Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-14-12, 07:20 AM   #1
wheelhorseman
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Gear Ratio Question

Which of the following is the HIGHER gear ratio.

46/18 or 44/16?
wheelhorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 07:34 AM   #2
norskagent
car dodger
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Bikes:
Posts: 3,365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just do the math - 46/18 = 2.55, 44/16 = 2.75. For gear inches multiply by ~27" 1st = ~69", 2nd = ~74".
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 07:51 AM   #3
wheelhorseman
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I didnt know how to compute the figures. So the 44/16 is the higher ratio correct??

What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed

Is it worth the trouble to change sprockets seeing as how the figures are quite close?
wheelhorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 08:08 AM   #4
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,820
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Just get a larger cog.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 08:24 AM   #5
norskagent
car dodger
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Bikes:
Posts: 3,365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
no I think he wants a smaller cog.
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 10:01 AM   #6
garage sale GT
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 2,078
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelhorseman View Post
What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed
I assume you realize the force required will go up in direct proportion to how much the pedal revolutions go down.
garage sale GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 10:15 AM   #7
Grand Bois
Senior Member
 
Grand Bois's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pinole, CA, USA
Bikes:
Posts: 16,820
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 130 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by norskagent View Post
no I think he wants a smaller cog.
I think you're right.
Grand Bois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 11:31 AM   #8
wheelhorseman
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes i know it will be slightly harder to pedal but thats ok. I have a 20in. bike geared 34/20 and you will pedel your butt off and not be going past walking speed. Im not a teenager anymore.
wheelhorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 11:33 AM   #9
norskagent
car dodger
 
norskagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: garner/raleigh nc
Bikes:
Posts: 3,365
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
20" wheels?
or frame size?
__________________
1989 Schwinn Paramount OS
1980 Mclean/Silk Hope Sport Touring
1983 Bianchi pista
1976 Fuji Feather track
1979 raleigh track
"I've consulted my sources and I'm pretty sure your derailleur does not exist"
norskagent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 11:34 AM   #10
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,061
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1103 Post(s)
Quote:
What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed
that is a higher gear ratio
bigger chain ring turning your [probably a Fixie] smaller cog more often ..

people who race on a velodrome, bring a box full of chainrings and cogs
to the track, because, to them, it does matter ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 03-14-12 at 11:39 AM.
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 12:58 PM   #11
wheelhorseman
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by norskagent View Post
20" wheels?
or frame size?
20in. muscle bike. Just for cruising but we have some light hills in our area.
wheelhorseman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 01:03 PM   #12
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Posts: 20,023
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 268 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelhorseman View Post
I didnt know how to compute the figures. So the 44/16 is the higher ratio correct??

What i am trying to do is decrease the amount of pedal revoultions to go the same speed

Is it worth the trouble to change sprockets seeing as how the figures are quite close?
Divide the front chainring by the rear cog. Bigger result = bigger gear.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike
Homebrew01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-12, 01:17 PM   #13
jimmuller 
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Bikes: '73 Raleigh Carlton Gran Sport, '72 Peugeot UO-8, '82 Peugeot TH8, '87 Bianchi Brava, '76? Masi Grand Criterium, '87 Centurion Ironman Expert, '74 Motobecane Champion Team, '86 Gazelle champion mondial, '81? Grandis, and lots of uncertainty on some
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Bigger charinring = smaller cog (rear) = go more distance per pedal revolution = go faster = more force on the pedals.
Smaller chainring = bigger cog (rear) = go less distance per pedal revolution = go slower = less force on the pedals.

But that's not all you asked. Is that difference significant? Not really. Those ratios are comparable to about 51 and 55 gear-inches on a bike with the more common 700c wheels. That difference is about "one click's worth" on a modern zillion-speed indexed system. You can feel the difference if you are trying to maintain an optimum cadence riding for speed, but otherwise it won't matter one bit. If you are changing your gearing because you are changing your riding style, then you need to reconsider.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
Honking a car horn is a privilege, not a right.
jimmuller
jimmuller is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.