MTB build for touring
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks! Would any vintage MTB of that time frame have componets that would fit?
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,977
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount P15, Fisher Montare, Proteus, Rivendell Quickbeam
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Yes. I personally like the Suntour XC derailleurs & micro ratchet thumb shifters. Also keep your eyes open for some of the sealed bearing hubs that came on some mid-80's MTB's. They are so very smooth!
#29
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
That's pretty much the best MTB touring conversion possible. I'm not sure I've ever seen one with mid fork eyelets AND a third bottle mount... it's almost like they knew what it would be good for, some 20 years later.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168
Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
10 Posts
Derailing (ha ha) the conversation here to ask if you've got anymore shots with the Pasela 1.75's? I was thinking of trying out the Tserv 1.75 (same thing, basically) but wasn't sure it was enough tire coming from the 1.95's I've got now.Curious to see how well they fill out the fenders/frames by comparison...
Here is my Trek 930 with 1.75 Tservs.
P4120228 by galoot_loves_tools, on Flickr
A closer look.
P4120233 by galoot_loves_tools, on Flickr
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Man that is nice!
#32
Nigel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
.....Here is the 'ol Mesa Runner. Shimano Z202 front Derailleur and Shimano Z501GS on the rear and has Shimano MT50 thumb shifters. This bike is the bottom of the line up that top is the Cimarron and it has Shimano Deore XT components. I see a lot of those Deore XT components on ebay...should I get them and upgrade?
I would keep thumb shifter, Sunrace offers some friction thumbies for a reasonable price.
Here is my PDG: https://s357.photobucket.com/user/Nig...acrtg.jpg.html
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Are your current derailleurs not functioning properly? New Shimano stuff - even the bottom end - works better than almost all of the components from 15+ years ago. Unless you are hung up on period specific components, use new stuff. It is cheaper, and easier to find. For a Mesa Runner, I would not worry about period specific. If you were talking about a Cimarron or PDG; that is an entirely different matter.
I would keep thumb shifter, Sunrace offers some friction thumbies for a reasonable price.
Here is my PDG: IMG_20150119_081222_510_zpsaovacrtg.jpg Photo by Nigel_F_Misso | Photobucket
I would keep thumb shifter, Sunrace offers some friction thumbies for a reasonable price.
Here is my PDG: IMG_20150119_081222_510_zpsaovacrtg.jpg Photo by Nigel_F_Misso | Photobucket
#34
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Basically all Shimano stuff of a given speed (up to 9spd) is cross compatible. Even then, I've used 7spd derailleurs with 9spd shifters no problem. As long as you're sticking to MTB stuff, you can pretty much use whatever.
#35
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 256
Bikes: '59 Raleigh Lenton, '86 Peugeot PSN-10 Triathalon, '84 Peugeot PGN-10, 8? Peugeot UE-18, Peugeot NS-540, '86 Giant Iguana (Xtracycle), Holdsworth Gemini tandem, Surly Cross Check fixie, '86 Centurion MV Ironman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#37
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 35
Bikes: Kona Sutra * Trek T2000 * Specialized Roubaix * 90 Gary Fisher Paragon * 71 Columbia Twosome * 66 Raleigh Sports * 36 Dawes tandem * 1925 Granby * 1908 Cleveland Swell * 1899 Gormully & Jeffries Rambler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
I have a '90 or '91 Paragon and the catalog description does say it's built for expeditions, though mine doesn't have that 3rd bottle mount. The problem I have is the quill stem is too long and it uses that 1 1/4" headset. How did you get around that? What's that setup you have on yours?
#38
Rides Majestic
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339
Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Have you decided on your cockpit setup yet? If you are doing a drop bar conversion you will need brake levers, bars, cables, and bar tape at the very least. The shifters and derailleurs could be used with a drop bar setup mounting the shifters to the tops or on the ends as a poor man's bar end. If you are going with a flat bar or trekking bar, the parts will move right over. I personally think if the frame fits, you should go with it to see how you like the ride, especially if doing a drop conversion. Upgrade later if you need to. Lots of times you can pick up a complete mountain bike with a nicer group for cheap on CL, even if it's too small you're just buying it for the parts anyway.
Another consideration with vintage MTBs is the rear spacing, many times it's 126mm or 130mm. If you are keeping the wheels, it may limit the number of rear cogs and therefore the shifter choices. Friction bar ends will work with just about anything so are a good choice. If you want to go more modern, you can cold set the frame to 135mm to use standard freehub wheels and more rear cogs. In any case, I would check out the spacing before I bought anything for use on that frame. Good luck.
Another consideration with vintage MTBs is the rear spacing, many times it's 126mm or 130mm. If you are keeping the wheels, it may limit the number of rear cogs and therefore the shifter choices. Friction bar ends will work with just about anything so are a good choice. If you want to go more modern, you can cold set the frame to 135mm to use standard freehub wheels and more rear cogs. In any case, I would check out the spacing before I bought anything for use on that frame. Good luck.
#39
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Have you decided on your cockpit setup yet? If you are doing a drop bar conversion you will need brake levers, bars, cables, and bar tape at the very least. The shifters and derailleurs could be used with a drop bar setup mounting the shifters to the tops or on the ends as a poor man's bar end. If you are going with a flat bar or trekking bar, the parts will move right over. I personally think if the frame fits, you should go with it to see how you like the ride, especially if doing a drop conversion. Upgrade later if you need to. Lots of times you can pick up a complete mountain bike with a nicer group for cheap on CL, even if it's too small you're just buying it for the parts anyway.
Another consideration with vintage MTBs is the rear spacing, many times it's 126mm or 130mm. If you are keeping the wheels, it may limit the number of rear cogs and therefore the shifter choices. Friction bar ends will work with just about anything so are a good choice. If you want to go more modern, you can cold set the frame to 135mm to use standard freehub wheels and more rear cogs. In any case, I would check out the spacing before I bought anything for use on that frame. Good luck.
Another consideration with vintage MTBs is the rear spacing, many times it's 126mm or 130mm. If you are keeping the wheels, it may limit the number of rear cogs and therefore the shifter choices. Friction bar ends will work with just about anything so are a good choice. If you want to go more modern, you can cold set the frame to 135mm to use standard freehub wheels and more rear cogs. In any case, I would check out the spacing before I bought anything for use on that frame. Good luck.
#40
Rides Majestic
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westfield, MA
Posts: 1,339
Bikes: 1983 Univega Gran Turismo, 1970 Schwinn Super Sport, 2001 Univega Modo Vincere, Self-Built Nashbar Touring, 1974 Peugeot U08, 1974 Atala Grand Prix, 1986 Ross Mt. Hood, 80's Maruishi MT-18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
True enough. I hadn't even considered building a 26" wheel with a road hub for such a bike, I was thinking a wheel swap from a donor bike to keep costs down.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,471 Times
in
2,079 Posts
Another good option for MTBs is a trekking bar. That way your investment in parts is low since all the original parts will work. Trekking bars work well with longish top tubes since you are not quite so bent over and they have lots of comfortable hand positions. Also some of the older vintage MTBs from the 80s tend to have a bit longer wheelbases and the top tubes tend not to be as long relative to seatpost length than the ones in the 90s. They were still working out MTB geometry in the 80s and the bikes were often a bit longer in the wheelbase than became common by the 90s. My 1988 specialized stumpjumper comp came with a u-brake in the rear. It's a 20 inch bike with a 22 inch top tube; my 1991 team specialized stumpjumper is an 18 inch frame with a 22 inch top tube. Big difference when thinking about adding drops.
Last edited by bikemig; 02-24-15 at 09:46 AM.
#42
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Shimano Tiagra hubs are a great value for a durable hub for 130 spaced builds. Not sure if the CX series hubs are available in 130, but if they are, those would be a really good option as well.
#43
Nigel
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,991
Bikes: 1980s and 1990s steel: CyclePro, Nishiki, Schwinn, SR, Trek........
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
https://www.amazon.com/Profile-Design...less+converter
They are made for 1" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless and a 1 1/8" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless.
#44
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Threadless converter. Are you sure it is 1 1/4" ? 1 1/8" threaded is more likely.
https://www.amazon.com/Profile-Design...less+converter
They are made for 1" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless and a 1 1/8" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless.
https://www.amazon.com/Profile-Design...less+converter
They are made for 1" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless and a 1 1/8" threaded to 1 1/8" threadless.
Edit: looks like Wheels Mfg. has a press-in adapter to 1 1/8, though then the fork will be an issue... https://www.cambriabike.com/Wheels-He...lack-HRED2.asp
Last edited by seely; 02-24-15 at 10:23 AM.
#45
Banned
I Used a Mesa Runner ( dumpster find) and Built a single speed out of it , a IGH does a lot without the vulnerabilities of Bent Derailleurs .
width of the rear end , if you want derailleur drive trains 120 , 5, 125, 6 speed freewheels. 130- and 135 start to let you use cassette hubs.
width of the rear end , if you want derailleur drive trains 120 , 5, 125, 6 speed freewheels. 130- and 135 start to let you use cassette hubs.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a '90 or '91 Paragon and the catalog description does say it's built for expeditions, though mine doesn't have that 3rd bottle mount. The problem I have is the quill stem is too long and it uses that 1 1/4" headset. How did you get around that? What's that setup you have on yours?
Last edited by sculbertson; 02-24-15 at 08:57 PM.
#47
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 35
Bikes: Kona Sutra * Trek T2000 * Specialized Roubaix * 90 Gary Fisher Paragon * 71 Columbia Twosome * 66 Raleigh Sports * 36 Dawes tandem * 1925 Granby * 1908 Cleveland Swell * 1899 Gormully & Jeffries Rambler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times
in
5 Posts
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that Nitto converter!
Here's the catalog page for the Paragon. The Evolution steering system is 1 1/4" (for everyone else's benefit).
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
Think big.
Like @seely above, I'm a 6 footer with long legs and best fit bikes normally found under guys who are 6'2" to 6'5" (61-64cm on a traditional roadbike) The two pictured below are set up to fit me as best they can; though the bars on the green one (1985 Raleigh Elkhorn Mountain Track) don't go down far enough for my liking and blue one (1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker) feels a bit short on the top tube, which I don't mind for single track, but would probably hate for touring.
BTW, both of these bikes are ones I'm thinking of selling this spring, so PM if you like to talk details or get exact measurements.
Like @seely above, I'm a 6 footer with long legs and best fit bikes normally found under guys who are 6'2" to 6'5" (61-64cm on a traditional roadbike) The two pictured below are set up to fit me as best they can; though the bars on the green one (1985 Raleigh Elkhorn Mountain Track) don't go down far enough for my liking and blue one (1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker) feels a bit short on the top tube, which I don't mind for single track, but would probably hate for touring.
BTW, both of these bikes are ones I'm thinking of selling this spring, so PM if you like to talk details or get exact measurements.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The First State.
Posts: 1,168
Bikes: Schwinn Continental, Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn High Plains, Schwinn World Sport, Trek 420, Trek 930,Trek 660, Novara X-R, Giant Iguana. Fuji Sagres mixte.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times
in
10 Posts
The Tservs have been great tires. Roll fast, good on wet surfaces and corner well. I regularly roll over broken glass on my commute and no flats so far. I weighed mine before installation and they came in at about 440 grams per. If you are using 800 gram tires, you will shave some weight off for sure.
#50
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Think big.
Like @seely above, I'm a 6 footer with long legs and best fit bikes normally found under guys who are 6'2" to 6'5" (61-64cm on a traditional roadbike)
Like @seely above, I'm a 6 footer with long legs and best fit bikes normally found under guys who are 6'2" to 6'5" (61-64cm on a traditional roadbike)