Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-24-07, 11:47 PM   #1
Wogster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tires?

Okay, so I am at Mountain Equipment Co-op today, to pick up a cheap bike computer, and I decided to look at some other stuff, tires I am down to two choices to replace the fat knobby slow tires on my MTB-Touring Commuter Bike conversion (it's a 2004 Norco Bushpilot). The engine for this bike is a 45 year old guy, 1.7m tall around 105kg (on a good day).

Ritchey Tom Slicks 26" x 1.4, $17 each.
Tioga City Slickers 26" x 1.5, $18 each

Anyone have experience good or bad with either of these tires?
Wogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-07, 05:46 AM   #2
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For commuting, either one is a good choice. I'd go with the Ritchey, just because of the name (I used to love that old cartoon, Tom Slick), because in this application, the tires are equal quality!
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-07, 06:42 PM   #3
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Either will be a major improvement over the knobbies.
I don't know which one might be more "durable", but depending on your road conditions, you might just feel the thickness of the tread to aid in your decision.
A few months back I was in a similar quandry between 1.5 & 1.25. I was afraid the 1.25 would be too small for my 20?mm wide MB rims, so I opted for the 1.5's. After mounting, it was pretty obvious the 1.25's would have been OK.
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-07, 07:16 PM   #4
Wogster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Either will be a major improvement over the knobbies.
I don't know which one might be more "durable", but depending on your road conditions, you might just feel the thickness of the tread to aid in your decision.
A few months back I was in a similar quandry between 1.5 & 1.25. I was afraid the 1.25 would be too small for my 20?mm wide MB rims, so I opted for the 1.5's. After mounting, it was pretty obvious the 1.25's would have been OK.
Well that's part of the issue, how narrow can you go Compared to the army boot like 2.25 inch knobbies on there now, anything is an improvement. Really though 1" is 25.4mm so on a 20mm rim anything over 1" should be okay. The Ritcheys look more sturdy, are a buck cheaper, and 81g lighter per tire -- not that 162g matters when the bikes engine is 25Kg heavier then it should be BTW the knobbies are about double the weight per tire....
Wogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-07, 07:23 PM   #5
late
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,377
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Hi,
I used a variety of tires on my old XO2. They came with Tom Slick 1.4
and that tire was better than any of the others I tried. Don't go smaller than
that, the ride gets harsh. I doubt it matters much which brand you get, they are both decent tires. You don't need a ton of pressure, just put in enough to keep
them kinda round and they'll give a nice ride.
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-07, 07:33 PM   #6
Velo Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Bikes:
Posts: 3,802
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've used both on my Bridgestone MB-turned-commuter, and they're both fine. The Ritcheys are on there now, and I like them a lot, though they're not the easiest-rolling 26-inch tires around (I think Panaracer Paselas get that prize,though mine were only 1.25 vs. the 1.4 Ritcheys). It's been awhile since I used the Tiogas, but they were good for urban use. Like another post said, I might go with the Toms just because of all he's done for cycling.
Velo Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-07, 07:28 PM   #7
Wogster
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just an update on this thread.

I went with the Ritchey Tom Slicks, man oh man what a difference, first the pfffft pfffft pfffft sound of the knobbies ( you know that sound, you hear it in July when some cager was too cheap to get the snow tires taken off -- even though he wasted $500 worth of gas, to save $15 getting the tires swapped ), is gone, it was truly annoying. Actually the only car I had snow tires for, I spent $10 at the junk yard for a couple of extra rims, got the snow tires mounted on them, and did the biannual swap in the driveway.

Second my normal gear on the flats has gone from 46.1 gear inches to 60.5 gear inches. Still managed to end up walking the one hill, but I did get further up before I stopped riding. Because of the higher gear, I managed to average 25km/h versus 17km/h with the "snow tires", I hit about 35km/h at one point.

I will keep the knobbies and the larger tubes as spares.

If you want to see what I have done to turn my mountain bike into a commuter/tourer, see my blog, it even includes a picture!
Wogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.