My 'new' Cinelli SC - any ideas on age?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Great Southern Land
Posts: 173
Bikes: ’71 Cinelli SC;‘ 72 Cinelli SC ; 2011 Baum Corretto Ti; 2007 BMC SLC01; 1986 Pinarello Team Bike; 1983 De Rosa Professional; 1959 Bianchi TdF; ’78 Masi GC Ca
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
My 'new' Cinelli SC - any ideas on age?
Hi everyone
Once you start you cant stop at one Cinelli..
Just picked up this Cinelli SC and only have these photos to go by until it arrives - has a mixture of pre and post '78 Cinelli detailing. On one hand it has the older style 3 hole lugs, early 70's seat clamp bolt and the underside of the BB is plain with the old style 4 digit number stamped in (5638) - not a flying C Cinelli casting. The headbadge is the 70's (not sure if earlier or later) bolt-on type.
However it also has braze-ons, under BB cable routing (sorry I cant reproduce the BB photo) and brake cable through the top tube. Headbadge is old style and decals are modern. There do not appear to be any flying C castings.
The componentry I am told is '71 NR with exception of the FD which is SR. The brake levers are the pre-75 long type.
I'm thinking it maybe a early/mids '70's which has had a mid-life crisis upgrade(?) I'm not sure that through-to-tube cabling came into being until mid '80's (?)
Any ideas gratefully received
Once you start you cant stop at one Cinelli..
Just picked up this Cinelli SC and only have these photos to go by until it arrives - has a mixture of pre and post '78 Cinelli detailing. On one hand it has the older style 3 hole lugs, early 70's seat clamp bolt and the underside of the BB is plain with the old style 4 digit number stamped in (5638) - not a flying C Cinelli casting. The headbadge is the 70's (not sure if earlier or later) bolt-on type.
However it also has braze-ons, under BB cable routing (sorry I cant reproduce the BB photo) and brake cable through the top tube. Headbadge is old style and decals are modern. There do not appear to be any flying C castings.
The componentry I am told is '71 NR with exception of the FD which is SR. The brake levers are the pre-75 long type.
I'm thinking it maybe a early/mids '70's which has had a mid-life crisis upgrade(?) I'm not sure that through-to-tube cabling came into being until mid '80's (?)
Any ideas gratefully received
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Capestang, France
Posts: 1,341
Bikes: Lots of French, some British and a couple of Italian
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 247 Post(s)
Liked 130 Times
in
65 Posts
Slap me sideways with a wet kipper. That is a beauty. I would hazard a complete guess at a strip down and fettle a few years ago to add the braze ons, then a restoration to as close as possible original. Either way, its fab.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times
in
78 Posts
Show off!
Very nice.
Certainly looks like a repaint, looking at the paint lapping up over the shorelines on the lugs. And the edges of the vinyl stickers.
But it begs the question, why would they put later, improper decals on it? perhaps the mid 70's decals were not available?
Nevertheless, a super beauty.
Very nice.
Certainly looks like a repaint, looking at the paint lapping up over the shorelines on the lugs. And the edges of the vinyl stickers.
But it begs the question, why would they put later, improper decals on it? perhaps the mid 70's decals were not available?
Nevertheless, a super beauty.
Last edited by rootboy; 09-18-14 at 08:55 AM.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,223
Bikes: 2012 Moots VaMoots-74 Peugeot Mixtie U018-73 Peugeot U018
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
Gorgeous, fabulous, and stunning Cinelli SC and Ageless Beauty. A mix of modern and older version with braze-on and then the seat cluster with the long drilled pointed lugs reminiscent of an earlier age.
__________________
Moots VaMoots 2012-Peugeot Mixte 1974-Peugeot Mixte 1973
Moots VaMoots 2012-Peugeot Mixte 1974-Peugeot Mixte 1973
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
Hi everyone
Once you start you cant stop at one Cinelli..
Just picked up this Cinelli SC and only have these photos to go by until it arrives - has a mixture of pre and post '78 Cinelli detailing. On one hand it has the older style 3 hole lugs, early 70's seat clamp bolt and the underside of the BB is plain with the old style 4 digit number stamped in (5638) - not a flying C Cinelli casting. The headbadge is the 70's (not sure if earlier or later) bolt-on type.
However it also has braze-ons, under BB cable routing (sorry I cant reproduce the BB photo) and brake cable through the top tube. Headbadge is old style and decals are modern. There do not appear to be any flying C castings.
The componentry I am told is '71 NR with exception of the FD which is SR. The brake levers are the pre-75 long type.
I'm thinking it maybe a early/mids '70's which has had a mid-life crisis upgrade(?) I'm not sure that through-to-tube cabling came into being until mid '80's (?)
Any ideas gratefully received
Once you start you cant stop at one Cinelli..
Just picked up this Cinelli SC and only have these photos to go by until it arrives - has a mixture of pre and post '78 Cinelli detailing. On one hand it has the older style 3 hole lugs, early 70's seat clamp bolt and the underside of the BB is plain with the old style 4 digit number stamped in (5638) - not a flying C Cinelli casting. The headbadge is the 70's (not sure if earlier or later) bolt-on type.
However it also has braze-ons, under BB cable routing (sorry I cant reproduce the BB photo) and brake cable through the top tube. Headbadge is old style and decals are modern. There do not appear to be any flying C castings.
The componentry I am told is '71 NR with exception of the FD which is SR. The brake levers are the pre-75 long type.
I'm thinking it maybe a early/mids '70's which has had a mid-life crisis upgrade(?) I'm not sure that through-to-tube cabling came into being until mid '80's (?)
Any ideas gratefully received
If I had to hazard a guess as to the age I would say maybe 1974. That is when the Cinelli timeline says the badge changed to aluminum and it might not have had the over BB guides as a factory feature at that time, hence the under BB ones. It has had enough done to it though that the person having the work done might have just had a preference for the under BB ones. in that case probably anywhere from '74 to '77 or so.
I completely understand the Cinelli addiction. I recently pared back from 4 to 3 but am now kind of looking for another one. Its a pretty specific one and might never show up though.
Last edited by kylarr; 09-18-14 at 07:26 PM. Reason: had more to say
#10
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I think it's mid-late 70s based on the badge, lack of eyelets, holes in lugs, later seatpost bolt and geometry. I'm sure it will make a nice rider, but the restoration isn't at all to my taste. Personally I'd replace the decals, bar tape and remove the paint fill in the lug cutouts.
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 09-18-14 at 07:37 PM.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Great Southern Land
Posts: 173
Bikes: ’71 Cinelli SC;‘ 72 Cinelli SC ; 2011 Baum Corretto Ti; 2007 BMC SLC01; 1986 Pinarello Team Bike; 1983 De Rosa Professional; 1959 Bianchi TdF; ’78 Masi GC Ca
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I think it's mid-late 70s based on the badge, lack of eyelets, holes in lugs, later seatpost bolt and geometry. I'm sure it will make a nice rider, but the restoration isn't at all to my taste. Personally I'd replace the decals, bar tape and remove the paint fill in the lug cutouts.
#13
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I'm not sure which way I'd go with this...the modifications have already been made and the cost of a proper restoration likely exceed the bike's value. Honestly - I might go full hot rod at this point. I'd definitely be thinking rider, not show piece. I've got one show piece Cinelli and one rider myself. My rider Cinelli is UGLY.
Cinelli has so many bad arse paint schemes - my favorite is the salmon.
Cinelli has so many bad arse paint schemes - my favorite is the salmon.
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 09-18-14 at 08:11 PM.
#14
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times
in
1,709 Posts
Agree with Aaron about turning it into a hot rod. Undoing the internal rear brake cable is going to be some work and will ruin the paint on the top tube at the very least. Add in all the other metalwork to get her back to original and the bill climbs way higher.
I'd like a better look at the headbadge - it looks as tho it could be a modern repro, but the angle is bad to make a true call.
It's a beauty in its own right, no matter the modifications - if you plan on using it as a rider. You could do LOTS worse But worth the money to bring back to original spec? Well, of course only you in the end can answer that.
Whichever way, enjoy!
DD
I'd like a better look at the headbadge - it looks as tho it could be a modern repro, but the angle is bad to make a true call.
It's a beauty in its own right, no matter the modifications - if you plan on using it as a rider. You could do LOTS worse But worth the money to bring back to original spec? Well, of course only you in the end can answer that.
Whichever way, enjoy!
DD
#15
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
I thought that might be the case on the badge too dd, but the shape looks right. I think it might be repainted.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more I think leave it as is (except the decals and tape), build it as a rider however you'd enjoy it and have fun. Your signature says you already have a perfect Cinelli anyway. Even as odd as this one is, it's still probably prettier than my ugly duckling.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more I think leave it as is (except the decals and tape), build it as a rider however you'd enjoy it and have fun. Your signature says you already have a perfect Cinelli anyway. Even as odd as this one is, it's still probably prettier than my ugly duckling.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 105
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
3 Posts
I thought that might be the case on the badge too dd, but the shape looks right. I think it might be repainted.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more I think leave it as is (except the decals and tape), build it as a rider however you'd enjoy it and have fun. Your signature says you already have a perfect Cinelli anyway. Even as odd as this one is, it's still probably prettier than my ugly duckling.
The more I'm thinking about this, the more I think leave it as is (except the decals and tape), build it as a rider however you'd enjoy it and have fun. Your signature says you already have a perfect Cinelli anyway. Even as odd as this one is, it's still probably prettier than my ugly duckling.
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South Australia
Posts: 9
Bikes: 1993 Klein quantum, 1999 Fondriest spur, 1988 Paconi 653, 2006 Cannondale Rush, 2013 Spec Carve, 1992 Repco Superlight 2 speed.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Superb. Love the crankset.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rosanky, Texas
Posts: 308
Bikes: Steel is real. All others need not apply.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
It appears to be mid to late 80's, if it is original. The internal cable routing and the decals are definitely after 1983. Do you have a serial number?
Here are a few pictures of a 1980 SC.
Here are a few pictures of a 1980 SC.
#20
Stop reading my posts!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,574
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1440 Post(s)
Liked 1,058 Times
in
783 Posts
I'm curious about the internal cable grommets on the TT: does the housing pass thru the TT or are there "stops" built into the grommets so you have 2 lengths of housing, one fore and one aft? If the latter was there a metal tube brazed inside the TT to guide the cable? Obviously those are long Campy (1010A) dropouts, does the BB shell look correct for the era people are thinking? What style cable guidance underneath the BB shell was brazed on, or is it (shudder) a plastic piece?
I'm obviously no expert, but things that look different between the OP's frame and the black '80 SC: the dropouts, TT cable guides and nutted versus Allen-head bolts for the brakes, plus the cable stop on the top of the chainstay on the '80...still has over-BB cable routing for RD.
I'm obviously no expert, but things that look different between the OP's frame and the black '80 SC: the dropouts, TT cable guides and nutted versus Allen-head bolts for the brakes, plus the cable stop on the top of the chainstay on the '80...still has over-BB cable routing for RD.
Last edited by unworthy1; 09-21-14 at 01:48 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,047
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3011 Post(s)
Liked 3,788 Times
in
1,405 Posts
Typically you run the cable housing the entire length from the levers to the calipers. No stops.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
colnagoracer
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
2
02-03-13 11:21 PM