Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Looking for a good multi-purpose Clyde bike.

    I'm new to this forum and fairly new to cycling, and am 6'4" 240.

    I'm looking for a good commuter that is comfortable enough to ride for fun on a local bike path, and efficient enough to ride to work on the road. I would also like a bike that I could use to do some touring (just to begin, if it's something I get into I could upgrade to a full touring bike when I can afford it.) As of right now, I prefer a more upright position, below are the bikes I've narrowed my choice to (and have ridden at my LBS.) Is one of these bikes better for Clydes, or a better value in general? (I don't know enough about components to judge.) I'm on a budget (around $500) but don't know enough to feel comfortable buying a used bike. I currently ride an old Raleigh M30 mountain bike.

    Giant Cypress DX--Nice ride, comfortable. I don't know if I need the front shock. The disc breaks might make it hard to attach racks.

    Giant FCR3--really liked the ride and it was a step (or turn?) faster. Could I attach a more plush seat?

    Trek 7300--About the same as the Giant. But I can't judge components.

    Trek 7.2FX--Again with the components, I like the suspension seat post on this one (which the FCR3 doesn't have.)

    Also, I saw online that Giant makes a Tran Send commuter, but my LBS didn't have one to ride. I think it looks like a Cypress without front suspension and disc breaks. Any feedback or advice would be helpful. Thanks.

    bdkbrown

  2. #2
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,014
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Any of these are nice, but forget the suspension seat post, as you'll find it really detracts from cycling. Every one of us that had one has replaced it with a nonsuspension post or is planning to. It makes getting the saddle height correct difficult.

    Instead, look at a saddle like the Brooks Conquest or B-67 or the like, with spring set in the back, you'll be a lot happier, as well as a pair of padded shorts. The padding is better in the shorts than on the saddle, believe it or not!



    Rigid forks are also a plus, unless you're going offroad and riding singletrack. On pavement, all it'l do is add weight and suck up your pedal stroke power and be another part to break.
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks. Is a rigid fork O.K. for a big guy to use on rough pavement with potholes, or over a bike path where stumps have cracked the cement? I'm not going "off-road" but some of the roads I ride on are less than perfect.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Caincando1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dodge Center, MN
    My Bikes
    Trek Pilot 1.0
    Posts
    820
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bdkbrown View Post
    Thanks. Is a rigid fork O.K. for a big guy to use on rough pavement with potholes, or over a bike path where stumps have cracked the cement? I'm not going "off-road" but some of the roads I ride on are less than perfect.
    Sure, I ride a aluminum frame and rigid carbon fiber fork and I'm 310lbs. I ride on the rural roads here in MN that are pretty beat up.
    2006 Trek Pilot 1.0
    2005 Trek Navigator 300

  5. #5
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,014
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Yep, you just learn to "Unweight the Bike", through shifting your weight to ease the shock, ot just avoid the obstacles and holes entirely.
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 6'3 315 and I ride a rigid fork as well with a nonsuspension post. It might take a little longer to get used to, but you'll be happier in the long run. The roads i ride aren't rediculously bad, but i do spend a fair amount of time on cracked concrete pavement and riding over potholes as well as some time on tree root cracked pavement.

  7. #7
    5' 19" barndoor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    832
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Absolutely forget that $#%*@! floating seatpost! They are ok "for a while" but your butt will love you once you go to a sprung Brooks saddle! I'm 6'7" 280# , so I can attest....
    I own my dream bike, a 2006 R-14 66cm Waterford road bike

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chili, NY
    My Bikes
    88 Fisher Gemini tandem, 92 Trek 970, 07 Nashbar Frame, 08 Gary Fisher Paragon
    Posts
    734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless it is a High End Suspension fork and you need it for off-road work, I tell folks to stay with the rigid fork to be sure. If you need added comfort, by all means look for a carbon front fork as a replacement.

    At 255 lbs My STEEL frame MTB with the CARBON front fork works very well for me. Very positive handling and not too jarring a ride at all.

    Brooks B-17 rider here!
    A Mess of old bikes...
    92 Trek 970
    08 Gary Fisher Paragon

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the advice. I think I'll probably go with a rigid fork, then.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Terrierman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SWMO
    Posts
    3,138
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bdkbrown View Post
    Thanks for the advice. I think I'll probably go with a rigid fork, then.
    Smart move. Delete the suspension seat post too, get a bike with a lot of spokes on the factory wheels (28 min, 32 better, 36 best) a wide gear range with a triple chainring crankset, 700 x 28 or so tires and you are good to go. At the first tuneup, specifically ask the shop to stress relieve and retension the spokes on the wheels, you will very likely have much less trouble with your wheels if you can get them to actually do that correctly. You are looking at some darn decent bikes. Good luck.
    It's all downhill from here. Except the parts that are uphill.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,944
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ang1sgt View Post
    Unless it is a High End Suspension fork and you need it for off-road work, I tell folks to stay with the rigid fork to be sure. If you need added comfort, by all means look for a carbon front fork as a replacement.

    At 255 lbs My STEEL frame MTB with the CARBON front fork works very well for me. Very positive handling and not too jarring a ride at all.

    Brooks B-17 rider here!
    Do they make a rigid carbon fork, that is a drop in replacement for a suspension fork? If so, made by whom, and what model(s). I would like to dump the 80mm suspension fork on my bike, and since, these days, I am so close to the Clyde limit, ( 97kg at last check), I would consider CF, providing it's inexpensive enough (side benefit, I could get the bars up a little).

  12. #12
    Senior Member Terrierman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    SWMO
    Posts
    3,138
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, they make CF forks that will fit practically any bike out there, made by many manufacturers in many different models. Figure out what you need for your bike and head on over to E-bay, if you dare. Son Chris replaced the front fork on his RockHopper with a CF rigid fork, on the way to converting it to a "RoadHopper" with 700 C wheels, Avid BB7 disc brakes and a new 52-42-30 triple crank.
    It's all downhill from here. Except the parts that are uphill.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Wogster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
    Posts
    6,944
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terrierman View Post
    Yes, they make CF forks that will fit practically any bike out there, made by many manufacturers in many different models. Figure out what you need for your bike and head on over to E-bay, if you dare. Son Chris replaced the front fork on his RockHopper with a CF rigid fork, on the way to converting it to a "RoadHopper" with 700 C wheels, Avid BB7 disc brakes and a new 52-42-30 triple crank.
    Problem is, there are about 65.536 different models out there, and I am not sure, even what to look for.....

  14. #14
    Huge Memeber fifthcircle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    O-Town, NE
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher Cobia, Lemond Buenos Aires
    Posts
    231
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•...¸><((((º>`• .¸¸.•´¯`•.¸><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•...¸><((((º>
    2006 Gary Fisher Cobia - 29er baby!
    2006 Lemond Buenos Aires - Steel/Carbon best of both worlds.

  15. #15
    "Big old guy"
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Trure North Touring, Cannondale Killer V
    Posts
    240
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey now not so fast with the "forget the suspension seat post" stuff. I guess I'm one of the few that took off my Thudbuster when I bought my Brooks and put in back a few months later. I just completed a 300 mile tour and loved having the Thudbuster under my butt. ( I not so in love with the Brooks). I agree a cheap suspension seat post is worthless but a Thudbuster with the correct elstomers (a purple and a black) is a magic carpet ride.
    The Older I Get, The Better I Was.

  16. #16
    Senior Member MrEWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Aurora, IL
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As far as basic bikes, take a look at Cross style bikes. I found them more comfortable than other styles. Go to the bike store and ask about Surly Cross-check or other cross bikes.

  17. #17
    Neil_B
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bdkbrown View Post
    I'm new to this forum and fairly new to cycling, and am 6'4" 240.

    I'm looking for a good commuter that is comfortable enough to ride for fun on a local bike path, and efficient enough to ride to work on the road. I would also like a bike that I could use to do some touring (just to begin, if it's something I get into I could upgrade to a full touring bike when I can afford it.) As of right now, I prefer a more upright position, below are the bikes I've narrowed my choice to (and have ridden at my LBS.) Is one of these bikes better for Clydes, or a better value in general? (I don't know enough about components to judge.) I'm on a budget (around $500) but don't know enough to feel comfortable buying a used bike. I currently ride an old Raleigh M30 mountain bike.

    Giant Cypress DX--Nice ride, comfortable. I don't know if I need the front shock. The disc breaks might make it hard to attach racks.

    Giant FCR3--really liked the ride and it was a step (or turn?) faster. Could I attach a more plush seat?

    Trek 7300--About the same as the Giant. But I can't judge components.

    Trek 7.2FX--Again with the components, I like the suspension seat post on this one (which the FCR3 doesn't have.)

    Also, I saw online that Giant makes a Tran Send commuter, but my LBS didn't have one to ride. I think it looks like a Cypress without front suspension and disc breaks. Any feedback or advice would be helpful. Thanks.

    bdkbrown
    I rented a Giant Cypress during my vacation in Cleveland, Ohio, in May. It's a nice bike for a flat city, and I enjoyed riding it in rush hour traffic. (I live in farm country, so riding in urban traffic is a treat for me.) With only seven gears, I didn't think it suitable for hills.

    I strongly suggest replacing any suspension seatpost on any bike you buy. The bouncing compromises your pedal stroke. Also, if you have hills to climb, get a triple gear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •