Why does it seem that classic boom bikes all seemed to have very narrow drop bars?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243
Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Why does it seem that classic boom bikes all seemed to have very narrow drop bars?
Seems like all the old seventies era drop bar bikes that run through our bike co-op all seem to have very narrow bars. Why is that? Most people who want to fix up their bikes seem to like the wider bars except the hipsters building up their fixies.
Based upon shoulder to bar width, most seventies era bars were too narrow for proper fit.
Based upon shoulder to bar width, most seventies era bars were too narrow for proper fit.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
87 Posts
Looking at photos from that era, those bars would be the correct fit for the build of riders then. Take a bike from are recent 15 years ago, and things will look odd compared to a current bike, tires back then were narrower, think 19mm vs current 25/23mm
#3
Still learning
+1
Compared to the other 6.7 billion inhabitants of the world, Americans are wide bodied. Domestic cars are long and wide by global standards too.
Compared to the other 6.7 billion inhabitants of the world, Americans are wide bodied. Domestic cars are long and wide by global standards too.
#4
Cisalpinist
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557
Bikes: blue ones.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
11 Posts
-people got fat.
-lemond practically introduced the wide drop bar because he believed it opened his lungs more (I think this is a bogus argument).
-40/42 is about middle of the road, so when sleccing millions of bikes for the boom, best not to fiddle around hundreds of shapes and sizes.
-lemond practically introduced the wide drop bar because he believed it opened his lungs more (I think this is a bogus argument).
-40/42 is about middle of the road, so when sleccing millions of bikes for the boom, best not to fiddle around hundreds of shapes and sizes.
#5
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I'm actually comfortable on narrower bars- but I don't like the way my handlebar bag is snug in there.
I'm also comfortable on more regularer bars too. Six of one, half dozen of the other.
I'm also comfortable on more regularer bars too. Six of one, half dozen of the other.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 187
Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur | Francesco Moser SL | 1984 Ross Utopian | St. Etienne 531 | 1981 Peugeot PK10 | 2015 Cannondale SuperSix | 2012 Felt F65X
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
18 Posts
+1
I am always finding that I need to replace the bars to be comfortable. Although, I rode a 38 for a week and when I returned to a 44, that felt odd. I never felt I had as much balance or climbing ability when on the narrow bar though.
I am always finding that I need to replace the bars to be comfortable. Although, I rode a 38 for a week and when I returned to a 44, that felt odd. I never felt I had as much balance or climbing ability when on the narrow bar though.
#7
weapons-grade bolognium
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344
Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times
in
891 Posts
38 cm seemed to be a really popular size back then, even for higher end stuff like cinelli.
#8
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,507
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2743 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
We were all much tougher then and didn't need all that extra leverage to turn.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
468 Posts
Narrow bars suck. The same reason a narrow wheel base on cars sucks.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Metro Exurb
Posts: 424
Bikes: 1982 Torker BMX, 1990 Cannondale Black Lightning, 1996 Cannondale F400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BMX racing in the early 80s, wider bars felt to me like i had more power to accelerate and made passing me a bit more difficult.
#11
Not racing.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
If you want to get rid of a few pairs of 37 or 38 cm handlebars, pm me with what you have. I'd like a few.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
With bars, I've found wide bars can be too sensitive due to greater leverage, with narrower being more stable.
As far as track on cars, compare the handling of an E36 BMW with a Cadillac DeVille, both from the early '90s. Wider track in cars does not necessarily create better handling.
As far as track on cars, compare the handling of an E36 BMW with a Cadillac DeVille, both from the early '90s. Wider track in cars does not necessarily create better handling.
#20
Senior Member
What I prefer are bars with more throw, or longer ramps. Makes for more comfortable hand positions.
#21
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I think they've gotten wider over the years, and it doesn't seem good to me. Maybe I just have narrow shoulders.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
#24
Trek 500 Kid
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times
in
307 Posts
If the stem is too long on a relatively shorter frame it affects handling when climbing up out of the saddle.
Bars should approximately match shoulder width c/l to c/l.
And yeah I'm tall and narrow in the shoulders and found myself not needing to replace the bars on new bikes that I bought in the '80s.
#25
Tyrannosaurus Rexitis
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 934
Bikes: Scott Addict 6870
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts