Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

rotor size for clydesdale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-09, 11:18 PM
  #1  
clydesdale Paul
Thread Starter
 
bigpaul652002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rotor size for clydesdale

I am putting together a surly km rigid and trying to decide on rotor size. Me 6'5" 300lb so i was thinking a little bigger 185mm . My mtb know is a 96 trek 930 that i changed into a 69er.

I ordered some 185mm avid bb7

Last edited by bigpaul652002; 11-27-09 at 01:21 PM.
bigpaul652002 is offline  
Old 11-25-09, 02:28 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think a bigger rotor would be good as it would heat up less on the steep descents.
bigtempo is offline  
Old 11-25-09, 08:15 AM
  #3  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by bigpaul652002
I am putting together a surly km rigid and trying to decide on rotor size. Me 6'5" 300lb so i was thinking a little bigger 185mm . My mtb know is a 96 trek 930 that i changed into a 69er.
I'd say one around 600mm but that's just me (For the measurement challenged that's a rim).

For the front, go with a 203mm. You can probably get away with a 160mm in the rear.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 11-25-09, 10:21 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bigpaul652002
I am putting together a surly km rigid and trying to decide on rotor size. Me 6'5" 300lb so i was thinking a little bigger 185mm . My mtb know is a 96 trek 930 that i changed into a 69er.
If it were me, I'd probably go with a 185mm rotor. I've ridden both 203mm and 185mm rotors on the front and couldn't tell much of a difference. Then again, I'm relatively new to MTB riding so I'm not doing anything too crazy. If you decide to go with 203mm, be sure to check the specs on your fork and make sure it can handle the stress created by a large rotor; if you believe the manufacturers, not all of them can. Like cyccommute, I'd stick with a 160mm for the rear. For me, larger rear rotors just make it easier to accidentally lock the rear wheel ...
sstorkel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.