Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member 1855Cru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    My Bikes
    2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Cervelo R3
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Clydesdale classification in races

    I have recently taken part in both bike races and a Duathlon and in both cases the Clydesdale class was won by someone who was right at 6ft tall and weighed about 160lbs. This does not seem particularly fair to me. I was wondering if it wouldn't be more equitable to have the Clydesdale class be based on BMI of say 30 and above? In that case the 6ft rider would have to be 221lbs or more and at least I may have had a chance to catch him
    http://www.ablokeandabike.blogspot.com

    2011 Cervelo R3
    2011 Trek 2.1
    2011 Trek X-Caliber
    2005 Gitane Oregon
    2000 Trek 820 Multitour

  2. #2
    Starting over CraigB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    My Bikes
    1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
    Posts
    4,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    While I'm sure most racers, even recreational ones, know their BMI, I bet if you used it as the criterion for entry into a class, you'd get a whole lot of whining "how should I know what my BMI is?"

    I think it's a great idea, though. Club-level bike racing is full of sandbaggers, in my experience.
    Craig in Indy

  3. #3
    Gears? CliftonGK1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    My Bikes
    '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2009 Spesh Singlecross, 2011 RM Flow1
    Posts
    11,322
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The definition of Clydesdale seems to have changed since my racing days. When the category was first introduced into the triathlon circuit in the late 80s/early 90s, (back when Budweiser was still the primary sponsor of many races, hence the division name,) it was strictly reserved for 200 pounders and over.

    Somewhere along the way this 6' and up thing came into play, which is just ridiculous for exactly the reason that the OP mentioned, especially when there's such a diverse group in the division these days. Back 20 years ago, the starting line for the Clyde division races was about 4 or 5 of us; all in the low 200s and around 6'3" to 6'7"

    How is it that a mere 3% above average height should qualify someone for the category? That's not even 1 SD, is it?
    "I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
    - Mandi M.

  4. #4
    Senior Member 1855Cru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    My Bikes
    2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Cervelo R3
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigB View Post
    While I'm sure most racers, even recreational ones, know their BMI, I bet if you used it as the criterion for entry into a class, you'd get a whole lot of whining "how should I know what my BMI is?"

    I think it's a great idea, though. Club-level bike racing is full of sandbaggers, in my experience.
    Craig,
    I think it would be a pretty simple thing to have a link to a BMI calculator on the application or a simple table showing height weight and BMI and require someone to enter height and weight if they enter the Clydesdale class. Then have a weigh in for the winner to ensure no cheating.
    http://www.ablokeandabike.blogspot.com

    2011 Cervelo R3
    2011 Trek 2.1
    2011 Trek X-Caliber
    2005 Gitane Oregon
    2000 Trek 820 Multitour

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •