Raleigh Technium line
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raleigh Technium line
There are two Raleigh Techniums available in my area, one is a Pre that is black with white lettering and small red stripes, the other is a Tri-Lite that is red white and black. From what I gathered on the net they sound interesting, aluminum and steel frames. I was wondering if they are nice bikes and which is higher up on the line up? I haven't been able to locate a lineup for the Technium line, or a lineup for Raleigh in general for that time period.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
There were actually five Technium Tri-Lite models: the Tinley, Prestige, Pro 105, Comp and Pre.
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
It depends on the year. The black and red bicycle appears to be a 1987-1988 Tri-Lite Pre. The black bicycle with the thin red stripes appears to be a 1989 Pre. I believe they had dropped the Tri-Lite designation by then. It was definitely gone by 1990 when they reverted to more tragityional Raleigh model names. When the Technium road models first appeared in 1986 they used 4xx model numbers.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Where did the Technium Pre rank in the Raleigh line?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
I have an '89 PRE (black with silver lettering and raspberry stripes). I love it. Very responsive, light, and amazingly comfortable with the Tange steel stays and forks. The Suntour Accushift has never let me down. It's my main ride this summer.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Now that I look at it it does have silver letters. I guess it is the same bike as you have.
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
A Pro came up on CL in Asheville NC, and I emailed a friend's son within minutes of the ad appearing. He went over there about an hour after the listing came up and he was the 3rd guy to show. 1st guy stole it for $250. Doubt if the seller could have sold it any faster.
I had a 440 and liked it fine. I assumed the Pro would be a really good bike; obviously 2 others did, as well....
I had a 440 and liked it fine. I assumed the Pro would be a really good bike; obviously 2 others did, as well....
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
There is another big PRE rider here, hope he pops in. He told me that the PRE and PRO share the same frame. I cant prove that as there isnt a lot of easily obtained info on these bikes. I havent found any rider/owners that didnt enjoy the PRE. I paid 100.00 for mine last year, it was pristine except for tires/tape/cables and only had a few small nicks in the paint. I swapped parts on mine that give it a black-out theme.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Raleigh's strategy with the Technium frames appears to have changed over the years. In 1986, all three 4xx raod bicycles appeared to share identical frames (both geometry and material), differing only in the component mix. Later models shared the same geometry but not materials. By 1991 frames were differing in both geometry and material.
It's quite possible that a 1989 Pre and Pro105 had the exact same frame, given that they were adjacent in the hierarchy. Based on a couple 1989 specs that I have, it's appears that all the 1989 Technium models shared the same geometry but there were definite material differences between some models. Still, it's unlikely that Raleigh used completely different materials for every Technium model.
A 1989 Pre would be a lower mid-range model, however there were several Raleigh models below it, including another Technium. My reservation with the Pre is the Accushift. It did does not perform as well as Shimano SIS. Also, since it is obselete and incompatible with SIS, replacement parts are becoming increasingly harder and more expensive to obtain.
It's quite possible that a 1989 Pre and Pro105 had the exact same frame, given that they were adjacent in the hierarchy. Based on a couple 1989 specs that I have, it's appears that all the 1989 Technium models shared the same geometry but there were definite material differences between some models. Still, it's unlikely that Raleigh used completely different materials for every Technium model.
A 1989 Pre would be a lower mid-range model, however there were several Raleigh models below it, including another Technium. My reservation with the Pre is the Accushift. It did does not perform as well as Shimano SIS. Also, since it is obselete and incompatible with SIS, replacement parts are becoming increasingly harder and more expensive to obtain.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Raleigh tri-light with the tri color Teel/gray/Yellow. I've been told it's a Scott Tinley but does not say Scott Tinley on it anywhere. does the color identify this as a tinley or where there other tri - lights with these colors. I also have a Technium M/B but my kid has it at his now.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,940
Bikes: 1986 Raleigh Competition (Restored to Original), 1986 Cannonade SR400 (Updated to Dura Ace 7800)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a Raleigh tri-light with the tri color Teel/gray/Yellow. I've been told it's a Scott Tinley but does not say Scott Tinley on it anywhere. does the color identify this as a tinley or where there other tri - lights with these colors. I also have a Technium M/B but my kid has it at his now.
Last edited by TampaRaleigh; 07-03-13 at 10:03 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,940
Bikes: 1986 Raleigh Competition (Restored to Original), 1986 Cannonade SR400 (Updated to Dura Ace 7800)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a Raleigh tri-light with the tri color Teel/gray/Yellow. I've been told it's a Scott Tinley but does not say Scott Tinley on it anywhere. does the color identify this as a tinley or where there other tri - lights with these colors. I also have a Technium M/B but my kid has it at his now.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
On the PRE the rear brake enters the TT on the left side. At some point they thought a change was needed.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,337
Bikes: 1962 Carlton Franco-Suisse Custom,1968 Raleigh DL-1/Tourist, 1971 Holdsworth Professional, 1973 Holdsworth Mistral,1973 Raleigh Gran Sport,1974 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1993 Trek 2200 Composite, 2011 Trek 7.3FX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
my brother just scored a raliegh technium pro, all 105 for 150,
the ad said that the guy really needed to sell the bike, it was up for weeks at 175, then in the course of 3 days it went 150-125-100, then on the 4th day it shot back up to 175 sayin that he didn't need to sell it anymore..
my bro talked him down to 150.. .a steal in my mind
i offered the guy 125 for it when he had it listed for 175, and he declined.... weird.. .the bike is in ok shape, the steal stays are rusted in spots and it looks like it was painted over
rides great and very quick, my bro was super excited to bring it home, he had me fix it up too, new cables, long cage 105 derailluer, new chain, new hyperglide cassette with 34t big ring... he wants to do some riding with his baby bro now... my disease has spread
the ad said that the guy really needed to sell the bike, it was up for weeks at 175, then in the course of 3 days it went 150-125-100, then on the 4th day it shot back up to 175 sayin that he didn't need to sell it anymore..
my bro talked him down to 150.. .a steal in my mind
i offered the guy 125 for it when he had it listed for 175, and he declined.... weird.. .the bike is in ok shape, the steal stays are rusted in spots and it looks like it was painted over
rides great and very quick, my bro was super excited to bring it home, he had me fix it up too, new cables, long cage 105 derailluer, new chain, new hyperglide cassette with 34t big ring... he wants to do some riding with his baby bro now... my disease has spread
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Weehawken, NJ
Posts: 32
Bikes: Windsor Wellington 3.0, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raleigh's strategy with the Technium frames appears to have changed over the years. In 1986, all three 4xx raod bicycles appeared to share identical frames (both geometry and material), differing only in the component mix. Later models shared the same geometry but not materials. By 1991 frames were differing in both geometry and material.
It's quite possible that a 1989 Pre and Pro105 had the exact same frame, given that they were adjacent in the hierarchy. Based on a couple 1989 specs that I have, it's appears that all the 1989 Technium models shared the same geometry but there were definite material differences between some models. Still, it's unlikely that Raleigh used completely different materials for every Technium model.
A 1989 Pre would be a lower mid-range model, however there were several Raleigh models below it, including another Technium. My reservation with the Pre is the Accushift. It did does not perform as well as Shimano SIS. Also, since it is obselete and incompatible with SIS, replacement parts are becoming increasingly harder and more expensive to obtain.
It's quite possible that a 1989 Pre and Pro105 had the exact same frame, given that they were adjacent in the hierarchy. Based on a couple 1989 specs that I have, it's appears that all the 1989 Technium models shared the same geometry but there were definite material differences between some models. Still, it's unlikely that Raleigh used completely different materials for every Technium model.
A 1989 Pre would be a lower mid-range model, however there were several Raleigh models below it, including another Technium. My reservation with the Pre is the Accushift. It did does not perform as well as Shimano SIS. Also, since it is obselete and incompatible with SIS, replacement parts are becoming increasingly harder and more expensive to obtain.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
As recomended above, the Shimano swap would be a lot nicer though for the time being the accushift will do a decent job. To swap you would have to find a compatible freewheel and I would suggest a shimano 600 RD or better. The 600 did excellent duty on C-Dales for years of quick, smooth shifting.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks Tampa,
Yes that is it, What model whould you call this bike. changing the drive train to Shimano is a good idea, I have a new rear wheel and have shimano free wheel now and only can shift with friction shifters now, ive lost idexting
Yes that is it, What model whould you call this bike. changing the drive train to Shimano is a good idea, I have a new rear wheel and have shimano free wheel now and only can shift with friction shifters now, ive lost idexting
#23
Hogosha Sekai
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,669
Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts