Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Gravel Grinding on a vintage frame, safe?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Gravel Grinding on a vintage frame, safe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-15, 07:58 AM
  #1  
afraid of whales
Thread Starter
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Gravel Grinding on a vintage frame, safe?

I went for a gravel grinder ride with my riding club, I rode my 1973 Raleigh Super Course that I tarted up with some modern parts. I was hammering away just fine, then we hit a big stretch of washboards at ~20mph. I started hoping the person that brazed my fork 42 years ago was sober the day my fork was built.

I'm starting to worry that my vintage frame wasn't really intended to be abused like this?

Maybe I should bit the bullet and get a modern steel frame from Surly/Salsa/Soma or the like for my gravel grinder?

Mr IGH is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:17 AM
  #2  
Aspiring curmudgeon
 
icepick_trotsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Guerciotti, Serotta, Gaulzetti

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
I don't think that modern steel frames are any tougher/better constructed than vintage ones. The Super Course hasn't fallen apart over the course of the last 42 years, right? Maybe go with bigger tires if you're really worried about it. It looks like you have the clearance thanks to removing the rim brakes.
__________________
"Party on comrades" -- Lenin, probably
icepick_trotsky is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:21 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Your SC will handle it just fine. Besides, how do you know that the welder behind the TIG torch on the modern bike was sober? If the filler on a lugged bike is insufficient there is still some support there. If a tig weld fails, what will hold that fork leg in place?
busdriver1959 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:29 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
A brazing fault would probably have revealed itself a decade or two ago.

If you want buy a brand new Look cyclocross bike so you know it will brand new. If you are going to spend, spend big.
repechage is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:44 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 4,780

Bikes: Numerous

Mentioned: 150 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1677 Post(s)
Liked 3,095 Times in 913 Posts
I think your frame will be fine. Spokes and rims would be highest risk for breaking IMO. Years ago I used to ride on washboard trails with my steel shock-less mtb and I worried more about my arms failing than my bike.
Spaghetti Legs is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 09:13 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
Is it a trick of the camera or is the fork already tweaked a bit?
fender1 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 09:19 AM
  #7  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by fender1
Is it a trick of the camera or is the fork already tweaked a bit?
I see that, too. But I don't think it was riding on gravel that did the damage.
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
rhm is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284

Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times in 158 Posts
I didn't like the performance of my lugged fork on my Simoncini Cyclocross bike. The fork was very flexy, among other issues. I found a NOS Fuji fork that was a perfect fit. Now the bike is rock steady at high speeds and can absorb any abuse that I might dish out. The fork was $39.

Soma and Surly sell steel forks with 1 inch steerers.
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Barrettscv is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 10:18 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4233 Post(s)
Liked 2,948 Times in 1,807 Posts
Give it a whirl. These things are meant to be ridden, right?
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?), 1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"





himespau is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 11:07 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
GravelGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: MidWest USA
Posts: 82

Bikes: Colnago Super, Giant, Waterford X11, Look 785 Huez, Merlin Titanium, in past times...Gitane Super Corsa, Ron Stout, Ciocc San Cristabal, Ciocc CX, Colnago Master, Pogliaghi TT, Crescent

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 4 Posts
I think a discussion point could be made that many older frames were built to ride gravel roads because…well, there were a lot of really crappy were back in the 50’s, 60’s and early 70’s in many parts of Europe, and the US for that matter. Bikes were built accordingly and riders had no qualms about taking them down some cow path or dirt road because that was the road. We didn’t know any better. Heck, some of us still don’t.

Wheelbases and chain stays were longer, had longer dropouts where more adjustments could be made and there was more clearance for tire width.

Even racing frames had longer wheelbases and more clearance. I semi-regularly put 35mm tires on my 1973 Colnago and ride gravel. And other than the looks other riders give me it’s a great ride.
GravelGuy is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 11:29 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
cyclotoine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Yukon, Canada
Posts: 8,759
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 113 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
A gitane is french, there were no roubaix specific bikes back then you road the cobbles on your road bike. Cobbles are a whole lot worse than a lot of gravel roads. I would not be concerned.

I believe the camera angle is causing the illusion that the steerer is bent on the OP's bike. You would be able to tell pretty quick if it was as the headset would not stay tight and would bind when you turned the wheel.
__________________
1 Super Record bike, 1 Nuovo Record bike, 1 Pista, 1 Road, 1 Cyclocross/Allrounder, 1 MTB, 1 Touring, 1 Fixed gear
cyclotoine is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 11:34 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
SJX426's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579

Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times in 1,103 Posts
I think you are taking less of a risk than those in the TdF of 80 years ago!
SJX426 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 11:51 AM
  #13  
Old. Slow. Happy.
 
MileHighMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Free your mind, and your bike will follow. Bicycles are a lot tougher and more versatile than the industry would have you believe.
MileHighMark is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 12:04 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 423 Times in 282 Posts
Good topic. I consider the majority of gravel trails smooth, shouldn't have much if any concerns.

These days I seek more of the gravel and even the occasional ATB single track riding a road bike (modern and vintage). It's quite amazing what the fork's duty is and the punishment it takes. Those boulders and challenging descents riding a full rigid frame is where ones nerves are tested.

(Depicted is a bi-plane crowned road fork that oddly came on an old Specialized Stumpjumper hardtail. I don't think its original but the bike fits a 700c wheelset. Looks neat but I don't trust it for where I want to take it. Anyhow, I recently acquired a massive chrome Spinner with cast crown. Beautiful piece and found for only $10! Even though heavier than a uni-crown fork, I think its far more classic and beefy! The Frankenbike Stumpjumper will be fitted with wide 700c and honking wall climbing gearing.)

Frames: I mentioned the full rigid Stumpjumper.... purpose built bike for off or rough roads. Light, thin Tange Prestige tubes and TIG joints. One could easily inspect the joints on the TIG frames vs. lower end bike boom lugged type. I wouldn't put all the faith into some lugged frames unless its a high-end make with quality measures such as mitered joints. I'm not saying one could away with less quality lugged framesets but if you do go off-road, I'd want that extra security. Right now I'm finishing up a '72 LeChampion for all type of riding- road, gravel to full off-road. Nice geometry, longer stays but a bit steeper head angle, R-531 / lugged and a beefy fork crown for a vintage road bike.




Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_8763sm.jpg (100.0 KB, 676 views)
crank_addict is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 12:09 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times in 2,553 Posts
I just picked up a Raleigh Carlton International and have been gravel grinding it. Obviously what that frame was built for! Every piece of the frame was designed and built for an environment of poor roads. Why you do anything else in a world where good pavement was not the norm?

And lugged construction is very forgiving of poor work. Even very poorly made frames don't fail very often. Most common places for failure are the seatstay attachments (outside the lug) and the right chainstay behind the gusset, both not a catastrophic event if they break while you are riding.

Do look at your fork periodically. Those steerers rarely failed, so a look when you are doing the headset bearings will be just fine. Crown and blades at the crown are the biggest issue. All that is visible. If the bike sees rain/water, all the better. You will have rust to help you find problems. Don't see anything? Ride it!

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 06:25 PM
  #16  
afraid of whales
Thread Starter
 
Mr IGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
LOL, the fork isn't tweaked, wide angle lens. I'm just not feeling good about this old frame. A modern uni-crown is much stronger, I am on the edge...Besides, after I add braze-ons and refinish I'm more than 1/2 way to a Soma DC disc with fork or a disc trucker.
Mr IGH is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 06:43 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times in 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr IGH
LOL, the fork isn't tweaked, wide angle lens. I'm just not feeling good about this old frame. A modern uni-crown is much stronger, I am on the edge...Besides, after I add braze-ons and refinish I'm more than 1/2 way to a Soma DC disc with fork or a disc trucker.
I've ridden a Soma DC disc. Nice bike.

Unless you are going to ride with a full load, I wouldn't choose the disc Trucker.

FWIW I ride this routinely on the gravel in northern Minnesota near our cabin and it works great.

I maybe have $150 into it. No need to spend big $$$$.

[IMG]DSCN2251 by gomango1849, on Flickr[/IMG]
gomango is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 06:46 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times in 1,995 Posts
I think the purpose of the thread was to justify a new frame and fork, just an oblique angle to arrive to that conclusion.
repechage is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 06:50 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr IGH
LOL, the fork isn't tweaked, wide angle lens. I'm just not feeling good about this old frame. A modern uni-crown is much stronger, I am on the edge...Besides, after I add braze-ons and refinish I'm more than 1/2 way to a Soma DC disc with fork or a disc trucker.
You've gotta know what the answer will be if you ask on this forum if you should ride a vintage bike hard. It'll always be yes. Forgive me for pointing this out but in your first post, you wanted a new bike because you were worried about the fork. Now you are justifying the purchase because of the cost of brazeons and a repaint that weren't mentioned before. It sounds like what you really want is the new bike. If you want the new one, get it. It's still steel after all.

oops, looks like Repechage beat me to it while I was typing.
busdriver1959 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 06:52 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 255 Times in 142 Posts
Originally Posted by busdriver1959
You've gotta know what the answer will be if you ask on this forum if you should ride a vintage bike hard. It'll always be yes. Forgive me for pointing this out but in your first post, you wanted a new bike because you were worried about the fork. Now you are justifying the purchase because of the cost of brazeons and a repaint that weren't mentioned before. It sounds like what you really want is the new bike. If you want the new one, get it. It's still steel after all.

oops, looks like Repechage beat me to it while I was typing.
Plus the Soma beats the daylights out of the first choice. They are dirt cheap and ride well.

Especially with two pounds of muck on them.
gomango is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 07:44 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times in 395 Posts
Yes it will be fine. All bikes used to be "gravel grinders".

Lazyass is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 07:45 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Chrome Molly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Forksbent, MN
Posts: 3,190

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 301 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
You're good. Ride the snot out of it.

A fancy refinish and gravel will not mix well anyway...
Chrome Molly is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:11 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
fender1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Berwyn PA
Posts: 6,408

Bikes: I hate bikes!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 431 Post(s)
Liked 710 Times in 233 Posts
I think the Super Course was 531 main triangle and hi-ten stays and fork right? I would think it would hold up pretty well to most riding abuse,except jumps etc. If you keep the frame and continue to ride off-road, maybe try a different set of bars? When I was riding my road bike off road, I was missing the leverage of straight bars. Wash board type terrain was tough with drops.
fender1 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:21 PM
  #24  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times in 1,433 Posts
Originally Posted by fender1
I think the Super Course was 531 main triangle and hi-ten stays and fork right?
Correct.

And I agree with @icepick_trotsky that if things have held up this long, that pretty much shows they're good for the "long haul."
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 08:43 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times in 2,610 Posts
Some years back, I acquired a Super Course MkII with a stuck stem. In the process of removing that stem, I had the stem itself in a vise and tried to rotate the wheel/fork. As a result, one of the fork dropouts slipped right out, and it was clear that very little brazing material was holding it on (i.e., it came off nice and clean!). I had a local frame builder braze it back on, as well as add a bit more brazing material to the other fork dropout.
nlerner is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.