Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Playing card symbols in bikes...

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Playing card symbols in bikes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-14, 03:19 PM
  #1  
Hoards Thumbshifters
Thread Starter
 
mechanicmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,156

Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 192 Posts
Playing card symbols in bikes...

I'm curious if anyone knows the meaning or the background of why some frame makers like Ciocc, Colnago, Richard Sachs, etc. use playing card symbols on there bike frames. Mostly I have seen them on the forks but I'm sure there are other examples elsewhere in the lugs.

Anyone have any insight? Is it to pay tribute to something or to show that the rider is a gambler?

It's just something I have always wondered about.

From Richard Sachs:
mechanicmatt is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 03:32 PM
  #2  
one life on two wheels
 
cobrabyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 2,552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
I've read that "Ciocc" is the nickname of the guy that built Ciocc bikes, and it translates to "poker face"
cobrabyte is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 03:40 PM
  #3  
surly old man
 
jgedwa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 3,392

Bikes: IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 18 Posts
Paul uses card symbols on many of their components too. No idea why.

jim
__________________
Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
--------------------------
SB forever
jgedwa is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 04:05 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times in 1,995 Posts
Originally Posted by jgedwa
Paul uses card symbols on many of their components too. No idea why.

jim
The reinforcements used by Richard Sachs are buyout parts, they were available to anyone. At this point, Richard might have ordered the "last run" or secured a supply. Silva might have made them. He selected them and at some point around the custom builders he became known for them. Brian Baylis has been using them for a long time too, he sharpens the cutouts to make them more definitive.

As to the playing card theme, CdM may have a perspective, as I recall someone familiar with Italian racing from long ago made a reasonable connection about the luck of card games and the luck of winning bicycle races.
repechage is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 04:43 PM
  #5  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times in 935 Posts
Originally Posted by mechanicmatt
Anyone have any insight? Is it to pay tribute to something or to show that the rider is a gambler?
You know I'm born to lose
And gamblin's for fools
But that's the way I like it, baby
I don't want to live forever.

And don't forget the Joker.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 05:25 PM
  #6  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by repechage
The reinforcements used by Richard Sachs are buyout parts, they were available to anyone. At this point, Richard might have ordered the "last run" or secured a supply. Silva might have made them. He selected them and at some point around the custom builders he became known for them. <cut> .
That's not true. And since this stuff is cached for a long time, I thought I'd let you know.
__________________
Atmo bis
e-RICHIE is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 05:48 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 162 Posts
I have wondered that myself. Conversely, why do playing cards have Bicycles on them?
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 06:16 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
daf1009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 2,982

Bikes: LESS than I did a year ago!

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Ever thought that the symbols might just be that...symbols...and nothing to do with cards? A diamond is a diamond, cloverleaf (oops, club) is a cloverleaf, etc...
daf1009 is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 06:21 PM
  #9  
minimalist cyclist
 
Deal4Fuji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,745

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1119 Post(s)
Liked 1,641 Times in 944 Posts
Originally Posted by embankmentlb
I have wondered that myself. Conversely, why do playing cards have Bicycles on them?
Deal4Fuji is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 08:50 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
mikemowbz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,324

Bikes: Are several.

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by daf1009
Ever thought that the symbols might just be that...symbols...and nothing to do with cards? A diamond is a diamond, cloverleaf (oops, club) is a cloverleaf, etc...
Does that idea seem to hold much water when we're talking about, for example, the fork reinforcements pictured in the OP...which feature all four 'suits' at once?

I have a pretty hard time imagining that an example of the symbols associated with all four suits, collected together (as on those reinforcements, or as associated with the Ciocc marque), lacks any connection to playing cards, on which those same four symbols have appeared in association with one another for centuries. Clearly there is a direct, intended reference to the suits on playing cards here.

If just one of these symbols in isolation - maybe, but still probably not. Colnago = club, Confente = spade...I'm already sensing a pattern, and that sense gets awfully strong once I get to Ciocc, etc.

There really does seem to be a pattern of use of these symbols in the bicycling world, and perhaps the most famous example, the Colnago 'cloverleaf', seems to have been referred to all along in Italian (by Ernesto Colnago, no less) as the ​asso di fiori...i.e. 'the ace of clubs', though 'fiori/fiore' means 'flower(s)' in Italian (plural/singular forms of the same word), and that latter association may have had a role in the symbol's selection for the logo also.

There are some stories about that, apparently, that offer differing accounts of the addition of the club symbol to the 'C' as Colnago's logo ca. 1970.

For some fragments from published accounts of the origin of the Colnago 'Ace of Clubs' logo, check out:

ITALIAN CYCLING JOURNAL: Unraveling the Mystery of the Colnago "Clubs"


I don't know if there's a bigger story here in terms some specific set of associations between the set of symbols associated with playing cards and cycling/racing more generally...but I'd be inclined to dismiss out of hand the contention that it's just a coincidence, and would love to hear more if folks have any insight into this question!

Last edited by mikemowbz; 11-17-14 at 09:15 PM. Reason: clarity...and a couple of typos
mikemowbz is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 09:00 PM
  #11  
Hoards Thumbshifters
Thread Starter
 
mechanicmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,156

Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 192 Posts
Originally Posted by e-RICHIE
That's not true. And since this stuff is cached for a long time, I thought I'd let you know.
Mr. Sachs. I didn't think his answer was true either. I hoped you were going to chime in.

Could you enlighten us why you used them on you lugset?

I guess DeRosa's have hearts as well, Paul Components have a single speed crankset with it as well.
mechanicmatt is offline  
Old 11-17-14, 09:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rootboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,748
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 132 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by e-RICHIE
That's not true. ......
Which part?
rootboy is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 05:14 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Michael Angelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hurricane Alley , Florida
Posts: 3,903

Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 22 Posts
CIOCC.



Some say CIOCC is Italian Slang for Poker Face....
Michael Angelo is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 06:27 AM
  #14  
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times in 935 Posts
Originally Posted by daf1009
Ever thought that the symbols might just be that...symbols...and nothing to do with cards? A diamond is a diamond, cloverleaf (oops, club) is a cloverleaf, etc...
Right, but how does that explain the pink hearts, yellow moons, orange stars, and green clovers. And blue diamonds?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 07:06 AM
  #15  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by rootboy
Which part?
The part of the quote that I replied to.

Look. In my book, none of this matters much, especially some 40 years after the fact. I'm not going to speak to the use of playing card figures as individual design elements used by bicycle makers back in the day, because that's all it was. Some folks needed/wanted a way to differentiate. Some used color (paint). Some had a unique confluence of tubes. Some had unusual fork bends. It was a simpler time, that's all atmo. There's no deep, hidden meaning regarding card suits and bicycle logos.

For my part in the thread, my own picture is in the OP and there are comments about the blade liners. The shortest way to cover all the bases is to paste in an unedited reply I sent to VeloNews ten years ago (2004) when the same questions were being asked. I'll restate what may not be the obvious from my reply: the reason the parts entered the mainstream in the states (in the 1970s) was because I opened that door. I was ground zero here for them and, one by one and peer by peer, I gave them away or sold them or eventually hooked up my pals with my source. And I still have the letters Baylis, Serotta, and others wrote to me asking about them, and could I sell some.

Here -

Dear Lennard,
I think the best way to start is at the beginning, circa 1974. My best friend was in sales in the bicycle industry. There was a point in time when he traded lines with a European fellow; my friend represented the European fellow’s lines in North America – the other guy represented my friend’s goods overseas. In 1975, my friend met his guy in Belgium and the European guy was starting to sell framebuilding parts, the fork liner with the playing card figures was among these pieces. My friend returned with some to show me. I had my friend immediately order me 2000 pieces because I thought they’d give my brand some much-needed élan. Nothing more. Nothing less. In the ensuing years, whenever friends in the industry asked me about these parts and I freely sold from my inventory or gave the source information away. By 1980 these parts were so *^$%#? ubiquitous that I tired of seeing them on forks I made. Simply put, they became too common. Fast forward to 1992. That year, I added a limited edition 20th Anniversary model frameset and “re-introduced” the playing card pieces on my forks as a way to bridge the eras, especially since by that time most had forsaken using fork crowns and some even started using pre-built forks. In essence, I was the first North American user of this design. In the early days of my frame-building career I sought ways to have my look be unique and interesting. Had I not been as magnanimous, I could have been the only user, because my friend and his European contact did not see much profit to be made in these small low cost parts. The happy ending to all this is that about seven years ago I found the son of the original supplier – and he still had the remaining stocks of these pieces which had not been reproduced since the 1970s. I made a deal to buy all 9000-plus parts, partly to ensure that my supply would never run out and partly to be able to offer them with the Richard Sachs fork crown that I was about to bring to the market. So, to answer the “Why?” question about the playing card motif, the only thing I can say is “Because!”
Richard Sachs
__________________
Atmo bis
e-RICHIE is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 07:33 AM
  #16  
Hoards Thumbshifters
Thread Starter
 
mechanicmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,156

Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 192 Posts
Thanks for the reply Mr. Sachs. I appreciate the candid response. I was never aware of this Velonews' letter and couldn't find an answer on Google search. For me "because" is a perfectly acceptable answer.

Now I just wonder why the Italian companies used these symbols.
mechanicmatt is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 07:44 AM
  #17  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by mechanicmatt
Thanks for the reply Mr. Sachs. I appreciate the candid response. I was never aware of this Velonews' letter and couldn't find an answer on Google search. For me "because" is a perfectly acceptable answer.
You're welcome.
Now I just wonder why the Italian companies used these symbols.
The answer to that is also Because. You have to under-think this, and also channel a Kennedy (JFK) era mentality. The bicycle is a pretty small and limited canvas. In the days when these design elements were being appropriated, the niche was incredibly unsophisticated and even, to a point, incestuous. It's not a criticism by any means. There is no thread that ties all of these questions together and yields a reasonable and rational answer. To say Because covers the bases for me - and I lived through it.
__________________
Atmo bis
e-RICHIE is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 07:52 AM
  #18  
Hoards Thumbshifters
Thread Starter
 
mechanicmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Signal Mountain, TN
Posts: 1,156

Bikes: '23 Black Mtn MC, '87 Bruce Gordon Chinook, '08 Jamis Aurora, '86 Trek 560, '97 Mongoose Rockadile, & '91 Trek 750

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 246 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 192 Posts
Fair enough. Too bad though, I was hoping for an ancient frame builders guild or cycling illuminati that you were carrying on the traditions of. Again, appreciate the participation here, thanks.
mechanicmatt is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 07:54 AM
  #19  
Cisalpinist
 
Italuminium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 5,557

Bikes: blue ones.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Carryover from fighter pilots? Who knows.
Italuminium is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 08:01 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
embankmentlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North, Ga.
Posts: 2,401

Bikes: 3Rensho-Aerodynamics, Bernard Hinault Look - 1986 tour winner, Guerciotti, Various Klein's & Panasonic's

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 375 Times in 162 Posts
In the 1980's some companies spent more time designing symbols than working components.

That's a joke, sort of....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Icons copy.jpg (74.6 KB, 230 views)
embankmentlb is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 08:28 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,444
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4231 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times in 1,806 Posts
Originally Posted by mechanicmatt
Fair enough. Too bad though, I was hoping for an ancient frame builders guild or cycling illuminati that you were carrying on the traditions of. Again, appreciate the participation here, thanks.
Yeah, symbolism would be nice (and that's where my mind always goes too), but I bet someone did it to stand out, and then someone else thought, "hey that looks cool, I should do that too" and boom...
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 08:37 AM
  #22  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
Originally Posted by e-RICHIE
The part of the quote that I replied to.

Look. In my book, none of this matters much, especially some 40 years after the fact. I'm not going to speak to the use of playing card figures as individual design elements used by bicycle makers back in the day, because that's all it was. Some folks needed/wanted a way to differentiate. Some used color (paint). Some had a unique confluence of tubes. Some had unusual fork bends. It was a simpler time, that's all atmo. There's no deep, hidden meaning regarding card suits and bicycle logos.

For my part in the thread, my own picture is in the OP and there are comments about the blade liners. The shortest way to cover all the bases is to paste in an unedited reply I sent to VeloNews ten years ago (2004) when the same questions were being asked. I'll restate what may not be the obvious from my reply: the reason the parts entered the mainstream in the states (in the 1970s) was because I opened that door. I was ground zero here for them and, one by one and peer by peer, I gave them away or sold them or eventually hooked up my pals with my source. And I still have the letters Baylis, Serotta, and others wrote to me asking about them, and could I sell some.

Here -
What were the time lines for when you stopped using the cards? I'm sure that it's a product of my age, but I find them somewhat affected, and agree they were overly ubiquitous in the early 80s. I'm certain that in 1978 I would have found them exotic and distinctive.

What I believe to be an 83' Sachs does have the cards, as does the 79'.

To me, the cards remind me of my childhood intro to cycling - adding playing cards to the spokes. The location on the suits on the fork tang sort of reinforces that association.

Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 11-18-14 at 08:44 AM.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 08:49 AM
  #23  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 447
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
What were the time lines for when you stopped using the cards? I'm sure that it's a product of my age, but I find them somewhat affected, and agree they were overly ubiquitous in the early 80s. I'm certain that in 1978 I would have found them exotic and distinctive.

What I believe to be an 83' Sachs does have the cards, as does the 79'.

To me, the cards remind me of my childhood intro to cycling - adding playing cards to the spokes.
Yes - read the letter to VN. I stopped by 1979/1980 because I got sick of what I essentially enabled. I let the others run with it. But here, I was done with the part (even though I had thousands in stock..). In 1980 I switched to what looked like 2 shovels punched into the fork liner. In 1992 when I was doing the 20th Anniversary Frame model, I thought that, since no one was even making forks anymore, much less the kind in which a crown enveloped a decorative liner, I'd reintroduce the part. I did just that, and then continued using them ever since. And as I wrote, I found out that the son of my original source still had some (by then he was a client of mine...) and I bought the lot of them to add to what I originally started in the early 1970s.
__________________
Atmo bis
e-RICHIE is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 08:52 AM
  #24  
Semper Fi
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,942
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 358 Times in 241 Posts
Thanks, Mr. Sachs, I had wondered why the suits were used by different frame builders, or manufacturers, your replies clears this up for me. In previous instances where this question was posed, it was a lot of conjecture, as you said, in your Kennedy Era statement, above. "Because" feels much better for me, not one to buy into a lot of the wild conjectured ideas out there about bicycles, and their lore. Your time and input are appreciated, very much.

Bill
__________________
Semper Fi, USMC, 1975-1977

I Can Do All Things Through Him, Who Gives Me Strength. Philippians 4:13


qcpmsame is offline  
Old 11-18-14, 09:02 AM
  #25  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
Originally Posted by e-RICHIE
Yes - read the letter to VN. I stopped by 1979/1980 because I got sick of what I essentially enabled. I let the others run with it. But here, I was done with the part (even though I had thousands in stock..). In 1980 I switched to what looked like 2 shovels punched into the fork liner. In 1992 when I was doing the 20th Anniversary Frame model, I thought that, since no one was even making forks anymore, much less the kind in which a crown enveloped a decorative liner, I'd reintroduce the part. I did just that, and then continued using them ever since. And as I wrote, I found out that the son of my original source still had some (by then he was a client of mine...) and I bought the lot of them to add to what I originally started in the early 1970s.
Apologies - but I'm a persnickety reader. The letter to VN said that you were tired of them by 1980, not that you stopped using them in 1980. I was tired of bartending when I was 28, but it still took until I was 30 to escape it!

I guess the real part of my question becomes were they occasionally used after 1980, perhaps as a custom request, or is my Sachs roadie earlier than I believed it to be?



KonAaron Snake is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.