Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What Difference - C&V Steel, Newer Steel, Modern Custom Steel?

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What Difference - C&V Steel, Newer Steel, Modern Custom Steel?

Old 01-24-15, 03:55 PM
  #1  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,644

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 48 Times in 30 Posts
What Difference - C&V Steel, Newer Steel, Modern Custom Steel?

Something that I have been wondering about.

How much difference, if any, would there be in the ride, feel, weight, etc of (a) a top level 1970s or 1980s C&V production steel frame, (b) a top-level newer production steel frame, and (c) a modern custom steel frame. Each with the best steel of the day.

Presume all have identical components, wheels, tires. For example, suppose Campagnolo 10 speed brifters, with handbuilt wheels on alloy rims, 25 mm tubular tires.

An example of (a) might be my 1978 Raleigh Team Pro 753 or a 1986 (?) Look Bernard Hinault 753 that I am considering.
An example of (b) might be the early 2000's Colnago Master X-Light that I've always wanted to get someday.
An example of (c) might be a Waterford Artisan 953, with the lugs and horizontal top tube.

If you went on a 50 mile ride, a mix of flat road hammering, climbing, descending, town line sprints, and cruising, during which you couldn't or didn't look down at the bike - what would you notice? Anything big? Anything subtle? The relative lightness of your wallet?
jyl is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 04:24 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
LazyLegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 129

Bikes: 1989 Moser Leader Pro, 1978? Flandria, Batavus Professional AMEV, Gios Compact Pro, 1968? Frejus Tour de France, 1972 Peugeot Touring?, 1976 Flandria Tour?, 2013 Kuota Kharma, 2010 BeOne Raw, 2013 Kenesis Pro6, 2009 GT Aggressor, 2011 Trek Fuel Ex8.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It depends, if you can feel a pea through twenty mattresses you might notice a difference in feel, if you are more fit then you will feel fresher after 50miles on the same bike that suddenly feels like a bone shaker after the same distance when you are less fit. Saying that, I think I remember something about the Madison Genesis pro team from the UK, who raced on Steel quite recently, having to modify their frames as some of the riders found them uncomfortable as they were too stiff - Too Lazy to look it up and it could have been some sort of marketing hype too - In any case, they've had to concede that steel isn't competitive enough and are now racing Carbon.

Newer steels can be lighter, and stiffer at the top end, you can also get stainless steel for durability.

C&V is an ethereal quality that can only be mimicked, not recreated - A new steel bike is a new bike, if you want performance over 50miles in a new bike, then go with Carbon. if have Carbon anxiety then go with an aluminium frame. Steel if you want it for the aesthetic.
LazyLegs is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 04:35 PM
  #3  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,229

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
With modern stuff the weights are reduced, you have access to OS tubes, air hardening and more shaped tubesets. As for the rest, it's controled by what the builder does with those tubes. You're asking vague, sweeping questions without real answers.

I have never ridden a bike I like more than my custom. I haven't met many people who have gotten a custom that think it isn't preferable for its piose contrasted with a production bike.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 04:38 PM
  #4  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,644

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Interesting. I found this article.

thewashingmachinepost :: velo club d'ardbeg :: robert millar :: societa colnago
jyl is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 04:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,223
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times in 141 Posts
This is a real toughie to answer.

I will ponder this for a bit.
gomango is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 06:26 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 807
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Too many variables to give a coherent answer so I'll just give my impressions of modern double oversize steel tubes. I weigh about 155 lbs and have three handbuilt road bikes built with double oversize tubes. One is True Temper OX Platinum. One is KVA MS2 stainless and the third is Nova Cycle Supply house brand 4130. The True Temper and KVA are almost identical designs. The Nova is a very aggressive crit bike. I can't tell the difference in how the tubes feel. They do seem to be much more comfortable than the carbon bikes all around me when the group hits a rough section of chipseal road. They climb well. I am usually first up the hill among my riding buddies who, like me, are old guys who used to race. I've heard it said that double oversize tubes are too stiff for a rider of my weight. I couldn't disagree more. They are very solid when I stand on the pedals but are still very comfortable. The stainless bike is 17lbs with Campy 10 speed from the early 2000s. The True Temper is 19 lbs with Campy 9 speed from the late ninetys. I haven't weighed the crit bike but it's probably about 19 lbs. hope that helps answer part of your question.
busdriver1959 is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 06:44 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Modern steel in the hands of a good builder is going to give you all the attributes you like of vintage steel with added stiffness and reduced weight. If you are looking for a vintage steel frame that is more modern in design I would suggest the Raleigh Columbus Zona steel frames...some of they came with a campy group. Do not confuse them with the zonal alloy aluminum.

They are great bikes and can be had with a full group for much less than a single custom frame. I think vintage frames all have different strengths and weakness. For instance my Carlton had a really sweet swept out fork that was springy, it felt supple on bad roads but it was a real noodle when climbing.

Modern steel is without a doubt better than vintage bikes made with SLX,SP etc...but you can find some classic custom frames of the era when SLX/SP was state of the art where the builder used stiffening braze on's on the bottom bracket shell. I think it does make a difference.

If you are going to commit to riding a 753 frame with sew ups, I don't think you will be sorry, that's creme de la creme of vintage performance and art.

I probably would not notice a difference in columbus slx/sp or even 4130. I did notice a difference when riding 753. It was stiffer and really felt lively and compliant if you want to use buzzwords, that's how I'd describe it.

If the wallet allows, buy all means get a custom steel frame. I would certainly not think twice about getting a modern steel frame built.But if you are chasing the classic appearance then you'd be better off seeking out a vintage bike.
SoreFeet is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 07:04 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,132

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 40 Posts
Man, I know that the newer materials far outpace the "old stuff," but I tend to think that so much of what we feel can be chalked up to fit, geometry, tires, etc. Out of all the bikes I've owned - and that's been quite a few - the most comfortable have been my 1966 Paramount, 1971 Raleigh International, and the Boulder Brevet I built in 2012. The Paramount and International are both 531, while the Boulder is whatever Mike Kone/Waterford specs. There's a similar size and geometry to the two older bikes, and while the fit is quite similar, the Boulder does not have a parallel top tube. Yet, all three are wonderful to ride and have a similar ride quality/fit. What is the magic to those three I wonder? I wish I could tell you with any sort of assurance. My overall sense is that a perfect fit will at least give higher quality tubing a run for the money. I'm really curious how others feel about new steel, custom fit, etc.
AZORCH is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 07:07 PM
  #9  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,229

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
Originally Posted by AZORCH
Man, I know that the newer materials far outpace the "old stuff," but I tend to think that so much of what we feel can be chalked up to fit, geometry, tires, etc. Out of all the bikes I've owned - and that's been quite a few - the most comfortable have been my 1966 Paramount, 1971 Raleigh International, and the Boulder Brevet I built in 2012. The Paramount and International are both 531, while the Boulder is whatever Mike Kone/Waterford specs. There's a similar size and geometry to the two older bikes, and while the fit is quite similar, the Boulder does not have a parallel top tube. Yet, all three are wonderful to ride and have a similar ride quality/fit. What is the magic to those three I wonder? I wish I could tell you with any sort of assurance. My overall sense is that a perfect fit will at least give higher quality tubing a run for the money. I'm really curious how others feel about new steel, custom fit, etc.
Proving that this is subjective and based on the rider, the bike I have most hated was a raleigh international, or the rubber band turd as I came to think of it. It looked like it was made as an act of sabotage and it rode like it was tubes of rubber.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 07:12 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
AZORCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Liberty, Missouri
Posts: 3,132

Bikes: 1966 Paramount | 1971 Raleigh International | ca. 1970 Bernard Carre | 1989 Waterford Paramount | 2012 Boulder Brevet | 2019 Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 129 Post(s)
Liked 76 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
Proving that this is subjective and based on the rider, the bike I have most hated was a raleigh international, or the rubber band turd as I came to think of it. It looked like it was made as an act of sabotage and it rode like it was tubes of rubber.
AZORCH is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 07:14 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,315
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3446 Post(s)
Liked 2,785 Times in 1,967 Posts
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
Proving that this is subjective and based on the rider, the bike I have most hated was a raleigh international, or the rubber band turd as I came to think of it. It looked like it was made as an act of sabotage and it rode like it was tubes of rubber.
Some were indeed like that. The example I have fortunately rides pretty well. I think there could be a wide variation of construction fidelity, be it good brazing with good filling of the lugs and not overheated, to the frame came out straight by luck and no cold setting was necessary. Definitely a bike where you would want to test ride it if you could. I can state that there have been a few "big name" Italian bikes in the 70's that looked the part but did not feel like their sister bikes. Lug construction has plenty of places to induce a wide variation of fidelity.
repechage is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 07:38 PM
  #12  
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,327

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 2,344 Times in 879 Posts
laterally stiff, yet vertically compliant.
thinktubes is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 08:23 PM
  #13  
Get off my lawn!
 
Velognome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,253

Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 98 Times in 48 Posts
"Mu"
Velognome is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 09:08 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
jethin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,107
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times in 154 Posts
What is the sound of one wheel spinning?
jethin is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 10:01 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 680

Bikes: 2023 Canyon Endurace 7 CF Di2, 1982 Trek 957 (retro), 80s Trek 710 (retro), 1995 Trek 930 MTB (singlespeed), Surly LHT

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by jyl
Something that I have been wondering about.

How much difference, if any, would there be in the ride, feel, weight, etc of (a) a top level 1970s or 1980s C&V production steel frame, (b) a top-level newer production steel frame, and (c) a modern custom steel frame. Each with the best steel of the day.

Presume all have identical components, wheels, tires. For example, suppose Campagnolo 10 speed brifters, with handbuilt wheels on alloy rims, 25 mm tubular tires.

An example of (a) might be my 1978 Raleigh Team Pro 753 or a 1986 (?) Look Bernard Hinault 753 that I am considering.
An example of (b) might be the early 2000's Colnago Master X-Light that I've always wanted to get someday.
An example of (c) might be a Waterford Artisan 953, with the lugs and horizontal top tube.

If you went on a 50 mile ride, a mix of flat road hammering, climbing, descending, town line sprints, and cruising, during which you couldn't or didn't look down at the bike - what would you notice? Anything big? Anything subtle? The relative lightness of your wallet?
Or (d) a run-of-the-mill modern QBP frame such as a Surly Pacer.

I suspect geometry makes the biggest difference in the feel after a 50-mile ride. Not only does this include rider position, but things like fork trail which have a huge impact on the feel of a ride. Next biggest difference I would feel is tire size and pressure. All else equal, I suspect I wouldn't feel much of a difference between a Waterford 953 and a 30-year old 531 frame.
ppg677 is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 10:29 PM
  #16  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,644

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 48 Times in 30 Posts
I understand it is a vague and difficult topic. I'm getting the impression that the modern steels, like 953 let's say, is much stronger than the vintage steels, like 753 for example, and comes in a wider variety of sizes including oversize. So, compared to vintage steels, 953 can be made into a lighter frame (thinner tubing walls), a stiffer frame (larger diameter tubing, where desired), or both lighter and stiffer.

Sound right?
jyl is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 10:34 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Chrome Molly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Forksbent, MN
Posts: 3,271

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 301 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Most of the most noticeable ride differences between vintage and modern will be in design, then materials.

I can compare vintage to custom road frames based on my experience. I had a custom made with the same geometry as my bike from 1985. The most appreciable differences are in the weight, climbing ability, and the vertical dropouts. The frame and fork (both steel) weigh almost 2 lbs less than the 1985 bike. Adding to that, there is weight savings due to the thread-less stem. The vintage bike has ultegra level components, and the custom has record/SR level components. Wheelsets and tires are comparable.

There is no comparison in terms of climbing ability and the way the new bike transfers power to the ground. The new bike also seems more "flickable" in a pinch, but on the flat rides more composed. I'm not a builder and didn't study up on it, so I'm not sure why any of these things are true. Visibly, the chain stays are more ovalized on the custom and the down tube just a little larger diameter. The new fork flexes front to back much more than the old, but holds lines through turns better. These are the type of ride differences I attribute to the frame/fork more so than any component differences. I like both bikes very much and ride them about equally in terms of saddle time. I am convinced that a great builder can transform your described wants for how your new bike will ride into reality.
Chrome Molly is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 10:59 PM
  #18  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,489

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by jyl
I understand it is a vague and difficult topic. I'm getting the impression that the modern steels, like 953 let's say, is much stronger than the vintage steels, like 753 for example, and comes in a wider variety of sizes including oversize. So, compared to vintage steels, 953 can be made into a lighter frame (thinner tubing walls), a stiffer frame (larger diameter tubing, where desired), or both lighter and stiffer.

Sound right?
Yes; sounds right.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 11:39 PM
  #19  
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
 
Jeff Wills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,808
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 785 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times in 366 Posts
John, some relevant reading from a vintage issue of a great bicycle magazine: Magnificent 7
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline  
Old 01-24-15, 11:43 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern San Diego
Posts: 1,857

Bikes: mid 1980s De Rosa SL, 1985 Tommasini Super Prestige all Campy SR, 1992 Paramount PDG Series 7, 1997 Lemond Zurich, 1998 Trek Y-foil, 2006 Schwinn Super Sport GS, 2006 Specialized Hardrock Sport

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 59 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Scooper
Yes; sounds right.
Except possibly the use of the word "much" in front of the word "stronger". The newer steel is better, but it's arguable how much better.
D1andonlyDman is offline  
Old 01-25-15, 12:59 AM
  #21  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,644

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Wills
John, some relevant reading from a vintage issue of a great bicycle magazine: Magnificent 7
Well that is depressing . . .
jyl is offline  
Old 01-25-15, 07:57 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 680

Bikes: 2023 Canyon Endurace 7 CF Di2, 1982 Trek 957 (retro), 80s Trek 710 (retro), 1995 Trek 930 MTB (singlespeed), Surly LHT

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeff Wills
John, some relevant reading from a vintage issue of a great bicycle magazine: Magnificent 7
Another comparison: 87_03Steel1
ppg677 is offline  
Old 01-25-15, 08:41 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
LazyLegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 129

Bikes: 1989 Moser Leader Pro, 1978? Flandria, Batavus Professional AMEV, Gios Compact Pro, 1968? Frejus Tour de France, 1972 Peugeot Touring?, 1976 Flandria Tour?, 2013 Kuota Kharma, 2010 BeOne Raw, 2013 Kenesis Pro6, 2009 GT Aggressor, 2011 Trek Fuel Ex8.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When someone is selling you something, it is invariably the bees knees. When you invest heavily in something you will be naturally swayed to believe that it is the best thing since sliced bread (not that sliced bread is all that when you stop and think about it). Human Bias is so bad that they have to go to extreme lengths to avoid it when testing new medicines in order to prove efficacy. The two linked article above show that difference in steel grades is probably un-noticeable to most riders.

I would argue the same for custom bike builds - If you have unusual physical dimensions, then a custom frame build may be the only way to get a bike that fits reasonably comfortably but for your average Joe-Fred, then the adjustments possible with seatpost, Stem, Cranks and Handlebars are enough. Of course, I could be shot in the face for saying that but do you really think someone who paid $5,000 for a custom bike build is going to admit that it's made little or no difference. Look how many people are turning to Homeopathy and how vociferously they will defend.

Vinatge bikes are not about performance, no one brings a restored Model T to the Car fair and argues its merits versus a new car, they bring it because of the nostalgia and sense of history and the camaraderie with a group of like minded souls. It's not the object that brings happiness, it's the experience that the object make possible. If you want to experience performance, buy the new bike. If you want to experience vintage cycling in relevant context then buy a vintage bike... just beware of the false idols of bias.
LazyLegs is offline  
Old 01-25-15, 09:43 AM
  #24  
Decrepit Member
 
Scooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 10,489

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 634 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 57 Posts
Originally Posted by D1andonlyDman
Except possibly the use of the word "much" in front of the word "stronger". The newer steel is better, but it's arguable how much better.
I guess the question is whether the degree of higher strength warrants the use of the adjective 'much'?

Reynolds 753 has an ultimate tensile strength of 1080-1280 MPa, 853 has a UTS of 1250-1400 MPa, and 953 has a UTS of 1750 to 2050 MPa.

Since 953 is almost twice as strong as 753, I believe the use of the term 'much stronger' is easily justified.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline  
Old 01-25-15, 09:52 AM
  #25  
jyl
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,644

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 48 Times in 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ppg677
Another comparison: 87_03Steel1
And that is not depressing . . .

This rider took a lot longer to evaluate the bikes than did the rider in the seven bike shootout.
jyl is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.