Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    68
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    27 in. Tire Availability

    What's generally available in 27 in. tires? I only seem to see 1-1/8 and more commonly 1-1/4 in. widths, which actually are pretty undersized at ~25 mm. I'm interested in something closer to 35 mm.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ColonelJLloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Louisville
    Posts
    8,196
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Psst.

    The only tires I know of marked 27 x 1 3/8 are Kenda crap. I'm not sure if Panaracer makes the Pasela in 27 x 1 3/8 any longer.
    Bikes on Flickr
    I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    OC, SoCal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot PX-10, P8, Urban Express; Miyata 1000LT, 1000, 610; Univega Gran Turismo, Sportour, Competizione, Viva Sport; Raleigh Portage, Super Grand Prix; Specialized Expedition, Sequoia; TREK 728, Bianchi Brava, Bill Davidson, Centurion Pro Tour 15
    Posts
    49
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hibonite View Post
    What's generally available in 27 in. tires? I only seem to see 1-1/8 and more commonly 1-1/4 in. widths, which actually are pretty undersized at ~25 mm. I'm interested in something closer to 35 mm.
    http://www.niagaracycle.com/categori...-wire-gum-wall

  4. #4
    Senior Member gaucho777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    My Bikes
    '72 Cilo Pacer • '73 Speedwell Ti • '74 Nishiki Competition • '74 Peugeot UE-8 • '86 Look Equipe (753) • '86 Look KG86 • '89 Parkpre Team Road • '90ish Parkpre Team MTB
    Posts
    4,038
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was just browsing around for 27" tires this morning. I have a pair of gorgeous Tipo hubs I just polished and a pair of 27" Fiamme Professional (yellow label) clincher rims, both of which were original to the bike I am restoring. I don't mind spending a little extra on tires for this build, but the limited options for 27" tires is really discouraging. Seems like Panaraceer Pasela's about the best new 27" tire with tan sidewalls (which is important to me) currently available. I'd hoped to keep the bike original, but now I'm reconsidering. 700c rims would give me a lot more tire choices, plus more clearance for fenders. Decisions, decisions....

    By the way, the Continental website mentions that they are reintroducing the Continental SuperSport tire. Their website mentions 27 x 1-1/4 and 27x1-1/8 options, but adds that not all sizes are available in all countries. Haven't yet checked to see if my LBS can get them. They only come with black sidewalls though:
    http://www.conti-online.com/www/bicy...t_plus_en.html

  5. #5
    Senior Member dvsjes28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa Bay FLA
    My Bikes
    1982 Trek 613, 1983 Trek 500, 2011 Mercier WT5
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Michelin World Tours in 27 x 1 1/4 seem wider. Maybe around 35mm. I just replaced them with 27 x 1 1/4 Panaracer Paselas which seem far narrower.
    1982 Trek 613 - 1983 Trek 500 - 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp - 2010 Mercier WT5 - 2013 All-City Macho Man Disc

  6. #6
    Bianchi Goddess Bianchigirll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA
    My Bikes
    Too many to list here check my signature.
    Posts
    20,718
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Except the afore mentioned Kendas I don't think there were many 27" tires made wider than x 1 1/4. I could be wrong but I think 27" wheels were a US market thing and always intended to be for "light weight" bikes so fat tires were never a big deal. I do recall seeing some sort of knobby 27" tires back in '90ish but they were really cheap.
    Bianchis '87 Sport SX, '90 Proto, '90 Campione del Fausto Giamondi Specialisma Italiano Mundo, '91 Boarala 'cross, '93 Project 3, '86 Volpe, '97 Ti Megatube, , '90 something Vento 603,

    Others but still loved,; '80 RIGI, '80 Batavus Professional, '87 Cornelo, '09 Motobecane SS, '?? Jane Doe (still on the drawing board), '90ish Haro Escape

  7. #7
    Over forty victim of Fate Cougrrcj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    NE Ohio / Phoenix AZ
    My Bikes
    A few...
    Posts
    1,243
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1" = 25.4mm

    1-1/8" = 28mm

    1-1/4" = 32mm

    Lots of 27x1-1/4" tires from online sources like Niagara Cycle.

  8. #8
    Member jplebrun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    My Bikes
    '84 Fuji Sagres and '11 Trek Lexa S
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Conty also makes their Gatorskins and GS Hardshells in 27x1-1/4. They're not quite 35's, but they're pretty fat and they're nearly bullet proof.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    My Bikes
    87 Expert Miami,'88 Peugeot Canyon Express, '87 Raleigh Elkhorn
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nashbar Prima Plus 2. 27 x 1 1/4". Kevlar, durable "rubber", blackwall. (CST) These roll and handle very well. Have just surpassed 3100 miles and NO wear than I can see. NO flats even though I've picked-out several goat heads, thorns, and a piece of steel or two. They are usually $12.00 each at Nashbar. They replaced a pair of Panaracer Pasella TG's than wore to paper thin at 1600 miles. Ironman 6-03-14.jpg

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waukesha WI
    My Bikes
    1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra w/ Drop Bars
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bianchigirll View Post
    Except the afore mentioned Kendas I don't think there were many 27" tires made wider than x 1 1/4. I could be wrong but I think 27" wheels were a US market thing and always intended to be for "light weight" bikes so fat tires were never a big deal. I do recall seeing some sort of knobby 27" tires back in '90ish but they were really cheap.

    I'd love to find a set of these (that aren't dry rotted out)

    *Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waukesha WI
    My Bikes
    1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra w/ Drop Bars
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    By the way, on the bike that I got them from it was paired with this:

    *Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,053
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a 27x1-3/8 set of cyclocross knobbies for a while. I don't recall who made them, wtb I think.

    You could consider changing your bike over to 700c. There's only 4mm difference in rim radius so your existing brakes may have enough reach.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Velocivixen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The Great Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    1974-1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 1985 Sekai Bigfoot, 1985 Nishiki Riviera Mixte, 2011 Surly Cross Check, 1986 Fuji Sundance, 1992 Specizlized Hardrock, 1987 Miyata One Twelve Mixte.
    Posts
    1,275
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Paselas are 27 x 1 1.4" & measure 32mm width with digital calipers. Yes, I'd love wider ones too without having to go the "cross" knobby versions. I tried some 700c wheels on my mixte (which sports it's original 27" wheels), and I thought the 700c wheels looked "insignificant" compared to the 27". I know there's not much of a difference in size, but the overall gestalt on the bike was not aesthetically pleasing. You will have more tire choices, however, if you go 700c.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,942
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bianchigirll View Post
    Except the afore mentioned Kendas I don't think there were many 27" tires made wider than x 1 1/4. I could be wrong but I think 27" wheels were a US market thing and always intended to be for "light weight" bikes so fat tires were never a big deal. I do recall seeing some sort of knobby 27" tires back in '90ish but they were really cheap.
    27" was popular in North America, up until the late 1970's when they started disappearing in Canada. I think it had to do with the start of the failed start to metric conversion. I think they held on much longer in the US. Even so, nobody has made a new bike with 27" wheels in over 20 years, so it's surprising that there are ANY 27" tires still around.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Waukesha WI
    My Bikes
    1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra w/ Drop Bars
    Posts
    4,052
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wogster View Post
    27" was popular in North America, up until the late 1970's when they started disappearing in Canada. I think it had to do with the start of the failed start to metric conversion. I think they held on much longer in the US. Even so, nobody has made a new bike with 27" wheels in over 20 years, so it's surprising that there are ANY 27" tires still around.
    Why?

    The tire companies aren't the bike companies. I can understand the bike companies wanting to force the change- but the tire companies sell the product to those holdovers. There's no innovation on the 27" end, and just the cursory models, and that seems to be enough to keep the people that still have 27" wheels in use.
    *Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*

  16. #16
    Disco Infiltrator Darth Lefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Orangevale CA
    My Bikes
    76 Paramount, 02 Hardrock, 72 Super Sport
    Posts
    1,407
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wogster View Post
    Even so, nobody has made a new bike with 27" wheels in over 20 years, so it's surprising that there are ANY 27" tires still around.
    I was surprised twice, the first time when I learned 27" and 700c were different sizes, the second when I found you could still get decent tires in the obsolete size. But it makes sense, the 27" size was used to the exclusion of nearly all else on good road bikes, of which they made millions in the early 1970's and many into the 80's; so there will still be a market for service parts. What doesn't make sense to me is that they changed it for something arbitrarily slightly different but functionally the same. Can you imagine being a bike shop owner and carrying two sizes of nearly the same thing, or having to tell the guy the very nice bike he bought in '87 won't take the best tires available in '92?

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Lefty View Post
    I was surprised twice, the first time when I learned 27" and 700c were different sizes, the second when I found you could still get decent tires in the obsolete size. But it makes sense, the 27" size was used to the exclusion of nearly all else on good road bikes, of which they made millions in the early 1970's and many into the 80's; so there will still be a market for service parts. What doesn't make sense to me is that they changed it for something arbitrarily slightly different but functionally the same. Can you imagine being a bike shop owner and carrying two sizes of nearly the same thing, or having to tell the guy the very nice bike he bought in '87 won't take the best tires available in '92?
    My understanding is that 700c's came first then, way back in the 1930's, Dunlop introduced 27" tires which mainly caught on in North America, while in Europe they stuck with their 700C's and later on we made the switch back to what everyone else had stuck with in the first place.

    I could be wrong on this though. It seems certain that tubular 700's preceded 27" clinchers, but I'm not so certain that 700 clinchers came out before 27" clinchers.

  18. #18
    Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race dddd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    Cheltenham-Pederson racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
    Posts
    3,498
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by scopinusa View Post
    Nashbar Prima Plus 2. 27 x 1 1/4". Kevlar, durable "rubber", blackwall. (CST) These roll and handle very well. Have just surpassed 3100 miles and NO wear than I can see. NO flats even though I've picked-out several goat heads, thorns, and a piece of steel or two. They are usually $12.00 each at Nashbar. They replaced a pair of Panaracer Pasella TG's than wore to paper thin at 1600 miles.
    These are one of my favorite tires, not too heavy and few flats for me.

    They are actually Cheng Shin (CST) C-740, which can be purchased in many solid colors.

    They measure only about 28.5mm wide though on some 22mm Mod58 rims at 100psi.

  19. #19
    Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race dddd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    Cheltenham-Pederson racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
    Posts
    3,498
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocivixen View Post
    My Paselas are 27 x 1 1.4" & measure 32mm width with digital calipers. Yes, I'd love wider ones too without having to go the "cross" knobby versions. I tried some 700c wheels on my mixte (which sports it's original 27" wheels), and I thought the 700c wheels looked "insignificant" compared to the 27". I know there's not much of a difference in size, but the overall gestalt on the bike was not aesthetically pleasing. You will have more tire choices, however, if you go 700c.
    That's what I got got when I measured the 1-1/4" Paselas.

    Michelin World Tours in the same size also measure about 32mm, making these two tires the fattest 27" tires available.

    27" tires labeled 1-3/8" are not even this wide! This includes the Kenda and Cheng gumwalls, as well as the knobbied 1-3/8" cross tires such as Kenda Kross Cyclo or Club Roost Cross-Terra.

    Note that the Michelin World tour tires are rather heavy, but with lots of rubber protecting the sidewalls, so can handle trail riding at lower pressures.

    Years ago I was using Michelin's lightweight 1-3/8" version of the World Tour for my cyclocross racing, at pressures around 50psi.

    The lightweight, folding version had Kevlar beads and was called HiLite-Tour. It had very light-colored skinside sidewalls.

    Though sold as both 1-3/8" and 700x35, these were no wider than the current 1-1/4" World Tour or Pasela tires.
    Last edited by dddd; 07-20-14 at 01:28 PM.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Velocivixen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    The Great Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    1974-1975 Motobecane Grand Jubile, 1985 Sekai Bigfoot, 1985 Nishiki Riviera Mixte, 2011 Surly Cross Check, 1986 Fuji Sundance, 1992 Specizlized Hardrock, 1987 Miyata One Twelve Mixte.
    Posts
    1,275
    Mentioned
    71 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    @dddd-that's good to know about the Kenda Kross tires. I guess the final width of the tire has to do with the specific rim it's mounted on? It sounds like, from what I've read, that some tires spread out more when mounted to a particular wheel and other tires are "taller". Someone on one of my earlier thread had the opinion that, on a vintage mixte with good paint, "cross" type tires wouldn't be a good look. I went with my old stand by, the Paselas.

  21. #21
    Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race dddd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    Cheltenham-Pederson racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
    Posts
    3,498
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocivixen View Post
    @dddd-that's good to know about the Kenda Kross tires. I guess the final width of the tire has to do with the specific rim it's mounted on? It sounds like, from what I've read, that some tires spread out more when mounted to a particular wheel and other tires are "taller". Someone on one of my earlier thread had the opinion that, on a vintage mixte with good paint, "cross" type tires wouldn't be a good look. I went with my old stand by, the Paselas.
    A wider rim will appreciably widen a bike tire's casing and flatten the tread profile, but actually also slightly increases the height of the tread above the rim (at least it does when the original rim is considerably narrower than the tire, which is usually the case).

    Tires like the Kenda Kross get some added width and height from their free-standing tread knobs, but I measure tire width only across the casing and I measure tire height only up to the base of any such open tread blocks.

    The thickness of a smooth tread affects any dimension where the measurement is taken, especially the height.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,942
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Lefty View Post
    I was surprised twice, the first time when I learned 27" and 700c were different sizes, the second when I found you could still get decent tires in the obsolete size. But it makes sense, the 27" size was used to the exclusion of nearly all else on good road bikes, of which they made millions in the early 1970's and many into the 80's; so there will still be a market for service parts. What doesn't make sense to me is that they changed it for something arbitrarily slightly different but functionally the same. Can you imagine being a bike shop owner and carrying two sizes of nearly the same thing, or having to tell the guy the very nice bike he bought in '87 won't take the best tires available in '92?
    It was used to the exclusion of nearly all else, in North American and possibly parts of the British Commonwealth, 700C was used just about everywhere else. I think bicycle companies eventually dropped it, because there were fewer and fewer countries that used imperial measure for everything. 27" disappeared in Canada and much of the Commonwealth in the late 70's as part of the move to metric. That left the US as the sole user of that size, and the bicycle companies, many of which are international in scope, dropped it, because it cost too much to maintain that size.

    Personally I think we should quit using the old methods of referring to tire sizes, my road bike has 622-28 tires on it, and my mountain bike has 559-50 tires on it, I'd like to replace those with 559-38 or 559-42mm tires, and the road bike will likely get 622-32's next time. The only thing that keeps the old measures alive is marketing. I can't stand that idiotic reference to 622-50 and wider as 29"....

  23. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    My Bikes
    87 Expert Miami,'88 Peugeot Canyon Express, '87 Raleigh Elkhorn
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocivixen View Post
    My Paselas are 27 x 1 1.4" & measure 32mm width with digital calipers. Yes, I'd love wider ones too without having to go the "cross" knobby versions. I tried some 700c wheels on my mixte (which sports it's original 27" wheels), and I thought the 700c wheels looked "insignificant" compared to the 27". I know there's not much of a difference in size, but the overall gestalt on the bike was not aesthetically pleasing. You will have more tire choices, however, if you go 700c.
    You are spot-on about aesthetics. As you know also, 27"ers are smoother than 700's due to the increased radius just as 27.5 and 29" are smoother, among other things, than 26" tires. I feel the difference readily. That's why you see 27"s on my Ironman (previous post) rather than 700's. Weight differences are only found in set designs, so that's not a concern for me. There are more tire choices with 700's, but only in the higher priced, lighter and more puncture-prone designs that I don't want as a general statement.

    I was disappointed when the industry moved to 700's and still see it as a negative.

  24. #24
    Insane Bicycle Mechanic Jeff Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    other Vancouver
    Posts
    6,961
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Lefty View Post
    I was surprised twice, the first time when I learned 27" and 700c were different sizes, the second when I found you could still get decent tires in the obsolete size. But it makes sense, the 27" size was used to the exclusion of nearly all else on good road bikes, of which they made millions in the early 1970's and many into the 80's; so there will still be a market for service parts. What doesn't make sense to me is that they changed it for something arbitrarily slightly different but functionally the same. Can you imagine being a bike shop owner and carrying two sizes of nearly the same thing, or having to tell the guy the very nice bike he bought in '87 won't take the best tires available in '92?
    We had to do this back when I was working in a shop. (1979-1984) We had one side of the tire racks for 27", the other side for 700C. It wasn't that big of a deal. We were also a Schwinn shop, so we were always explaining to people the size difference between a "Schwinn" tire and an "everything else" tire. You whippersnappers don't know how good you got it.
    Jeff Wills

    All my bikes.

  25. #25
    AAZ
    AAZ is offline
    Senior Member AAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    143
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems like this type of thread is initiated once or twice a year.
    I found the Specialized All Condition Armadillo to be excellent at 27".

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •