Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-08, 05:37 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cyclocross Fork for a Clyde?

I need a strong fork for my 62cm surly cross check build. My main concern is a fork to strong enough for me (215+).

I am not looking to run disc brakes but I am going to be doing some double duty on this bike (commuting/city riding) so anything with eyelets is a bonus for mounting some fenders when the rain starts.

Any suggestions are appreciated!
tribune is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 06:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
c_m_shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087

Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 166 Posts
What's wrong with the stock fork? It'll clear a 1.9" tire or a 45mm with fenders, and mine has been ridden down some mountain bike trails that no sane person would ride a Cyclocross bike down.
c_m_shooter is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 06:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Any chro-moly cyclocross fork should be more than strong enough. Tange, Dimension, and Surly all have options available. Check Universal Cycles for some of the options.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 09-29-08, 06:39 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,941
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12192 Post(s)
Liked 1,496 Times in 1,108 Posts
Surly forks are quite heavy. How about a Winwood Muddy Cross?
late is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 09:17 AM
  #5  
Perma-n00b
 
Askel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Da UP, eh.
Posts: 423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I really like the Project Two on my Jake. It's definitely got some flex to it, so if you're running cantilever brakes, you'll want to make sure they're set up properly.

I've considered buying a Kona Unit 2-9 based solely on my positive experience with this fork.

And yeah, there are eyelets for fenders.
Askel is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 09:58 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I ride a 62cm Cross Check with the stock fork, and at 250 pounds I'm not exactly "easy" on my equipment. There's nothing wrong with the stock Surly fork. I run the stock cantis with a canti-mounted front rack and SKS full fenders. I've swapped the stock wheel for one with a SON28 hub, and that hasn't posed any issues, either.

Sure, the steel fork isn't as light as a $270 Winwood. I'm not going to cry about getting some chips and dings in my $75 steel fork. A fork that costs 3/4 what my frame does, I'd be a bit more concerned about.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Perma-n00b
 
Askel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Da UP, eh.
Posts: 423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs.
Askel is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 10:25 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Askel
Oh yeah, if we're talking lightness, skip the Project 2. Mine comes in at 2.9 lbs.
I weigh an eighth of a ton. I'm not gonna sweat it if there's an extra pound and a half on my bike.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 09-30-08, 11:41 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
daintonj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 372
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd be quite happy with this and I weigh more than you. Not disc brake compatible.

https://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/Cycle/7/Ki...rk/5360026870/
daintonj is offline  
Old 10-06-08, 03:12 AM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
After some consideration I'm going to be fair and give the Surly a try. If it doesn't work out, I'll be back!
tribune is offline  
Old 10-06-08, 08:33 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375

Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I think you're going to be pleasantly surprised with the Surly fork. I'll have 3200 miles on mine at the end of today, and I've put it through some serious beatings without ever having a concern for its strength.
CliftonGK1 is offline  
Old 10-06-08, 10:33 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I've been very happy with the Surly Instigator fork I installed on my MTB. Like it much better than the Kona Project 2 fork it replaced; the Kona is well-built but but heavy and their description of the sizing was a bit misleading. My bike handles much better now that it has a fork of the appropriate length installed...
sstorkel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.