Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Tires for Clydes (Technical)

    I had a full blown rear blowout yesterday and had to call the wife to get home. I can't quite figure out how the LBS and I missed the tire wear that I can now see. I was running 26x1.5 kevlar primo comets on the rear of my stratus and when it blew, it went BANG.
    Post mortem, the tire had a line of wear at the edge of the kevlar belting and had several spots where the white threads were showing. I'm very glad this happened on a slow section of MUP instead of the 36mph downhill on Saturday.

    Anyway, I bought a cheap tire from the LBS to get back on the road (26x1.5 Bontrager slick), but I'm trying to work out the dynamics of choosing a tire for us heavier riders.

    Here Goes: Weight on tire = Pressure (lb/in^2) * contact patch (in^2) * some constant

    So, let's say there's (340 (my weight) + 50 (bike+stuff) ) *3/4 of weight on the rear tire leading to roughly 300lbs. (Holy Crap!)

    300 lbs = pressure * contact patch (we'll assume the constant is same for all tires.)

    Now the width of the tire is variable and so is the max pressure so: 300 = pressure * width * length (dropping constants again and treating the patch as rectangular)
    So now, I want to minimize the length of the contact patch to drop my rolling resistance.
    My 100psi, 1.5 wide comets would come out to a length of 2 inches. Ok, now, looking at some 80 psi, 1.6 inch tires, the length goes to 2.34. And if the 2.5 inch tires at 60 psi will take the length to 2 inches, the same as my primos.

    In the end, it looks like comparing the product of width and pressure (more is better for clydes anyway) is a good rule of thumb. Now, I wish I could find some 26x1.7s that went to 120 PSI or ever 100 PSI.

    What do you think? As an engineer, this is a napkin-level analysis, but it seems valid. Anyone know of any 100PSI tires wider than 1.5in?
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  2. #2
    Chubby super biker bdinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    1,980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know about that, but I do know I've had excellent luck with my 26x1.5 Nimbus Armadillos. They show little wear after 500+ miles, and roll fantastically (is that a word? ).

    Another option known to hold weight are the Schwalbe Marathon. I'll be putting those on my LHT when the stock Continentals finally wear out.

  3. #3
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what pressure do you run in those nimbus tires? if you can use 1.5s at 65psi then i'm confused.
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  4. #4
    Chubby super biker bdinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    1,980
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tomdaniels View Post
    what pressure do you run in those nimbus tires? if you can use 1.5s at 65psi then i'm confused.
    I run mine at 80 psi, which I *think* is what they are rated to. Even with my substantial girth, there's not a lot of "squatting".

  5. #5
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bdinger View Post
    I run mine at 80 psi, which I *think* is what they are rated to. Even with my substantial girth, there's not a lot of "squatting".
    My bad, I thought they were only rated to 65. Hmmm... I see some folks in the forums running 100 psi in them. I may have to get some ordered before RAGBRAI.

    I also noticed upon further inspection that I had highly uneven tread wear. A line towards the edge of the kevlar belting on the comets is very worn and that whole side is more worn than the other. I will keep a closer eye on this from now on!
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  6. #6
    Senior Member meanwhile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,747
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tomdaniels View Post
    So now, I want to minimize the length of the contact patch to drop my rolling resistance.
    Doesn't work that way. Rolling resistance is created by the energy needed to flex the material of the tyre; it isn't eg drag between the contact patch and ground. So the size of the patch is irrelevant; it's the rate at which material enters and leaves the patch that matters. You'd think this would mean that width is key, but there can be situations when a wider lower pressure tyre (and hence a larger patch) has lower rr; see http://www.bicicletta.co.za/Download...llustrated.pdf
    - very useful paper if you mountain bike, or even ride gravel roads.


    This might be useful too -

    http://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...ing_resistance
    Why do wide tires roll better than narrow ones?

    The answer to this question lies in tire deflection. Each tire is flattened a little under load. This creates a flat contact area.
    At the same tire pressure, a wide and a narrow tire have the same contact area. A wide tire is flattened over its width whereas a narrow tire has a slimmer but longer contact area.


    The flattened area can be considered as a counterweight to tire rotation. Because of the longer flattened area of the narrow tire, the wheel loses more of its “roundness” and produces more deformation during rotation. However, in the wide tire, the radial length of the flattened area is shorter, making the tire “rounder” and so it rolls better.


    ...Wide tires only roll better at the same inflation pressure, but narrow tires can be inflated to higher pressures than wide tires. However, they then obviously give a less comfortable ride.
    In addition to this, narrow tires have an advantage over wide ones at higher speeds, as they provide less air resistance.
    Above all, a bicycle with narrow tires is much easier to accelerate because the rotating mass of the wheels is lower and the bicycle is much more agile.
    At constant speeds of around 20 km/h, the ride is better with wider tires. In practice, the energy saving is even greater than in theory as the elasticity of the tires absorbs road shocks, which would otherwise be transferred to the rider and so saves energy.
    I've seen similar stuff from other manufacturers, who seem quite frustrated that most people are buying narrower tyres than is optimal.


    On a good road surface the material of the tyre is the main thing to worry about. Schwalbe and Conti now make some very low rr wide tyres, eg the 38mm Marathon Supremes.
    Last edited by meanwhile; 06-24-08 at 01:03 PM.

  7. #7
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,008
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Uneven wear? Rear wheel? Check your wheel dish.....

    Quote Originally Posted by tomdaniels View Post
    My bad, I thought they were only rated to 65. Hmmm... I see some folks in the forums running 100 psi in them. I may have to get some ordered before RAGBRAI.

    I also noticed upon further inspection that I had highly uneven tread wear. A line towards the edge of the kevlar belting on the comets is very worn and that whole side is more worn than the other. I will keep a closer eye on this from now on!
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  8. #8
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe View Post
    Uneven wear? Rear wheel? Check your wheel dish.....
    Will do! Time to go see the Mechanic again! I have noted that the cassette side spokes are much tighter than the other.

    Quote Originally Posted by meanwhile View Post
    Doesn't work that way. Rolling resistance is created by the energy needed to flex the material of the tyre; it isn't eg drag between the contact patch and ground. So the size of the patch is irrelevant;
    Meanwhile: Thanks for the schooling. That makes quite a bit of sense. I can see how a 1.75 or 1.95 might be ok.
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  9. #9
    Just rollin' thru... scelia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PDX, OR
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Rock Hound (http://gunnarbikes.com/rockhound.php)
    Posts
    275
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You did not mention which bike this was with. It might help to know the width of your rim. If it is to narrow or wide for the tire, it could cause unnatural tire wear.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lamplight View Post
    Though I love mountain bikes, rarely would I consider one "beautiful". This one is. I hope you don't mind, but I used this picture as my wallpaper.

  10. #10
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's the stratus long wheelbase recumbent. It is a sun mammoth rim (36h) which is a pretty wide rim for the 1.5in comets.
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  11. #11
    Just rollin' thru... scelia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PDX, OR
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Rock Hound (http://gunnarbikes.com/rockhound.php)
    Posts
    275
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I weigh 290 and for slicks I run the Continental Town & Country 2.1" @65 psi. I have not had a flat with them yet. They roll smooth and grip the road well. They do not grip off road very well at all. I do not ride a recumbent, but do ride my mountain bike "like it's stolen"...
    Quote Originally Posted by Lamplight View Post
    Though I love mountain bikes, rarely would I consider one "beautiful". This one is. I hope you don't mind, but I used this picture as my wallpaper.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Bill Kapaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
    My Bikes
    86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
    Posts
    6,788
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by tomdaniels View Post
    Will do! Time to go see the Mechanic again! I have noted that the cassette side spokes are much tighter than the other.



    Meanwhile: Thanks for the schooling. That makes quite a bit of sense. I can see how a 1.75 or 1.95 might be ok.
    IF your spokes were the same tension, you wouldn't have any dish in the wheel. Like the front.

    I think you're over thinking tire pressure. Max + 5PSI!

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Posts
    1,371
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, I think the drive side is supposed to be tighter...

  14. #14
    half fast Pupsocket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Western Wisconsin, USA
    My Bikes
    Catrike Trail (fixed frame) tadpole trike recumbent
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tom,

    I'm not sure what the PSI rating is at that size, but I had Maxxis Hookworms on the EZ I used to ride. 110 PSI, 1.95 x 406. I know they're made in other diameters and widths. Large, firm, and durable, the penalty is weight (over 400g for the one I was riding!)

    Karl

  15. #15
    Clydeasaurus tomdaniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Took the tire to my wheel builder mechanic. He pointed out that the wear was fairly even except for the circle where the wear was extreme. He was certain that something was rubbing.

    We were stumped until I remembered I broke a rear seat support a couple hundred miles back. We decided that the loose support tube pushed on the fender and the fender mount rubbed the tire intermittently.
    I was somewhat confused as this rubbing coincided with the edge of the anti-flat strips and there was some shading difference left to right.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    2007 TerraTrike Cruiser (XL) Trike
    2004 Rans Stratus XL LWB Recumbent
    1999 Trek Navigator 200 21"

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
    IF your spokes were the same tension, you wouldn't have any dish in the wheel. Like the front.
    Not so fast there. Dish is achieved, in part, by using shorter spokes on the drive side. It's been a while since I built a wheel (like 15 years or so), but seems like you don't want too much of a tension difference (that's why the drive side spokes are shorter). Otherwise, sproing, you've got a potato chip instead of a wheel.


    And here's a question for everyone: I ride a hardtail, with slicks (1.5 inch, I think), primarily on the road. Would going to a fatter slick at higher pressure give me a large effective wheel diameter, and hence a bit more speed? Or just bog me down more due to greater tire squish?
    Last edited by jswilson64; 06-25-08 at 03:18 PM.

  17. #17
    Lanterne Rouge
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Beacon, NY
    My Bikes
    Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
    Posts
    1,768
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even so, you still (I think) need to have higher tension in the drive side to keep the rim in line at the much flatter angle of the spokes due to the dish of the wheel. At least I think that's so...
    "Having modest aspirations RULES." --patentcad
    "You know who I feel bad for? Arab-Americans with a real, genuine interest in cropdusting." -- Brian Regan
    blogging about nothing, when the mood strikes

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •