Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Bike shifts differently on the stand vs. riding

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Bike shifts differently on the stand vs. riding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-11, 09:48 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bike shifts differently on the stand vs. riding

Forgive my ignorance, but I've been trying to get my Eisentraut to shift reliably into the larger chainring and the biggest and smallest sprockets. So far, I've been able to get it to work great on the stand, but poorly when actually riding the thing. The bike has Suntour Cyclone front and rear derailleurs, a Regina 6-speed freewheel, and Rivendell silver friction barcons.

Things I've done:
-Taken all the slack out of the shifting cables when in the smallest chainring and shifted out into the smallest sprocket.
-Adjusting trim levels to get more throw out of the rear derailleur and to a less extent, the front derailleur.

Hypothesis:
-This might seem obvious, but a bicycle's drivetrain will behave slightly different whilst under an actual load.
-I haven't taken enough slack out of the lines.
-The frame is flexing under load (body-weight) and messing up the shifting.

Any other ideas?
toosahn is offline  
Old 12-08-11, 09:53 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
toytech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: san leandro
Posts: 1,344

Bikes: enough bikes to qualify for Hoarders......

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Could be a lot of things, some that come to mind are worn pivots, limit screws that are a little to close. Without ramped gears you might need to overshift/back off a little.
toytech is offline  
Old 12-08-11, 10:26 PM
  #3  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Just checking: Did you use shifter (i.e., longitudinal wrap) cable, or brake (spiral wrap) cable housing? If you used plain ol' brake cable housing, I would swap it out for some SIS or other shifter cable housing. It can make a big difference, even on friction shifted drivetrains- provides more consistent shifting.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 12-08-11, 10:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
What chain are you using?
due ruote is offline  
Old 12-08-11, 10:50 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Shifter housing: I'm using the Velo-orange derailleur cable and housing kit. I just bought some shimano derailleur cables from my LBS today and they are much smaller in diameter than the derailleur cabling from velo-orange.

Chain: SRAM PC-850. Bought brand new. I didn't remove and links however.
toosahn is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 04:56 AM
  #6  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
Check to make sure the back wheel is in there tight.
Smooth shifting on the stand means all the relationships are right at that time.
Weight on the frame and resistance on the chain can change those relationships.
When you find the change in relationship, 3/4 of the time you'll find the answer.

I recommend letting someone else ride the bike, and you observe it while being shifted, etc.
Start by focuing on the rear wheel, then the cogs, then the RD, and slowly move forward on the bike.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 07:01 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Posts: 17,392
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 443 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 25 Posts
You didn't take any links out of the new chain?
Grand Bois is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:18 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times in 938 Posts
I too suffer from this delimma. And the question is why does it work in the stand but not on the road? At least that is my take on the concern.

I have run across this many times and try to understand why. The shifts are perfect in the work stand, jumping from one indexed position to the next. Or, the chain shifts to and from the large ring and small, with never a hint of dropping. But when I get the bike on the road...

There might be a need to adjust cable tension to achiever indexed shifts. Or, I might have to tweak a screw or two to prevent the chain from falling off.

Why is this so?
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:52 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
JReade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,597
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Grand Bois
You didn't take any links out of the new chain?
I've had the chains be the exact same size before. On my giant framed touring bike, every last link was required.
JReade is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:52 AM
  #10  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by randyjawa
I too suffer from this delimma. And the question is why does it work in the stand but not on the road? At least that is my take on the concern.

I have run across this many times and try to understand why. The shifts are perfect in the work stand, jumping from one indexed position to the next. Or, the chain shifts to and from the large ring and small, with never a hint of dropping. But when I get the bike on the road...
There is more tension on the chain on the road. The force put on the pedals (far more than one puts on the drivetrain in the stand), and the weight being moved - not to mention friction - is far more than a wheel with no load being operated by a crankset spun by hand.

Cheap components (especially front derailers) will show up the difference in their stiffness - the linear load on the chain is enough to cause the pusher plates of the FD or RD to bend, accommodating the now-offset chain rather than forcing it onto the next chainring or cog tooth. This is more common with upshifts, but a hard, jolting downshift with el-cheapo bits is often from this same phenomenon.

Good components that do the same thing are either poorly adjusted (FD not sitting on the right plane), badly designed and therefore hard to dial in (Nuovo Record pulley cage), mis-matched by virtue of a design difference (some pre-index era C&V drivetrains are picky about the chain you pair with them) or damaged (scored or bent pulley cage, pusher plate, or parallelogram).

------------------

But to the OP's problem:

Cyclone mechs - especially the FD - aren't generally known for this; in fact, they're my preferred substitute choice on nice flippers when this problem rears its head.

I'm shooting in the dark here, but I'd bet that your bottom bracket spindle is far wider than it should be, placing the crankset too far outboard. This can cause strange problems at both ends, but - more importantly - its the only thing I can think of that would cause an otherwise good Cyclone FD - one that has been aligned on the proper plane, mind you - from operating as intended. If there's one weakness to that FD, it is that the parallelogram doesn't care to travel farther than it has to.

-Kurt
__________________













Last edited by cudak888; 12-09-11 at 08:58 AM.
cudak888 is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 08:55 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by randyjawa
I too suffer from this delimma. And the question is why does it work in the stand but not on the road? At least that is my take on the concern.

I have run across this many times and try to understand why. The shifts are perfect in the work stand, jumping from one indexed position to the next. Or, the chain shifts to and from the large ring and small, with never a hint of dropping. But when I get the bike on the road...

There might be a need to adjust cable tension to achiever indexed shifts. Or, I might have to tweak a screw or two to prevent the chain from falling off.

Why is this so?
Same here. It's vexing. I'd start with the chain length, only because that's the first thing you've said about the bike that sounds questionable. Put the chain around the large/large combination without going through the derailleur, see where the ends meet, add a link. Try that length and see what happens.

As to the fd, by how much space is it clearing the large ring? You may need to move it closer.
due ruote is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 09:04 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
There is more tension on the chain on the road. Cheap components (especially front derailers) will show up the difference in their stiffness
Good components that do the same thing
-Kurt
1. Yes, there is more tension on the chain on the road.
2. Cheap vs. good components. Ummm, dont think so. I've said many many times on this forum that inexpensive all metal Z-series Shimano kills anything Campy made in the 60's, 70's, 80's and early 90's. Everything. There is something to be said for loose pivots and sloppy jockey wheels but expensive goods shift like crap if they're worn out.

Because there is so much tension on the drive train its common practice to back off on pedal pressure while shifting. Think of it as backing off on the gas pedal when shifting a stick shift.

Last edited by miamijim; 12-09-11 at 10:18 AM.
miamijim is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 09:06 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by due ruote
Same here. It's vexing. I'd start with the chain length, only because that's the first thing you've said about the bike that sounds questionable. Put the chain around the large/large combination without going through the derailleur, see where the ends meet, add a link. Try that length and see what happens.

As to the fd, by how much space is it clearing the large ring? You may need to move it closer.
I despise that chain measuring method because your measuring for the shortest chain possible.....I use the small/small method which gives the longest chain and thus the least drivetrain tension. Add links until the chian drags on the RD then remove 1 link.

You want a nickles width of distance bewteen the FD and big ring.




Last edited by miamijim; 12-09-11 at 09:10 AM.
miamijim is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 09:32 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Glennfordx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,959

Bikes: Too many Bicycles to list

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Liked 137 Times in 45 Posts
The big big + 1" is Shimano's way of doing it,I just set up a Fuji with full Suntour and tried this method and it didn't work out very good,Suntour's way is small small and the RD cage should sit at a 45 degree angle or as close to that as you can get. I set it up this way and it shifts like butter both on and off the stand.
Glennfordx4 is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 09:49 AM
  #15  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by miamijim
2. Cheap vs. good components. Ummm, dont think so. I've said many many times on this forum that inexpensive all metal Z-series Shimano kills anything Campy made in the 60's, 70's, 80's and early 90's. Everything. There is something to be said fro loose pivots and sloppy jockey wheels but to expensive good shift like crap if they're worn out.
When I said "cheap," I was thinking of those stamped steel Simplex clones made by Falcon - the kind you find on Wally World bikes. The old Z-series is dressed-down 105/Golden Arrow in my book.

I even consider the Tourney RD-TX31 in the "good" category - because it works. Mind you, this doesn't necessarily extend to everything similar in the Shimano lineup. Case in point, the RD-TZ30 is a disaster - both in terms of function and life expectancy. It's arguably the worst adaption of the straight parallelogram design in recent years. I refuse to use them.

-Kurt
__________________













Last edited by cudak888; 12-09-11 at 10:00 AM.
cudak888 is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 10:20 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 13,954
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 109 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
When I said "cheap," I was thinking of those stamped steel Simplex clones made by Falcon - the kind you find on Wally World bikes. The old Z-series is dressed-down 105/Golden Arrow in my book.

I even consider the Tourney RD-TX31 in the "good" category - because it works. Mind you, this doesn't necessarily extend to everything similar in the Shimano lineup. Case in point, the RD-TZ30 is a disaster - both in terms of function and life expectancy. It's arguably the worst adaption of the straight parallelogram design in recent years. I refuse to use them.

-Kurt
I agree. Shimano does have alot of crap derailleurs. I'm was thinking of the light action Z-series....
miamijim is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 11:43 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
Originally Posted by miamijim
I despise that chain measuring method because your measuring for the shortest chain possible.....I use the small/small method which gives the longest chain and thus the least drivetrain tension. Add links until the chian drags on the RD then remove 1 link.
You know, for years I had chain length set more like what you're advocating. Then I read something on here about the method I espoused in my post, and started doing it that way. But I like your point about less drivetrain tension, so I think I'll revert to that method.
due ruote is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 12:00 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,768

Bikes: Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by toosahn
Forgive my ignorance, but I've been trying to get my Eisentraut to shift reliably into the larger chainring and the biggest and smallest sprockets.
Back in the day, we called shifting into the big/big combo "crosschaining", and it was usually avoided. Seems like it no longer followed these days as I see it out on every ride...

As far as the front derailler, I like to get them down, clearing the large ring by 1/8" to 3/32" or so. I set the chain on the middle cog in the rear and the small ring in the front and use that position to align the derailler cage to the chain and spin slightly if needed from there. Sometimes you can add a tiny bend to the inside, front of the cage to help it climb the big ring. I run the chain through the derailler and make it just long enough to cover the big/big combo, though I'd never ride there.

Sometimes you need to open the derailler stops a hair to work well when riding over in the stand.
dbakl is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 04:17 PM
  #19  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,524

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
+1 BB spindle might be too long. Post some pics.
wrk101 is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 04:53 PM
  #20  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times in 909 Posts
I still say check the QR skewer first, then go to other things.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 06:03 PM
  #21  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2421 Post(s)
Liked 4,388 Times in 2,092 Posts
Originally Posted by miamijim
I agree. Shimano does have alot of crap derailleurs. I'm was thinking of the light action Z-series....
Pretty good RD's, but I'm antsy about using derailers that have spring-loaded cable pinch ends - both Suntour and Shimano. A weak spring can result in spongy (if not entirely non-responsive) shifting.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 12-09-11, 07:43 PM
  #22  
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,193

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1565 Post(s)
Liked 1,295 Times in 865 Posts
Have you tried doing your final adjustments while out on the road?

That's my preferred method since it optimises the shifting per my actual usage, and often uncovers hidden glitches.

I tuned up a suspension bike recently, and failed to provide enough housing length to allow for full suspension movement.
The test ride made for an immpossible task of adjusting the cable, but ultimately revealed the problem.
Woulda caused a broken cable if I had sent it out that way.

I'm assuming the SRAM chain you used has the Shimano-type bulged sideplates? The older ones were notorious for not providing robust shifting, especially under load. I used to have to bend a few chainring teeth to hasten the chain pick-up, and still do on certain older chainsets.
dddd is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hayden52
Bicycle Mechanics
3
07-19-15 01:27 PM
corrado33
Bicycle Mechanics
7
05-06-15 03:54 PM
tdmjk
Bicycle Mechanics
12
03-22-14 05:36 PM
Nickfrogger
Bicycle Mechanics
6
07-23-13 06:58 AM
Burf
Bicycle Mechanics
7
05-17-10 08:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.