Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    East Tawas, MI
    Posts
    127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Brooks and padded shorts?

    For those that use a Brooks saddle, do you also wear padded shorts or are they not necessary?

  2. #2
    Senior Member climbhoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    My Bikes
    SS Surly Crosscheck; '91 Cannondale 3.0
    Posts
    1,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You know, the reason chamois exists is for chafing and not for actually padding anything. I think it's funny because folks think of it as an extra cushioning layer. It can, in fact, cause MORE pressure on the perineum because of the added material.

    I wore mine at first, and one day didn't and found it to be at least 100x more comfortable without the chamois. The saddles are slick enough that you won't chafe even without chamois. You can still wear lycra, just get the un-chamoised kind. I will never go back to chamois!

  3. #3
    SERENITY NOW!!! jyossarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In the 212
    My Bikes
    Haro Vector, IRO Rob Roy, Bianchi Veloce
    Posts
    8,757
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For me, the Brooks is more comfortable without the padded shorts. With the padded shorts, my ass hurts even more. I wonder if it's because the saddle is broken in to my non-padded ass.
    HHCMF - Take pride in your ability to amaze lesser mortals! - MikeR



    We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!

  4. #4
    Lanky Lass East Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Take a deep breath, and ask--What would Sheldon do?
    My Bikes
    Nishiki Nut! International, Pro, Olympic 12, Sport mixte, and others too numerous to mention.
    Posts
    21,575
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The odd thing is that when a saddle really fits well, you don't need a chamois. I ride my bikes in street clothes and unpadded tights/knickers and don't have any significant issues. I don't have a Brooks yet--but I did get chosen to be a product tester for the Brooks Imperial. I went with the ladies model, and I am very excited about it. I suspect I will find it very comfortable no matter what I wear riding.

    East Hill
    Last edited by East Hill; 03-16-08 at 03:51 PM.
    ___________________________________________________
    TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...

  5. #5
    Senior Member Caincando1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dodge Center, MN
    My Bikes
    Trek Pilot 1.0
    Posts
    820
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    None for me either.
    2006 Trek Pilot 1.0
    2005 Trek Navigator 300

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    777
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    EastHill said it all

    I don't and I will never buy or wear a pair of daipers again

  7. #7
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You don't need padded shorts...but for men, tight shorts (or a tight under short) that keep all your pieces parts in place is a darned good idea. Flat or no seams - better yet.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just got a Brooks B17 and I have about 100 miles on it, got it last Tuesday. Anyway, I will try this out, that is, no padding on my next ride.

  9. #9
    Steel Frame BrooklynRider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    My Bikes
    Roadbike, commuterbike and wife's "Bike with a bell and a basket" 3 speed.
    Posts
    186
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I found this thread wondering if the padding actually makes problems... I'm thinking now that the chamois causes more trouble than it solves...

    If you are using padding for your sit bones, the padding interferes with anatomic cutouts in the saddle! And frankly, a 2mm of compressible polyester fiber are NOT going to make much difference on the sit bones if the saddle is not doing it's most basic job supporting your pelvis while providing clearance for soft tissue that suspends, etc...

    The real problem, is the padding bunches up and fills the 'taint area and you get compression where the padding bunches up between the legs. Unless you grab your padding and pull it out from 'there' every 5 miles, it bunches up and you start to wonder why the cutout on your expensive saddle still make you numb.

    I'm beginning to think a part of advanced cycling is to make your sit bones numb to a hard saddle and forgo padding that makes other more important things complain. I'm going to cut the chamois out of my winter tights and wear padded shorts under them if I need padding.

    I've ridden the Brooks B-17 with and without padding. The sit bones are fine either way, but I do notice, the 'taint suffers more with padding on the b17. A quality saddle shouldn't need padding I think. It's 2008! The Brooks still shows it's usefulness. If only I could ride low on the drops with the Brooks... 'Taint no thing.
    ...Riding...Riding...Sleeping...Riding...

  10. #10
    Real Human Being wild animals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Ottery St. Catchpole
    My Bikes
    Sleeping Beauty: 2008 Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    936
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so those of you who don't wear padded shorts just wear regular cycling shorts or tights?

    i'm having problems riding in the drops, too. crotch goes numb. it's unpleasant. i'm just wearing civilian exercise/rain gear, using the saddle that came with my bike, though. nothing fancy. i have to figure out what to change next.

    i gotta say, though, that the saddle is a thousand times better than the one on my old bike. i think the bike shop saw my butt and took mercy on me, because the saddle isn't the one that is supposed to come with the bike, according to the bike company's website. hehe

  11. #11
    Senior Member Caincando1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dodge Center, MN
    My Bikes
    Trek Pilot 1.0
    Posts
    820
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A B 17 is a touring saddle, not a race saddle and really isn't going to work if you want to ride in the drops a lot. I'm to the point that I want to run low and aero and the now the beloved B 17 is going to have to get swapped out for a race saddle.
    2006 Trek Pilot 1.0
    2005 Trek Navigator 300

  12. #12
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross
    Posts
    11,338
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've got a B.17 on my commuter/distance bike and I wear padded shorts with it. Thin padded for long rides, but still something. It's more about moisture wicking than actually "padding" anything since my saddle is pretty well worn in and comfortable after 4000+ miles.
    "I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
    - Mandi M.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •