Why a Stainless Frame?
#1
Get off my lawn!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031
Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times
in
48 Posts
Why a Stainless Frame?
Just curios what the commotion is about SS Frame sets, the excitement over the Schwinn announcement has got me thinking. I've been riding long enough to remember: Cro-Mo, then Alum, then back to Cro-Mo, Carborn Fiber, back to Cro-Mo again, Ti and now SS. I'm ignoring wood, plastic, bamboo and yes even wire frames as the fads and experiments they where/are.
So why SS.....is it a fad or what?
So why SS.....is it a fad or what?
Last edited by Velognome; 09-05-14 at 02:51 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Stainless Steel - in Reynolds 953 or 921 - its main advantage is that it will NEVER rust! No coat of paint is needed and the beautiful naked steel is half the pleasure of owning the bike. Plus, the lighter weight is also worth the price.
See the Waterford thread on C&V for a more through discussion.
See the Waterford thread on C&V for a more through discussion.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,845
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
ask scooper
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#5
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
Isn't SS made via some sort of electro chemical reaction?
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#6
incazzare.
Because it looks nice? I like it when things look nice.
__________________
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
1964 JRJ (Bob Jackson), 1973 Wes Mason, 1974 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1986 Schwinn High Sierra, 2000ish Colian (Colin Laing), 2011 Dick Chafe, 2013 Velo Orange Pass Hunter
#7
Senior Member
Stainless Steel - in Reynolds 953 or 921 - its main advantage is that it will NEVER rust! No coat of paint is needed and the beautiful naked steel is half the pleasure of owning the bike. Plus, the lighter weight is also worth the price.
See the Waterford thread on C&V for a more through discussion.
See the Waterford thread on C&V for a more through discussion.
KVA is another player in the stainless market. Their tubes definitely come in at a lighter weight than standard chromoly and are nicely finished.
#8
Get off my lawn!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,031
Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times
in
48 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,597
Bikes: Too many 3-speeds, Jones Plus LWB
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
119 Posts
Stainless is harder than regular steel, including 531 so you can make the walls thinner and therefore lighter. This comes at a price- IME stainless is often more brittle. It is certainly harder to work as anyone who has tried to drill it knows.
A frame made with stainless weighs about the same as TI, but should be less whippy. I hear stainless rides just like good 531 steel, but simply weighs less. I should know soon- just got a stainless frame. Its really pretty... but I'm still building it up.
A frame made with stainless weighs about the same as TI, but should be less whippy. I hear stainless rides just like good 531 steel, but simply weighs less. I should know soon- just got a stainless frame. Its really pretty... but I'm still building it up.
#10
Senior Member
Old news:
Crescent rostfria
Crescent rostfria
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,989
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
No, stainless steels are created from a variety of different alloying elements, so they are different at the metallurgical level from conventional steels. And different varieties of SS have different resistance to corrosion, some are partially magnetic and some essential non-magnetic, some are heat-treatable, and some aren't, and so on.
#12
Senior Member
Regardless of the chemical composition, polished SS looks great. Chromoly that's treated with Framesaver or a similar product on the inside and a good paintjob on the outside will last as long as a stainless bike but if you like bling, there's only one choice.
#13
Decrepit Member
Against my better judgment, I'm going to venture down the rabbit hole. I'm not a pitch man for stainless, but I am an unabashed fan. Are stainless frames a fad? Perhaps, but the fact that in seven years five different stainless tubesets have been developed and are in production by three separate tubing manufacturers, and after a somewhat tepid start in 2005-2007 with a few adventurous framebuilders experiencing great success building stainless steel frames many more have hopped on the bandwagon suggest it isn’t a fad.
Why stainless frame?
1) It's steel, and there are lots of cyclists who still prefer the resilient ride and “bend, not break” failure mode of a steel frame.
2) Reynolds 953, one of the stainless tubesets, has the highest ultimate tensile strength (1750 - 2050 MPa) and yield strength (1500 - 1900 MPa) of any steel alloy commonly used for bicycle frames. 1500 MPa yield strength is approximately twice the yield strength of cold-worked, stress-relieved 3-2.5 titanium. This high strength means that the tubes can be drawn with thinner walls than tubes with lower UTS and YS, making the frames lighter. As with non-stainless steels, flexy frames resulting from the thin walled tubing can be made stiffer by increasing the tube diameter using OS or double OS tubing. With a hardness of 44 HRc, in spite of wall thickness as thin as 0.3mm, the tubes are very impact resistant yet with an elongation of 14% has similar ductility to other steel alloys that are substantially softer. The assertion that harder means brittle isn’t true. Elongation is the property used to describe a material's range from brittle on one end of the scale (low elongation) to ductile on the other end (high elongation). For example, carbon fiber reinforced polymer has elongation of around 1% to 3% and is brittle. Plain carbon steels, chromoly steels, and the stainless steels all in the condition ready to be used in bicycle frames have elongation in the 10% to 15% range, which is pretty ductile.
For anyone who missed it, here are the properties of the five currently available stainless tubesets. It is worth noting that, in spite of the 44 HRc hardness of 953, Reynolds ovalized 953 round tubes to 70% of its original diameter without any sign of microscopic cracking as a test of ductility.
3) All of these stainless alloys with high chromium content are corrosion resistant. As Reynolds puts it with typical British understatement, "Under some conditions, e.g. sulfuric acid or prolonged submersion in sea water, 953 will show signs of pitting and corrosion. We assume these are not normal conditions for a bike frame." Even in a humid salt air environment and riding frequently in rainy weather, it's unlikely you'll ever see rust. A polished, unpainted surface has the appearance of having been chrome plated; you never have to worry about paint getting scratched and having an exposed steel surface rusting.
4) Like many non-stainless air-hardening steels, the stainless tubesets are suitable for brazed lugged, fillet brazed, and TIG welded construction.
All five of the currently available stainless tubesets can make light, stiff, corrosion resistant frames.
In summary, a stainless frame provides all the qualities of steel plus the lower maintenance and some would say attractiveness of a bare polished finish. Is it worth the premium over a high-end non-stainless painted steel frame? After seven years riding my Waterford it is to me, but to lots of folks probably not.
EDIT - Is stainless harder to work with and harder on machining tools? 953 certainly is, but a number of builders who have worked with both 953 and KVA MS2 and MS3 say the KVA tubes are much easier to work with.
Why stainless frame?
1) It's steel, and there are lots of cyclists who still prefer the resilient ride and “bend, not break” failure mode of a steel frame.
2) Reynolds 953, one of the stainless tubesets, has the highest ultimate tensile strength (1750 - 2050 MPa) and yield strength (1500 - 1900 MPa) of any steel alloy commonly used for bicycle frames. 1500 MPa yield strength is approximately twice the yield strength of cold-worked, stress-relieved 3-2.5 titanium. This high strength means that the tubes can be drawn with thinner walls than tubes with lower UTS and YS, making the frames lighter. As with non-stainless steels, flexy frames resulting from the thin walled tubing can be made stiffer by increasing the tube diameter using OS or double OS tubing. With a hardness of 44 HRc, in spite of wall thickness as thin as 0.3mm, the tubes are very impact resistant yet with an elongation of 14% has similar ductility to other steel alloys that are substantially softer. The assertion that harder means brittle isn’t true. Elongation is the property used to describe a material's range from brittle on one end of the scale (low elongation) to ductile on the other end (high elongation). For example, carbon fiber reinforced polymer has elongation of around 1% to 3% and is brittle. Plain carbon steels, chromoly steels, and the stainless steels all in the condition ready to be used in bicycle frames have elongation in the 10% to 15% range, which is pretty ductile.
For anyone who missed it, here are the properties of the five currently available stainless tubesets. It is worth noting that, in spite of the 44 HRc hardness of 953, Reynolds ovalized 953 round tubes to 70% of its original diameter without any sign of microscopic cracking as a test of ductility.
3) All of these stainless alloys with high chromium content are corrosion resistant. As Reynolds puts it with typical British understatement, "Under some conditions, e.g. sulfuric acid or prolonged submersion in sea water, 953 will show signs of pitting and corrosion. We assume these are not normal conditions for a bike frame." Even in a humid salt air environment and riding frequently in rainy weather, it's unlikely you'll ever see rust. A polished, unpainted surface has the appearance of having been chrome plated; you never have to worry about paint getting scratched and having an exposed steel surface rusting.
4) Like many non-stainless air-hardening steels, the stainless tubesets are suitable for brazed lugged, fillet brazed, and TIG welded construction.
All five of the currently available stainless tubesets can make light, stiff, corrosion resistant frames.
In summary, a stainless frame provides all the qualities of steel plus the lower maintenance and some would say attractiveness of a bare polished finish. Is it worth the premium over a high-end non-stainless painted steel frame? After seven years riding my Waterford it is to me, but to lots of folks probably not.
EDIT - Is stainless harder to work with and harder on machining tools? 953 certainly is, but a number of builders who have worked with both 953 and KVA MS2 and MS3 say the KVA tubes are much easier to work with.
Last edited by Scooper; 09-05-14 at 04:32 PM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Capestang, France
Posts: 1,341
Bikes: Lots of French, some British and a couple of Italian
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times
in
65 Posts
Columbus foco (and now Life tubeset?) is pretty close to stainless, and having ridden road and MTB foco bikes, it makes a for great ride.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
Stainless is harder than regular steel, including 531 so you can make the walls thinner and therefore lighter.
As for strength, not sure if it is stronger or weaker than regular or chrome moly steel. It does fade (oxidize) with time just like everything else. And, keep in mind that there are different grades of stainless steel.
But it is pretty and, as others have mentioned, probably not as good as chrome moly or something similar. Just my opinion on that last comment.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 7,244
Bikes: '72 Cilo Pacer, '72 Gitane Gran Tourisme, '72 Peugeot PX10, '73 Speedwell Ti, '74 Peugeot UE-8, '75 Peugeot PR-10L, '80 Colnago Super, '85 De Rosa Pro, '86 Look Equipe 753, '86 Look KG86, '89 Parkpre Team, '90 Parkpre Team MTB, '90 Merlin
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 834 Post(s)
Liked 2,125 Times
in
554 Posts
@Scooper, thanks as always for your valuable and informed input, along with the technical details to back it up.
I don't have anything to add, except that I saw a few really attractive SS frames at the NAHBS in Sacramento a couple years ago. Steve Rex had a beautiful example with polished lugs that resembled chrome (without the drawbacks of chrome--environmental impact, potential for corrosion, etc.).
I don't have anything to add, except that I saw a few really attractive SS frames at the NAHBS in Sacramento a couple years ago. Steve Rex had a beautiful example with polished lugs that resembled chrome (without the drawbacks of chrome--environmental impact, potential for corrosion, etc.).
#18
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,417
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 112 Times
in
70 Posts
"Stainless" steel is a category, not a specification. So you can't generalize about the properties of "Stainless" steel. You need to pick an exact specification and, if necessary, heat treatment, cold working etc.
Then the properties can be nailed down.
Then the properties can be nailed down.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Forksbent, MN
Posts: 3,190
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 301 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
Put me in the fan section...
Stainless will rust, eventually, very lightly on the surface. I've had it occur on non-bicycle items, and just barely noticably on the bike below. Something as simple as auto wax can protect it for a very long time though. These lines of stainless are harder than the stuff kitchen utensils are made of, the specs prove it as so. Scooper summed up the properties very well, but for me these were the selling points:
The rest of the benefits are true of any fine custom:
Stainless will rust, eventually, very lightly on the surface. I've had it occur on non-bicycle items, and just barely noticably on the bike below. Something as simple as auto wax can protect it for a very long time though. These lines of stainless are harder than the stuff kitchen utensils are made of, the specs prove it as so. Scooper summed up the properties very well, but for me these were the selling points:
- It is very hard and can be drawn into thin tubes without great fear of denting
- It need not be painted, though it certainly can be
- A brushed finish can be refreshed, by me, at anytime with results much better than my paint touch up jobs
- Ride it hard, put it away wet, no problem
- Grey matches my hair
The rest of the benefits are true of any fine custom:
- The ride is sublime, tailored by the builder to your needs, not an off the rack carbon type of thing
- Dream it, they will build it
- If it is your dream bike, why not get it made of a material that has arguable benefits and a certain rarity
Likes For Chrome Molly:
#20
Decrepit Member
Bingo!
#21
Decrepit Member
Dave Anderson was one of the pioneers, and his experience and attention to detail really show in the end result. Besides that, he's a helluva nice guy.
#22
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,923 Times
in
1,491 Posts
OH that's right, Rigi made a Stainless model in '80
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#23
Decrepit Member
Anybody can look up the UNS, DIN, AISI, etc., standards online.
#24
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
I've had Revere Ware pans for 30+ years.
The Soma Stanyan has beautiful stainless lugs.
The DeLorean had stainless steel body panels.
I'd not hesitate to steal Chrome Molly's stainless.
They make good spokes, and excellent cheese vats.
Lighter and stronger than other kitchen sinks.
The Soma Stanyan has beautiful stainless lugs.
The DeLorean had stainless steel body panels.
I'd not hesitate to steal Chrome Molly's stainless.
They make good spokes, and excellent cheese vats.
Lighter and stronger than other kitchen sinks.
#25
Decrepit Member
Crescent of Sweden made the Mark XX stainless frame in the early seventies.