Called the shop today
#1
speed bump
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 15
Bikes: Rocky Mountain Fanatik
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Called the shop today
I called the shop I'm stopping by this weekend. The only Specialized they have on hand is the Allez in a 58cm, which is a bit tall judging by the stand over height. They do have a couple of Trek bikes in my size neighborhood. It looks like I'll be looking at a 1.2, a 2.1 Pilot, and a 2.3. He said they also had a 5.1 Madone, but I know that is way beyond my budget. For the most part I'm looking toward the 2.1 pilot and 2.3 if I can get enough out of my existing bike. I figure the higher grade components on those two would be worth the extra cost.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco East Bay Area
Posts: 170
Bikes: Trek, Klein, Vintage Specialized
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Standover height is not that important.
Far more important is the top tube length and the saddle position (height, fore and aft).
I can stand over bikes that fit me, but with the compact geometry trend I can also stand over bikes that don't.
Find someone who can fit you, then test ride stuff, and if possible try to ride on the same (or very similar setups).
Far more important is the top tube length and the saddle position (height, fore and aft).
I can stand over bikes that fit me, but with the compact geometry trend I can also stand over bikes that don't.
Find someone who can fit you, then test ride stuff, and if possible try to ride on the same (or very similar setups).
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 388
Bikes: Trek 2.3 w/ full SRAM Red; Surly LHT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm a bit biased, but if you can afford the 2.3, go for it. It's what I have. It's a real solid bike though. It has really great components that will last you quite a while. The wheels are also rock solid. I've only had my 2.3 for a little over a month, but I have yet to find a single negative thing about it.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In Oregon looking for more hills to ride
Posts: 834
Bikes: 2016 Niner RLT Steel, 2015 GT Grade Carbon 105, 2014 NS Bikes Eccentric, 2013 Norco Sight Killer B-1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have done test rides on both the 2.1 Pilot, and a 2.3 . The 2.1 Pilot has a more relaxed geometry and is more comfortable. The 2.3 has a lighter more racy feel to it. The 2.3 felt like all your effort was making it to the ground where the 2.1 seemed a little sluggish, but more stable. So it depends on what kind of ridding you plan on doing, but either bike is nice. It just matters which one suits your purpose best.
#6
Senior Member
I called the shop I'm stopping by this weekend. The only Specialized they have on hand is the Allez in a 58cm, which is a bit tall judging by the stand over height. They do have a couple of Trek bikes in my size neighborhood. It looks like I'll be looking at a 1.2, a 2.1 Pilot, and a 2.3. He said they also had a 5.1 Madone, but I know that is way beyond my budget. For the most part I'm looking toward the 2.1 pilot and 2.3 if I can get enough out of my existing bike. I figure the higher grade components on those two would be worth the extra cost.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with Brentley. Top tube length is more important for me, since I have a rather short inseam and longer torso. I can just stand over my 58cm Tommasini, but the top tube fits me. Some 56cm and 57cm are too short (top tube) for me to ride comfortably.