, your bike may be too big.
#27
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
From the original poster's comment, he may only be having a problem with one bike, so position or the bar shape levers on THAT bike are factors.
From way back, I was thrilled to get a full Campagnolo bicycle and after I rode it, I was really tempted to put Mafac brake levers on it, the ones with the half hoods as I liked the shape better, not the finish for sure but the ergonomics.
The moral here? brake levers and handlebars are like saddles, everyone is different. One thing I have done is to set up a bike that has different levers sans bar tape for a ride or two, and fine tune the position of the levers before I commit to handlebar tape.
If Aero Gran Compe levers from the 80's were still being made, I would have those on almost every bike, I like the fit very much.
From way back, I was thrilled to get a full Campagnolo bicycle and after I rode it, I was really tempted to put Mafac brake levers on it, the ones with the half hoods as I liked the shape better, not the finish for sure but the ergonomics.
The moral here? brake levers and handlebars are like saddles, everyone is different. One thing I have done is to set up a bike that has different levers sans bar tape for a ride or two, and fine tune the position of the levers before I commit to handlebar tape.
If Aero Gran Compe levers from the 80's were still being made, I would have those on almost every bike, I like the fit very much.
I had those levers on a bike that I bought that was a record/c-record mix. I removed them in favor of some gruppo appropriate Campy aero levers (Chorus) and, while the bike might look nicer, the Gran Compes fit and felt a LOT better.
As far as non-brifters, I've found that the newer Tektro and Cane Creek levers are wider and far more comfortable than the older, more blade levers. The Campy record/super record levers do well for me, but their aero stuff is brutal, and I've yet to find a Shimano non-sti lever that isn't a b;lade. The only thing worse are those horrendous Suntour levers...MAJOR butchers. Even worse than Weinmann.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768
Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Raising the stem will move some weight to the seat.
#29
Senior Member
Lots of good advice already. I can't remember whether saddle tilt has been mentioned, but if you're tipped forward, even a little, it can put a lot of weight on your hands. I try to keep the nose up as far as possible without inducing numbness in the "soft tissue", which generally means the saddle is essentially horizontal.
Also, slight changes in hand position can make a big difference. I'm usually "on the hoods" but that time varies between a) grabbing the hood and b) shifting back slightly so the first joint of my index finger is against the hood, and the last three fingers sort of grab the bar behind the hood. This position tips the wrists out slightly, which in turn has the effect of keeping the elbows in tighter.
Also, slight changes in hand position can make a big difference. I'm usually "on the hoods" but that time varies between a) grabbing the hood and b) shifting back slightly so the first joint of my index finger is against the hood, and the last three fingers sort of grab the bar behind the hood. This position tips the wrists out slightly, which in turn has the effect of keeping the elbows in tighter.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
The common position for vintage bikes I learned was the end of the bars point to the dropout (though I like my bars with the tops flat) and the bottom of the brake lever is level to the bottom of the drop[s (though I move mine up about a 1/4").
Raising the stem will move some weight to the seat.
Raising the stem will move some weight to the seat.
...such that the flats of the drops are pressed flat against the table....
...in this position the lower tips of the levers should just touch the table themselves.
That's usually the starting point....
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#31
Get off my lawn!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031
Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times
in
48 Posts
maybe you have tender hands?
maybe webbed fingers?
maybe the bars are too low
maybe the hoods are too far down?
Ahhhh Rats!!
How about a profile photo of you on the bike, on the hoods - so everyone can see what's going on?
maybe webbed fingers?
maybe the bars are too low
maybe the hoods are too far down?
Ahhhh Rats!!
How about a profile photo of you on the bike, on the hoods - so everyone can see what's going on?
#32
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
My hands hurt from holding the bars- Then again my hands hurt from anything, holding a steering wheel, writing for extended periods, playing guitar/bass...
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#33
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
As an aside- what is that area of the bars called between the flats and the hoods?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#34
Senior Member
Maybe, could be, might be...
It could be anything, or a combo of things,
Pics or a vid would help, but at this point it's just a guess!
It could be anything, or a combo of things,
Pics or a vid would help, but at this point it's just a guess!
#36
is just a real cool dude
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Thumb, MI
Posts: 3,165
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
14 Posts
Take a measure of your other bikes and try to copy those onto the bike causing the problems. Start out with saddle height and then saddle setback because the goal is to have your body balanced over the saddle so there is little weight on your hands. A higher bar position usually pivots the body back requiring more saddle setback. Average is 5-8cm from the center of the bottom bracket to the nose of the saddle.
Then do handlebar drop. An average person will want 4-5cm's lower then the top of their saddle.
Then handlebar reach. A normal person likes to have their back at a 45 degree angle to the ground when hands are on the hoods. A normal range for the average size person is between 48-52cm.
I just got this from the notes I took in my frame building class on sizing.
Then do handlebar drop. An average person will want 4-5cm's lower then the top of their saddle.
Then handlebar reach. A normal person likes to have their back at a 45 degree angle to the ground when hands are on the hoods. A normal range for the average size person is between 48-52cm.
I just got this from the notes I took in my frame building class on sizing.
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here are pictures. Hope these are ok, if not I'll retake them.
Bike as is:
Thanks for all your input.
Bike as is:
Thanks for all your input.
Last edited by hadeone; 11-22-11 at 04:29 PM.
#38
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That bike looks properly set up to me.
I am going to make the argument that the brake levers are causing the pain.
Personally for me, vintage brake levers don't work for me. Maybe I am spoiled by modern brifters. On my new bike, I immediately swapped out my vintage levers (shimano 105) to modern ones (SRAM R500). The vintage ones just have so little surface area that it creates so much pressure. If you have big hands (which it seems like you do) you should consider getting modern levers.
Here is some data supporting that claim:
Comparing Tektro R200 levers to my vintage Shimano 105 (BL-1055):
All measurements taken with caliper. Area approximation is based on a trapezoid approximation A = .5 (b1+b2)*h
Tektro R200:
Narrowest point: 1.28in
Widest point: 1.44in
approximate grip length: 2in
Surface Area = 2.72 in^2
Shimano 105:
Narrowest point : 1.12
Widest point: 1.17in
approx grip length: 1.35in
Surface Area = 1.55in^2
So, making sense of the numbers, lets say your hands are on the hoods with the same amount of force (weight). The pressure that the shimano 105 levers exert on you are about 75% more than the tektro brake levers. The pain that you feel on your hands is the extra pressure due to having less surface area to hold on to.
If someone can check my calculations, please do. I always make simple mistakes
Comparison Pictures:
Notice that even though the tektro brakes seem slightly larger, the area is much greater. This is because area is the square of a linear dimension, so it increase rapidly as the linear direction increases slightly.
I am going to make the argument that the brake levers are causing the pain.
Personally for me, vintage brake levers don't work for me. Maybe I am spoiled by modern brifters. On my new bike, I immediately swapped out my vintage levers (shimano 105) to modern ones (SRAM R500). The vintage ones just have so little surface area that it creates so much pressure. If you have big hands (which it seems like you do) you should consider getting modern levers.
Here is some data supporting that claim:
Comparing Tektro R200 levers to my vintage Shimano 105 (BL-1055):
All measurements taken with caliper. Area approximation is based on a trapezoid approximation A = .5 (b1+b2)*h
Tektro R200:
Narrowest point: 1.28in
Widest point: 1.44in
approximate grip length: 2in
Surface Area = 2.72 in^2
Shimano 105:
Narrowest point : 1.12
Widest point: 1.17in
approx grip length: 1.35in
Surface Area = 1.55in^2
So, making sense of the numbers, lets say your hands are on the hoods with the same amount of force (weight). The pressure that the shimano 105 levers exert on you are about 75% more than the tektro brake levers. The pain that you feel on your hands is the extra pressure due to having less surface area to hold on to.
If someone can check my calculations, please do. I always make simple mistakes
Comparison Pictures:
Notice that even though the tektro brakes seem slightly larger, the area is much greater. This is because area is the square of a linear dimension, so it increase rapidly as the linear direction increases slightly.
Last edited by natzoo; 11-14-11 at 07:48 PM.
#39
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
do you have pain or numbness? except for a few years when I was doing tons of miles, I always had troubel with numbness. that is why I use those gawd awful stems everyone here hates so much. also I find the larger size of the Campi aero levers make a big difference. the Tektros like pictured above seem to have a similar feel, although I personally do not have any real experience riding a pair yet/
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#41
Get off my lawn!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031
Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times
in
48 Posts
Just a guess, but I think you're over extended, but just slightly. Measure the nose to the saddle plumb line between the hoods. I think you will find your troublesome bike is a bit longer than your comfortable bike. A slightly shorter stem might solve the problem.
Also looks like you rotated the bars up from the first to the second picture, did that help?
Also looks like you rotated the bars up from the first to the second picture, did that help?
#42
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just a guess, but I think you're over extended, but just slightly. Measure the nose to the saddle plumb line between the hoods. I think you will find your troublesome bike is a bit longer than your comfortable bike. A slightly shorter stem might solve the problem.
Also looks like you rotated the bars up from the first to the second picture, did that help?
Also looks like you rotated the bars up from the first to the second picture, did that help?
@fender1 - I'll give it a shot.
do you have pain or numbness? except for a few years when I was doing tons of miles, I always had troubel with numbness. that is why I use those gawd awful stems everyone here hates so much. also I find the larger size of the Campi aero levers make a big difference. the Tektros like pictured above seem to have a similar feel, although I personally do not have any real experience riding a pair yet/
Last edited by hadeone; 11-14-11 at 09:02 PM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
1. Tilt the bars back down...
2. Levers are fine....
3. Lower the seatpost 1cm and raise the stem 1 cm.
4. Shorten the stem 1cm.
5. Tilt the saddle back so that the nose is just a teeny itsy bitsy above plane. (Your saddle is throwing you forward - that's a big part of your problem.)
However, I have a feeling that your frame is 1-2cm too small for you.
=8-)
2. Levers are fine....
3. Lower the seatpost 1cm and raise the stem 1 cm.
4. Shorten the stem 1cm.
5. Tilt the saddle back so that the nose is just a teeny itsy bitsy above plane. (Your saddle is throwing you forward - that's a big part of your problem.)
However, I have a feeling that your frame is 1-2cm too small for you.
=8-)
__________________
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
5000+ wheels built since 1984...
Disclaimer:
1. I do not claim to be an expert in bicycle mechanics despite my experience.
2. I like anyone will comment in other areas.
3. I do not own the preexisting concepts of DISH and ERD.
4. I will provide information as I always have to others that I believe will help them protect themselves from unscrupulous mechanics.
5. My all time favorite book is:
Kahane, Howard. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life
#44
is just a real cool dude
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Thumb, MI
Posts: 3,165
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
14 Posts
From how you have the levers positioned I can't imagine you'd have a lot of weight on the hoods being their so far up. It appears you'd have more weight on the top of the bars. Also the older and less flexible or out of shape you are the higher the bars go up. The more fit and more flexible the lower the bars go. The more you ride also and more flexible you get throughout the year you may also drop your bars down from where they are at the beginning of the year. You should be able to lift up from your bars roughly a centimeter with no back pain. If not you've got some adjusting to do and I'd say like a few others said. Raise your stem and bump your saddle a bit back and you might need a slightly shorter stem also.
#45
Spin Forest! Spin!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,956
Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Too give credit to the OP and his discomfort with the RX100 levers....
I have a similarly equipped Cannondale R500. Upon inspecting, I found the RX100 levers to be a bit narrow and I was concerned enough to swap them for Cane Creek SCR5's (Tektro equivalent).
I've two sets of Tektros on other bikes and got too used to them. The improvement is noticeable.
I have a similarly equipped Cannondale R500. Upon inspecting, I found the RX100 levers to be a bit narrow and I was concerned enough to swap them for Cane Creek SCR5's (Tektro equivalent).
I've two sets of Tektros on other bikes and got too used to them. The improvement is noticeable.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: -1973 Motobecane Mirage -197? Velosolex L'Etoile -'71 Raleigh Super Course
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Try taking a cue from the '50s and wrapping your hands around the front of the levers. Kind of like you're gripping them from each side. I ride GB Rando bars, and 2-3mm either way makes a big difference in the rideability of the brake hoods; while I'm dialing the levers in, I will sometimes do this to ease the strain. It transfers the weight from the web of the hand to the meaty section at the base of the thumb, but puts a little pressure on the wrist joint itself.
I don't know. On a long ride (50+ miles) I find myself doing all sorts of things to keep the blood flowing to my hands. Sometimes I'll grab the drops and try to bend them up or down just to get the tendons exercised. We tend to forget that cycling is a big sufferfest. You aren't out there on a Barcalounger, man.
I don't know. On a long ride (50+ miles) I find myself doing all sorts of things to keep the blood flowing to my hands. Sometimes I'll grab the drops and try to bend them up or down just to get the tendons exercised. We tend to forget that cycling is a big sufferfest. You aren't out there on a Barcalounger, man.
#47
Я люблю суп
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Your bike setup doesn't look too bad. Two things I would try before replacing the levers or slightly shorter stem. First, rotate your bar down a bit. Second, tilt the saddle up slightly. Also, I do agree with other posters that the frame is a size small for you.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I think your bike is way too small.
For some reason bike fit has become something of a cult of late. The dogma for the last fifteen years is to size to frames that are really 3-6cm too small for the cyclist. This is intuitive when you realize that most cyclists can not spend any significant time riding in their drops comfortably, yet vehemently suggest that their frame and fit is "right."
If you can't spend at least 51% of every ride in the drops your bike doesn't fit. However, that's too waffling for me. As a rule, I'd just go with: Your bike is too small.
In the obsession with compact geometry and the aesthetic of the modern race bike somehow we've transposed fit normatively onto classic and vintage bikes with horizontal top tubes. My advice for all C&V cyclists is that you ride a bicycle, you don't stand over it. Abandon all preconceived notions about what a properly fitting bicycle is to swing a leg over, and to straddle. Neither has anything to do with your "fit" on the bike.
I always suggest that any serious cyclist purchase a Look Ergostem (in threadless). With a shim, and a quill adaptor you can quickly size yourself to just about any frame, and also prove that most frames just can not be reasonably made to fit. You can, to a degree make a too small bike more or less fit. However, the real issue is getting the handlebars up to a neutral position relative to your saddle height. All pretense of racing aside, a recreational cyclist, club racer, randonneur, and anything other than a sponsored racer will want their bars AT LEAST at saddle height. Almost all actually prefer them 1-4m higher.
The picture you provided is a bit of a train wreck in that there is a significant drop from saddle height to bar height, and that's just to the hoods. Realistically you already realize you can not comfortably reach the drops (the "curves" or hooks in the bars where a rider acheives a more aerodynamic position), and this should tell you that this bike is nowhere in the neighborhood of fitting you properly. I'd look for the largest bike that you can possibly stand over (comfortably or not) that does not have too long of a top tube. You're trying to find a starting point where the bars are the highest you can possibly get them without being too streched out with a reasonable stem on the bike.
I'd say your bike is at least 4cm too small and closer to 7cm from what I'm seeing of bar height relative to saddle height for the type of cyclist you probably are.
Ignore the machismo about "ride harder" and those with numb willies and normative notions about race "fit." Then read these two notions of fit:
https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm
https://www.rivbike.com/kb_results.asp?cat=23
For some reason bike fit has become something of a cult of late. The dogma for the last fifteen years is to size to frames that are really 3-6cm too small for the cyclist. This is intuitive when you realize that most cyclists can not spend any significant time riding in their drops comfortably, yet vehemently suggest that their frame and fit is "right."
If you can't spend at least 51% of every ride in the drops your bike doesn't fit. However, that's too waffling for me. As a rule, I'd just go with: Your bike is too small.
In the obsession with compact geometry and the aesthetic of the modern race bike somehow we've transposed fit normatively onto classic and vintage bikes with horizontal top tubes. My advice for all C&V cyclists is that you ride a bicycle, you don't stand over it. Abandon all preconceived notions about what a properly fitting bicycle is to swing a leg over, and to straddle. Neither has anything to do with your "fit" on the bike.
I always suggest that any serious cyclist purchase a Look Ergostem (in threadless). With a shim, and a quill adaptor you can quickly size yourself to just about any frame, and also prove that most frames just can not be reasonably made to fit. You can, to a degree make a too small bike more or less fit. However, the real issue is getting the handlebars up to a neutral position relative to your saddle height. All pretense of racing aside, a recreational cyclist, club racer, randonneur, and anything other than a sponsored racer will want their bars AT LEAST at saddle height. Almost all actually prefer them 1-4m higher.
The picture you provided is a bit of a train wreck in that there is a significant drop from saddle height to bar height, and that's just to the hoods. Realistically you already realize you can not comfortably reach the drops (the "curves" or hooks in the bars where a rider acheives a more aerodynamic position), and this should tell you that this bike is nowhere in the neighborhood of fitting you properly. I'd look for the largest bike that you can possibly stand over (comfortably or not) that does not have too long of a top tube. You're trying to find a starting point where the bars are the highest you can possibly get them without being too streched out with a reasonable stem on the bike.
I'd say your bike is at least 4cm too small and closer to 7cm from what I'm seeing of bar height relative to saddle height for the type of cyclist you probably are.
Ignore the machismo about "ride harder" and those with numb willies and normative notions about race "fit." Then read these two notions of fit:
https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/fitting.htm
https://www.rivbike.com/kb_results.asp?cat=23
#49
Surf Bum
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I keep meaning to take pictures to explain this but...a lot of people have pain if they hold their hands basically palm down and jam their hand into the hood so that it hits between thumb and index finger. There are more nerves in this part of the hand and diagonally along that path towards the wrist.
Instead, try to rotate your hands in so the two palms are facing each other. Then put the fleshy part on the outside of your hand (you know, between your pinky and wrist?) on the bars/hood. Natural padding, no nerves to get pinched. And guess what? Your fingers are now at the correct angle to pull the lever, too. Might need to rotate them down just a little when needed, but that's easy.
this is where we need *** again: i suspect he would have photos handy to show this hand position! (edit: seriously mods? the guy's username is a banned word? no class).
Instead, try to rotate your hands in so the two palms are facing each other. Then put the fleshy part on the outside of your hand (you know, between your pinky and wrist?) on the bars/hood. Natural padding, no nerves to get pinched. And guess what? Your fingers are now at the correct angle to pull the lever, too. Might need to rotate them down just a little when needed, but that's easy.
this is where we need *** again: i suspect he would have photos handy to show this hand position! (edit: seriously mods? the guy's username is a banned word? no class).
__________________
Thirst is stronger than the rules. - Stars and Watercarriers, 1974
Thirst is stronger than the rules. - Stars and Watercarriers, 1974
Last edited by pacificaslim; 11-15-11 at 01:54 AM.
#50
Я люблю суп
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
All pretense of racing aside, a recreational cyclist, club racer, randonneur, and anything other than a sponsored racer will want their bars AT LEAST at saddle height. Almost all actually prefer them 1-4m higher.
The picture you provided is a bit of a train wreck in that there is a significant drop from saddle height to bar height, and that's just to the hoods.
The picture you provided is a bit of a train wreck in that there is a significant drop from saddle height to bar height, and that's just to the hoods.