Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Help Me Make My Mixte A Triple

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Help Me Make My Mixte A Triple

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-14, 10:30 AM
  #26  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,873

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1795 Post(s)
Liked 1,269 Times in 876 Posts
Possibly, you might be able to simply "flip" the spindle.
I've seen some early 80's? Diamondbacks that came in a triple & double.
They used the same spindle, long side out for the triple and short side out for the double.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:45 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Velocivixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,513
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
@Amesja - the Mixte, the bike I want to ADD the triple to already has a bb shell of 68. It's the spindle for the triple that came from a donor bike with bb of 70. Regarding my comment on shifting, and your response about knees. I do shift, but not like my cycling partner who downshifts multiple times before coming to a stop sign, then multiple upshifts once we get going again. This particular bike has brazed on down tube shifters and I have short arms, so I don't like reaching way down to shift. I have good knees at this point and won't do anything to harm them.
@ThermionicScott - I've had some bike mechanics say they would just add spacer to drive side & use original triple spindle, and others who say they'd just get the "correct" spindle. So 6 of one - half dozen of the other???
@Bill Kapaun - Howdy neighbor. I've wanted to say that to you. Good idea. I will check things out.
@fietsbob - ok, that's good to know. I'm not sure what constitutes "low profile" vs more profile. Here's a photo of just the crank arm and the distance from the large ring. Is this photo enough to demonstrate whether it's a low profile or would a different angle or overall shot be more informative?

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_3713.jpg (81.8 KB, 15 views)
Velocivixen is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:56 AM
  #28  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Shimano XTR M 900 cranks were more of what is low profile ..
VeloBase.com - Component: Shimano FC-M900, XTR M900

lower end, even the XT M730, the spindle comes out a bit more, to meet the crank.

the Right angle straight arm cranks from the Pre MTB mass production era are the wider style TA Cyclotouriste

VeloBase.com - Component: Spécialités TA Cyclotouriste
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 03:43 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Bicycle Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 778

Bikes: Marin Bolinas ridge, Carlton Corsa 5, Falcon Olympic 12, 98 Shesh Rockhopper,

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Velocivixen, if I lived in the States I would just send you a 122.5 for you to try, I am almost certain it will work.

1 question though on the Nishiki how much of a gap is there between your on the crank and your BB cage? and chain ring to seat stay

Could you please take a photo looking down the seat tube at the BB and chain stay? Also one from the back of the bike as it sits with the chain in 2 on the cogs and also on inner chain ring? I would like to see the chain line.

I wouldn't want to say for definite but, I have found some cases on 70s-80's 10/12 speeds some bikes had such wide BB axle widths that I could use the original axle to convert to triple when setting these up as retro tourers for friends, this may be the case on your bike. With a very nice chain line.

Last edited by Bicycle Addict; 09-16-14 at 03:54 PM.
Bicycle Addict is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 04:06 PM
  #30  
Rides Majestic
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339

Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I would just get a couple of 1mm spacers and put them on the fixed cup and use the crank's spindle. Spacers are cheap enough, cassette spacers are the same size, it doesn't have to say "for bottom bracket".
likebike23 is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 04:32 PM
  #31  
Retro Grouch
 
onespeedbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
@Amesja - the Mixte, the bike I want to ADD the triple to already has a bb shell of 68. It's the spindle for the triple that came from a donor bike with bb of 70. Regarding my comment on shifting, and your response about knees. I do shift, but not like my cycling partner who downshifts multiple times before coming to a stop sign, then multiple upshifts once we get going again. This particular bike has brazed on down tube shifters and I have short arms, so I don't like reaching way down to shift. I have good knees at this point and won't do anything to harm them.
@ThermionicScott - I've had some bike mechanics say they would just add spacer to drive side & use original triple spindle, and others who say they'd just get the "correct" spindle. So 6 of one - half dozen of the other???


As juvela said
Originally Posted by juvela
to get a good chainline all you would need to is to place a 1mm spacer behind the fixed cup and you can use the 3x spindle for 70mm shell. you will have about 1mm of threads showing on the adjustable cup.
The difference between to two BB shells is only 1 mm on each side. To install the 70mm spindle in a 68mm shell, all you need to do is add a 1mm spacer to the fixed side and it should solve your problem. The adjustable side cup will extend 1mm farther, but it's "adjustable" so there shouldn't be a problem.

Last edited by onespeedbiker; 09-16-14 at 04:37 PM.
onespeedbiker is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 05:16 PM
  #32  
Full Member
 
ofgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: NELA
Posts: 291

Bikes: Mostly '80s MIJ steel.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
Anyway, I rode about 12 miles with the new 38/52 and really liked the 38 chainring. Don't know that I'll go so fast as to benefit from a 52, so may go 38/48 and keep the 14-30 cluster. I am not one who shifts frequently. Guess I don't care about my cadence. If I'm going up a hill I, of course, anticipate and shift to a lower gear, but on flat land I just pedal harder vs shifting all the time.
Most of my stuff is set up with similar low gearing 'cause that's the way I like it. Only time I might need a 52 tooth ring is when there is a huge tailwind but I probably wouldn't be riding that day anyway to avoid the headwind.
ofgit is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 06:06 PM
  #33  
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Amesja
They are your knees. Treat them however you like. Sure, modern medical science has gotten to the point where they can put one (1) new set in -but everyone I know who's had knee-replacement surgery says to do whatever it takes to avoid the necessity.

YMMV
I forget who is was, but when asked if it was better to spin a small gear fast or to push a big gear slow, he said it was best to spin a big gear fast . . .

Need muscle to do that, build it by attacking a big gear instead of dropping to a little gear whenever it gets hard :-)

I'm in the minority maybe but I think a 52/14 is an important gear to have. 80 rpm gets you 24 mph. 42/14 at 100 rpm gets the same speed but when the lungs run out, good to be able to gear up and use up the legs.

Last edited by jyl; 09-16-14 at 06:10 PM.
jyl is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 06:10 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Velocivixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,513
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
@jyl - I'm all for building muscle - that's what personal trainers & PTs are for. Seriously, I'm afraid to go fast. More than about 20 mph & I'm holding on for dear life. It's not my nature to cycle fast, so I'm not worried about what I might loose moving from a 52 to a 48. Now, I'll go full steam in other athletic endeavors, just not cycling.
Velocivixen is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 06:16 PM
  #35  
Cottered Crank
 
Amesja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,401

Bikes: 1954 Raleigh Sports 1974 Raleigh Competition 1969 Raleigh Twenty 1964 Raleigh LTD-3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Spinning a big gear slow is increasing the amount of force transmitted through your knees by a huge amount.

Jamming a big gear taking off is analogous to slipping the clutch and lugging an engine at a stop sign in 2nd or even 3rd gear. Sure, you can get the car to take off but you are burning the valves and slipping the clutch -causing wear on both of them.

There is an auto repair shop at just about every major intersection in a decent-sized city that can replace a clutch and most can do a valve job too. It's expensive, but not a big deal.

Have you priced a knee surgery lately?

You downshift your car or your motorcycle as you come to a stop, and then shift back up. Why not do it on your bicycle? Ask your doctor what he thinks.

Go ahead, they are your knees. Unfortunately with the unaffordable care act that passed a few years back, and is taking effect in stages, everyone is eventually going to be sharing in the future for the paying to fix bad health decisions other people made in the past.
Amesja is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 06:18 PM
  #36  
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
VV, you need to be able to grind your husband into dust! Which, from what I've seen, will take some doing. So you need all the weapons (gears). Eventually you will be flying in 52/12 and he'll be seizing up trying to catch you.

Anyway, I would hold the triple crank on the double spindle and eyeball what spindle length you might need, then go to CityBikes and rummage around their loose spindles. Take the double crank spindle to know what cone spacing you need. I bet you'll find something suitable there. They have spacers too.

Amesja, everyone has to respect the limitations of their particular body parts. But knees will give you plenty of warning. If you listen and back off when you hit those limits, I think it will be fine.

As cyclists, I think we've picked an activity that is pretty knee-friendly. The people I know who have had TKR are life long runners ( evil for knees ), played high football in high school ( ditto ), or have carried way too much weight for way too long ( ditto ).

Last edited by jyl; 09-16-14 at 06:26 PM.
jyl is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 07:40 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Velocivixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,513
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
Yo! Let's get off the knee topic. I didn't say I never shift. I'm usually in such an easy gear I don't have to downshift & starting from a stop is easy. Many people shift in order to keep a particular cadence. I don't give a rip about my cadence. Just wanna ride. My joints are all in fantastic shape including my knees. I'm an endurance runner (think 26.2 miles), do crossfit, and many other activities that keep my body in tip top shape.
@jyl- I did a bunch of measuring, mounting, etc. & Ill need 68 x 122 spindle. I'll go to Citybikes and get hooked up.
Velocivixen is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 10:55 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Bicycle Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 778

Bikes: Marin Bolinas ridge, Carlton Corsa 5, Falcon Olympic 12, 98 Shesh Rockhopper,

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am really surprised how complicated this thread got!? @Velocivixen, glad to see you on your way to being sorted, a UN55 would be a nice upgrade while you have the cranks off.
122's fit that era of 10/12 speed and the early 90's MTB's well.
Bicycle Addict is offline  
Old 09-16-14, 11:35 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 269

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Newest 2.0, Fausto Coppi Torino,Bridgestone RB-2, CB-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bicycle Addict
I am really surprised how complicated this thread got!? @Velocivixen, glad to see you on your way to being sorted, a UN55 would be a nice upgrade while you have the cranks off.
122's fit that era of 10/12 speed and the early 90's MTB's well.
I like cartridges, too. She also has to get the special tool for the cartridge $13-18 or use one at the co-op.



I clean the threads with a Dremel and wire buffer, wipe down with mineral spirits and grease them so the cartridge threads in easier.
Uncle Randy is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 12:31 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Bicycle Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 778

Bikes: Marin Bolinas ridge, Carlton Corsa 5, Falcon Olympic 12, 98 Shesh Rockhopper,

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 88 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Uncle Randy
I like cartridges, too. She also has to get the special tool for the cartridge $13-18 or use one at the co-op.



I clean the threads with a Dremel and wire buffer, wipe down with mineral spirits and grease them so the cartridge threads in easier.
Agreed Uncle Randy, I like Parks Shimano BB tool, it fits an existing socket wrench I had etc.

I am lucky enough to have access to the BB tap at work, I only really chase difficult BB threads all other cleaning of threads happens with a steel cup each side with some cuts in the threads, homemade BB taps! Stay away from the lead in thread, makes life hard otherwise.

Grease is a wonderful thing you can actually get old BB's out when the threads are greased, when installing I always use a nice heavy black grease from Morris Lubricants.
Bicycle Addict is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 03:28 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Michael Angelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hurricane Alley , Florida
Posts: 3,903

Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
@Sixty Fiver -I'm positive it is 70 mm bb shell and the two spindles side by side demonstrated a difference between distance of races. I read Sheldon Browns cribsheet for bb and mine is not Italian. It is standard threading except for bb shell. Research indicates that some Japanese manufacturers made bb 70mm. So who knows why? I did online search of "'80's Miyata bb 70 mm" and found others with same issue.

Anyway, I rode about 12 miles with the new 38/52 and really liked the 38 chainring. Don't know that I'll go so fast as to benefit from a 52, so may go 38/48 and keep the 14-30 cluster. I am not one who shifts frequently. Guess I don't care about my cadence. If I'm going up a hill I, of course, anticipate and shift to a lower gear, but on flat land I just pedal harder vs shifting all the time.

I also have a Mixte Frame set with a 70mm shell and english Threads. I am currently building it up for my Daughter. When I first measured the BB shell I couldn't believe it, The bottom bracket is is fine shape so it will be reused. That's a good thing, if not I would be facing it to 68mm in a flash.
Michael Angelo is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 06:02 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,035

Bikes: 1984 Bridgestone 400 1985Univega nouevo sport 650b conversion 1993b'stone RBT 1985 Schwinn Tempo

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 542 Post(s)
Liked 152 Times in 100 Posts
Is your SR Signature crank drilled for a triple? Some are and some aren't. If it is, it might be possible to simply add a small ring. SR made it difficult because some cranks were drilled with a small, non-standard hole. (sorry, I can't give the precise thread size)

On a Miyata made Univega, I was able to fit a third chainring without changng to a longer spindle.

Your spouse must ride a Volpe.
ironwood is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 10:06 AM
  #43  
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
Yo! Let's get off the knee topic. I didn't say I never shift. I'm usually in such an easy gear I don't have to downshift & starting from a stop is easy. Many people shift in order to keep a particular cadence. I don't give a rip about my cadence. Just wanna ride. My joints are all in fantastic shape including my knees. I'm an endurance runner (think 26.2 miles), do crossfit, and many other activities that keep my body in tip top shape.
@jyl- I did a bunch of measuring, mounting, etc. & Ill need 68 x 122 spindle. I'll go to Citybikes and get hooked up.
I have a childlike faith in Citybikes' ability to find anything I need in their parts bins. I've even found loose spindles to convert cottered cranks to square taper. They have more stuff in the back room than what you see in the front. CCC is also very good for dumpster diving.
jyl is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 11:37 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Velocivixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,513
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
@IRONweed -my spouse rides a 2008 Trek 200SU with pletscher double leg kick stand, front & rear racks, a trunk bag on back, a leather U-lock holster and a myriad of lights. His bike weighs about 40 lbs. He can show up at ANY century race wearing cargo shorts, a polo shirt and hiking boots (he's not into fashion) and hang with the "carbon & Lycra" crowd. They've been known to try to shake him and mostly they can't and they end up scratching their heads. He has a Go-Pro camera & films it. Pretty cute.

Also there are only "divots" where the holes would be to mount a smaller chainring on that double crankset.
@Michael Angelo - would love to see your Mixte. My mixte HAS 68 mm bb shell; it's the mountain bike that I stole the triple crankset from that has a 70mm bb shell, so the bb spindle is too long. I don't want to use spacers, as others have mentioned.

UPDATE: I rode about 8 miles last night with my new & improved 38-48 double on the mixte. I determined that, if I want a triple, I will require a 68 x 122 square taper spindle. I will go to the co-op, where hopefully, they would have one. Or if one of you is feeling particularly generous and want to lighten your inventory, you can PM me with an offer to gift me one. I do "pay it forward".
Velocivixen is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 11:45 AM
  #45  
Rides Majestic
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339

Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
You know, a compact double is actually pretty nice. I have a 47-36 on one of my bikes and like that I can keep it in the 47 most of the time and use the 36 for more hilly or windy rides. I like to spin and not grind, so 47 is a good for me. I don't track speed or anything, but feel like I ride faster overall cruising in the 47T ring. You may find that what you've got is fine for your style of riding.
likebike23 is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 12:19 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 269

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Newest 2.0, Fausto Coppi Torino,Bridgestone RB-2, CB-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Possibly, you might be able to simply "flip" the spindle.
I've seen some early 80's? Diamondbacks that came in a triple & double.
They used the same spindle, long side out for the triple and short side out for the double.
That could be the same for a Miyata. It's worth a try.
Uncle Randy is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 12:22 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 269

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Newest 2.0, Fausto Coppi Torino,Bridgestone RB-2, CB-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by intransit1217
Clearly others are better versed in this than I am. But I'm watching with interest, for educational reasons.

So my ignorant question of the day would be: what is preventing you from simply bolting on the inner chainring to the current crank set up?
It would probably be too close to the right chainstay and the chain would rub against it.
Uncle Randy is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 01:04 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Velocivixen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 4,513
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 400 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 26 Posts
@Uncle Randy & @intransit1217 - Bingo! I tried hand mounting the triple on to the current spindle and the chainring was extremely close to the chain stay. If I had mounted it all the way, it would not be able to spin and would ruin a perfectly lovely paint job. Definitely need a longer spindle. Current spindle length for the double is 68 x 115.

Also, there are no threaded holes on the backside of the spider arms (or whatever) where I could mount a smaller chainring using this crankset. I would have to use the triple entire crankset. Also, not sure this matters, but the crank arms on the mountain triple crankset are 5mm shorter (165mm) than on the current double (170mm). I guess that's ok. Guess it depends on whether or not I'm a "spinner".
Velocivixen is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 03:11 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 269

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour, Fuji Newest 2.0, Fausto Coppi Torino,Bridgestone RB-2, CB-1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
@Uncle Randy & @intransit1217 - Bingo! I tried hand mounting the triple on to the current spindle and the chainring was extremely close to the chain stay. If I had mounted it all the way, it would not be able to spin and would ruin a perfectly lovely paint job. Definitely need a longer spindle. Current spindle length for the double is 68 x 115.

Also, there are no threaded holes on the backside of the spider arms (or whatever) where I could mount a smaller chainring using this crankset. I would have to use the triple entire crankset. Also, not sure this matters, but the crank arms on the mountain triple crankset are 5mm shorter (165mm) than on the current double (170mm). I guess that's ok. Guess it depends on whether or not I'm a "spinner".

@Velocivixen


“Martin conducted a study using 60 racers of all skill levels. He would vary crank length in 15mm increments, both longer and shorter. His findings showed that there was no power difference from one length to another, but that oxygen uptake was always better with shorter cranks.

“Subsequently I worked with a rider who is 6'5", bringing his crank length down to 165mm’s over three months. He’s gained 65 watts of power.”

- See more at: Crank Length: Coming Full Circle

and then there's your Q Factor:



https://www.sheldonbrown.com/bridgest...ne-1991-13.htm
Uncle Randy is offline  
Old 09-17-14, 03:42 PM
  #50  
jyl
Senior Member
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Velocivixen
Also there are only "divots" where the holes would be to mount a smaller chainring on that double crankset.
Interesting. Can you drill and tap holes at the divots and mount the small ring to the double crank? Will the small ring clear the chainstay if mounted that way? The crank is aluminum, so will drill and tap like butter. Ideal to use a drill press (I have one . . . ).
jyl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.