Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Shelby Township Michigan
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trek 7.3 or 7.5 that is the Question

    I was in the LBS on Saturday getting new pedals (because my Fat AZZ broke one), and I took the Trek 7.3FX out for a long test ride. There is a huge difference in speed between the FX, and my MTB.

    I road that thing like I stole it.....man was it fast compared to my MTB.

    I also did ride the Trek 7500, and it was not to my liking.
    I would recommend the 7500 to somebody an older, or to somebody with back problems.
    I am 31, but my mind still thinks I am 18, and skinny, so the upright position was not for me.

    So now my delima is what bike I buy the 7.3, or 7.5.
    The 7.5 is about $200 more that the 7.3, but has much nicer components.

    I honestly don't have the money for either, because I just bought my MTB, a new house, central air, and a LCD TV in the past 2 months.

    I don't want to buy the 7.3, and then 2 weeks later wish I had the 7.5.

    Anybody out there go through this same delima

  2. #2
    On my TARDIScycle! KingTermite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eastside Seattlite Termite Mound
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Trek Navigator 300, Peugeot Versailles PE10DE
    Posts
    3,928
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well, its usually my opinion that its worth a little extra to get the better components.


    However, in your case, I'm wondering if its just "I want" syndrome. If you just got all that stuff recently, I'd try to force myself to hold off and see if you are still jonesin' for it in about 5-6 months.
    Quote Originally Posted by coffeecake View Post
    - it's pretty well established that Hitler was an *******.

  3. #3
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,014
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    You already answered your own question:

    Quote Originally Posted by Skoper
    I was in the LBS on Saturday getting new pedals (because my Fat AZZ broke one), and I took the Trek 7.3FX out for a long test ride. There is a huge difference in speed between the FX, and my MTB.

    I road that thing like I stole it.....man was it fast compared to my MTB.

    I also did ride the Trek 7500, and it was not to my liking.
    I would recommend the 7500 to somebody an older, or to somebody with back problems.
    I am 31, but my mind still thinks I am 18, and skinny, so the upright position was not for me.
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  4. #4
    Chubby super biker bdinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    1,980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depending on your size, you may go with the 7.3 over the 7.5 simply due to the wheelset. The ones on the 7.5 are low spoke count and fast, but they are low spoke count. Or in other words, not nearly as tough .

    I ride a 7.3 and love it, chose it over the 7.5 for that reason specifically. I'd recommend replacing the saddle, NOBODY likes the stock one, but aside from that they are great, versatile rides.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Shelby Township Michigan
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was worried about the wheels, and also the carbon fork on the 7.5
    The guy was really pushing the 7.5 to me, but at 170lbs, he is not going to have the issues I will be having.
    I bought my MTB (GF Wahoo) about 6 weeks ago, and ride it everyday.
    The only problem is I do all paved trail riding.
    I just moved, and do not have anybody to ride the dirt with.
    I am very lucky my sub backs a rail trail, so I try to get in a min of 10 miles a day, and them I do a distance 2 X a week. I am up to 20 miles.

    My goal is to do 50 by October, and I think that with the FX my distance riding will be much more enjoyable.
    (It also has a cool bell on it....hahaha get outa my way)

    I can still remember my first ride. I was out of water, and dead tired after 2 miles.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,944
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Skoper
    I was worried about the wheels, and also the carbon fork on the 7.5
    The guy was really pushing the 7.5 to me, but at 170lbs, he is not going to have the issues I will be having.
    I bought my MTB (GF Wahoo) about 6 weeks ago, and ride it everyday.
    The only problem is I do all paved trail riding.
    I just moved, and do not have anybody to ride the dirt with.
    I am very lucky my sub backs a rail trail, so I try to get in a min of 10 miles a day, and them I do a distance 2 X a week. I am up to 20 miles.

    My goal is to do 50 by October, and I think that with the FX my distance riding will be much more enjoyable.
    (It also has a cool bell on it....hahaha get outa my way)

    I can still remember my first ride. I was out of water, and dead tired after 2 miles.
    You can gain a lot of paved trail and road performance with different tires. When your riding in dirt, mud, snow, etc you want wide, knobby tires with low air pressure, to maximize traction, the knobs dig into the surface.

    On hard surfaces like asphalt and concrete, traction is actually better with a smooth tire, because knobs can't dig into the surface, and will just ride on top, giving a lot less surface area. There is also the question of rolling resistance, this is the frictional resistance of the tires to roll along the surface, and the solution is to go with a narrower tire, at a higher pressure. There is one thing that is confusing, some measurements are in American units (inches), and some are in Metric. To resolve the confusion, we refer to the master mechanic, Sheldon Browns article on Tire Sizes

    Where it gets confusing is that the old 27" is marked in inch widths, as are most MTB tires, and Sheldon's chart is in mm. Simply multiply inches by 25.4 or divide mm by 25.4 to get the other unit. I currently run 36mm wide tires (1.4 inch) on my MTB, and get a lot better road performance, then with the old 2.5" knobby tires.

  7. #7
    user friendly doctortalk121's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    267
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    xxx
    Last edited by doctortalk121; 08-12-07 at 01:31 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •