Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 510
  1. #151
    aka Tom Reingold noglider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Village, New York City
    My Bikes
    too many
    Posts
    18,348
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    oddjob2, I think you should be disqualified because you declunkified it.
    Please email me rather than sending me a private message. My address is noglider@pobox.com

    Tom Reingold
    Residences: West Village, New York City and High Falls, NY
    Employer: Larry's Freewheeling, 301 W 110 St, New York, NY 10026
    Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

  2. #152
    Senior Member Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ I think you're right, Tom. Let me help out a bit here, by showing my echt-clunky choice of bars for dumpster Redline project:

    These are from a first-gen (i think) LeTour that I bought from a highschool chum in 1979. i rode that bike for 3 years then it got smushed when I chose a poor parking spot for it one day. All the parts I could salvage went onto a Lambert frame which i still have and ride. The bars came off at some point, and in unwrapping them, I remembered my friend had done some personalization before passing the bike on to me:
    "Cool Bike"
    And below that:
    "FAR"
    "OUT"

    A decent set of bars, for those who like rando-bars? Yes. Decidedly clunky? Also yes.

    Another parts update, the BB cups I pulled out of that Redline, once I washed away big gobs of greasy rust, came out almost perfect, and will be re-used. The spindle is a little pitted, but I think still usable (we'll see) the bearings were shot, so I went to the LBS for pair of new ones. My grand total is up to $5.96 right now. I might knock that back to zero if I can get some good donors out of some random frame I've got sitting around. But I did want spend at least a little money on this project.
    Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 02-19-14 at 11:42 AM.
    ● 1971 Grandis Superleggera ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course ● 1972 Peugeot UE-18 Mixte ● 1980 Apollo Prestige fixie ● 1982 Motobecane Jubile Sport ● 1983 Nishiki Landau ● 1984 Peugeot PH10LE ● 1984 Bianchi Limited ● 1985 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Trek 600 ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ● And a Bike to Be Named Later ●

  3. #153
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,847
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by shoota View Post
    That's what I'm saying. I mean I got my '87 Trek 560 with full 105 for $75.
    almost every bike in my collection was acquired for under $100 I just picked up a 90 Fuji with full 105 for $40 the other day. heck around here there's a volunteer-based shop that sells fully refurbished bikes for adults starting at $50. i could see if you're not someplace with a big supply of used bikes that you would need a bigger budget though.
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  4. #154
    Senior Member Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think people may be fixating a bit too much on how often very nice bikes can be had for less than $100. I'm pretty sure that's entirely beside the point. I myself had some luck last summer and bought a 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport in quite literally showroom condition for $95.

    Something like that doesn't belong on a thread like this because it's not a clunker. (Plus I didn't have to do anything to build it, it was already done.) I think the OP intended this thread to be about building a clunker with a $100 maximum budget.
    ● 1971 Grandis Superleggera ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course ● 1972 Peugeot UE-18 Mixte ● 1980 Apollo Prestige fixie ● 1982 Motobecane Jubile Sport ● 1983 Nishiki Landau ● 1984 Peugeot PH10LE ● 1984 Bianchi Limited ● 1985 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Trek 600 ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ● And a Bike to Be Named Later ●

  5. #155
    rhm
    rhm is offline
    multimodal commuter rhm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NJ, NYC, LI
    My Bikes
    1945? Fothergill, 1948 Raleigh Record Ace, 1954 Drysdale, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1972 Fuji Finest, 1983 Trek 720, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
    Posts
    12,203
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman View Post
    I think people may be fixating a bit too much on how often very nice bikes can be had for less than $100. I'm pretty sure that's entirely beside the point. I myself had some luck last summer and bought a 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport in quite literally showroom condition for $95.

    Something like that doesn't belong on a thread like this because it's not a clunker. (Plus I didn't have to do anything to build it, it was already done.) I think the OP intended this thread to be about building a clunker with a $100 maximum budget.
    +1, yeah, that's what I'm saying, what he said.

  6. #156
    Senior Member Daveyates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Paris France
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rhm View Post
    +1, yeah, that's what I'm saying, what he said.
    +1, I've removed my entry and will submit something more clunkerish.

  7. #157
    Unreasonably tall member non-fixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Land of REAL GOUDA Cheese and Tulips
    My Bikes
    all the ones nobody else seems to want ...
    Posts
    2,460
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveyates View Post
    +1, I've removed my entry and will submit something more clunkerish.
    So what's the minimal level of clunkerishism that is needed to start out with / needs to be obtained as a result? I'm getting a little confused now.
    Clunker or not, it's gotta have gears!

  8. #158
    Senior Member trailmix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    My Bikes
    Cannondale:83 ST500, 85 ST500, 85 SR300, 86 SR500, 87 SR400, 87 ST400, 88 ST400x2, 89 ST400, 90 ST400, 90 SM700, 92 M700, 93 T700, 95 F200, 96 M200se, 03 F3000, Peugeot: 88 Montreal Express, Schwinn: 87 Prologue, Trek 94 370
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by non-fixie View Post
    So what's the minimal level of clunkerishism that is needed to start out with / needs to be obtained as a result? I'm getting a little confused now.
    I agree.

  9. #159
    Senior Member Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveyates View Post
    +1, I've removed my entry and will submit something more clunkerish.
    Hmm... I thought yours was a good entry. Sure it's a valuable frame, but in parts, faded paint, chrome stripping off, neglected for years under a tarp in some guys back yard? To my thinking, that's a clunker. A complete, shiny unridden garage queen that maybe needs new tires and squirt of WD-40 on the brake pivots?? That's not a clunker.


    I guess it's time we had our big international dialog on clunkerhood.
    ● 1971 Grandis Superleggera ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course ● 1972 Peugeot UE-18 Mixte ● 1980 Apollo Prestige fixie ● 1982 Motobecane Jubile Sport ● 1983 Nishiki Landau ● 1984 Peugeot PH10LE ● 1984 Bianchi Limited ● 1985 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Trek 600 ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ● And a Bike to Be Named Later ●

  10. #160
    Senior Member Daveyates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Paris France
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm confused as well and that's why i thought my bike wasn't suitable.
    The bike i originally went to buy was 80 euros and in very nice condition and ready to ride.
    So not really a clunker!
    So i thought the frame i picked up was perfect but then had second thoughts about it because of the value.
    Because is a constructeur built French frame with a very rare crankset really a clunker?

    Maybe i don't understand what a clunker is. Isn't it a bike that looks like it couldn't ride down the road let alone 100 kilometers?
    And value wise only worth like 30 dollars.
    Last edited by Daveyates; 02-19-14 at 03:49 PM.

  11. #161
    rhm
    rhm is offline
    multimodal commuter rhm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NJ, NYC, LI
    My Bikes
    1945? Fothergill, 1948 Raleigh Record Ace, 1954 Drysdale, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1972 Fuji Finest, 1983 Trek 720, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
    Posts
    12,203
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I guess we should let Narhay explain. It's his party!

    My own view of the challenge is to take a neglected and ( some might think) useless old dog of a bike, and teach it to hunt again, for under a hundred bucks.

    We all know there are spectacular deals to be had, if you are lucky, or clever, or persistent (all of which are traits I admire very much). We all know it is possible to pick up a very fine, classic, and dare I say: collectable bike for a song. But that's not what this is about. This is about creating something useful on the cheap.

    But as I say, it's not my party. That's just how I read it. OP?

  12. #162
    Unreasonably tall member non-fixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Land of REAL GOUDA Cheese and Tulips
    My Bikes
    all the ones nobody else seems to want ...
    Posts
    2,460
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The way I saw it until now, there are two strategies that might be successful:

    1. The Max Declunkification Strategy
    Buy a cheap bike (the amount of clunkiness earns points, nice finds too) and build it into the nicest possible bike for no more than $100. Riding it for 100 km should be a piece of cake. Money spent and distance travelled between "before" and "after" are the deciding factors. Discussions to be expected about the "Fair Market Value" of the additions from the parts bin / junk pile.

    2. The Ultimate Clunkiness Strategy
    Buy a really horrible clunker and surprise everyone by actually riding it for 100 km. Money spent and perceived effort needed to ride it will be the deciding factors. Discussions to be expected about what ultimately defines a clunker and BB's that may have secretly been lubed or saddles that may have been actually horizontal while riding.

    As far as I can see, Daveyates' entry is legit and could be successful in the first category.
    Last edited by non-fixie; 02-19-14 at 04:35 PM. Reason: typo
    Clunker or not, it's gotta have gears!

  13. #163
    Senior Member Daveyates's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Paris France
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another thing i'm confused about is putting the price on bits from the parts bin.
    Usually i buy a bike cheaply as i need a certain part and then dismantle the bike and put all the bits aside to use later.
    I don't know of any bike co ops around here to get very cheap pieces from.

    So if i have a bike that i paid 30 euros for and use the wheels or derailleurs system for my bike then what would the price be for the bits i use?
    Just part of the 30 euros or secondhand market prices? If the latter then i'm buggered in this challenge lol.

  14. #164
    accidental 3 speed geek yellowbarber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NYC, Virginia, Paris, UK
    My Bikes
    1933 Gibson L-50, prototype Gibson Legends L-00, ca 1900 French Guarneri model, Custom Phil Davidson 2-point mandolin
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Narhay View Post

    Edit: although they are very nice, this game is not to show off your past finds. This is to find and build something new specifically for this purpose.
    Dang. I picked up a mid 50s Raleigh Sports for $10
    I even have plenty of the replacement bits I need, most of which I acquired for free or next to nothing so basically my only other expense would be tubes, tires and a chain.
    But I picked it up about 6 weeks ago, so it doesn't count.
    dang
    we'll see what turns up in the trash as the snow begins to melt here

    TB
    NYC
    "If dogs arenít supposed to eat dental floss out of the trash, why did they make it mint flavored?"
    - Brian Griffin

  15. #165
    Senior Member browngw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Port Dover Ontario Canada
    My Bikes
    1976 SuperCycle Excalibur,1980 Raleigh Record, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2010 Giant Cypress, 2012 Giant Halfway Folder
    Posts
    351
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A suggestion to help with the evaluation of "fair market value".

    When the bike is complete, if you put it up for sale, would you let it go for $100 or less?

    If I'm back from vacation in Myrtle Beach in time, I'm thinking about using a Raleigh "Lenton"that's been littering my shed for a few months. I intended to use a part from it, and then place it in the garden for decoration. It cost me $0, exactly what it is worth!


    We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-

  16. #166
    Still learning oddjob2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North of Canada, Adirondacks, NNJ
    My Bikes
    Too many
    Posts
    4,958
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    If I ride a true clunker where I live, with a black hoodie, the gendarmes would stop & frisk!
    Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving. Albert Einstein
    2014 Additions: 1985 Trek 560, 1992 Trek Multitrack 700 (my 2nd), 1994 Trek Carbon 2200, Peugeot PX-10, 1981 Schwinn Voyager, 1989 Bridgestone RB-1

  17. #167
    Senior Member jish1969's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    My Bikes
    1970 Schwinn Paramount P-15, 1985 Miyata Seven-Ten, 2003 Diamondback Response
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With the new rubber,grips, and hyperglide FW I'm just about done and this bike doesnt feel so klunkerish anymore...$86 so far...

    1984 Schwinn Sierra 001.jpg
    1970 Paramount P-15, 1985 Miyata Seven-Ten, 198? Univega Gran Touring, 1984 ROSS Signature 292S, 2004 Diamondback Response

  18. #168
    Senior Member Narhay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    629
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I meant don't use finds you found some time ago that you have already rehabbed. A bike you've had for a while in as-found condition is ok if you don't want to search for a new bike.

    Quote Originally Posted by yellowbarber View Post
    Dang. I picked up a mid 50s Raleigh Sports for $10
    I even have plenty of the replacement bits I need, most of which I acquired for free or next to nothing so basically my only other expense would be tubes, tires and a chain.
    But I picked it up about 6 weeks ago, so it doesn't count.
    dang
    we'll see what turns up in the trash as the snow begins to melt here

    TB
    NYC

  19. #169
    Senior Member Narhay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    629
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I may may have caused confusion with "clunker". It was using the extra c in the alliteration c&v clunker challenge. You are correct in the types of bikes to be used here. Any bike, be it a $15 colnago super or a $40 scrap pile find are welcome here. The idea is to use a fixed $100 budget to make the nicest (or for fun, the clunkiest) bike you can successfully build with your budget. Some may take this as a challenge to build a nice bike and some may want to have fun with the crappiest, clunkier bike they could possibly ride for 100km.

    I dont want want this to get bogged down by rules. Just have fun and stay true to the original intent as best you can. $100 or less for a bike, 100km ridden and 100 days to do it.

    Quote Originally Posted by non-fixie View Post
    The way I saw it until now, there are two strategies that might be successful:

    1. The Max Declunkification Strategy
    Buy a cheap bike (the amount of clunkiness earns points, nice finds too) and build it into the nicest possible bike for no more than $100. Riding it for 100 km should be a piece of cake. Money spent and distance travelled between "before" and "after" are the deciding factors. Discussions to be expected about the "Fair Market Value" of the additions from the parts bin / junk pile.

    2. The Ultimate Clunkiness Strategy
    Buy a really horrible clunker and surprise everyone by actually riding it for 100 km. Money spent and perceived effort needed to ride it will be the deciding factors. Discussions to be expected about what ultimately defines a clunker and BB's that may have secretly been lubed or saddles that may have been actually horizontal while riding.

    As far as I can see, Daveyates' entry is legit and could be successful in the first category.

  20. #170
    Still learning oddjob2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North of Canada, Adirondacks, NNJ
    My Bikes
    Too many
    Posts
    4,958
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by noglider View Post
    oddjob2, I think you should be disqualified because you declunkified it.
    No bearings for you next December, just a lump of coal!
    Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving. Albert Einstein
    2014 Additions: 1985 Trek 560, 1992 Trek Multitrack 700 (my 2nd), 1994 Trek Carbon 2200, Peugeot PX-10, 1981 Schwinn Voyager, 1989 Bridgestone RB-1

  21. #171
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,847
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Narhay View Post
    Just have fun
    hey hey hey whoa now.. this is starting to sound too complicated!
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  22. #172
    Senior Member Narhay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    629
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A Reading from the Book of Schwinn Varsity, Sprocket 4, Spokes 16 to 20:

    Then did he raise on high the clunker, saying, "Bless this, O Lord, that with it thou mayst sit on thy ass hatchet, in thy mercy." And the people did rejoice and did feast their gaze upon the steel wheels and rust and stem shifters and dry rot and DUI bars and breakfast cereals ... Now did the Lord say, "First thou pullest the Bottom bracket. Then thou must count to three bearings. Three shall be the number of the counting and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither shalt thou count two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the number of the counting of bearings, be reached, then rideth thou the Clunker in the direction of thine clunker competition, who, being cheap in my sight, shall envy it."

    Narhay: Right. One... two... five.
    Frantik: Three, sir.
    Narhay: Three.

    Quote Originally Posted by frantik View Post
    hey hey hey whoa now.. this is starting to sound too complicated!
    Last edited by Narhay; 02-19-14 at 10:25 PM.

  23. #173
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,847
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    a crazy white rabbit bit my tire!!
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  24. #174
    Senior Member Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    My Bikes
    A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
    Posts
    1,338
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Some call me .... Tim.
    ● 1971 Grandis Superleggera ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course ● 1972 Peugeot UE-18 Mixte ● 1980 Apollo Prestige fixie ● 1982 Motobecane Jubile Sport ● 1983 Nishiki Landau ● 1984 Peugeot PH10LE ● 1984 Bianchi Limited ● 1985 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Trek 600 ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Univega Nuovo Sport ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ● And a Bike to Be Named Later ●

  25. #175
    Unreasonably tall member non-fixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Land of REAL GOUDA Cheese and Tulips
    My Bikes
    all the ones nobody else seems to want ...
    Posts
    2,460
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Narhay View Post
    I may may have caused confusion with "clunker". It was using the extra c in the alliteration c&v clunker challenge. You are correct in the types of bikes to be used here. Any bike, be it a $15 colnago super or a $40 scrap pile find are welcome here. The idea is to use a fixed $100 budget to make the nicest (or for fun, the clunkiest) bike you can successfully build with your budget. Some may take this as a challenge to build a nice bike and some may want to have fun with the crappiest, clunkier bike they could possibly ride for 100km.

    I dont want want this to get bogged down by rules. Just have fun and stay true to the original intent as best you can. $100 or less for a bike, 100km ridden and 100 days to do it.
    Thanks for clearing that up. @Daveyates: get your *** back in here!
    Clunker or not, it's gotta have gears!

Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •