Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-07, 09:56 AM   #1
redneckwes
Super Course fan
Thread Starter
 
redneckwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Bikes:
Posts: 2,715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Clydes, fitness, frame sizes and not spending too much $$

Some of Neil's comments in Becky's Thread made me start thinking about this, and if it helps some of my fellow Clydes/Clydeettes save some money, so much the better.

Background, I'm 30 with a lifelong history of nagging back/knee problems, mostly caused by accidents and my weight. and 6'1" with short legs, long torso

When I started riding again last summer, (After 14 years or so away from bikes) I started at 280lbs, down from my worst at 305-310 on a 23" (58cm) Schwinn Continental, the conti, didn't fit me very well at all, It was all I could do, despite being a fairly "Active" clyde to get my leg over it. So I went looking for 21" frames, there being a shortage of older 22" frames to be found. I ended up with two pretty nice road bikes with 21" frames, both were pretty cheap, standover gave me about an inch before hitting anything, top tube length was pretty cramped, but I rode mostly on the flats of the bars and bolt upright, so it seemed ok. Also, I never raised the seat high enough to get full leg extension, (my knees seemed happier that way,) and I was/am a noob with no clue about proper fitting to begin with. So at best, my riding position was pretty inefficient.

Now, since last fall I've been watching what I eat, quit drinking anything carbonated, cut back on the baked goods and all the trips to DQ, and I've rode a lot, 20-30-40 miles at a time. I was really surprised that my rebuilt left knee could take more than 10 miles! But.. over the past few months my noob mistakes began to come to light. The stronger my legs became, the more they supported my bad knees, so I began to raise the seat every now and then, (not even thinking about it really) A few weeks ago, the cramped position on the small frame really began to affect my back, even with a long stem. And the reality that a 6'1" man does not belong on a 21" frame became very clear. I must have looked like a circus bear on the 21" bike. The standover on a 23" frame is not as tight as it was before, (Gravity?) so I'm moving to 22"-23" 56-58cm bikes now. I've been lucky enough to find reasonable inexpensive replacements.

Just making a short story long,
__________________
http://bicyclenut.bravehost.com/Bicy...nt%20page.html

The last two bikes on my list are a 50's Lenton Grand Prix and a '64 Raleigh Record.
redneckwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 10:08 AM   #2
Neil_B
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneckwes View Post
And the reality that a 6'1" man does not belong on a 21" frame became very clear.
Huh?!? I'm six even and my new bike is a 20" frame. I just picked it up and it fits me very well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 10:21 AM   #3
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Historian View Post
Huh?!? I'm six even and my new bike is a 20" frame. I just picked it up and it fits me very well.
Ah, but what's the geometry? A Compact geometry frame sizes differently than a traditional geometry like an older Schwinn would have, or other horizontal Top Tube design, for example.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 10:22 AM   #4
bdinger
Chubby super biker
 
bdinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska
Bikes:
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Historian View Post
Huh?!? I'm six even and my new bike is a 20" frame. I just picked it up and it fits me very well.
Pictures! Pictures!

I'm 6 2 and my MTB is a 19in frame - fits me great. The seatpost is way up in the air, but I have great clearance and like my position on the frame.

My Trek FX is a 22.5 and also fits me very well. I have very little or no clearance when standing, but I like the fit of it enough that it doesn't matter. I'll take that over feeling "scrunched".

You might go visit some shops and try out various bikes. There's nothing saying you have to buy one, but it will give you a good idea of fit.
bdinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 10:29 AM   #5
redneckwes
Super Course fan
Thread Starter
 
redneckwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost on the windswept plains of the Great Black Swamp
Bikes:
Posts: 2,715
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe View Post
Ah, but what's the geometry? A Compact geometry frame sizes differently than a traditional geometry like an older Schwinn would have, or other horizontal Top Tube design, for example.
+1 My size references were in old school steel road frames, level top tubes ect. Think ...70's and 80's 10 Speeds.
__________________
http://bicyclenut.bravehost.com/Bicy...nt%20page.html

The last two bikes on my list are a 50's Lenton Grand Prix and a '64 Raleigh Record.
redneckwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-07, 10:31 AM   #6
Caincando1
Senior Member
 
Caincando1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dodge Center, MN
Bikes: Trek Pilot 1.0
Posts: 820
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ever person will feel a little different on each size bike. I'm 6 foot but have short legs. My Navigator is a 21" which is really a bit to tall for me in the stand over. But the longer cockpit fit my long torso better. My Pilot is a 58cm. The stand over is great, but the cockpit is to long and I'll need to swap out the stem for a much shorter one.
Caincando1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM.