Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    new newbie jorpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    My Bikes
    Cannondale F400
    Posts
    158
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    help me choose between these bikes...

    http://denver.craigslist.org/bik/311662049.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/bik/309313758.html

    http://denver.craigslist.org/bik/310994350.html

    My gut is to go with the $200 trek and beat it to death to see how I deal with day in and day out commuting. The primary use of this bike will be to ride on paved trails in a mostly dry climate carrying a backpack to and from work.

    I usually just take a backpack to work and leave a handful of myoplex shakes in the fridge so I dont carry much at all. I'd like to be comfortable riding this bike on a longer ride on the weekends also. I'm just geting into ''cycling''. I weigh 205 lbs and am 6'2''. I've had a MTB for a few years and it's been a sidewalk/dirt trail queen.
    Learning how to rock out in the rockies since 2006

  2. #2
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,012
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    If you are planning on commuting, either the Trek or the Specialized. The Cannondale is a TT/ Tri bike and I suspect you might find it unsuitable for commuting or much else besides racing.

    The Trek has brazeons for that rear rack, has friction shifting (Simplicity and reliability), and if it fits you properly, that's the one I'd lean toward, personally.

    DT shifters are......well, an adjustment, but I use them myself and frankly, I've grown to love them!
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  3. #3
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,012
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Add in the fact that the Trek is actually designed for touring, so it will have a more relaxed geometry, hence more comfort on long rides!
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gut feeling ? the Trek is the choice as a bike to use and abuse as a comm. bike. The others two look nice. Nothing to compare to the Trek. It would be more sensible to compare a new 5-8 hundred dollar bike to the Trek than the c.dale or spec... don't ya think ?

  5. #5
    bear murphjam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Parker, CO
    My Bikes
    '06 Scott S20, '04 Trek 3700, '88 Schwinn Tempo, '86 Schwinn Tempo, '85 Centurion Le Mans RS, '84 Univega Gran Tourismo
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Specialized is sweet. I was actually looking at that bike last year. I like the Trek as a commuter. How much do you really want to spent would be the big factor.

  6. #6
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,352
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Trek is the obvious choice for commuting...if it fits you. I'm 6'1" and usually ride 56-58cm frames. You may stand over the frame ok, but you might be uncomfortable with the reach, in which case a shorter stem might fix you right up (adjust the saddle for proper position of your legs in relation to the pedal spindle, not to compensate for reach).
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  7. #7
    Mad bike riding scientist cyccommute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Denver, CO
    My Bikes
    Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
    Posts
    15,419
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Forget the Cannondale. It's a race bike pure and simple...and for a very specialized type of racing at that.

    The other 2 have pros and cons that you need to consider before you decide. I'll start with the Specialized

    Pros:

    Modern equipment. No need for upgrades

    Nice light bike.

    Very nice stuff hanging on it. Dura Ace is the top of the line for Shimano road stuff.

    A little smaller if you have fit issues

    Cons:

    For a commuter bike, you probably want something with a rack to carry stuff. Backpacks are fine but they can become uncomfortable for some people. There are ways around this but a rack on the bike is going to be problematic plus you'll get major fred points.

    It's a pretty short wheelbase bike. Fast but not necessarily comfortable.

    It's $1100.

    It has very nice stuff hanging on it

    For us larger guys (you aren't that heavy) 28 spoke wheels probably aren't the best choice. For a commuter bike, they are probably an even worse choice. You could end up with a spoke popper.

    Carbon fiber fork with carbon fiber steer tube would cause me some concern. I have a bike with a carbon fork but it has a aluminum steer tube. It still kinda gives me the willies to ride it.

    The Trek:

    Pros:

    It's cheap.

    It doesn't have anything modern hanging on it so the risk of theft (especially in Denver) is kinda low.

    It's got a longer wheel base and more comfortable ride.

    It has rack and fender mounts.

    Steel fork.

    Cons:

    It doesn't have anything modern hanging on it. That stuff may need to be replaced at some point and that can add cost. It can be done but all it takes is money.

    It may have 27" wheels (may not, too). 27" tires are harder to find and you don't have much selection.

    It has downtube shifters. That's not too bad but they aren't as easy to get use to as STI. You have to reach a ways to get to them.

    It has a rack but it looks like the rack is for a mountain bike, i.e. too small. It would need replacing but that's not too expensive. I'd look for a Delta Universal rack.

    Overall, if you want a bike for commuting, I'd go with the Trek. If you want a bike for fast weekend rides, the Specialized would get my vote. If you want a bike for long weekend rides, the Trek would be a slightly better choice. And, finally, if you want a bike that people will drool over, the Specialized wins hands down.
    Stuart Black
    Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
    Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
    Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
    Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
    An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,013
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1) Look at the hubs. If the $1000 bike has sealed hubs and the old $200 bike does not, you might have to overhaul the hubs and BB. I would guess a total overhaul of a bike runs $100-$200.

    2) Having bought many older bikes, the hub cones and possibly the BB might need to be replaced.

    3) The older the bike, the cheaper the parts, the more likely there is a time consuming problem. Every bike I have bought has had a significant unforeseen problem with it, so I can attest to the fact that trying to save money does not always work as planed.

    On the other hand $200 leaves room for upgrading and there is no reason to think the $1000 bike is perfect.
    2000 Montague CX, I do not recommend it, but still ride it.
    Strida 3, I recommend it for rides < 10mi wo steep hills.
    2006 Rowbike 720 Sport, I recommend it as an exercise bike.
    1996 Birdy, Recommend.
    Wieleder CARiBIKE (folding), decent frame.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •