Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: What crank arm length do you ride?

Voters
93. You may not vote on this poll
  • 165mm

    9 9.68%
  • 170mm

    44 47.31%
  • 172.5mm

    27 29.03%
  • 175mm

    29 31.18%
  • 180mm

    5 5.38%
  • Other

    3 3.23%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 76
  1. #26
    Senior Member gaucho777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    My Bikes
    '72 Cilo Pacer • '73 Speedwell Ti • '74 Nishiki Competition • '74 Peugeot UE-8 • '86 Look Equipe (753) • '86 Look KG86 • '89 Parkpre Team Road • '90ish Parkpre Team MTB
    Posts
    3,911
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    5'11" and a 30" inseam (pant size)--pretty short-legged. I use 172.5mm on a road bike, 175 on MTB or TT bike (though I don't ride any TT bikes any longer). I'm one of those people that can tell the difference in crank sizes. When I used to race, 172.5 cranks seemed to me a good compromise between shorter, 170mm cranks (good for sprints/crits), and 175mm (good for road races/hilly rides). The added leverage of 175's is good for time trials and mountain biking where spinning/sprinting is not important. 172.5mm is what I got used to, and now I always try to find 172.5s if at all possible. I'll use 170s if it's a rare model or if that's what came on a bike (as is usually the case) but it's not my preference.

    P.s. By the way, if anyone wants to trade 172.5mm Campagnolo cranks for 170s (NR or SR) or 175s (C-record, etched), I'm all ears.
    Last edited by gaucho777; 07-25-12 at 06:17 PM.
    -Randy

    '72 Cilo Pacer • '73 Speedwell Ti • '74 Nishiki Competition • '74 Peugeot UE-8 • '86 Look Bernard Hinault 753 • '86 Look KG86 • '89 Parkpre Team Road • '90ish Parkpre Team MTB

    Avatar photo courtesy of jeffveloart.com, contact: contact: jeffnil8 (at) gmail.com.

  2. #27
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,282
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Novakane View Post
    I just use what's on the bike and in decent shape...
    +1
    I've got them from 170 to 175 and don't think about it. I'm 5'6" and 31 inseam (trousers).

    By the way, I've got some 9-sp Records cranks in 180mm....

    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻

    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...
    ...or maybe you did, and that's why you're so mad.


    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso) SLX
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

  3. #28
    rhm
    rhm is offline
    multimodal commuter rhm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NJ, NYC, LI
    My Bikes
    1945? Fothergill, 1948 Raleigh Record Ace, 1954 Drysdale, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1972 Fuji Finest, 1983 Trek 720, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
    Posts
    12,467
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    6' height, 32" pants; I voted "165."

    But the truth is more complicated.

    I have 145's on my recumbent, have ridden a lot of bikes with 152's (6") and currently have two bikes with 160's, several with 165's, some with 170's, and a very beautiful 6.75" crank. It's long but just too pretty to get rid of. I used to have 172.5 and 175's but I have successfully got rid of all those.

    You can get used to anything. Anything more than 5 mm off what you're used to will feel wrong at first but you will adapt quickly. I have ridden thousands of miles on 140's and hundreds on 127's (5"). I didn't much like the latter but it was a single speed and a pretty terrible bike anyway so maybe not a fair test of the crank.

    On long rides, long cranks make my leg muscles very sore; I don't have that problem with shorter ones. But as I say, you can get used to anything, and that's what I'm used to.

  4. #29
    Senior Member mikemowbz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    My Bikes
    Are several.
    Posts
    854
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RobbieTunes View Post
    By the way, I've got some 9-sp Records cranks in 180mm....
    Still interested in those, right here!

  5. #30
    Senior Member jr59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    the 904, Jax fl
    Posts
    2,184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6'4 and 32 inseam on my pants
    Gravity hates us all, but it hates me more than thin people!

  6. #31
    WNG
    WNG is offline
    Spin Forest! Spin! WNG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Arrid Zone-a
    My Bikes
    I used to have many. And I Will again.
    Posts
    5,958
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I chose 170mm as that's what I've mostly ridden the past 30 years. But I've rode 175mm on a mtb, and didn't notice much difference.
    Therefore, I've not been choosy when acquiring cranks, and have 170, 172,5 and 175 models for both road and mtb models.
    Most of my C&V bikes have 170. Daily road beater has 170, and two future modern road builds will sport 175, and a Campy 172.5 respectively. It will interesting to compare the three.

    I'm about 5'10" pant inseam is 30", short leg/long torso build. 9.5W shoe size (as I also feel shoe size factors), and I'm a spinner not a masher.
    “You meet the nicest people on two wheels!"
    "Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow." ~Albert Einstein

  7. #32
    Fast+Bulbous thinktubes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,550
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    172.5, 6' 1", 32 inseam

  8. #33
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    19,531
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 4Rings6Stars View Post
    170 or 172.5 on the road/cross bikes. I don't notice a difference. I've also ridden 175 with no ill effect...

    5'8"

    Cycling inseam (perineum to floor, barefoot): 29.5"
    +1 This.
    See some of my bikes on facebook: http://www.facebook.com/BillsVintageSteelBikes

    Or visit my finished bikes flickr page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/billssteelbikes/

  9. #34
    Get off my lawn! Velognome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Garden State
    My Bikes
    1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
    Posts
    5,376
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    34" riding 175mm

    Oh you ment inseam

  10. #35
    Senior Member KZBrian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI USA
    My Bikes
    1986 Cannondale SR400 Road,1986 Schwinn Super Sport , 2011 Raleigh Talus 3.0 MTB
    Posts
    340
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    170, 68", 32" pants.

  11. #36
    Senior Member cyclotoine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    YT
    Posts
    7,632
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6'3.something" 32" pant, I hate walking on my pant legs! So I like them just so.

    I have 170mm on my track, but have some 172.5s somewhere for it, I have 172.5mm on my fixed gear (road 170s forever on it), I have 175s on my mountain bike and used them for polo too and my winter beater. I have 180s on my cross bike and my road bike and my touring bike and now on my cross/beater/fast touring/slow road bike. I have some 185s to that used to be on my road bike, but the square taper is not for me anymore on a road bike. The cranks, for a number of reasons, had too much flex and shifted poorly and I had one chain derailment that caused me some pretty bad road rash... they are TA Carmina's BTW and were mated to a phil wood titanium magnum BB (the best I could possibly get for these cranks). I may tripilize them and put them on my touring bike in place of the 180 ritchey compact pros I have currently (old 94bcd mtb cranks, very cool).

    for anyone that wonders why longer cranks are the norm on mtbs... well... try riding up a mountain on your road bike with longer cranks and you will no longer wonder why someone thought that was a good idea.
    1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear

  12. #37
    Senior Member rootboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sand Spit East
    Posts
    12,736
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    OK guys. Are we talking pants length or fromunder to floor?

  13. #38
    Geck, wo ist mein Fahrrad Rx Rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Front Range
    Posts
    715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rootboy View Post
    OK guys. Are we talking pants length or fromunder to floor?
    s'pose to go to the floor.

    6', 33.5''. I've noticed I "ankle" my 172.5 a lot but don't my 175. I like 175 a wee bit more, (masher).

  14. #39
    Bianchi Goddess Bianchigirll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA
    My Bikes
    Too many to list here check my signature.
    Posts
    20,344
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I favor a 172.5 and it mioght be in my head but they just feel better. I have never been a good spinner and these slightly cranks just feel right. I am without heels a statuesque 5' 11"
    Bianchis '87 Sport SX, '90 Proto (2), '91 Boarala 'cross, '93 Project 3, '88 Trofeo SOLd, '86 Volpe, '89 Axis SOLD, '79 Mixte SOLD, '99 Mega Pro XL Ti SOLD, '97 Ti Megatube, , '90 something Vento 603,

    Others but still loved,; '80 RIGI, '80 Batavus Professional, '87 Cornelo, '86 Bertoni (sold), '09 Motobecane SS, '98 Hetchins M.O., '09 K2 Mainframe SOLD, '89 Trek 2000, '?? Jane Doe (still on the drawing board), '90ish Haro Escape

  15. #40
    Senior Member curbtender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SF Bay Area, East bay
    My Bikes
    Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Schwinn Speedster, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina
    Posts
    2,971
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6', 32", 175 on most of my bikes and I like the 172.5 on my commuter. Tend to mash.

  16. #41
    old and fixed... clubman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    My Bikes
    roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
    Posts
    1,902
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    30" inseam, 170 road bike, 165 track, usually 175 mtn bike. Just cuz.

  17. #42
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    20,942
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    I like 172.5, but they're hard to find for MTBs so put 175s on those.

    I prefer 170 on flat road rides but just put up with the 172.5 mostly.
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  18. #43
    Senior Member Wildwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle area
    Posts
    2,614
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6'1" and a bit. I've ridden 170/172.5/175 with no problem. Now over 60 yrs I intuitively (?) know a smaller circle should be easier on knees when properly centered on the frame. Right? For me, the wider Q on my triple is more of an adjustment, no an annoyance.

    I want to try 165.
    '81 Austro Daimler Olympian, '86 Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, '87 DeRosa Professional, '99 Calfee TetraPro, '03(?) Macalu Cirrus, '04 Tallerico, '97 Co-Motion Tandem

  19. #44
    Hopelessly addicted... photogravity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Central Maryland
    My Bikes
    1949 Hercules Kestrel, 1950 Norman Rapide, 1970 Schwinn Collegiate, 1972 Peugeot UE-8, 1976 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Raleigh Sports, 1977 Jack Taylor Tandem, 1984 Davidson Tandem, 2010 Bilenky "BQ" 650B Constructeur Tandem, 2011 Linus Mixte
    Posts
    4,670
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    I have bikes with 140mm, 165mm, 170mm and 175mm crankarms. I'm about 5' 10" and my pants inseam is roughly 30 inches. The only cranks that I can really tell are shorter are the 140mm, but that's a full inch shorter than the other cranks, so it stands to reason I'd notice the difference.
    --
    Ridding the world of derailleurs, one bicycle at a time.

    46 Hercules Roadster, 49 Hercules Kestrel, 50 Norman Rapide, 51 Hercules Lion, 52 Hercules Windsor, 56 Hercules Royal Prince, 61 Fiorelli Tandem, 67 Carlton Super Race (IGH), 70 Schwinn Collegiate (IGH), 71 Hercules, 71 STF Hercules, 72 Peugeot PX-8 (IGH), 76 Raleigh Sports, 77 STF Raleigh Sports, 77 Jack Taylor Tandem, Early-80's Mike Appel SC, 84 Davidson Tandem, Late-80's Alpine, 10 Bilenky "BQ" Signature Tandem

  20. #45
    Senior Member jonwvara's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington County, Vermont, USA
    My Bikes
    1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record
    Posts
    1,872
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I'm probably 6' 3.5", not especially long-legged. I ride 170 and 175 interchangeably--can't detect any difference between them. I DO notice that the cottered cranks on my old Dawes Double Blue seem kind of short, but there's no length marking on them as far as I know. I should measure them sometime. I like they way they feel, though, so I probably wouldn't mind going even shorter than 170.
    www.redclovercomponents.com

    "Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
    --Ogden Nash

  21. #46
    Senior Member mapleleafs-13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Pinarello Veneto, Pinarello Montello, Bianchi Celeste
    Posts
    1,724
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i usually have 172.5 or 170, i don't think i notice a difference.

  22. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
    My Bikes
    2013 Custom SA tourster
    Posts
    510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'8 with 825mm standover using runners.

    In highschool I rode an antique 45 lb XL Rudge with 180mm cranks. It was the easiest peddling bike I ever rode.
    Next came 2 Raleighs and 2 hybrids. They all had gutless 165mm cranks.
    This year I put XL SA5w hubs on the 1990 Raleigh frame with the cotter crank off the 1974 Raleigh.
    I did 3 centuries on this 53 lb (loaded) frankenbike. With the short cranks it went up only 3%ish hills sitting down.
    It still went up all hills if standing up. GI's are 43.4 to 111.1 I needed 14.5 mph speed to push ok in 3rd gear.
    Then I got 180mm ENO cranks/Phill BB. It now goes up 8 or 10% sitting, although at low revs, 25 or 30.
    The gears all then shifted 2 or 3 mph lower also. Now I mostly shift at 10.5 mph to 3rd.
    I then easily upped my all-time speed record to 44.63 mph on a 44m drop hill about only 500m long. This hill I went up at 6 to 7 mph while sitting and tired from 96 all day miles and 30 yet to ride.
    That is 9.1% force difference from 165 to 180. Newton's Laws are CONFIRMED.

  23. #48
    Senior Member Pars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    '73 Raleigh RRA, 1986 Trek 500 commuter
    Posts
    2,023
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    5'8" (maybe a bit less), 30" pant inseam (can't remember bike inseam), 170mm

  24. #49
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    CT
    My Bikes
    1984 Schwinn Peloton, 1991 Schwinn World Sport, 1980 Motobecane Nomade Sprint
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6'1, 34" (32" pants), 170mm

    why 170mm? That's what my bikes have--I'll be switching out to 172.5 on a trial basis

  25. #50
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    My Bikes
    Cinelli, Paramount, Raleigh, Carlton, Zeus, Gemniani, Frejus, Legnano, Pinarello, Falcon
    Posts
    5,775
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mostly 170s, though I have one bike with 172.5 that always felt good to ride...

    6', I don't know, 32"

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •