Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-11, 04:12 AM   #1
Tex Bs
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tex Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Cadence

I just got a bike computer that measures cadence. At 6'1" and 265 I am interested in what a good cadence should be.

I started riding regularly in April and I ride about 15 miles a day with an average speed of 13-15 mph. I live outside of Houston, and my rides are on fairly flat terrain.

What is your average cadence?
Tex Bs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 04:23 AM   #2
RollCNY
Speechless
 
RollCNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Posts: 8,720
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...e-for-a-newbie

First time I've tried dropping a link, but this a thread with info out the wazoo on cadence
RollCNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 10:58 AM   #3
Paul01
Senior Member
 
Paul01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, Fl
Bikes: Vitus 979, KHS Montana Comp
Posts: 531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In short, 80-100 is good.
Paul01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 11:01 AM   #4
Cyclogenesis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Bikes: Trek Madonne 4.5, Yeti 575
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
80+ it will feel weird but it is soooo much better for your legs... Essentially sub 80-Damaging, above 100=in efficient (unless you are GOOD... Pros can sustain 120!)
Cyclogenesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 11:04 AM   #5
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 22,149
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Staying on top of the gear, spinning rather than mashing can take place
at lower cadences.
and lower speeds, just match the gear ratio to the terrain.
and stay ahead of the gear..
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 12:25 PM   #6
CACycling
Senior Member
 
CACycling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxnard, CA
Bikes: '08 Fuji Roubaix RC; '07 Schwinn Le Tour GS; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX
Posts: 4,565
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My sweet spot seems to be around 95 RPMs right now so I try to keep between 90 and 100 during most of my rides.
CACycling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 12:39 PM   #7
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Posts: 2,924
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
I'm usually in the 80-90 range, but I really try to keep it over 70 when climbing. Especially with a load, or when I'm tired. Below 70, experience has shown my knees will start to ache very soon.
pdlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 12:42 PM   #8
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Like CACycling, I pretty naturally fall into a cadence of about 95 or 96 on flats.
CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 01:32 PM   #9
IAmCosmo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Roanoke, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you are only riding 15 miles at a time, you don't need to worry about your cadence. Worry about seat time and getting your legs and lungs into shape. Work on your cadence once you get some longer rides under your belt.
IAmCosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 01:39 PM   #10
sjvcycler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAmCosmo View Post
If you are only riding 15 miles at a time, you don't need to worry about your cadence. Worry about seat time and getting your legs and lungs into shape. Work on your cadence once you get some longer rides under your belt.
exactly! Group rides help you build cadence without thinking about it, might want to join a local group ride now and then.
sjvcycler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 02:08 PM   #11
kenoshi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fremont, CA
Bikes: Trek 1200
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Since you just now started riding, try to maintain 80 cadence to build endurance. Once your legs/lungs start to catch up, you can increase cadence to work on your aerobic capacity (and for a more efficient ride), or 65-75 cadence to work on muscle endurance (need to be careful when doing this as it can damage your knees). I kind of keep at 90ish myself on flats.
kenoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 02:49 PM   #12
RandoneeRider
Retired C.O.
 
RandoneeRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Central Kali'
Bikes: REI 2009 Novara Randonee
Posts: 207
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My opinion, based on what I've read and personal (albeit limited) experience:

If a rider is cruising his bike at anything less than 55 rpm, the only benefit he's getting is fresh air and better blood circulation than if he was sitting on the front porch.

Bumping the cadence up to 65 now tells your body that it's exercising, and once again, that's better than sitting on the front porch. But 65+ WILL result in a little lactic acid the following day leading you to believe that you're doing something good for the body.... but it might be limited to cardio alone.

Over 70rpm, your heart and lungs are in it for the party..... but this is just warming you up for the day when a more rapid cadence results in evem BETTER results.

80 and over: Interesting that I read somewhere (here) that a gentleman was told an rpm of 80 is easiest on knees and less likely to result in taxing knees already weakened from age or prior abuse.

I'm discovering with every additional ride of late, that spinning at 83+rpm results in faster overall average speeds, my right knee no longer bothers me ('cause I'm not "mashing"), and though my heart rate/"bpm" is higher and in a better zone to benefit from the exercise.... I'm peddaling at a consistent/(easier?) rate, right out of my home's drive-way, up hills, on the straights, and when conditions allow me to speed....., throughout the entire ride all the way back home. Recently I've noticed too that my time for a 10 mile loop has been reduced by five or more minutes since increasing my cadence to 83 or above.

Last edited by RandoneeRider; 08-09-11 at 02:54 PM.
RandoneeRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-11, 03:07 PM   #13
Tex Bs
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tex Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for all the great answers. When I first got back on a bike, after a 25 year gap of a very sedentary lifestyle, I got trapped into the mashing form of riding. I felt that the harder I worked my muscles, the stronger and better rider I would become.

Since I joined this forum, I have corrected my style of riding and began riding in a lower gear but with a focus on spinning. That only got me so far, as I was having a hard time knowing what cadence I was riding at. So I went out and purchased a Sigma 1606L and rode with it for the first time today.

I have started a spreadsheet to track my rides:
Today: 20.04 miles in 1:12:44 for an average speed of 16.53 mph.
My average cadence was 84.

Heading down in SE Texas what we consider a 'hill' I reached a top speed of 26.94 mph feeling great and like superman - at which someone casually road past me. OUCH

I have a long way to go but:
Starting weight in Oct 2010 - 320lbs and could only ride a mile.
Current weight - 260lbs and road my longest distance ever, 31 miles on Sunday.

I feel I have a bit more work on my endurance before joining a group ride.
Tex Bs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 PM.