Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Why does it seem that classic boom bikes all seemed to have very narrow drop bars?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Why does it seem that classic boom bikes all seemed to have very narrow drop bars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-13, 12:48 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,243

Bikes: Specialized Sequoia Elite/Motobecane Fantom Cross Team Ti/'85 Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Why does it seem that classic boom bikes all seemed to have very narrow drop bars?

Seems like all the old seventies era drop bar bikes that run through our bike co-op all seem to have very narrow bars. Why is that? Most people who want to fix up their bikes seem to like the wider bars except the hipsters building up their fixies.

Based upon shoulder to bar width, most seventies era bars were too narrow for proper fit.
bobotech is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 01:09 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 87 Posts
Originally Posted by bobotech
Based upon shoulder to bar width, most seventies era bars were too narrow for proper fit.
Looking at photos from that era, those bars would be the correct fit for the build of riders then. Take a bike from are recent 15 years ago, and things will look odd compared to a current bike, tires back then were narrower, think 19mm vs current 25/23mm
jimc101 is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 02:00 AM
  #3  
Still learning
 
oddjob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North of Canada, Adirondacks
Posts: 11,533

Bikes: Still a garage full

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 847 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 44 Posts
+1

Compared to the other 6.7 billion inhabitants of the world, Americans are wide bodied. Domestic cars are long and wide by global standards too.
oddjob2 is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 03:25 AM
  #4  
Cisalpinist
 
Italuminium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557

Bikes: blue ones.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
-people got fat.

-lemond practically introduced the wide drop bar because he believed it opened his lungs more (I think this is a bogus argument).

-40/42 is about middle of the road, so when sleccing millions of bikes for the boom, best not to fiddle around hundreds of shapes and sizes.
Italuminium is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 05:04 AM
  #5  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times in 935 Posts
I'm actually comfortable on narrower bars- but I don't like the way my handlebar bag is snug in there.

I'm also comfortable on more regularer bars too. Six of one, half dozen of the other.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 05:05 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Revracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 187

Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur | Francesco Moser SL | 1984 Ross Utopian | St. Etienne 531 | 1981 Peugeot PK10 | 2015 Cannondale SuperSix | 2012 Felt F65X

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 18 Posts
+1

I am always finding that I need to replace the bars to be comfortable. Although, I rode a 38 for a week and when I returned to a 44, that felt odd. I never felt I had as much balance or climbing ability when on the narrow bar though.
Revracer is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 06:26 AM
  #7  
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,344

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 985 Post(s)
Liked 2,378 Times in 891 Posts
38 cm seemed to be a really popular size back then, even for higher end stuff like cinelli.
thinktubes is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 09:01 AM
  #8  
SE Wis
 
dedhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,507

Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2743 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times in 2,053 Posts
We were all much tougher then and didn't need all that extra leverage to turn.
dedhed is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 09:57 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Narrow bars suck. The same reason a narrow wheel base on cars sucks.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 10:18 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Cache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Metro Exurb
Posts: 424

Bikes: 1982 Torker BMX, 1990 Cannondale Black Lightning, 1996 Cannondale F400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BMX racing in the early 80s, wider bars felt to me like i had more power to accelerate and made passing me a bit more difficult.
Cache is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 10:24 AM
  #11  
Not racing.
 
stanman13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 186

Bikes: Old rigid mtn bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by shoota
Narrow bars suck. The same reason a narrow wheel base on cars sucks.
Because it makes you tip over in turns? Or does a narrower wheelbase on a car make it harder to breathe? Bicycles do have a pretty narrow wheelbase already.
stanman13 is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 10:26 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by stanman13
Because it makes you tip over in turns? Or does a narrower wheelbase on a car make it harder to breathe? Bicycles do have a pretty narrow wheelbase already.
Because it feels less stable.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:22 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by jimc101
Looking at photos from that era, those bars would be the correct fit for the build of riders then. Take a bike from are recent 15 years ago, and things will look odd compared to a current bike, tires back then were narrower, think 19mm vs current 25/23mm
Huh? Bar width is supposed to be based on shoulder and chest width, which are skeletal properties that should d not be affected by a modern layer of fat (at least for me). Style, wide bars in proportion to wide tires, isn't really a part of it except for pure looks rather than good fitting, good comfort, and good performance. I can see a person wanting or appreciating more leverage with wide tires, high trail, and low tire pressure. However, my UO-8 was most likely built with 38 cm handlebars, 27x1 1/8 70 psi tires, and a very low trail. It steers reasonably quick considering it's overall length and laid-back angles.

If you want to get rid of a few pairs of 37 or 38 cm handlebars, pm me with what you have. I'd like a few.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:23 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by shoota
Narrow bars suck. The same reason a narrow wheel base on cars sucks.
Thank you for that clear explanation.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:27 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
Thank you for that clear explanation.
You're welcome.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:29 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by shoota
You're welcome.
So what in heck did you mean?

We get that you don't like some things.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:32 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Fan
So what in heck did you mean?

We get that you don't like some things.
Wider = more stable, better handling. It may not be a large difference but I can sure feel it with narrow bars.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:51 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
With bars, I've found wide bars can be too sensitive due to greater leverage, with narrower being more stable.

As far as track on cars, compare the handling of an E36 BMW with a Cadillac DeVille, both from the early '90s. Wider track in cars does not necessarily create better handling.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 12:52 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
shoota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 7,827
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1872 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times in 468 Posts
Ok you win.
__________________
2014 Cannondale SuperSix EVO 2
2019 Salsa Warbird
shoota is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 02:06 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wilmette, IL
Posts: 6,881
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 751 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 351 Posts
Originally Posted by thinktubes
38 cm seemed to be a really popular size back then, even for higher end stuff like cinelli.
I didn't even know that bars were available in wider sizes and for the most part they weren't. 38cm was the standard whether you road a 19" frame or 25" frame. I rode 38cm bars from the early 70's till the mid 80's when wider bars were finally somewhat available. And even then I only could find 40cm. bars.
What I prefer are bars with more throw, or longer ramps. Makes for more comfortable hand positions.
big chainring is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 02:31 PM
  #21  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,462 Times in 1,433 Posts
I think they've gotten wider over the years, and it doesn't seem good to me. Maybe I just have narrow shoulders.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 03:40 PM
  #22  
smelling the roses
 
seedsbelize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320

Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5

Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times in 612 Posts
And how does all this relate to stem length, a subject that's been on my mind lately? Seems narrower bars on a short stem would tend toward twitchiness. Or not.
__________________
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
Auto-pause is a honey-tongued devil whispering sweet lies in your ear.


seedsbelize is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 03:50 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times in 2,079 Posts
Originally Posted by dedhed
We were all much tougher then and didn't need all that extra leverage to turn.
No. 1.
bikemig is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 04:44 PM
  #24  
Trek 500 Kid
 
Zinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562

Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2904 Post(s)
Liked 382 Times in 307 Posts
Originally Posted by seedsbelize
And how does all this relate to stem length, a subject that's been on my mind lately? Seems narrower bars on a short stem would tend toward twitchiness. Or not.
For stems I like to keep my nose even with the c/l of the bar tops looking up with my hands on the drops. I even go to the trouble of taping a string on my nose with a washer tied on the end and have someone standing beside me tell me how it lines up. I don't like to go by putting my elbow on the front of the seat and barely touching the bars because that seems to give me a little too long of a stem with a Brooks saddle....personally.

If the stem is too long on a relatively shorter frame it affects handling when climbing up out of the saddle.

Bars should approximately match shoulder width c/l to c/l.

And yeah I'm tall and narrow in the shoulders and found myself not needing to replace the bars on new bikes that I bought in the '80s.
Zinger is offline  
Old 09-14-13, 05:12 PM
  #25  
Tyrannosaurus Rexitis
 
Harlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 934

Bikes: Scott Addict 6870

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shoota
Narrow bars suck. The same reason a narrow wheel base on cars sucks.
Yeah...No.

My mazda miata was on rails. My much wider subaru is not. There is just so much more that goes into making a car handle well like suspension, height, tires.
Harlan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.