Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Seeking 69cm or larger frame or frameset

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Seeking 69cm or larger frame or frameset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-14, 10:05 PM
  #26  
十人十色
 
Dawes-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 19 Posts
Originally Posted by beaverstuff
There are two conditions in life that determine your job, your house, your wife, your hobbies, etc.
1. You can do it. 2. It feels good.
That's why I ride big-frame bikes.
(It also keeps the short ones at bay that want to take a spin around the block/)
And you can leave them unlocked in Tokyo

I ride a 60 to 62cm frame and there's hardly anyone who can ride even them. Many people's feet can't even reach both pedals sitting on the top tube. Luckily, my bikes are the kind that thieves who simply cut locks and throw them into vans aren't interested in.
Dawes-man is offline  
Old 09-07-14, 10:31 PM
  #27  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times in 1,432 Posts
Sorry, I meant to ask what your maximum weight requirement, for the frameset, not your body. In other words, for example, if it's 8 pounds or more, you don't want it.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 05:23 AM
  #28  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by eschlwc
6'3" 190 lb beaver that rides a 70cm bike?

sorry. not buying it.
Not selling either bike.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 05:28 AM
  #29  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by noglider
Sorry, I meant to ask what your maximum weight requirement, for the frameset, not your body. In other words, for example, if it's 8 pounds or more, you don't want it.
If it is steel alloy, the weight will be fine. Assembled, steel alloy bikes run about 21-23 pounds.
I have no clue what a frameset (frame) would weigh - never did such. Don't want gas-pipe (1040 carbon steel)
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 06:27 AM
  #30  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,460 Times in 1,432 Posts
OK, I'll take pictures next time I'm in the country, which will be in a week or two.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 08:20 AM
  #31  
Young Vintage
 
Wordwreckin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm 6'3" with almost a 35" inseam. I rode a 68cm Nishiki with tange cromoly tubes. Had probably 4 or 5 inches of seatpost visible. A bike that big handles sluggishly but NO ONE would think of stealing it. I still have the frameset and 220 pound Olympic weightlifter me couldn't flex the frame much at all. Surprised me but the tubes were unbutted.
Wordwreckin is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 08:35 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fenton, Mi.
Posts: 54

Bikes: 2011 Surly Pacer. Shimano 105 components.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.

If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
r0cket88 is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 10:02 AM
  #33  
Keener splendor
 
TimmyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,164

Bikes: Black Mountain Cycles Road and canti MX, Cannondale CAAD12, Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by r0cket88
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.

If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
+1 I'm 6'2" with a 35" inseam. The largest frame I have is 64cm ctt. I guess I could go larger as I have at least 5cm of seatpost showing. Why would I?
TimmyT is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 10:41 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Iowegian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boulder, Colo
Posts: 1,801
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
I have a couple 4130 frames that might fit. One is 1982 Schwinn Voyageur SP (27") and the other is some Japanese brand (Nishiki?) that is ~70cm. The Schwinn is hanging in my garage but the Nishiki is with my brother back in Iowa. I have the Schwinn but I can't speak for the Nishiki except that my brother told me he doesn't ride it anymore.
Iowegian is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 04:04 PM
  #35  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by icepick_trotsky
This popped up on my local CL. He wants too much for it, but it's been on there a while, so he'd probably come down. Probably 4130 chro-moly, depending on the year.

Schwinn LeTour Luxe mens extra tall 12 spd
Saw it thanks. Pretty bike. I'd have to add $65 shipping if he's even bother.
Rather have a frameset - thanks, again.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 04:13 PM
  #36  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by r0cket88
I am 6'4" tall with a 38" cycling inseam as measured according to the competitive cyclist fit calculator.
For a french fit it puts me on a 65.4-65.9cm Frame. I have been looking for something about that range since I am currently on a 63cm frame and struggling to make it fit.

If your cycling inseam is 35" then it seems to me that a 70cm frame would be way to large. Heck standover on something like that is going to be taller than your inseam is long. You have to lean these frames over sideways to stand over them?
Gnaw, standing with both paws on the ground I have 2 cm to spare. I do very little standing.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-08-14, 04:17 PM
  #37  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Iowegian
I have a couple 4130 frames that might fit. One is 1982 Schwinn Voyageur SP (27") and the other is some Japanese brand (Nishiki?) that is ~70cm. The Schwinn is hanging in my garage but the Nishiki is with my brother back in Iowa. I have the Schwinn but I can't speak for the Nishiki except that my brother told me he doesn't ride it anymore.
Have your brother check the steer tube. If it is Ishiwata or Tange, I give him $100 plus shipping costs. Would like to see an image first.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-11-14, 04:52 PM
  #38  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TimmyT
+1 I'm 6'2" with a 35" inseam. The largest frame I have is 64cm ctt. I guess I could go larger as I have at least 5cm of seatpost showing. Why would I?
Because, 1) You can & 2) It will feel goooooood!
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-11-14, 05:56 PM
  #39  
Keener splendor
 
TimmyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,164

Bikes: Black Mountain Cycles Road and canti MX, Cannondale CAAD12, Bob Jackson Vigorelli

Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 80 Times in 51 Posts
Do you really have a 35" inseam or did you mistype that and you have a 38" inseam? It seems to me that your inseam is much longer than what you wrote.
TimmyT is offline  
Old 09-12-14, 09:01 PM
  #40  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by TimmyT
Do you really have a 35" inseam or did you mistype that and you have a 38" inseam? It seems to me that your inseam is much longer than what you wrote.
I don't have an image of me on a bike. The jeans I wear are 36 waist, 34 inseam - they don't come, regularly, in 35.
I have to let my jeans ride down just a bit.
In the attached image, you can observe my long legs and short pants.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Linthicum2011.jpg (86.7 KB, 53 views)
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-12-14, 09:05 PM
  #41  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
The brother of a previous posting person is sending me this bike, a Panasonic.

They may have some nicks, which can be repaired. The color combo is neat.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
decal.jpg (27.9 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg
headset-decals.jpg (90.2 KB, 46 views)
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-12-14, 09:12 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
BigJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What is the seat to bar drop for that six e for you?

Pant size I'm 33" waist 36" inseam, but I'm more of a 37" cycling inseam. I think a 70cm frame would be a bit big. (Even though I'm 6'4")

Last edited by BigJeff; 09-12-14 at 09:18 PM.
BigJeff is offline  
Old 09-13-14, 04:35 PM
  #43  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BigJeff
What is the seat to bar drop for that six e for you?

Pant size I'm 33" waist 36" inseam, but I'm more of a 37" cycling inseam. I think a 70cm frame would be a bit big. (Even though I'm 6'4")
The Gazelle has a 2 1/2 cm chimney - the amount the seat tube is above the top tube.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-13-14, 10:07 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
BigJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by beaverstuff
The Gazelle has a 2 1/2 cm chimney - the amount the seat tube is above the top tube.
Awesome, with a quill stem you should have pretty comfortable bar height, near or above the seat height.
BigJeff is offline  
Old 09-13-14, 10:22 PM
  #45  
ham
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't think you're measuring your cycling inseam correctly - that seat height on the Gazelle looks like something I would have (38.25" inseam here).
ham is offline  
Old 09-13-14, 10:34 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 990

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by beaverstuff
I don't have an image of me on a bike. The jeans I wear are 36 waist, 34 inseam - they don't come, regularly, in 35.
I have to let my jeans ride down just a bit.
In the attached image, you can observe my long legs and short pants.
That explains it... I wear a 32 or 34 pants inseam, but my cycling inseam is 35.5". I was wondering how this would work because there's no WAY I could straddle a 70cm frame with both feet on the ground. Measure your cycling inseam (crotch to ground in bare feet) and peoples heads will stop asploding.
Caliper is offline  
Old 09-22-14, 08:57 AM
  #47  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
If you folks are still looking at this, I received the Panasonic on September 17. Most of the parts were there, except the wheels by my suggestion, and so it went together easily. I put my 700mm wheels on, adjusted the brakes and rode it 20 miles on Saturday, the 20th. I measured the seat tube, center to center: 70cm; the standover is 95, which just barely touches my crotch (TMI); I'm maxed out. The ride was great! The tubes are slightly larger in diameter so the ride was fairly stiff. After I get the S/N and a pic or two, I'm going to give T-mar a PM to try and get a build date. Thanks for looking.
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-25-14, 01:18 PM
  #48  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
I gather you're no longer looking, but in case you need a spare:

71cm Panasonic DX 2000 XXXL Frame
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 09-25-14, 03:31 PM
  #49  
WoodBadge NE-VI-1
Thread Starter
 
beaverstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 386

Bikes: 1983 Sequoia by Specialized; 1989 Panasonic

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rhm
I gather you're no longer looking, but in case you need a spare:

71cm Panasonic DX 2000 XXXL Frame
Many thanks for your effort. I paid far less for the DX-2000 now in my possession.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
current.jpg (105.5 KB, 34 views)
File Type: jpg
Fdecal.jpg (39.4 KB, 16 views)
beaverstuff is offline  
Old 09-25-14, 04:35 PM
  #50  
Is Right
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That is a righteous bicycle. Congrats on finding the frame you needed.
newenglandbike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.