Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-14, 11:56 AM   #1
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Is there any way to differentiate Tange forks?

Is there a way to tell the difference between a Tange chrome-moly and a Tange mangalloy fork?

I've recently acquired a cannondale touring frame/fork, and, from the serial number code, I can see it was made in 1984, meaning it's either an '84 or '85 model. I'm trying to figure out (from curiosity, it doesn't really matter) the model number. If it's an 84, it is either an ST-500 or an ST-300 (which as I'm reading the catalog was identical, but just the frameset). If it's an 85, it's either an ST-400 or an ST-500, which only differed in fork and components mounted (which doesn't affect me as I only have frame/fork).

The frame is red of some hue or other and both were offered in red (ST-400 was fire engine red, but it all looks red to me). The only markings on the fork itself that I can see is where it says Tange 4F, Made in Japan.

The person I bought it from called it an '84 ST-400, but I can't see that they sold an ST-400 in 1984, but it could be a frame they made in 1984, but was a 1985 model. Or he misspoke and it's an ST-500.

In the end, it doesn't really matter, I'm just curious. Either way, it's a nice-looking frame that I hope to build into a decent rider for my wife. It won't be taken out on any tours, so the fact that it's going to have caliper brakes rather than cantilevers won't matter (and, in fact, should make the switch to 700c wheels easier).
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 12:46 PM   #2
gaucho777
Senior Member
 
gaucho777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Bikes: '72 Cilo Pacer • '72 Peugeot PX10 • '73 Speedwell Ti • '74 Nishiki Competition • '74 Peugeot UE-8 • '86 Look Equipe 753 • '86 Look KG86 • '89 Parkpre Team Road • '90 Parkpre Team MTB • '90 Merlin
Posts: 5,444
Not sure if this will help in this case, but there is a great Tange catalog (though from '88) on velobase. Toward the end there are lots of detailed photos & specs for different Tange forks.

http://velobase.com/CatalogScans/Tange_1988.pdf
gaucho777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 01:06 PM   #3
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Thanks, didn't see a any fork crown that was quite right. I'd been hoping for something easy like learning that mangalloy wasn't magnetic or the steerers were *****d or something. Since my wife's not a vintage person who cares, I guess I'll just not worry about it.
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 01:39 PM   #4
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,244
In general, the higher-end forks will have investment cast crowns and forged fork ends. Look for a weld seam on the bottom of the crown; if you find one it's not investment cast. Forged fork ends tend to be thicker than stamped ones, and usually have a manufacturer name stamped on the face. Post some pictures of the bottom of the crown and the fork ends if you're unsure. Here's the fork page from an early 80s Tange catalog:

JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 02:03 PM   #5
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Well the sloped fork crown lug does appear to have a seam on the underside or at least a bump on both sides (pretty well hidden by the paint) where as seam would be - probably 1/8" wide. On the other hand the dropouts appear forged (Tange TL is stamped on them). It is a touring fork though, so maybe all touring fork dropouts are forged so that the eyelets can handle the weight of a loaded front rack?
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 02:15 PM   #6
U5512
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 42
I don't have an answer for you, but I have an '87 / '88 model year SR500 (which I am currently restoring) that has Tange 7.G and Made in Japan engraved on the steerer. According to vintage Cannondale Catalogs, my '87/'88 SR500 has Tange mangalloy fork.

U5512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 07:25 PM   #7
xuwol7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 431
I have 2 Peugeot bikes with Tange 2001 Magnaloy forks and frame and I find them to be very durable and bullet proof.
I believe it to be Chrome Moly 4130.
They ride like a dream and make excellent touring bikes.

They are a vintage Canyon Express and Urban Express and would never sell them
xuwol7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 08:20 AM   #8
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by xuwol7 View Post
I have 2 Peugeot bikes with Tange 2001 Magnaloy forks and frame and I find them to be very durable and bullet proof. I believe it to be Chrome Moly 4130.
No, "Champion" was Tange's chrome-moly tubing; "Mangaloy" was a Manganese-Molybdenum alloy similar to Reynolds 531.
JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 08:29 AM   #9
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Hmm, that sounds a lot nicer than I'd thought. I was figuring it'd be more like HiTen given the seamed fork crowns.
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 09:54 AM   #10
kc0yef
Senior Member
 
kc0yef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Olympia WA
Bikes: Bill Stevenson Kawai, 1973 Paramount, Voyageur SP, Nishiki; KOKUSAI & Competition, Bridgestone; RBT RB-T & Kabuki Submariner, Mercian; Campionissimo, TriA, Superlight, , Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Gitane TDF
Posts: 1,098
I have a Tange that has Reynolds fork legs and Tange Steering tube
kc0yef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 11:09 AM   #11
miamijim
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Bikes:
Posts: 13,163
I believe the cro-mo steerers are stamped as such.
__________________
WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 1984 Schwinn Paramount; 1987 Schwinn Paramount; 1975 Tom Ritchey, 198X Vitus
miamijim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 11:24 AM   #12
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by kc0yef View Post
I have a Tange that has Reynolds fork legs and Tange Steering tube
Yes, Tange was completely willing to build forks to customer's specs. It's likely that your steer tube is also Reynolds; Tange stamped all the forks they built regardless of whose tubing was used to make them.
JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 11:54 AM   #13
kc0yef
Senior Member
 
kc0yef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Olympia WA
Bikes: Bill Stevenson Kawai, 1973 Paramount, Voyageur SP, Nishiki; KOKUSAI & Competition, Bridgestone; RBT RB-T & Kabuki Submariner, Mercian; Campionissimo, TriA, Superlight, , Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Gitane TDF
Posts: 1,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
Yes, Tange was completely willing to build forks to customer's specs. It's likely that your steer tube is also Reynolds; Tange stamped all the forks they built regardless of whose tubing was used to make them.
Ough.. now I am going to have to look and see if there is reynolds stamped somewhere on that fork it came without a frame but it had a 250mm steering tube so I snapped that one up at recycled cycles in Seattle for My 64cm KHS TRI-A
kc0yef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 12:29 PM   #14
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
I haven't seen a Reynolds stamp anywhere on the fork, but it might be there somewhere under the paint. I didn't notice the stamping on the dropouts until Mr. Thompson told me to look for it.

I have another, probably stupid, but kind of related question to my original about using the type of fork to identify my frame. How do I know whether I need nutted or recessed brakes? I've only ever worked with cantilevers before (with the exception of one bike that does have recessed dual caliper brakes). The frame (a cannondale ST400 or ST500 from 1984 or 1985) either came with "New Shimano 600 EX regular reach", "Modolo Flash regular reach", or "New Grand Compe side pull" brakes depending on the exact year/model according to the catalog. Are those all obviously one or the other, or could those be either from that time frame?

Does the fact that there isn't a flat face on the rear brake bridge and the fork crown is a bit rounded unlike the example in U5512's picture mean I need nutted brakes?
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 12:48 PM   #15
miamijim
Senior Member
 
miamijim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Bikes:
Posts: 13,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by himespau View Post
How do I know whether I need nutted or recessed brakes? I've only ever worked with cantilevers before (with the exception of one bike that does have recessed dual caliper brakes). The frame (a cannondale ST400 or ST500 from 1984 or 1985) either came with "New Shimano 600 EX regular reach", "Modolo Flash regular reach", or "New Grand Compe side pull" brakes depending on the exact year/model according to the catalog. Are those all obviously one or the other, or could those be either from that time frame?

Does the fact that there isn't a flat face on the rear brake bridge and the fork crown is a bit rounded unlike the example in U5512's picture mean I need nutted brakes?
The mounting hole for nutted brakes will be the same ID on both sides of the bridge/crown. For recessed brakes the hole on the wrench side will have larger ID and will be countersunk.

Forks can be either or regardless of the crown being flat or rounded. Rear bridges are more than likely nutted if it's a rounded bridge but could be either or if it's a flat sided bridge.
__________________
WWW.CYCLESPEUGEOT.COM 1984 Schwinn Paramount; 1987 Schwinn Paramount; 1975 Tom Ritchey, 198X Vitus
miamijim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 03:37 PM   #16
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by himespau View Post
Does the fact that there isn't a flat face on the rear brake bridge and the fork crown is a bit rounded unlike the example in U5512's picture mean I need nutted brakes?
Post some pictures and we'll likely be able to figure it out.
JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 05:24 PM   #17
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
I didn't have my calipers with me at the time, but my tape measure (not the most accurate) made it look like they were 6mm holes on all sides and the scuffing on the rear brake bridge looked more like a convex washer than the bite of a round washer that I have on my bike that has the recessed nut. If I remember to take a camera in to where I have my frame/fork, I will take some pictures. Thank you.

If they're nutted, I have some Dia Compe 610 centerpulls with new Kool Stop Continental Salmon pads that should fit that I took off the frame that I was originally going to use for this build. Are those good enough stopping power, or should I look for some nutted Tektro R559s? I need ~63 mm reach in my brakes.

Last edited by himespau; 07-10-14 at 05:31 PM.
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-14, 08:43 PM   #18
onespeedbiker
Retro Grouch
 
onespeedbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Bikes: Yes
Posts: 2,210
The 1985 STs came with "low rider" rack bosses on the fork about 1/3 up from the dropouts; the 84 did not. I would also say that there is a big difference between red and Fire Engine red; I had a Fire engine red 1985 SR900 and it was truly the color of a red Fire Engine.. The catalog also decribed the 85 ST500 as having Tange Chromoly with Fully Sloping Crown and came in Fire engine Red; and the 85 ST400 having a Tange mangally (fork) with "low rider bosses" (I believe the 85 ST500 also had the "low rider bosses" and came in regular Red, but Fully Sloping Crown may have been unique to the the ST500. The 1984 catalog only spec'd the ST300 with Tange 124B, Chromoly with Fully Sloping Crown and came in regular red; it's unknown if the 84 ST500 came in a different color or not. Between the "low rider" rack bosses and difference in reds, you should be able to figure out what fork you have..

Last edited by onespeedbiker; 07-11-14 at 01:19 AM.
onespeedbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 04:39 AM   #19
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Huh, I hadn't noticed the lack of bosses on the 1984 or the ST500. I guess 1985 ST400 it is because my fork has them.
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 08:39 AM   #20
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamijim View Post
The mounting hole for nutted brakes will be the same ID on both sides of the bridge/crown. For recessed brakes the hole on the wrench side will have larger ID and will be countersunk.

Forks can be either or regardless of the crown being flat or rounded. Rear bridges are more than likely nutted if it's a rounded bridge but could be either or if it's a flat sided bridge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
Post some pictures and we'll likely be able to figure it out.
So the holes appear to be the same size front and rear. Best as I could measure it with my calipers the rear brake bridge hole on both sides was 6 mm. The holes on the fork crown both appeared to be 6.4 mm.

Some pictures:





That makes it sound as though I need nutted brakes, right? Originally, I was going to build a bike up for my wife on a different frame, but that turned out to be too small, so I bought this frame for her instead. I'd hoped to move all the parts over (except headset - that's JIS, this appears to be ISO - and seatpost) and do it on the cheap. I had thought the centerpull might work as I need 63 mm reach and the one I'd measured was 60-75 mm and nutted, but it turns out the catalog for that bike (a 1980 Fuji Gran Tourer SE mixte) says that the bike came with Dia Compe 610 brakes, so I'm guessing it actually came with 610 and 750 brakes and I only measured the rear. I'll have to measure them both tonight to make sure. If I'm lucky and they're both 750s, I'll just need cable stops. If one is a 610, I'll either need to get another 750 and some cable stops or a set of tektro R559 calipers which might be better anyway (though not cheaper than using what I have).

Last edited by himespau; 07-11-14 at 08:47 AM.
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 08:48 AM   #21
himespau 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Bikes:
Posts: 9,350
That color seems true to me. Is that Fire Engine or regular red?
himespau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 09:13 AM   #22
kc0yef
Senior Member
 
kc0yef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Olympia WA
Bikes: Bill Stevenson Kawai, 1973 Paramount, Voyageur SP, Nishiki; KOKUSAI & Competition, Bridgestone; RBT RB-T & Kabuki Submariner, Mercian; Campionissimo, TriA, Superlight, , Fuji Touring Series IV, 1969 Gitane TDF
Posts: 1,098
Sand Cast & Investment Cast Strongest
3D printed (not sure where these fit yet)
Forged
Stamped weakest

More about Fork crowns with pictures...
The Retrogrouch: Lovely Fork Crowns
kc0yef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 09:27 AM   #23
WNG
Spin Forest! Spin!
 
WNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arrid Zone-a
Bikes: I used to have many. And I Will again.
Posts: 5,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
No, "Champion" was Tange's chrome-moly tubing; "Mangaloy" was a Manganese-Molybdenum alloy similar to Reynolds 531.
Interesting! From the stuff I've read, I was under the impression Tange Mangaloy tubing was a cheaper grade offering than their Cro-moly line. And it was alloyed with Manganese only, no molybdenum like 531. A step up from hi-ten, but heavier than cro-moly tubing.

But since you're a frame builder, you must have had access to tubeset specs from the factory and know every little detail!
WNG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-14, 04:15 PM   #24
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by himespau View Post
That makes it sound as though I need nutted brakes, right?
Yes, it looks that way. Tektro makes some still.
JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-15, 11:26 AM   #25
elfoam
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by WNG View Post
Interesting! From the stuff I've read, I was under the impression Tange Mangaloy tubing was a cheaper grade offering than their Cro-moly line. And it was alloyed with Manganese only, no molybdenum like 531. A step up from hi-ten, but heavier than cro-moly tubing.

But since you're a frame builder, you must have had access to tubeset specs from the factory and know every little detail!
The magnaloy frames weigh the same as Tange infinity (2300g). Its supposably very similar to 531 but thicker/stronger, bit heavier too (300grams). I like to grab the magnaloy frames because its a very underrated steel and you often find them cheap. Its definitely lighter and harder than your typical 4130 frame. 26.6m seat post.
elfoam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.