Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-25-08, 08:15 AM   #1
Tacfarinas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
tire clearances on road bike

Hi,

I'm not quite sure which forum this should go on but thought maybe us larger persons would be the most sympathetic. My wife (6' tall but not heavy) got a Fuji Roubaix last year as her first roadbike. But like me, at times, she feels nervous about the thin tires. So today I switch the 23mm tires that came with the bike for 28mms, and she really liked the sense of solidity they gave. The only trouble is that I then noticed that the rear tire was rubbing at the fork, and so changed it back, leaving the thicker one on the front.

So I'm wondering whether we should (a) sell the Fuji and get (e.g.) a Surly Crosscheck or (b) change to 650 wheels to allow the fatter tires. Option (b) seems a little perverse, but she does like the Fuji a lot (though I expect she'd like ANY nice road bike, esp. it were a bit comfort oriented).

Any thoughts?
Tacfarinas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 08:26 AM   #2
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Changing to 650's would create MAJOR issues....brake reach, etc. Try some 26 MM tires. I ride an Allez, which has extremely tight clearances as well and run Soma Everwears quite easily.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 08:55 AM   #3
Mr. Beanz
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
Posts: 20,030
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Might depend on the brand of tires also. I know Specialized tires have a very wide ridge along the outside of the tire. Heck, I have a hard time squeezing the 23's thru my calipers.
Mr. Beanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 09:42 AM   #4
Wogster
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tacfarinas View Post
Hi,

I'm not quite sure which forum this should go on but thought maybe us larger persons would be the most sympathetic. My wife (6' tall but not heavy) got a Fuji Roubaix last year as her first roadbike. But like me, at times, she feels nervous about the thin tires. So today I switch the 23mm tires that came with the bike for 28mms, and she really liked the sense of solidity they gave. The only trouble is that I then noticed that the rear tire was rubbing at the fork, and so changed it back, leaving the thicker one on the front.

So I'm wondering whether we should (a) sell the Fuji and get (e.g.) a Surly Crosscheck or (b) change to 650 wheels to allow the fatter tires. Option (b) seems a little perverse, but she does like the Fuji a lot (though I expect she'd like ANY nice road bike, esp. it were a bit comfort oriented).

Any thoughts?
Yeah first I would try a 25mm and see if that fits, otherwise a crosscheck would be really nice, if you can afford it, it makes a nice birthday or anniversary gift ...... Don't forget Surly also sells just the frame, if your good at doing your own bike repair, then just get the frame, and move the parts over from the Fuji, and put the Fuji frame on fleabay.....

650 wheels will not work, it changes the geometry, handling, the standover height, and brake reach.

Personally I don't see why any maker makes a frame that can't take at least a 40mm tire, tire width is a function of gross vehicle weight of the bicycle, in other words a bike for a 200kg rider needs a wider tire then a bike for a 100kg rider which needs a wider tire then a bike for a 50kg rider, given the same tire pressure. So when they make super narrow frames, then those bikes are not clyde friendly, even thought the frame may be able to handle the load.

For you, it's an easy solution, just tell her, because she is so light weight, she can use the narrowest of tires
Wogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 09:58 AM   #5
Longfemur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Personally I don't see why any maker makes a frame that can't take at least a 40mm tire
Well for one thing, I don't ever plan on using 40 mm tires on my road bike, and so I don't want the extra weight or the look of wide clearances. If I wanted a hybrid instead of a sharp handling road bike, that's what I would get. Nothing wrong with road bikes that do have that kind of clearance, but I wouldn't say that all frames should be made to accommodate the very few people who want to ride a road bike with such wide tires.

To the original poster, you should try 25mm tires. They fit fine on just about any road bike. I know you can put 28mm tires on any rim, but I find the rims on most road bikes sold today are a little on the narrow side for 28's. They tend to flop over from side to side on the rim while riding (assuming they are true 28's), and that makes the handling a little mushy. To make best use of a 28 mm wide tire, you really need a slightly wider rim that can open it up to its full width. But we're only talking a few tiny millimetres of width. The biggest difference is not in width in the sense of it being that much wider a tire (for more secure riding), but rather it's that it holds more air volume and so it doesn't have to be pumped up quite as high -- a bit softer ride.
Longfemur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 09:59 AM   #6
flip18436572
Triathlon in my future???
 
flip18436572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest Iowa
Bikes: Junk, that is why I am here. :-)
Posts: 2,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I thought as a big man 6'3" 250 that the 23 tires would be a problem. Now that I have lost more fat and gotten better with the bike, I don't have a problem with the 23 tires. Maybe she would be ok with the 23's after a new set.
__________________
2007 Jamis Ventura Comp
2006 Jamis Explorer 2.0
2000 Specialized Hardrock (bought used)
Swim, Bike, Run and sounds like fun
flip18436572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 10:45 AM   #7
Wogster
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Norco Bushpilot (out of commission), Raleigh Delta
Posts: 6,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longfemur View Post
Well for one thing, I don't ever plan on using 40 mm tires on my road bike, and so I don't want the extra weight or the look of wide clearances. If I wanted a hybrid instead of a sharp handling road bike, that's what I would get. Nothing wrong with road bikes that do have that kind of clearance, but I wouldn't say that all frames should be made to accommodate the very few people who want to ride a road bike with such wide tires.

To the original poster, you should try 25mm tires. They fit fine on just about any road bike. I know you can put 28mm tires on any rim, but I find the rims on most road bikes sold today are a little on the narrow side for 28's. They tend to flop over from side to side on the rim while riding (assuming they are true 28's), and that makes the handling a little mushy. To make best use of a 28 mm wide tire, you really need a slightly wider rim that can open it up to its full width. But we're only talking a few tiny millimetres of width. The biggest difference is not in width in the sense of it being that much wider a tire (for more secure riding), but rather it's that it holds more air volume and so it doesn't have to be pumped up quite as high -- a bit softer ride.
Well lets see, a 23mm wide tire with a 42mm wide frame, is about 10.5mm on each side, versus a frame that is 27mm wide having 4mm on each side, so 6.5mm difference. That is not a huge space, and we are talking maybe 20-25g additional frame weight. Okay for you Americans reading this, 6.5mm is just a hair over 1/4" and we are talking less then 1 oz in weight. I can't see a big difference in handling on those, especially considering that at the hub it needs to be 130mm wide to accommodate the hubl, so it's just bending the stays a little differently, and a slightly longer brake bridge.
Wogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 01:29 PM   #8
jaxgtr
Senior Member
 
jaxgtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Bikes: Trek ALR 6, Trek CrossRip, Trek X-Caliber 8
Posts: 4,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The true difference between a 23 an 28 is pretty minimal, this is really a mind game she is playing with herself. I say leave the 23's on and just encourage her to keep trying. If she still bawks, then I would move to 25's. I can fit the 28's on my CAAD9, but it is really tight.
__________________
Brian | 2015 Trek Emonda ALR 6 | 2015 Trek X-Caliber 8 | 2014 Trek CrossRip Comp
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEO View Post
you should learn to embrace change, and mock it's failings every step of the way.
jaxgtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 02:13 PM   #9
bdinger
Chubby super biker
 
bdinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska
Bikes:
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
28's? That's weak talk. You need the ability to run 2in wide 29er MTB tires, my man - get a LHT!!

Just kidding . Encourage your wife, as I ran into the same thing last year - with myself. I was running 700x32's and thought I was going to die for the first hundred miles or so. After that, and after building some confidence, I loved 'em. Heck, I test rode a 700x23 equipped roadie for fun and didn't feel at all scared - and I'm well north of 300lbs!

Anyway, give her time, and she'll probably come around. If not, I'd suggest what others have, swapping the frame for a C-C then put something wide but fast - like a Schwalbe Marathon Supreme - on it.
bdinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 07:41 PM   #10
Tacfarinas
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for these thoughts. I'm sure it's true that she COULD get used to her Fuji, but the fact is that she's only going to ride a road bike if she's confident. And I'd like her to have something she likes.

I'm a little surprised by the suggestion ghat 23 vs 28 is minimal; it's what I would have thought, certainly, but I have 28s on my touring bike and certainly do find it much more solid and reassuring; I don't feel like a sudden dip in the road or crack in the pavement will throw me (I realize that of course it could happen; I'm talking about FEELING confident.

That said, I wonder if it's geometry issue as well as tire size issue. Anything she should consider other than a cross check? Would a Long Haul Trucker be better still, for comfort and confidence? Other candidates at @ 1K ?
Tacfarinas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 09:01 PM   #11
c_m_shooter
Senior Member
 
c_m_shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Redline Monocog 29er, Generic Track bike, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker
Posts: 1,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't see any problem with running a fatter tire on the front. It is pretty common with rigid mountain bikes. Its not like it is a big enough difference to warrant a different sized tube. (that would make it a pain)
c_m_shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-08, 11:30 PM   #12
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
Posts: 5,425
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by c_m_shooter View Post
I don't see any problem with running a fatter tire on the front. It is pretty common with rigid mountain bikes. Its not like it is a big enough difference to warrant a different sized tube. (that would make it a pain)
I'll second this suggestion. Keep the 28mm tire on the front and try a 25mm on the rear. Ideally, you'd probably use the same brand tire both front and rear...
sstorkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34 PM.