Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

Weight Loss - How is this possible?

Search
Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

Weight Loss - How is this possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-11, 10:26 AM
  #26  
2nd Amendment Cyclist
 
RichardGlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 1,036

Bikes: Schwinn 2010 World Street, Handsome Speedy w/ SRAM Apex

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by pdlamb
Eh? 16 oz = 1 lb. Is the bottle made of lead??
math is hard.
RichardGlover is offline  
Old 03-24-11, 11:21 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Bikeforumuser0022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Plenty of good advice here already.

Several years ago I let myself go during one winter and gained flab. Got disgusted with myself, smartened up my diet, and upped my kettlebell workout frequency.

One day a guy I worked out with who hadn't seen me for a while said I'd lost weight. So I checked. And I hadn't. I still weighed 100Kg -- my weight had not changed, altho I looked more like myself.

So if you're doing everything correctly, and you're not seeing scale movement, ignore the scale. Keep doing your good eating and exercising, and you'll see results in how your clothes fit.

I don't know what your motivation is. Looking good naked is mine. I truly don't give a krap what I weigh.
Bikeforumuser0022 is offline  
Old 03-24-11, 02:32 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Chaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Encinitas CA
Posts: 865

Bikes: Scott CR1 Team

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
First of all, human metabolism is not as simple as calories in, calories out. See this article for a more thorough explanation of this.

Second, your weight will fluctuate quite a bit from day to day, due to factors virtually impossible to account for. I weigh myself every day, but only do it to have a feel for the trend. The daily weight is never going to be "accurate". For example, yesterday I was exactly 2 pounds heavier than I was this morning. I ate the same diet, and did the same exercise. That's the equivalent of 7,000 calories. There's absolutely NO way to account for that difference by looking at food or exercise.

Last year, I did a century that, due to 30 mph headwinds, took me 10 hours. I probably burned about 8,000 calories on that ride. The next day I found I had gained 1.5 pounds!

The daily measurement is around 75% real, and 25% noise. It's only the trend that's truly meaningful.
Chaco is offline  
Old 03-24-11, 05:58 PM
  #29  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 36
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Believe it or not guys, there was a point where I was in really good shape and followed workout programs and diets pretty religiously. So I'm somewhat knowledgeable about this. 3500 calories does not always equal one pound (too many variables) nor does it mean that if it did equal one pound, that the weight lost would be pure fat. Everybody's body is different and will react to stimuli in a relatively unique manner.

I forget what this effect is called but there is a noted effect where the body will slow down the metabolism and attempt to store fat and water if it is physically over-stressed. Then the body will start breaking down amino acids and muscle tissue to feed itself as muscle tissue requires calories (fuel) even when at rest. It's an evolutionary auto response.

Then we have to remember with more than one grain of salt that muscle weighs twice as much as fat due to density. So therefore, big number losses in the beginning are usually due to dehydration and muscle loss.

The vast majority of bodybuilders have known for some time that losing fat and gaining muscle are conflicting goals. It's even noted numerous times that cutting fat and maintaining muscle mass requires a very controlled macro nutrient diet.

To the OP - two lbs is no biggy. If you're hydrating better and were relatively dehydrated before your body is now distributing water to muscle groups/organs that may desperately need it.

If anything, I bet your BMI would have dropped a tiny bit even with the weight gain because the gain was not fat nor was it redistribution of water too adipose fat cells.
TysonC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dpostelnicu
Fifty Plus (50+)
36
03-27-15 07:38 AM
chefisaac
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
25
01-23-13 12:25 AM
Mithrandir
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
12
08-12-12 11:45 AM
Dec1st
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
24
02-27-12 10:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.