Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    860
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bike Computer Setting

    I'm sure this is an easy question, but my wireless computer (a Sigma DTS 1606 L) always seems to record a bit high (more miles when compared to other riders). I have the wheel size set according to the manual. Without relocation any sensors, should I increase or decrease the setting? TIA.

  2. #2
    Galveston County Texas 10 Wheels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    In The Wind
    Posts
    25,113
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What is your tire size?
    [SIZE=1][B]What I like about Texas[/B]
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGukLuXzH1E

    Set F1re To The Ra1n ( NY Night Rain Ride)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jfcWEkSrI

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    860
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 10 wheels View Post
    what is your tire size?
    700 x 23c

  4. #4
    Senior Member thomson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I haven't calibrated a computer in a while but IIRC, the number you set is the number of mm's in one revolution of the wheel. To answer your question, decrease the number.

    [edit] I should add, try rolling out 1 revolution, measure in mm's, and use that number.
    Last edited by thomson; 12-30-08 at 07:18 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    860
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks.

  6. #6
    Senior Member rdtompki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hollister, CA
    My Bikes
    Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
    Posts
    3,933
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also, try to have weight in the saddle while you measure the actual rolling circumference. I understand it makes a difference.
    Rick T
    --------
    Volagi - Triple"ized" and Tubeless
    daVinci Joint Venture

  7. #7
    You Know!? For Kids! jsharr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart
    My Bikes
    '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa
    Posts
    6,082
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    Easy way to do this rollout measurement is to put a drop of liquid on the center of the tread of the tire that has the sensor on it, sit on the bike and roll it forward in a straight line. Now measure the center to center distance of two adjacent wet spots on ground and use that number to set your computer.
    Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
    Quote Originally Posted by colorider View Post
    Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.

  8. #8
    bear murphjam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Parker, CO
    My Bikes
    '06 Scott S20, '04 Trek 3700, '88 Schwinn Tempo, '86 Schwinn Tempo, '85 Centurion Le Mans RS, '84 Univega Gran Tourismo
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've done something similar with tape. I put a peice of tape on the ground and wrap the wheel with a peice of tape and then roll out the wheel three to five revolutions. Mark where the tape is on the ground and measure it. Then divide that number by the number of revolutions. The more revolutions the more accurate it will be. It can be a little tricky but I try to actually sit on the bike when I roll it out. If you are riding with people that are probably lighter than you then it makes sense that you are getting higher readings if they are also using the factory setting. If you weigh more then you will more than likely decrease the wheel diameter more than they will when you sit on the bike. All the computer does is count the revolutions and multiply it by the number that you have input.

  9. #9
    Senior Member thomson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    3,332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No matter how accurate you get it, you will still not match your friends. It is unlikely that you are all riding the exact same line down the street.

  10. #10
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross, 2011 RM Flow1
    Posts
    11,316
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weighted rollout, FTW. I calibrated my computer via a 3x averaged rollout and rode along a stretch of street which was marked for a running race, and my computer was spot-on to the measured mile-markers painted on the street.
    "I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
    - Mandi M.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Bill Kapaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
    My Bikes
    86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
    Posts
    6,788
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IF ALL your friends show CONSISTENTLY higher readings than you, then yours is probably wrong.
    I just ose a string to measure my tire circumference and it seems to work just fine. A rubber band is the same length no matter what shape it's laying in!

    IF you are a certain percent higher, just divide your current setting by 1 + the percent.
    Example 7% high, divide by 1.07 and use that number.

  12. #12
    Senior Member deraltekluge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    My Bikes
    Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
    Posts
    1,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun View Post
    IF ALL your friends show CONSISTENTLY higher readings than you, then yours is probably wrong.
    I just ose a string to measure my tire circumference and it seems to work just fine. A rubber band is the same length no matter what shape it's laying in!
    Not if you're applying force to the rubber band and deforming it.

  13. #13
    Council of the Elders billydonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    My Bikes
    1990 Schwinn Crosscut, 5 Lemonds
    Posts
    3,761
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had the same issue with a Sigma computer and I think the Sigma manual may be wrong. My Cateye manual says 2096 is the number for a 700x23... try that.

    There is a time to resign oneself
    to old age and infirmity. You first.
    My Cycling Blogspot

  14. #14
    Uber Goober StephenH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas area, Texas
    Posts
    10,509
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ask your friends how they calibrated theirs. If they all did the rollout measurement, they're probably fairly close. But they may all be going off the number in the manual, and you could be the one that's right.
    "be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."

  15. #15
    Senior Member Bill Kapaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
    My Bikes
    86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
    Posts
    6,788
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deraltekluge View Post
    Not if you're applying force to the rubber band and deforming it.
    How about on a Thursday?

    Any error induced by weighting the bike is so small, it's just as good as attempting to accurately measure roll out

    Which wat does the error go by weighting the bike? More or less? You might make a flat spot on the tire, but you also increase the tire pressure and stretch it larger.
    How many miles of tire wear should you recalibrate?

    It's ALL much ado about NOTHING!

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI
    My Bikes
    83 Trek 620, 84 Raleigh Portage, 84 Schwinn Voyageur, 85 Trek 460
    Posts
    463
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It doesn't make sense to use the number in the manual because different brands of tires can vary quite a bit even though they are supposedly the same size. I've got Continental Ultra 28 tires on one bike, and they are only 25 mm wide at full inflation. I use the rollout method to get it more accurate.

  17. #17
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,008
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Snapperhead View Post
    700 x 23c
    Set it for 2097 mm and you should be within 1% OF DEAD ON, +/-
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •