Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Mystery Bike

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mystery Bike

    Can someone please tell me the name of this bike? I found it on Craigslist, but I can't find any information on it. I am planning on getting it for my first bike. It is carbon and aluminum and the seller says it is somewhere between 1993-1996. Is this a good bike to get?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by HOG_USMC; 03-10-13 at 09:52 AM.

  2. #2
    DRF aka Thrifty Bill wrk101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    The NC Mountains
    My Bikes
    Too many to list, all vintage
    Posts
    19,466
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Trek made a whole series of these bonded carbon bikes in the 1990s, mostly differentiated by the components and the paint colors.
    no way of knowing which pieces are original (I never assume components on a bike are original). For instance, RD is one generation of Shimano 600, crankset is another generation. It could be several models in that group. Value is all about condition, so whether its a 2100 or a 2300 does not matter anyway. Same with exact year, whether its 16 years old or 20 years old has no impact on value.

    1993 or newer bikes are all on bikepedia. Earlier than that are at the vintage Trek site.

    Its not a collectible bike, its a rider. Focus on fit, price and condition, rather than model and year.
    Last edited by wrk101; 03-10-13 at 09:58 AM.

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So should I get it? Is it a good bike for my first road bike. It is for sale for $250.

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the reply, I greatly appreciate it.

  5. #5
    Unreasonably tall member non-fixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Land of REAL GOUDA Cheese and Tulips
    My Bikes
    all the ones nobody else seems to want ...
    Posts
    2,611
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    If that saddle in the picture is at the correct height for you, then the frame is a bit too small. I would suggest looking for something a little bigger. It'll be more comfortable.
    Clunker or not, it's gotta have gears!

  6. #6
    Senior Member Chombi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    9,357
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by non-fixie View Post
    If that saddle in the picture is at the correct height for you, then the frame is a bit too small. I would suggest looking for something a little bigger. It'll be more comfortable.
    +10!....... Having it that high might mean there's not much seatpost left in the set tube and the aluminum seat cluster lug....which can result in overstressing the lug and clamp, causing it to eventually crack.

    Chombi

  7. #7
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,155
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Much more like 1987 or so, much more similar to the 1987 Trek 2500 Composite.
    However, the fork is a bit different, I think. I no longer have this, sold it to a bike shop in Texas.
    The frame was built by Aegis System, a defense contractor in Maine.

    $250 may be OK for your market, but you've got some work to do to bring it to an acceptable leatherneck shine.
    I think decals are available. Light as can be, stiff for it's time. That's a 54cm frame, and if you're about 5'7 or under, fine. The seatpost is out way too much.

    If it's too small for you, you may need to move on.

    I sent you a PM, jarhead, Welcome Aboard the USS Nuthouse.

    Last edited by RobbieTunes; 03-10-13 at 12:07 PM.

    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻

    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...
    ...or maybe you did, and that's why you're so mad.


    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso) SLX
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

  8. #8
    Senior Member Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
    Posts
    1,508
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Check the carbon tubes very carefully for cracks or bashes. These things can break very easily once the carbon has been damaged. A little scuff in the clearcoat isn't anything to worry about, but if you see any, check those areas very closely.

    It appears the the original paint has been chemically removed from the aluminum parts (check out the bits of purple left behind where 'TREK" is cast into the seat cluster); I don't know if a chemical paint stripper does anything to weaken the CF tubes or the joins to the AL tubes, but I'd consider that a possibility.

    I've got a purple Trek 2100 from the early 90's; lightest bike I've ever owned. I should put the frame up on the swap thread again; it's too small for me.
    Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 03-10-13 at 12:23 PM. Reason: additinal info too

  9. #9
    Senior Member RobbieTunes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    15,155
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Robbie ♪♫♪...☻

    Perhaps you didn't really hear what you thought I said...
    ...or maybe you did, and that's why you're so mad.


    1979 Centurion Semi Pro
    1982 Lotus Classique
    1986 De Rosa Professional SLX
    1987 D'Arienzo (Basso) SLX
    1995 Hot Tubes TT
    1998 Kestrel KM 40 Airfoil
    2006 Cinelli XLR8R-2
    2011 Eddy Merckx EMX3
    2014 Wraith Hustle

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •