Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Two sport-touring bikes - why is one acting noticeably slower?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Two sport-touring bikes - why is one acting noticeably slower?

Old 06-11-14, 09:00 PM
  #1  
bicyclatte!
Thread Starter
 
echo victor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 545
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Two sport-touring bikes - why is one acting noticeably slower?

I've been riding my Raleigh Gran Sport more than anything else recently, but I plan to do some work on it soon, so I got out my Fuji S12-S LTD to ride in case the Gran Sport work takes more than an evening or so. But when I test rode the Fuji, I was struck by how sluggish it felt. It's been a while since I last rode it, but the difference took me completely by surprise. So now I'm trying to figure out what's behind it. I really liked the Fuji, so I'm hoping there's something that I can adjust to make it ride as smoothly as the Raleigh.

To put it in perspective, when riding the Fuji on flats I suddenly felt like it was just sucking up the effort I was putting in... even in a low gear. And even riding downhill it seemed like it was more effort-ful to keep pedaling than it would have been on the Raleigh.

Posts like this can be boring without photos, so here are the bikes in question:


1975 Raleigh Gran Sport
- "third in the Raleigh line, behind the Professional and International, and on par with the Competition" (according to a friend who sold them at the time)
- Reynolds 531 double butted throughout
- 24 1/2 inches
- ~25.5 lbs
- front tire 27 x 1 1/4, Forte Strada
- rear tire 27 x 1 1/8, Continental Sport 1000
- 10 speed, range ~ 33 - 102 gear inches



1982-ish Fuji S12-S LTD (sorry for the crappy pic and the leaves covering the saddle nose)
- second in Fuji's touring line at the time, behind the America
- Fuji 331 double butted cromoly (hi-ten fork)
- 23 inches
- ~27.5 lbs (with currently installed rear rack)
- front tire 27 x 1 1/4, Panaracer Pasela
- rear tire 27 x 1 1/4, Panaracer Pasela Tour Guard
- 18 speed, range ~ 30 - 108+ gear inches

A couple things I'm thinking about and would like input on:

Weight
I really don't think that 2-ish pounds of weight should make a significant difference, but maybe? (I'll be trying it without the rack pretty soon...)

Frame Material
Could the difference between 531 and Fuji's cromoly really be that pronounced?

Tires
I've heard that Paselas were supposed to be pretty supple & quick, but are they possibly this much more sluggish than the Forte/Continental combo? Could the Kevlar TG tire really be that sluggish by itself?

"Planing"
Maybe I've found myself in a Jan-Heine-style Twilight Zone of bicycle physics where one bike simply works with me and another works against me due to a combination of subtle material and geometry differences (or personality)? I do remember describing to someone once that the Raleigh seemed to have the Quality Without A Name....

I'm going to keep experimenting to see if I can resolve this, but I'd really love to hear from the collective wisdom here. Any ideas?

Sincere thanks!
__________________
If someone can pour a Guinness with a cycle instead of a shamrock on top, I'll update my profile pic.
echo victor is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 09:21 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,425

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I am going to guess frame material and geometry. I have a 74' Raleigh Super Tourer and I get that same feeling. I had sworn off 531 bikes as "too flexy". The ride of this bike completely surprised me. It was improved by adding the Compass Tires.

[IMG][/IMG]
fender1 is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 10:21 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Lascauxcaveman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016

Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.

Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times in 355 Posts
I am having this problem with my MIJ 1984 Bianchi Limited. No matter which wheel set I put on it, it feels slow.

It's one of my lighter bikes, just over 23 lbs with my best wheels on it.

Am I allergic to Ishiwata 022?
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●

Lascauxcaveman is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 10:28 PM
  #4  
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,335

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 2,353 Times in 882 Posts
Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
Am I allergic to Ishiwata 022?
thinktubes is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,944

Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX Single Track 2x11

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 610 Post(s)
Liked 558 Times in 423 Posts
Differences: weight; gearing; geometry; stiffness. I would think that each of these could affect the ability to get the power down.


Spit-balling here ... Perhaps eliminating one or more of those aspects could help narrow down things:
  • Geometry -- any differences in your effective top tube length, reach, height of seat off the BB? If significantly different, I'd think it could impact your efficiency.
  • Gearing -- how about testing the same ride routes with the same gearing?
  • Weight -- load up on the lighter bike, to equalize your overall weight, so weight differences aren't the issue.
  • Stiffness -- investigate the tubing, any deficiencies such as cracks or stress weaknesses in areas such as the BB that could impact how the power is delivered.
  • Tires -- does one have a stiffer, stronger center bead for clearly reduced rolling resistance, versus the other type, despite being similar in size and pressures?
  • Possible binding in the wheels/gearing -- remote possibility, probably.
  • Placebo effect -- you knowing you're on the "offending" bike, hence feeling like it's more of a chore than it really is?
Clyde1820 is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 10:57 PM
  #6  
Retro Grouch
 
onespeedbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Tires can make a huge difference; the Panaracer Pasela are hybrid tires, while the Conti/Forte are more on the road side. There is also air pressure and the age/condition of the tires. I would switch the wheels if possible and see if the Fuji is less sluggish with the Raleigh wheels.
onespeedbiker is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 11:21 PM
  #7  
Cyclist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Seattle/Victoria bc
Posts: 600

Bikes: '84 Univega Specialissima, Rawland Stag, '87 Rocky Mountain Blizzard

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Have you ruled out mechanical problems? Obvious, yes, but may be worth checking it out. Just last week my paramount felt extremely slow, and, sure enough, the freehub body had loosened up (never had that problem with a freewheel), which had the same effect as tightening the hub cones. Performed like normal, otherwise, but it just felt slow.
coolkat is offline  
Old 06-11-14, 11:26 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,707
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 903 Post(s)
Liked 524 Times in 318 Posts
I agree swapping the wheels is the most obvious test you can try without much fuss.

I've always loved the ride of my GS and I know others feel the same.

I have no experience with Fuji but that's a nice looking bike. Ride it, be happy, get used to it, then you can be pleasantly surprised by how quick the Raleigh is when you get it back into service.
due ruote is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 01:23 AM
  #9  
WNG
Spin Forest! Spin!
 
WNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Posts: 5,964

Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Tires.
A great set of tires will transform a bike.

Also check the spoke tension of the wheels on the Fuji. A properly tensioned wheel is more responsive and less dead.
WNG is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 04:36 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Michael Angelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hurricane Alley , Florida
Posts: 3,910

Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by WNG
Tires.
A great set of tires will transform a bike.

Also check the spoke tension of the wheels on the Fuji. A properly tensioned wheel is more responsive and less dead.
+1
Michael Angelo is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 04:59 AM
  #11  
Still learning
 
oddjob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North of Canada, Adirondacks
Posts: 11,620

Bikes: Still a garage full

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 847 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 44 Posts
I'd whip out your computer or Strava to see if there is a real performance difference. Weather can be a factor too.
oddjob2 is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:12 AM
  #12  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,640

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2597 Post(s)
Liked 1,678 Times in 926 Posts
I would guess tires or wheels.

I have a Trek 400 Elance- it's a beautiful bike, I think it's the prettiest bike I own. For whatever reason, riding it was a neutral experience. I didn't dislike it, but I didn't like it. I changed wheels (actually went from 700c x32 to 27 x 1 1/8) and I found I really liked the ride much better. Whether it was the better hubs, a larger wheel, more or less air volume, different freewheel... I don't know. It was a pronounced difference in the way the bike rode.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:15 AM
  #13  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,407 Times in 908 Posts
I have a Trek 400 Elance- it's a beautiful bike, I think it's the prettiest bike I own. For whatever reason, riding it was a neutral experience. I didn't dislike it, but I didn't like it. I changed wheels (actually went from 700c x32 to 27 x 1 1/8) and I found I really liked the ride much better. Whether it was the better hubs, a larger wheel, more or less air volume, different freewheel... I don't know. It was a pronounced difference in the way the bike rode.
He is right. I had the same bike, a 751 Elance 400, and with a great set of hand-built wheels, it rivaled anything I had.

Weight makes very little difference, about 36 seconds for 5 lbs over a 71-minute ride (per Cervelo's tests).

So, if you rule out weight (which I generally do), you come down to, IMO, these factors, in order:
1-geometry/riding position - the same "fit" on different geometry can still make muscle groups work differently.
2-wheelset-a properly trued and tensioned set of wheels can make a bike ride "like new."
3-tires - some just seem to suck the power; I don't know why. Easily tested with high PSI, though.

There's also the "package" effect. Just like some bikes come together like a cloud with wheels, some come together like a stubborn mule.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:18 AM
  #14  
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,006

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
EV - you never mention whether you've serviced the hubs on the Fuji's wheels. Why not? What about the bottom bracket bearings?

Have you done a coasting from stop test with both bikes down the same incline? Calibrated the odometers accurately?

I have bikes that give the sensation of riding faster, but in reality, the time differences over the same course are negligible.

Check the hub and crank bearings on the Fuji.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:23 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Duane Behrens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota and Southern California
Posts: 628

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac (carbon), Specialized Roubaix (carbon, wifey), Raleigh Super Course (my favorite), and 2 Centurion project bikes.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Because you don't mention when you last cleaned and packed your bearings - front wheel, rear wheel, bottom bracket and head set - I'm going to hazard a guess that it may be time to service your bearings. Doing so can REALLY improve - that is, lessen - rolling resistance. Good luck. Beautiful bikes, by the way. DB
Duane Behrens is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:28 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
daf1009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 3,178

Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by oddjob2
I'd whip out your computer or Strava to see if there is a real performance difference. Weather can be a factor too.
+10

Agreed...when I first rode my Team Miyata and RB-1...it totally felt like the RB-1 was slower, but more plush. While the plushness was true, the slowness was not. I rode them 5 miles over the exact same course...and the times came out to be within about 15 seconds of one another...with the RB-1 being 15 seconds faster! But, boy, it FELT slower.
daf1009 is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 05:47 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Chrome Molly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Forksbent, MN
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 301 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Tires
Chrome Molly is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 06:03 AM
  #18  
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,335

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 2,353 Times in 882 Posts
Tires are a good place to start.

As mentioned, frame flex can have a big effect on preceived speed. I had a titanium litespeed which fit great and was super-comfy, but felt like a total slug the second I quit pedaling. Tried a number of wheel tire combos before reluctantly selling it.
thinktubes is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 06:06 AM
  #19  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,153
Mentioned: 200 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 3,704 Times in 1,392 Posts
As oddjob indicated, was it actually sluggish or was it in your head?

What about wind, what you ate, how much riding beforehand, road conditions, your bowel movement.

99% of the time it is the engine.
iab is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 06:24 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,706
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Duane Behrens
Because you don't mention when you last cleaned and packed your bearings - front wheel, rear wheel, bottom bracket and head set - I'm going to hazard a guess that it may be time to service your bearings. Doing so can REALLY improve - that is, lessen - rolling resistance. Good luck. Beautiful bikes, by the way. DB
Seems to me a looser WB with less grease would have less rolling resistance. Less longevity, also , but less rolling resistance nonetheless.


OP, Nice GS !
Fred Smedley is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 06:31 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
auchencrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,327
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times in 31 Posts
What @iab said about the Engine.

Next:
  • Tires
  • Wheels
  • Gearing
  • Stiffness
  • Trail
  • Saddle
__________________
- Auchen
auchencrow is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 06:52 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Paramount1973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168

Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Tire pressure can make a big difference. Overinflation can be as bad as underinflation.
Paramount1973 is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 08:00 AM
  #23  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,570

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 957 Times in 624 Posts
+1,385,421 Until you have serviced anything, who knows? BB bearings and grease, wheel hubs, freewheel, chain, etc. I just finished a typical bike that the PO said was ready to ride. . Naturally, I tore it down to the bare frame. As we were tearing it down to the frame. Crank turned OK, not great. With the crank off, you could not turn the BB spindle. Opened it up, grease had turned into a sticky, gummy mess. Wheel bearings and HS were the same way. Ditto chain.

This is the norm on older bikes.

IF recently FULLY serviced, then you have the entire question on wheels, tires, inflation, etc.

Beyond that, one might fit you just a little better than the other.

I typically ride for exercise, so when one bike is less efficient, I just figure I am getting more exercise. I treat it as a benefit!
wrk101 is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 08:14 AM
  #24  
What??? Only 2 wheels?
 
jimmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,452

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times in 232 Posts
Good question and I'd really like to know the answers with more certainty. I'm with the camps that say (1) perception doesn't always agree with reality; (2) tires and wheels make a big difference; (3) the engine varies from day to day; (4) weather matters.

All that being said, here are my takes. First, those are curious tire choices. The rear on the Fuji is both wider and TG-belted compared to the Raleigh. Both those features make it heavier. Some here argue that width doesn't matter, but width adds weight and weight does matter. Every time you slow and re-accelerate you feel the weight and you take a bit longer to get back up to speed. Some also argue that tire pressure can be too high, which I disagree with but nobody listens to me. Turn your handlebar with the bike stationary and the pressure high, then drop the pressure and repeat. You'll feel the increase in lateral resistance. I would think that matters in a corner, but maybe others disagree. Experiments supposedly say that rolling resistance on a real road can increase with pressure, but I question whether that conclusion applies just to straight ahead rolling and certain road surfaces. I rarely ride in a straight line or at a constant speed, so these factors would seem to matter to me. Anyway, why not go with 28mm (1 1/8") or even 25mm for both wheels, and if you want TG protection then why not both wheels? Something to consider the next time you have to invest in tires.

I have one bike which always feels sluggish, even when it wore decent tires and lighter rims. I don't know if it really is sluggish or just feels that way. Still, feel matters, but since I'm not racing a clock the actual speed doesn't. Since the bike its redeeming qualities I still ride it sometimes. I have two bikes which feel very fast and I believe they are. They certainly feel effortless to ride even if they aren't faster. I suspect geometry and wheels/tires are the key factors.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Old 06-12-14, 09:11 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
dailycommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: RiverRoad, ME
Posts: 798
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Repacking bb/hubs + adjusting properly + favorite tire (rubino pro 3 is mine) = much improved rolling on any bicycle, esp old steel.
dailycommute is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.