Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?

    I need a strong fork for my 62cm surly cross check build. My main concern is a fork to strong enough for me (215+).

    I am not looking to run disc brakes but I am going to be doing some double duty on this bike (commuting/city riding) so anything with eyelets is a bonus for mounting some fenders when the rain starts.

    Any suggestions are appreciated!

  2. #2
    Senior Member c_m_shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Paradise, TX
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross Check, Redline Monocog 29er, Generic Track bike, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker
    Posts
    1,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What's wrong with the stock fork? It'll clear a 1.9" tire or a 45mm with fenders, and mine has been ridden down some mountain bike trails that no sane person would ride a Cyclocross bike down.
    May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.
    May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. -Edward Abbey

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    My Bikes
    Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
    Posts
    5,205
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Any chro-moly cyclocross fork should be more than strong enough. Tange, Dimension, and Surly all have options available. Check Universal Cycles for some of the options.

  4. #4
    Senior Member late's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    8,290
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Surly forks are quite heavy. How about a Winwood Muddy Cross?
    Facts have a well known liberal bias.

  5. #5
    Perma-n00b Askel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Da UP, eh.
    My Bikes
    Kona Hoss, Kona Jake, Trek 1500
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I really like the Project Two on my Jake. It's definitely got some flex to it, so if you're running cantilever brakes, you'll want to make sure they're set up properly.

    I've considered buying a Kona Unit 2-9 based solely on my positive experience with this fork.

    And yeah, there are eyelets for fenders.

  6. #6
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross
    Posts
    11,348
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a 62cm Cross Check with the stock fork, and at 250 pounds I'm not exactly "easy" on my equipment. There's nothing wrong with the stock Surly fork. I run the stock cantis with a canti-mounted front rack and SKS full fenders. I've swapped the stock wheel for one with a SON28 hub, and that hasn't posed any issues, either.

    Sure, the steel fork isn't as light as a $270 Winwood. I'm not going to cry about getting some chips and dings in my $75 steel fork. A fork that costs 3/4 what my frame does, I'd be a bit more concerned about.

  7. #7
    Perma-n00b Askel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Da UP, eh.
    My Bikes
    Kona Hoss, Kona Jake, Trek 1500
    Posts
    415
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs.

  8. #8
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross
    Posts
    11,348
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Askel View Post
    Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs.
    I weigh an eighth of a ton. I'm not gonna sweat it if there's an extra pound and a half on my bike.

  9. #9
    Senior Member daintonj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd be quite happy with this and I weigh more than you. Not disc brake compatible.

    http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/Cycle/7/Ki...rk/5360026870/

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    After some consideration I'm going to be fair and give the Surly a try. If it doesn't work out, I'll be back!

  11. #11
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross
    Posts
    11,348
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think you're going to be pleasantly surprised with the Surly fork. I'll have 3200 miles on mine at the end of today, and I've put it through some serious beatings without ever having a concern for its strength.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    My Bikes
    Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
    Posts
    5,205
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been very happy with the Surly Instigator fork I installed on my MTB. Like it much better than the Kona Project 2 fork it replaced; the Kona is well-built but but heavy and their description of the sizing was a bit misleading. My bike handles much better now that it has a fork of the appropriate length installed...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •