Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Newbie - Question on a Bike

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Newbie - Question on a Bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-07, 05:00 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NE Central Iowa
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Newbie - Question on a Bike

Hey guys, I just starting to get into this biking thing, trying to lose some weight. Here's my situation. My employer has an employee wellness program. Basically I've been recording my workout sessions over the past 10 months, and at the end of August will be getting a gift certificate to the local fitness related store of my choice. I'll end up with a $200 gift certificate to a local bike store. The two (three) bikes that have been most recommended so far are the Trek 3700 (and corresponding steel-framed 820) and the Raleigh Mohave 2.0. Does anyone have any experience with or comments on these three bikes? I need to keep it cheap, since I'm on a very tight budget. I don't have any loyalty to any brand, although the Trek/Gary Fisher dealer is by far the closest. Other less local dealers carry the Raleigh, Cannondale, Giant, Schwinn. . .

The majority of my riding will be on gravel roads, some paved roads, and trails/minimum maintainance roads, which is why I thought a mountain bike would be my best choice. Some dealers have mentioned hybrids also, but it seems to me that a mountain bike would be built a bit heavier.

Thanks for your input to the most commonly asked question,

John
besserheimerpha is offline  
Old 06-24-07, 05:44 PM
  #2  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,872

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1794 Post(s)
Liked 1,268 Times in 875 Posts
" The majority of my riding will be on gravel roads"
Well, there's gravel and then there's GRAVEL!
A hard packed dirt road with a scattering of gravel is very different than trying to plow through an inch or more of gravel.
IF your riding will be the former, you can pretty much get away with a "bike path" type tire. The thicker stuff, would mean a WIDE knobby would be more appropriate.
You didn't state your weight, but most likely, bike "strength" won't be a factor. WHEEL strength may be.
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Old 06-24-07, 08:40 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NE Central Iowa
Posts: 74
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Current weight is 320 lbs (5'8" also, kinda stocky). Log torso, short strong legs and arm. I've been lifting for a few years and am benching about 285, and squating about 475. My lean mass was calculated at ~200 lbs using an electronic body comp tester about 4 months ago.

Luckily I'll get to see both kinds of gravel, depending on the county's schedule for road maintanence and exactly where I'm at relative to town. The majority of the time, it's hard packed dirt with a lot of rougher sections from overaggressive plows during the winter. They spread new gravel several time a year, the stuff that will even try to suck a car into the ditch. The gravel is also thicker on the less traveled stretches of road. In the spring, it also get very soupy.

Another reason I've decided to stick more on the gravel than the pavement is because it really opens up my options for routes. There are only two paved highways that would allow for any decent trips, and both are pretty full of traffic (because they're the only paved roads).
besserheimerpha is offline  
Old 06-24-07, 11:35 PM
  #4  
Gorntastic!
 
v1k1ng1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United States of Mexico
Posts: 3,424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you're 320 and squating 475 then I'd suggest,

1. radically rethinking your budget

2. looking for a overbuilt steel frame instead of an aluminum frame

3. building up that frame with some solid custom-built wheels

4. staying away from suspension forks, especially low-end suspension forks (ride a rigid fork if you're going to be on gravel roads)


I think you're going to crush anything like that Trek or Raleigh. I'm only 220 and I crush my $1500-$2500 bikes. Better to buy something that is adequate to your physique.
__________________
v1k1ng1001 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.