Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-09, 02:56 PM   #1
bautieri
Downtown Spanky Brown
Thread Starter
 
bautieri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Camp Hill, Pennsyltucky
Bikes: 14 Motobecane Phantom Cross Pro 2000 Kona Lana'I
Posts: 2,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
On average, how many calories per mile

Would you say you burn while riding your bicycle. Yes I know this varies with terrain and intensity. For road riding at a slack pace of 15ish mph I usually figure 30 calories per mile.

I'm curious because this afternoon I jogged 3 miles and the treadmill indicated I burnt a whopping 385 calories. I feel fairly wiped out, much worse than after a 13 mile ride which would put me at the same amount of calories at 30 cal a mile. Either the treadmill is way off or I am being exceptionally generous with my 30 calories per mile. Any thoughts?
bautieri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-09, 03:00 PM   #2
billyymc
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I think the machines are not that accurate. At our gym at work, I can burn 500 calories in a hard 25 minutes Arctrainer session - according to the machine. On the incline elliptical, I feel like I'm putting in about the same effort, but get around 400. On the stationary bike, 450 or so in 25 minutes.

I don't think any of them are accurate -- I just use the measurements to sort of gauge how hard I worked out relative to other workouts on the same machines.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-09, 06:00 PM   #3
merlin55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SoCal
Bikes:
Posts: 1,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sorry but calories per mile are a function of elevation gain and your speed squared. 10 mphs on the flats uses 1/4 the calories per mile as 20 mphs. search for cycling power calculators to get an accurate estimate
merlin55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-09, 07:30 PM   #4
ScrubJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vero Beach FL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.caloriesperhour.com/
ScrubJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-09, 08:06 PM   #5
youcoming
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario Canada
Bikes: Opus Andante/Parleez5i/Burley Tosa Tandem
Posts: 2,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Too many variables, hills, wind, speed etc. I've had 3 hr rides that burnt 2000cal and 3 hour rides burn 4500cal.
youcoming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 05:29 AM   #6
flip18436572
Triathlon in my future???
 
flip18436572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest Iowa
Bikes: Junk, that is why I am here. :-)
Posts: 2,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It all depends upon the machines. In using my Garmin to compare calories burned with some of the machines, my Garmin is about 85% of the machines, and I think the Garmin still calculates on the high side. I would guess the machines are high and I usually give myself 75% percent of what they show.
__________________
2007 Jamis Ventura Comp
2006 Jamis Explorer 2.0
2000 Specialized Hardrock (bought used)
Swim, Bike, Run and sounds like fun
flip18436572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 06:38 AM   #7
professorbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
http://www.fatfreekitchen.com/weight...-calories.html
professorbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 09:06 AM   #8
Fishy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bautieri View Post
Would you say you burn while riding your bicycle. Yes I know this varies with terrain and intensity. For road riding at a slack pace of 15ish mph I usually figure 30 calories per mile.

I'm curious because this afternoon I jogged 3 miles and the treadmill indicated I burnt a whopping 385 calories. I feel fairly wiped out, much worse than after a 13 mile ride which would put me at the same amount of calories at 30 cal a mile. Either the treadmill is way off or I am being exceptionally generous with my 30 calories per mile. Any thoughts?
Running a mile burns about 115 calories - you're not that far off. If you were wearing a heart monitor, you likely would have noticed that your heart rate went up faster and stayed consistently higher than it would have on a 13 mile bike ride - especially if you're not used to running. You'll feel less thrashed the next time you run!
Fishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 12:57 PM   #9
flip18436572
Triathlon in my future???
 
flip18436572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest Iowa
Bikes: Junk, that is why I am here. :-)
Posts: 2,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just did a test on my Garmin in regards to riding. I did a 5 mile ride on my rollers with gears 1 - 5 with one mile on each gear and it said I burned 405 calories at a 16.8 mph average and a 89 cadence and an average heart rate of 104. Max heart rate was 124

I did the same thing again after doing some light stretching and some pushups and then stretching again to get my heart rate back down. Then I did another 5 mile ride with gears 2 - 4 for .5 miles each and then the remain miles in 5th gear. It said I burned 480 calories at a 18.1 mph average and an 88 cadence with an average heart rate of 110. Max heart rate was 142.

I can tell you from my old runs with the 305 a 2.16 mile run burned 405 calories at an average heart rate of 143 and a max of 151.
__________________
2007 Jamis Ventura Comp
2006 Jamis Explorer 2.0
2000 Specialized Hardrock (bought used)
Swim, Bike, Run and sounds like fun
flip18436572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 01:06 PM   #10
youcoming
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario Canada
Bikes: Opus Andante/Parleez5i/Burley Tosa Tandem
Posts: 2,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
While riding or running my avg HR is about the same. I can ride fast which requires spinning a hard gear like 53x15 around 90 cadance which usually has the HR abetween 160-170 but my avg is around 145. I can't jog fast tho, not enough training but my HR avg is usually the same. I can actually get my HR over 190 on the bike but while running rarely over 175 it just hurts too much. I'm sure I could get it better but I would rather not over train the legs.
youcoming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 01:10 PM   #11
flip18436572
Triathlon in my future???
 
flip18436572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southwest Iowa
Bikes: Junk, that is why I am here. :-)
Posts: 2,193
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Below is what I did quickly after reading a "Runner's World" article about calories burned when running a mile. So it is basically your weight times .75 for each mile.



LBS x calories burned

200 0.75 150
205 0.75 153.75
210 0.75 157.5
215 0.75 161.25
220 0.75 165
225 0.75 168.75
230 0.75 172.5
235 0.75 176.25
240 0.75 180
245 0.75 183.75
250 0.75 187.5
255 0.75 191.25
260 0.75 195
265 0.75 198.75
270 0.75 202.5
275 0.75 206.25
280 0.75 210
285 0.75 213.75
290 0.75 217.5
295 0.75 221.25
300 0.75 225
__________________
2007 Jamis Ventura Comp
2006 Jamis Explorer 2.0
2000 Specialized Hardrock (bought used)
Swim, Bike, Run and sounds like fun
flip18436572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 01:27 PM   #12
Neil_B
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bautieri View Post
Would you say you burn while riding your bicycle. Yes I know this varies with terrain and intensity. For road riding at a slack pace of 15ish mph I usually figure 30 calories per mile.

I'm curious because this afternoon I jogged 3 miles and the treadmill indicated I burnt a whopping 385 calories. I feel fairly wiped out, much worse than after a 13 mile ride which would put me at the same amount of calories at 30 cal a mile. Either the treadmill is way off or I am being exceptionally generous with my 30 calories per mile. Any thoughts?
I might be wrong, but isn't the rule of thumb about 300 calories per hour of cardio?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 04:51 PM   #13
billyymc
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Historian View Post
I might be wrong, but isn't the rule of thumb about 300 calories per hour of cardio?
Sounds low to me from tables I've seen, and from using the machines at the gym.

Now, I don't really believe what the machines say about the calories I burn in a workout, but they indicate a much higher burn rate than 300/hr.

There are typically 3 machines I use -- elliptical with arms included, Arctrainer (a different style of elliptical), and the bike.

I'll go anywhere from 20 - 25 minutes on a two or three machines in a given workout, to 45-50 on a single machine. If I were to believe the machines, I burn anywhere from 900-1200 calories an hour during th ose workouts. Again, I don't believe them -- but 300/hour sounds way low when I compare.

It's not going ot change my workout -- I only have so many minutes in a day to devote to exercise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 05:17 PM   #14
Fletch521
Senior Member
 
Fletch521's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Loves Park, Illinois
Bikes: 1897 Crescent Tandem, 1904 Rambler shaft drive, 1921 Schwinn Henderson, 1958 Schwinn Tiger, 1973 Raleigh International, 1982 Trek 420, 2010 Trek 720
Posts: 418
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I rode 40.4 miles today. I use B.iCycle to log my trips with a combined rider/cycle weight of 350 pounds. For the day it shows 4584 calories burned. So today it was 113.5 calories per mile.

Since the last time I reset the values, B.iCycle shows 208 total miles and 24273 calories burned. That is 116.7 calories per mile. Todays 40 mile ride was on former rail rode trails with a maximum of 1 1/2% grades. Over the 40 miles I climbed a total of 584 feet. Most of the other 208 miles was on hillier trails so that would account for the higher per mile average.
Fletch521 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 06:40 PM   #15
billbunton 
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Bikes: '09 Specialized Roubaix Pro SRAM, '11 BMC RM-01
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The treadmills are terribly inaccurate. As a rough estimate, 30 KCal/mile is about what I figure for riding (reality, according to the powertap, seems to be 27 to 35 or so). Obviously this varies by terrain.

For walking, I've found 60 KCal/mile to be pretty reasonable, based on my Garmin 310 (which also seems to agree reasonably well with the powertap when riding).

For running, I figure 100 KCal/mile, and find the Garmin usually comes out around 105.
billbunton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 08:27 PM   #16
Neil_B
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyymc View Post
Sounds low to me from tables I've seen, and from using the machines at the gym.

Now, I don't really believe what the machines say about the calories I burn in a workout, but they indicate a much higher burn rate than 300/hr.

There are typically 3 machines I use -- elliptical with arms included, Arctrainer (a different style of elliptical), and the bike.

I'll go anywhere from 20 - 25 minutes on a two or three machines in a given workout, to 45-50 on a single machine. If I were to believe the machines, I burn anywhere from 900-1200 calories an hour during th ose workouts. Again, I don't believe them -- but 300/hour sounds way low when I compare.

It's not going ot change my workout -- I only have so many minutes in a day to devote to exercise.
I've understood exercise machines, both in gyms and for home use, to be inaccurate and extremely optimistic. After all, they want people to get a sense of accomplishment using them.... like an amplifier going up to 11.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-09, 10:21 PM   #17
cyclist2000
Senior Member
 
cyclist2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Bikes: Masi (retired), Giant TCR, Eisentraut, Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo (trainer bike), Cannondale, 84 Stumpjumper, Waterford(N+1), Tern D8 (N+1), looking for a Ti frame
Posts: 3,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
google "cycling calorie calculator", there a lot of hits. The calories burned are dependent on your weight , age and speed. This is simplistic since it doesn't take into account the terrain and wind and ambient temps. I put in my typical ride and it was 75 calories burned per mile. This number will fluctuate based on speed.
cyclist2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 11:26 AM   #18
gamecock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Bikes: Rivendell--Sam Hilleborne, the only one I need.
Posts: 165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I use a Polar 55 heart rate monitor, physican's advice, and after entering a lot of personal data (age, sex, weight, etc.) it purportedly calculates calories expended, and pretty accurately according to my doc and dietician. Anyhow, 42 miles, hilly East Tennessee terrain, keeping my heart rate between 115 and 140 beats per minute, in just under 4 hours, burned 2654 calories according to the Polar--or, 663.5 calories per hour (similar to the gym bike), or, 63 calories per mile.
gamecock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 02:44 PM   #19
Missbumble 
I'm a Cyclist!
 
Missbumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boca Raton
Bikes: Specialized Dolce Elite
Posts: 1,397
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Riding I was gonna say 40 calories a mile...so 2 hour bike ride at 15 mph = 1200 calories.
Now two hours of running at say 12 min mile= oh dear 10 miles running. I bet I would burn just a friggin ton! A half hour run is pure torture....so I figure you have to ride twice as far biking as running. No science to it = just my thoughts....but all in all I think once you have been biking for a while as a fat woman (See not every one can do that) then try running it is a very very humbling experience.

OK You convinced me...I think Iwill go for a run now...(Only cause i do not have a bike here at my virtual lcoation)
Missbumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-09, 07:29 AM   #20
bautieri
Downtown Spanky Brown
Thread Starter
 
bautieri's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Camp Hill, Pennsyltucky
Bikes: 14 Motobecane Phantom Cross Pro 2000 Kona Lana'I
Posts: 2,102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missbumble View Post
OK You convinced me...I think Iwill go for a run now...(Only cause i do not have a bike here at my virtual lcoation)
You're...welcome?

Enjoy the jog!
bautieri is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.