Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-07, 05:18 AM   #1
actarheel
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
frame materials

Looking for a comparison between aluminum vs carbon vs steel vs titanium frames for big guys like myself (6'3" - 225). I'm curious about the ride and responsiveness of each as I have only ridden an alloy frame. What weight limits on carbon frames? How about durability? Any input/comments appreciated. I have a Giant tcr (alloy) now but I'm considering upgrade to carbon or titanium if that is a realistic option.
actarheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-07, 06:30 AM   #2
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At your weight, you should be fine on any frame, as long as it isn't an ultralightweight racing frame....

Ti is great, as is Aluminum. The only thing I have against Carbon Fiber is one crash that might only scratch up a metal frame could destroy a CF frame, or create hidden damage that can cause failure at a critical time (like when you are bombing down a hill!).

My personal preference is lugged steel, preferably Columbus or 531 and above alloy!
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-07, 08:42 AM   #3
adrien
Senior Member
 
adrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: Firefly custom Road, Ira Ryan custom road bike, Ira Ryan custom fixed gear
Posts: 1,204
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Most will claim that Alu has a stiffer, harsher ride, although higher-grade aluminum used on mid-level bikes (say $1k up) is a little more compliant. The only place you really feel it is in the fork (both mine have steel forks) and in the behind, if you sit a lot. FWIW, I love how stiff it is.

Steel is very traditional, and comes with a small weight penalty. It's more compliant, though you need to take care if you get nicks etc. and think about rust. A good choice for a clyde.

I have never cared for carbon, including in just forks. The phrase "catastrophic failure" does not appeal to me. The issue is not out-of-the-box strength, it's what happens if you hit something. Small nicks on carbon can lead to big failures.
adrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-07, 09:26 AM   #4
BetweenRides
Dog Chaser
 
BetweenRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Bikes: Lemond 853; Merlin Cyrene; Bike Friday Pocket Rocket, Kona Jake the Snake Cross, Trek 8000 MTB
Posts: 515
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've ridden them all (except magnesium) and at your weight, no frame material is off limit, with the exception of some of the Al pro bikes. I put almost 30,000 miles on a C-F frame and I am heavier than you. As someone above mentioned, Al gets a bad rap (deservedly so imho) as uncomfortable, but with more expensive Al frames and C-F chain/seat stays + forks you should be ok. Ti and steel are both very comfortable in a good fitting frame. Steel has the disadvantage of rusting, so Ti wins there, but at a significant cost.

There is some truth to the C-F debate, but I think it is overblown and good C-F frames are very tough. And any material can have a catastrophic failure. I've had sudden breaks in both Al and steel with no warning. As far as C-F goes, I've never ridden a more comfortable bike on long distances, although my current Ti bike comes very close.
BetweenRides is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.