Titanium or carbon and why
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Titanium or carbon and why
Lets say you've narrowed your bike down to 2 choices. one in Ti the other in CF. they have identical components and cost the same, which do you choose and why.
Part 2, one has ultegra 6700 the other SRAM Rival, still the same price. Does this change your decision? Why?
Part 2, one has ultegra 6700 the other SRAM Rival, still the same price. Does this change your decision? Why?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Part 2, one has ultegra 6700 the other SRAM Rival, still the same price. Does this change your decision? Why?
In 145 pound climbing form I wouldn't mind the lack of a triple option (34x23 was enough to get me over everything in the Colorado Rockies and still allowed for one tooth jumps to the 19 cog with just 9 in back) but as a Clydestale I'd skip SRAM because they lack the dozen cogs in back it takes to match the range and spacing we had with triple cranks and tight cassettes with 8 cogs in 1991.
Shimano's cranks look like dead octopuses, although since I spend more time riding my bikes than looking at them I could get over that.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I think Rival is a lower end SRAM road group? Ultegra 6700 is freaking brilliant. It's a bit heavy, at 1.5 lbs more than SRAM Red. But the front shifting is phenomenal. The rear shifting is great, too, but you expect that. The cranks on the 6700 group are the best I've used.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fishers, In
Posts: 306
Bikes: 2010 Surly Long Haul Trucker - Blue Velvet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'd buy the titanium bike. As cool as carbon fiber is, I can't get over how completely amazing titanium is. That's before ever talking about bikes mind you....
Ultegra vs Rival. I've ridden Rival, and I've ridden 105 (closer match imho that ultegra). I like the brake levers a lot better from SRAM. I like the operating system better on the Shimano.
Ultegra vs Rival. I've ridden Rival, and I've ridden 105 (closer match imho that ultegra). I like the brake levers a lot better from SRAM. I like the operating system better on the Shimano.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Danville, KY
Posts: 1,610
Bikes: '11 Felt Z85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
Maybe they need to create a new material called Carbanium? Mixture of Carbon and Titanium. Then there'd be no debate.
And to answer your question, I'd probably opt for Ti. With my bulk, I'd be afraid I'd crush a carbon bike.
And to answer your question, I'd probably opt for Ti. With my bulk, I'd be afraid I'd crush a carbon bike.
#7
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
great info thus far guys, keep it coming!
I've heard great things about Rival but I've also heard great things about 6700. I ride microshift right now, one thing I Like is my steady brake levers, I'm not sure I love the idea of ultegra moving the whole lever to shift but at the same time, thousands of others do it no problem, I think I'd get used to it.
I must say, I do like the low maintenance of Titanium yet I like that je ne sais quoi about carbon that just seems like it's going to buzz smoothly down the road.
double vs triple isn't really an issue. At first Ididn't love my compact double but now I actually really like it and I'm on a 9speed platform now and don't have problem with the range so 10 speed will only help me more.
I've heard great things about Rival but I've also heard great things about 6700. I ride microshift right now, one thing I Like is my steady brake levers, I'm not sure I love the idea of ultegra moving the whole lever to shift but at the same time, thousands of others do it no problem, I think I'd get used to it.
I must say, I do like the low maintenance of Titanium yet I like that je ne sais quoi about carbon that just seems like it's going to buzz smoothly down the road.
double vs triple isn't really an issue. At first Ididn't love my compact double but now I actually really like it and I'm on a 9speed platform now and don't have problem with the range so 10 speed will only help me more.
#8
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895
Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I myself have no experience with either (other than partial carbon no, no problems) but from what I gather Reading on the forums, the ti bike would depend highly on design and model.
Years back when Litespeed was real big, they offered the low end ti ($2400 model) and the high end ($4500). That was back in the late 90's /early 2000's.
They say the low end bike was really flexy and not good for heavier rider. I looked into the low end model but my friend that managed the LBS talked me out of it saying low end ti models were too flexy and noodly under my 230 lb body.
But other posters made claims (back then) that the high end designs were very stiff due to tube shape and design that was different from the low end model.
Like I said, no first hand experience but might be something you would like to investigate!
Years back when Litespeed was real big, they offered the low end ti ($2400 model) and the high end ($4500). That was back in the late 90's /early 2000's.
They say the low end bike was really flexy and not good for heavier rider. I looked into the low end model but my friend that managed the LBS talked me out of it saying low end ti models were too flexy and noodly under my 230 lb body.
But other posters made claims (back then) that the high end designs were very stiff due to tube shape and design that was different from the low end model.
Like I said, no first hand experience but might be something you would like to investigate!
#9
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I myself have no experience with either (other than partial carbon no, no problems) but from what I gather Reading on the forums, the ti bike would depend highly on design and model.
Years back when Litespeed was real big, they offered the low end ti ($2400 model) and the high end ($4500). That was back in the late 90's /early 2000's.
They say the low end bike was really flexy and not good for heavier rider. I looked into the low end model but my friend that managed the LBS talked me out of it saying low end ti models were too flexy and noodly under my 230 lb body.
But other posters made claims (back then) that the high end designs were very stiff due to tube shape and design that was different from the low end model.
Like I said, no first hand experience but might be something you would like to investigate!
Years back when Litespeed was real big, they offered the low end ti ($2400 model) and the high end ($4500). That was back in the late 90's /early 2000's.
They say the low end bike was really flexy and not good for heavier rider. I looked into the low end model but my friend that managed the LBS talked me out of it saying low end ti models were too flexy and noodly under my 230 lb body.
But other posters made claims (back then) that the high end designs were very stiff due to tube shape and design that was different from the low end model.
Like I said, no first hand experience but might be something you would like to investigate!
To clue you guys in, my commuter bike got stolen over the weekend. I have renters insurance and it should be covered. Ultimately, I think I want to use the money to buy a nicer roadie and then sell my existing roadie to finance the new commuter bike. I'm a big bikes direct fan so I'm considering their Le Champion Carbon Fiber and the Le Champ Titanium heat. Also, If I'm really disappointed in the frame itself, I can take the components off of it, sell it and then either purchase the other frame or go with another vendors frame.
Both bikes are about $1600 I'm leaning towards the carbon fiber because they have one in a blue color scheme that will match both of my existing sets of wheels.
I'm also considering a carbon fiber Kestral that is $300 more but it comes with better wheels (ksyrium equipe) that I should easily be able to sell for that price difference. My set of handbuilt wheels are 125 grams lighter and have 32 spokes. I'd rather ride on them then the low spoke ksyriums
#10
Starting over
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think Rival is a lower end SRAM road group? Ultegra 6700 is freaking brilliant. It's a bit heavy, at 1.5 lbs more than SRAM Red. But the front shifting is phenomenal. The rear shifting is great, too, but you expect that. The cranks on the 6700 group are the best I've used.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
You shouldn't be. Boeing's new dreamliner is mostly carbon fiber. My CF bike doesn't have a weight limit, although LBS says the drop outs are rated for 2,500 pounds. I don't think you could crush a carbon frame if you tried. Wheels might be another matter.
I've heard a lot of people say this, although I'm not sure why. Are you worried you're accidentally going to engage the brakes? That's never happened to me. I've always found that pushing one lever to shift one way and the other lever to shift the other way was pretty straight-forward and intuitive. It's never caused me problems of any sort.
I've heard a lot of people say this, although I'm not sure why. Are you worried you're accidentally going to engage the brakes? That's never happened to me. I've always found that pushing one lever to shift one way and the other lever to shift the other way was pretty straight-forward and intuitive. It's never caused me problems of any sort.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lexington KY
Posts: 476
Bikes: Salsa Casseroll for Street and Airborne Hobgoblin for dirt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I was having this delima and bought a steel Salsa frameset. I put a 105/ultegra groupset on it and love it.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Which you buy depends on what you value in a drive-train: Ultegra emphasizes smooth, quiet shifting at the expense of some performance. Rival, on the other hand, emphasizes performance over smoothness. Those with smaller hands may appreciate the shape and shorter lever throw of Rival.
When it came time for me to buy my dream bike, I went with a carbon fiber frame (Cervelo RS) and SRAM Red component group. I loved the fact that the carbon frame was insanely stiff during full-exertion sprints, yet still amazingly comfortable over less-than-perfect pavement. The lightening-fast rear shifting of SRAM sold me on their components and the fact that I was able to find a close-out Red gruppo for, literally, half the price of Dura-Ace was an added bonus.
#16
Senior Member
Red
Dura Ace
Force
Ultegra
Rival
105
Apex
Tiagra
etc.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I seem to be mistaken about Rival. Sorry for the confusion!
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Campagnolo Chorus shifters have no sexy cut-outs in the brake blades and say "Chorus"
Campagnolo Record shifters are identical but have two sexy cut-outs in the brake blades and are stamped "Record" but weigh the same as Chorus.
Campagnolo Super Record shifters add a third sexy-cut-out, change the label, and actually weigh 7 grams less because they have different rear ratchets (but are otherwise identical).
This was a lot more confusing before Campagnolo started putting group names on components during the transition from C-record to ergo era.
Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 08-23-11 at 02:58 PM.
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 8
Bikes: Mariposa Randonneur, Gilles Bertrand, Erickson Tandem, Calfee custom Dragonfly, Ritchie Mnt Tam
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbn or TI
Lets say you've narrowed your bike down to 2 choices. one in Ti the other in CF. they have identical components and cost the same, which do you choose and why.
Part 2, one has ultegra 6700 the other SRAM Rival, still the same price. Does this change your decision? Why?
Part 2, one has ultegra 6700 the other SRAM Rival, still the same price. Does this change your decision? Why?
Ultegra or SRAM Rival I would choose Campy
#20
Banned
Why indeed.. some really nice high strength steel alloys are made ,
and once the tube diameters get bigger, oversize, wall thickness can be kept thin,
Tubes still quite light, but will gain strength.
and lend themselves to small frame builders shops , domestic.
so you can have a frameset made to suit size and weight of the rider..
My last purchase , Bike Friday Pocket Llama , Rohloff, disc Brakes..
Schmidt Hub generator for lights .
Bike Fridays Heavy rider option ..
it's a using a front triangle, rather than the single Boom Tube,
So find it significantly easier to lock up securely.
and once the tube diameters get bigger, oversize, wall thickness can be kept thin,
Tubes still quite light, but will gain strength.
and lend themselves to small frame builders shops , domestic.
so you can have a frameset made to suit size and weight of the rider..
My last purchase , Bike Friday Pocket Llama , Rohloff, disc Brakes..
Schmidt Hub generator for lights .
Bike Fridays Heavy rider option ..
it's a using a front triangle, rather than the single Boom Tube,
So find it significantly easier to lock up securely.
Last edited by fietsbob; 08-23-11 at 03:48 PM.
#21
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good info guys. Campy isn't in the running neither is custom because then I still need a full groups. I suppose I could just buy a new frame and keep my existing Microsoft 9speed with ultegra crank fd and rd but that is no fun. I'm not sure that I want to put a compact crank on my commuter because it may see some loaded touring use but at the same time, I could use most of the parts off the current roadie for a commuter/touring build.
I shouldn't get my hopes up. If my insurance company screws me ill be getting nothing and get screwed having to spend another grand setting up a new commuter bike.
I shouldn't get my hopes up. If my insurance company screws me ill be getting nothing and get screwed having to spend another grand setting up a new commuter bike.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,695
Bikes: Kestrel Talon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a titanium Lynskey and sold a carbon Kestrel about 18 months ago. Honestly, there's little to choose between them when it comes to ride, vibration damping, etc. The wheels and tires have made a bigger difference (and yes, I tried both wheelsets on both bikes). I stuck with the Lynskey because it fit me better - I was a little stretched out on the Kestrel, even with a short stem and a no setback seatpost, and the headshell was shorter than I'd prefer. The idea that titanium might be either more durable or easier to repair was also in the back of my mind, but I have no real information to support that speculation.
I would also echo what others have said about the difference between a compact setup and a triple - with a compact double you have to use a wide-range cassette to match the overall gearing range you can get with a triple, but the narrower range of ratios can be really nice to have. My current bike has Rival with a 11-32 cassette, but there are times when I'd like a closer range cassette with smaller steps between the gears.
JB
I would also echo what others have said about the difference between a compact setup and a triple - with a compact double you have to use a wide-range cassette to match the overall gearing range you can get with a triple, but the narrower range of ratios can be really nice to have. My current bike has Rival with a 11-32 cassette, but there are times when I'd like a closer range cassette with smaller steps between the gears.
JB
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Up
Posts: 4,695
Bikes: Masi, Giant TCR, Eisentraut (retired), Jamis Aurora Elite, Zullo, Cannondale, 84 & 93 Stumpjumpers, Waterford, Tern D8, Bianchi, Gunner Roadie, Serotta, Serotta Duette, was gifted a Diamond Back
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 305 Post(s)
Liked 2,038 Times
in
604 Posts
Of your choices, I would get ti just because I don't have one yet. But if I were looking for a new bike I would just get a steel frame and build it up. Building it up is half the fun.
#24
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm leaning towards titanium for a few reasons: If I ever want to go somewhere and lock it up, I won't stress over throwing a lock around titanium tubes like I would with Carbon Fiber.
2. A lot of what I hear about titanium being flexy for bigger guys seems to be a bit mythical
3. While I like to go hard and mash out every once in awhile, I'm more of a distance kind of guy, chewing up long miles, seems like if it is slightly flexy thats not going to be an issue for a guy that mostly rides high cadence (100+) and lives in a relatively flat part of the country. seems like that may actually help with the comfort over the long haul.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 3,370
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3. While I like to go hard and mash out every once in awhile, I'm more of a distance kind of guy, chewing up long miles, seems like if it is slightly flexy thats not going to be an issue for a guy that mostly rides high cadence (100+) and lives in a relatively flat part of the country. seems like that may actually help with the comfort over the long haul.