Seeking 69cm or larger frame or frameset
#26
十人十色
I ride a 60 to 62cm frame and there's hardly anyone who can ride even them. Many people's feet can't even reach both pedals sitting on the top tube. Luckily, my bikes are the kind that thieves who simply cut locks and throw them into vans aren't interested in.
#27
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,432 Posts
Sorry, I meant to ask what your maximum weight requirement, for the frameset, not your body. In other words, for example, if it's 8 pounds or more, you don't want it.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#29
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I have no clue what a frameset (frame) would weigh - never did such. Don't want gas-pipe (1040 carbon steel)
#30
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times
in
1,432 Posts
OK, I'll take pictures next time I'm in the country, which will be in a week or two.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#31
Young Vintage
I'm 6'3" with almost a 35" inseam. I rode a 68cm Nishiki with tange cromoly tubes. Had probably 4 or 5 inches of seatpost visible. A bike that big handles sluggishly but NO ONE would think of stealing it. I still have the frameset and 220 pound Olympic weightlifter me couldn't flex the frame much at all. Surprised me but the tubes were unbutted.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fenton, Mi.
Posts: 54
Bikes: 2011 Surly Pacer. Shimano 105 components.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
#33
Keener splendor
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
#34
Senior Member
I have a couple 4130 frames that might fit. One is 1982 Schwinn Voyageur SP (27") and the other is some Japanese brand (Nishiki?) that is ~70cm. The Schwinn is hanging in my garage but the Nishiki is with my brother back in Iowa. I have the Schwinn but I can't speak for the Nishiki except that my brother told me he doesn't ride it anymore.
#35
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
This popped up on my local CL. He wants too much for it, but it's been on there a while, so he'd probably come down. Probably 4130 chro-moly, depending on the year.
Schwinn LeTour Luxe mens extra tall 12 spd
Schwinn LeTour Luxe mens extra tall 12 spd
Rather have a frameset - thanks, again.
#36
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.
If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
#37
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I have a couple 4130 frames that might fit. One is 1982 Schwinn Voyageur SP (27") and the other is some Japanese brand (Nishiki?) that is ~70cm. The Schwinn is hanging in my garage but the Nishiki is with my brother back in Iowa. I have the Schwinn but I can't speak for the Nishiki except that my brother told me he doesn't ride it anymore.
#39
Keener splendor
Do you really have a 35" inseam or did you mistype that and you have a 38" inseam? It seems to me that your inseam is much longer than what you wrote.
#40
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I have to let my jeans ride down just a bit.
In the attached image, you can observe my long legs and short pants.
#41
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
The brother of a previous posting person is sending me this bike, a Panasonic.
They may have some nicks, which can be repaired. The color combo is neat.
They may have some nicks, which can be repaired. The color combo is neat.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What is the seat to bar drop for that six e for you?
Pant size I'm 33" waist 36" inseam, but I'm more of a 37" cycling inseam. I think a 70cm frame would be a bit big. (Even though I'm 6'4")
Pant size I'm 33" waist 36" inseam, but I'm more of a 37" cycling inseam. I think a 70cm frame would be a bit big. (Even though I'm 6'4")
Last edited by BigJeff; 09-12-14 at 09:18 PM.
#43
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
The Gazelle has a 2 1/2 cm chimney - the amount the seat tube is above the top tube.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think you're measuring your cycling inseam correctly - that seat height on the Gazelle looks like something I would have (38.25" inseam here).
#46
Senior Member
That explains it... I wear a 32 or 34 pants inseam, but my cycling inseam is 35.5". I was wondering how this would work because there's no WAY I could straddle a 70cm frame with both feet on the ground. Measure your cycling inseam (crotch to ground in bare feet) and peoples heads will stop asploding.
#47
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
If you folks are still looking at this, I received the Panasonic on September 17. Most of the parts were there, except the wheels by my suggestion, and so it went together easily. I put my 700mm wheels on, adjusted the brakes and rode it 20 miles on Saturday, the 20th. I measured the seat tube, center to center: 70cm; the standover is 95, which just barely touches my crotch (TMI); I'm maxed out. The ride was great! The tubes are slightly larger in diameter so the ride was fairly stiff. After I get the S/N and a pic or two, I'm going to give T-mar a PM to try and get a build date. Thanks for looking.
#48
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#49
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386
Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post