Clyde race division question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Clyde race division question
This year is my first season back racing of any sort in about 20 years. My first race is next month, and I'm signed up for the Beginners division. After that first race, most people would seed themselves in the Cat-4 for the sake of competition, but the upcoming fall season of PDX Cross Crusade races has a Clydesdale division. If I'm racing at 6'6" and just a shade over 200 pounds (205-ish) is it more "on the level" to seed myself with the Clyde class and hope that RCB (sponsor of the series) doesn't re-seed me, or should I seed myself with the Cat-4 division?
The big determination comes down to Team Points for the series. If my team is 10 deep for the series then we might be in the running for series classification, and if I finish well in the Clyde category it could be advantitous. But looking at the previous Clyde finishes; the field is 50+ deep and could be competitive for a fit Clyde, with a number of tall/ripped guys racing.
Where would you seed yourself if you are 6'6", 205 pounds, and racing on a singlespeed (knowing that the singlespeed division is "open" and will include Cat-1/2 racers)? Clydes division or Cat-4? (Considering I don't make Cat-4 Masters for another 2 years).
The big determination comes down to Team Points for the series. If my team is 10 deep for the series then we might be in the running for series classification, and if I finish well in the Clyde category it could be advantitous. But looking at the previous Clyde finishes; the field is 50+ deep and could be competitive for a fit Clyde, with a number of tall/ripped guys racing.
Where would you seed yourself if you are 6'6", 205 pounds, and racing on a singlespeed (knowing that the singlespeed division is "open" and will include Cat-1/2 racers)? Clydes division or Cat-4? (Considering I don't make Cat-4 Masters for another 2 years).
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#2
Senior Member
EVERY Clyde event I have ever seen is filled with guys that should be racing cat 3 or better. They may weigh over 200, but a lot of those guys are flat out ripped and can really ride.
It's also like this in the masters div. A bunch of old racers cat 3 or better.
I don't know your area, so I can only speak of what I have seen.
In one of the bigger tri events here, a clyde finished in the top 5 overall. So much for being a fat fast guy!
Good luck!
It's also like this in the masters div. A bunch of old racers cat 3 or better.
I don't know your area, so I can only speak of what I have seen.
In one of the bigger tri events here, a clyde finished in the top 5 overall. So much for being a fat fast guy!
Good luck!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,266
Bikes: 2009 Fuji Newest 1.0, 2011 Trek 3900 Disc MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It cant hurt to try it either way. Worst case scenario youre outclassed and learn that you need to be with the Cat 4s. youre definitely clyde qualified though
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,621
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 485 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is this a route(s) with a lot of up? I find being bigger an advantage and can actually put some hurt on the waify types if the ups are not too much.... especially if it is windy. If that was the case I would say the 4.
On the flipside, while we do not have Clyde fields, I would suspect they would go uphill at a more suitable pace than a bunch of young waifs.
On the flipside, while we do not have Clyde fields, I would suspect they would go uphill at a more suitable pace than a bunch of young waifs.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 313
Bikes: 2015 Specialized Diverge Comp Carbon, 2011 Cervelo R3, 2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Trek X-Caliber
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The rules are the rules, so you would qualify for Clyde status.
I wish that Clyde categories were based on something other than height and weight, maybe BMI? It would make things much fairer in my opinion.
I wish that Clyde categories were based on something other than height and weight, maybe BMI? It would make things much fairer in my opinion.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It doesn't matter what division you are in there will be sandbaggers. Just a fact of the racing world life.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
The problem with BMI based qualifications is that there's still going to be a lot of lean racers who qualify. At 6'6" and 215 pounds my BMI is just a hair under 25. With my race kit and shoes, I'd officially weigh in heavy enough to tip the BMI calculators into the "overweight" range, even though my bodyfat percentage is in the mid 16s right now.
Well, it's not like I plan on giving Zdenek competition for the Worlds any time soon.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 557
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I usually choose based on how many participants there will be. If there is going to be some good competition in the Clyde division, go for it. If I know an event is only going to have 3-5 clydes, I sign up in the regular non-clyde division.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 11,375
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
In this race series, there looks to be a pretty big (no pun intended) Clydesdale field. The PDX Cross Crusade is a tremendous participation CX series up here. The Clyde division alone sees 50+ for the first 3 weeks. It only drops to the mid 30s for Clyde entrants by the end of the 8 week series.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 557
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In this race series, there looks to be a pretty big (no pun intended) Clydesdale field. The PDX Cross Crusade is a tremendous participation CX series up here. The Clyde division alone sees 50+ for the first 3 weeks. It only drops to the mid 30s for Clyde entrants by the end of the 8 week series.
Do the Clyde division. They have it for a reason, and you are a clyde.