Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-02-09, 11:06 AM   #1
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
Confused about clipless pedals - the 2 hole versus the 3 hole types

I have both a mountain bike and a road bike. Looking around, I have noticed that the mountain bikes use the 2-hole SPD style pedal while the road bikes typically have the longer 3-hole style. Why is that? Is there an advantage to using the 3-hole type on the road bike as opposed to the 2-hole type? I've heard that the larger platform of the road pedals is better, but if the entire shoe is stiff--doesn't the shoe sole become the pedaling platform?
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:10 AM   #2
socalrider
Senior Member
 
socalrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Upland, CA
Bikes: Litespeed Liege, Motorola Team Issue Eddy Mercxk, Surly Crosscheck Cyclocross bike, Fisher Supercaliber Mtn. Bike
Posts: 5,002
the 2 hole cleats are SPD's and the 3 hole is look compatible.. Most shoes come with both of these as a standard.. The type of cleat used is dependent on the pedal system you use..
socalrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:16 AM   #3
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
Right.

But I wanted to know if there was an advantage to using the Look/SPD-SL on the road rather than the SPD that is so ubiquitos on the mountain bike--for instance.
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:19 AM   #4
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
Posts: 5,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by socalrider View Post
Most shoes come with both of these as a standard..
No, they don't. Most MTB shoes can only accommodate a recessed, 2-hole cleat (SPD, Crank Brothers, etc). There simply isn't enough room to accommodate a 3-hole Look-compatible cleat. Many road bike shoes include both 2-hole and 3-hole bolt patterns... but just as many don't.

To answer the OP's question: the idea that large 3-bolt cleats are better than their 2-bolt competitors is left over from the days before cycling shoes had really stiff soles. If you've got a good shoe, it almost doesn't matter what the cleat looks like. For the sake of simplicity, I use SPD shoes and pedals on all of my road, touring, and mountain bikes.
sstorkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:21 AM   #5
MrClyde
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Marcos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 557
Here's my semi-newbie explanation, which should be good enough for the internet.

The 2 hole and smaller cleat for mountain biking makes it easier to have treads on the shoe so you can get traction when you have to walk or carry your bike. Road bike shoes don't need tread, so the bigger cleat is used. I was told the bigger cleat is a little more stable, even though the shoe is stiff, and less chance for hot spots on your feet. Yes, the shoe does become the platform, but it is not as stiff as the pedal.

I used campus pedals that came on my hybrid with the 2-hole cleats when I first bought cycling shoes. Later, I switched to the 3 hole bigger cleats and got shimano road pedals. I like the bigger cleats better. They do feel more solid, I think it is because the contact area is larger. And the big cleat, road pedals are easier to clip in my second foot without looking for me.
MrClyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:22 AM   #6
bdinger
Chubby super biker
 
bdinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nebraska
Bikes:
Posts: 1,980
What I was told is that in theory the Road-style pedal allows for more torque to be applied, and for the pedal to be a bit more lightweight. MTB pedals are more designed to shed dirt/mud, and to be durable - so they're heavier.

Again, this is what I was told, and I also know several people who use MTB SPD's on everything, including road bikes. I'm a huge fan of the MTB SPD's, personally, particulary the Shimano PD-M520's.
bdinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:28 AM   #7
daven1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Bikes:
Posts: 2,324
When I asked this question the answer was:

The larger platform on the road pedals are more comfortable over very long rides as they spread the weight.

However another thing that comes into play is mud shedding which I presume smaller cleats are better at.
daven1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:32 AM   #8
mustang1
Senior Member
 
mustang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London, UK
Bikes: 2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
Posts: 2,714
I moved from road pedals to mtb pedals coz i needed a better commuting pedal. I noticed a difference in transfer of power. I thought I wouldn't but I did. Not sure if this is down to different type of pedal, or a different type of shoe (my road shoe is a specialized bg comp, the mtb one is a bg sport).

Also, I'm not claiming there WAS a differnce in power, but it FELT like there was, and the feeling was noticeable.
mustang1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:41 AM   #9
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
Thanks Ben and MrClyde.

I was told that the larger platform allowed for a better transfer of energy, but assuming that the shoes are completely connected with little play, to me it didn't matter if the cleat size was the size of a wallet or the size of a dime.

The weight concern--ah...that makes sense to me (perhaps more sense if we weren't Clydes anyway).

I was pondering this because of the recent store sales, I was wondering if it would be a good idea to swap my M520's on the road to another style.
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:49 AM   #10
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
Daven--that makes sense assuming some type of flex in the shoe. But I have seen some really stiff SPD shoes with very little compliance that offered less flex than the road shoe.

Mustang--that very well may be, if the other responses are, indeed, true.

Thanks for the responses. With what I'm hearing, my experience is beginning to make better sense now. After a century, I couldn't wait to rip my shoes off. I'm wondering if the 3-hole types would allow for more comfort. Interestingly, their are some road-focused egg-beaters out there, and those have very little platform to begin with.
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 11:51 AM   #11
MrClyde
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Marcos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 557
Shameless Hijack-----

Where do you ride your MTB around San Diego? I am planning on going to Elfin Forest this Saturday, and in the future Daley Ranch, Mission Trails, Lake Hodges. Any good spots not to miss?
MrClyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 12:00 PM   #12
daven1986
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Bikes:
Posts: 2,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by spthealien View Post
Daven--that makes sense assuming some type of flex in the shoe. But I have seen some really stiff SPD shoes with very little compliance that offered less flex than the road shoe.
Yep only if there is flex does it make a difference. I wear stiff although walkable MTB shoes with egg beaters and find no discomfort.
daven1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 12:03 PM   #13
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
Posts: 5,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdinger View Post
What I was told is that in theory the Road-style pedal allows for more torque to be applied, and for the pedal to be a bit more lightweight. MTB pedals are more designed to shed dirt/mud, and to be durable - so they're heavier.
Again, I think you're listening to out-dated information: with current SPD pedals and a good shoe, I expect you're not going to notice any difference in torque/power transfer unless you're ready to participate in the Tour de France.

While road riders would like you to believe that their pedals are much lighter, there often isn't a lot of difference. My $35 Shimano M520 SPD pedals weigh 370 grams. $120 Look Keo Classic road pedals weigh 338 grams and $110 Shimano 105 road pedals weigh 322. If you spent a similar amount of money on an SPD pedal you could get something in the same ballpark, weight-wise (M540 @ $90 = 346g, for instance). And lets not forget that Crank Brothers EggbeaterMTB pedals are super-light (Eggbeater SL @ $110 = 266g)! You could spend $300 on road pedals (e.g. Shimano Dura-Ace) and still not match that weight...
sstorkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 12:22 PM   #14
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
Shameless hijack answer!

Lately, we've been riding around the easy trails in Chula Vista. I've heard some nice things about the Penesquitos trail and should be trying that sometime (assuming the weather cooperates).
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 12:29 PM   #15
Slee_Stack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Bikes:
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by sstorkel View Post
You could spend $300 on road pedals (e.g. Shimano Dura-Ace) and still not match that weight...
You could. I wouldn't. But you COULD.

I spent $130 on Keo Carbons. They weigh 230g. What's your point?

Honestly, the weight difference is pretty insignificant in the scheme of things, but 'MTB' pedals, on AVERAGE, weigh MORE than 'road' pedals.

2-bolt SPDs are plenty capable. 3-bolt cleats have a wider physical structure and DO support the shoe sole better....that is...less lateral flex. With an extra fixturing point, theoretically they would also be less prone to slip or twist.

What are 'good' shoes anyhow? Are they shoes with absolute zero flex front to back? Side-to-side?

To me, 'good' shoes are comfortable, and when paired with my cleats/pedals....remain that way.
Slee_Stack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 02:04 PM   #16
cod.peace
Senior Member
 
cod.peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: eastern Massachusetts
Bikes: Rans V-Rex
Posts: 999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slee_Stack View Post
2-bolt SPDs are plenty capable. 3-bolt cleats have a wider physical structure and DO support the shoe sole better....that is...less lateral flex. With an extra fixturing point, theoretically they would also be less prone to slip or twist.
If you're putting enough lateral force on your SPD's to make the cleats twist then you're pedaling wrong.
cod.peace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 02:23 PM   #17
MrClyde
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Marcos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 557
I think it is like a lot of things in cycling, there may not be a scientific reason, but some things feel different than others. Using the same shoes, I used the 2 bolt then switched to the 3 bolt. The 3 bolt feel more "solid". By this, I mean it feels like more of the pedaling effort goes to propeling me forward. This was with the same shoe.

So I like the 3 bolt, and for me they are easier to clip in as well.
MrClyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 02:40 PM   #18
sstorkel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB
Posts: 5,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slee_Stack View Post
I spent $130 on Keo Carbons. They weigh 230g. What's your point?
My point, which I thought was pretty obvious, is that pedals designed to work with 3-hole cleats aren't necessarily lighter than pedals designed to work with 2-hole cleats. There are quite a few heavy 3-hole/road pedals out there and, correspondingly, there are quite a few 2-hole/MTB pedals that are relatively light.

I, personally, can't tell the difference between my 370g M520 SPDs and the 270g Crank Brothers pedals they replaced so I'd suggest the OP not focus on weight as a deciding factor when selecting a clipless pedal system.
sstorkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 03:10 PM   #19
spthealien
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spthealien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
Bikes: Giant Deny Advanced, GT Avalanche, Giant Seek
Posts: 162
If I continuing being on the north side of 200 pounds, there is no way that the extra grams in the pedal would matter much to me.

I was just wondering if there was a functional difference among the pedals for the road vs offroad application.
spthealien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 05:38 PM   #20
c_m_shooter
Senior Member
 
c_m_shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Redline Monocog 29er, Generic Track bike, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker
Posts: 1,542
I have Egg Beaters on all my bikes. I only need one pair of shoes that way, and mountain bike shoes are much easier to walk in when stopping to take a break on road rides. I do notice a difference between the stiffnes of the cheap shoes I started with and the pair I have now though.
c_m_shooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 05:52 PM   #21
Mr. Beanz
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
Posts: 20,030
I like mtb shoes and pedals but I can't keep up with the guys that wear road shoes and pedals so it doesn't matter.
Mr. Beanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 06:32 PM   #22
TJClay
Senior Member
 
TJClay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Costa Mesa, Ca.
Bikes: Domane Project One, 6 series, Ui2
Posts: 455
i can't keep up with 5 year olds on tricycles so it really doesn't matter to me!
TJClay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-09, 07:02 PM   #23
subligar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ontario
Bikes: 2009 LHT, 2009 Kona Jake, 1992 Trek 850 Antelope
Posts: 60
The biggest functional difference is being able to walk normally in mtb shoes.

Also for weight savings, I think most of the saved weight would be on the shoes and not the pedals.
subligar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-09, 11:41 AM   #24
uber_Fred
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Philadelpia, PA
Bikes: Fuji touring, old Fuji mountain bike, Currie Peak
Posts: 58
One other advantage of the SPD pedals for a road bike is that there are quite a few pedals available that have an SPD mount on one face, and the other is a traditional flat pedal face, for use with regular shoes. That doesn't really matter on a bike that you will always ride fully geared up, but it is handy to be able to just hop on the bike with regular shoes on if I'm just on a short jaunt with my five-year-old.
(There may be similar pedals for look-compatible cleats, but I don't recall seeing them.)
uber_Fred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-09, 03:32 PM   #25
cyclist2000
Senior Member
 
cyclist2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Bikes: Masi (retired), Giant TCR, Eisentraut, Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo (trainer bike), Cannondale, 84 Stumpjumper, Waterford(N+1), Tern D8 (N+1), looking for a Ti frame
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by subligar View Post
The biggest functional difference is being able to walk normally in mtb shoes.
I have found one brand of shoe that does have the 3 hole bolt pattern and a tread for walking when off the bike. I would buy it but they don't come in a wide size. This may be an option if you have a few bikes with look style pedals and don't want to replace all the pedals.
cyclist2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 PM.