Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-11, 03:27 PM   #1
thefunnyman
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Bikes:
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Redline Conquest vs Motobecane Super Mirage

Hello! I hope this can be considered the right forum for this question. First a little history since this is my first post. I've been lurking this forum for a few months and just want to say thanks so very much up front to the entire community for the all of the awesome advice in this forum. I decided about 3 months ago to forego replacing a broken down car and instead bought a bicycle to ride to/from work (around 8 miles roundtrip). I'm a rather portly fellow (6' and 280 pounds) and have definitely taken to this whole cycling thing. The Trek 7.1fx i bought has been perfect for my needs. I have since outfitted it with a rack, fenders, headlights, computer, etc to make it my ideal commuting machine.

Now, i'm starting to embrace the n+1 concept everyone seems to speak so highly of and I've also noticed that sometimes you just need a backup ride. I am in the market for a new bike for riding longer distances and over varying terrain. I currently live in Northwest Arkansas, but found a couple bikes in nearby Tulsa that I'm considering for my next purchase (links below). Any thoughts on these machines and which would be the better deal?

Redline Conquest - http://tulsa.craigslist.org/bik/2700707489.html
Motobecane Super Mirage - http://tulsa.craigslist.org/bik/2688789960.html

I am personally leaning toward the cyclocross bike just because i'm rather hefty and the bike should be designed to take a little abuse. I am thinking of making the short drive tomorrow to test ride both and just wanted to know if the price seemed right for the components and if there is some additional information not provided that I should need to know before purchasing.

Thanks so much for your time and input!
thefunnyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-11, 01:27 PM   #2
goldfinch 
Senior Member
 
goldfinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Minnesota/Arizona and between
Bikes: Trek Madone 4.7 WSD, 1969 Schwinn Collegiate, Surly Long Haul Trucker, Terry Classic, Gary Fisher Marlin, Litespeed Ocoee
Posts: 3,980
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have no advice because I don't know anything about those bikes, but the redline conquest sure is pretty. Bikepedia may have some info on the bikes.

Last edited by goldfinch; 11-19-11 at 01:33 PM.
goldfinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-11, 03:34 PM   #3
CliftonGK1
Senior Member
 
CliftonGK1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Posts: 11,380
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Between those specific 2 I'd go with the Conquest because that Motobecane has 27" tires which limits your choices for future component selection. The Conquest has always been a nice bike, right since its introduction. A couple of my teammates ride/rode Conquest frames.

The Conquest does have a tire-size limitation, though. Don't plan on going much larger than a 35mm tire with it, especially if you're fitting fenders on there. It's a straight up CX frame and not designed around monstercross tires (38 - 45mm).
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
CliftonGK1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-11, 04:45 PM   #4
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Motobecane looks clean, but Charlie obviously doesn't know how to install a front wheel.

CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-11, 05:11 PM   #5
thefunnyman
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Bikes:
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the input. Does anyone have any opinions on the difference in shifters between the bikes? Having never ridden a road bike, I think the location of the bar end shifters on the Conquest would annoy me.

I guess I'm going to let my n00bness show CraigB, but what are you referring to?
thefunnyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-11, 08:15 PM   #6
CraigB
Starting over
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefunnyman View Post
CraigB, but what are you referring to?
Quick release levers go on the left side of the bike. He got the back wheel correct, but that one's pretty obvious, what with the gears and all.
CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.