Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
Reload this Page >

First "B" shop ride of the year (yikes!)

Notices
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) Looking to lose that spare tire? Ideal weight 200+? Frustrated being a large cyclist in a sport geared for the ultra-light? Learn about the bikes and parts that can take the abuse of a heavier cyclist, how to keep your body going while losing the weight, and get support from others who've been successful.

First "B" shop ride of the year (yikes!)

Old 04-06-12, 12:19 PM
  #1  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
First "B" shop ride of the year (yikes!)

Last night I went on my first group ride of the season from the LBS. Those around here last year may remember my season was spent working to get from the "C" flight "fun and fitness" group to the slowest of the three "B" groups, the so-called Bumble Bs (the next fastest group is the Honey Bs and the fastest is the Killer Bs; the As are simply called the "racer dudes and dudettes"). Well, I thought this year I'd start with the Bumbles and see how it goes.

Well, it was an interesting experience. We left the shop and headed north into a stiff 15-17 mph wind out of the northeast. For some reason the group never formed echelons, but a double pace line instead, which was probably just as well, since we only had half the road to work with. They kept a consistent pace of about 19.5 into this wind, and I sat at the back, dodging the half-dozen or so who got shelled off during the northerly stretch, but I finally lost the leaders in the wind at about 12.5 miles.

Fortunately they stopped to regroup at mile 13, the half-way point. I thought the leader talked about splitting into two, with each group trying to stay intact and work together, so when we started off again I didn't make any effort to stay with the front bunch, and kind of sat up waiting for the 6 or 8 behind to catch me, but after a mile or so I looked back and they were nowhere to be found. I guess rather than complete the loop they decided to turn around and go straight home.

So now I'm out there all by myself trying to bridge a gap of about a half mile to reach a group I couldn't stay with in the first place. Over the next 12 miles I did manage to reel in 4 or 5 stragglers, and finished within a few minutes of the lead group, but I was exhausted. 26 miles at 17.7 mph average (for me - I don't know how fast the leaders came in).

It's kind of demoralizing to be going 18.5 to 19 mph and feel like you're the slowpoke in the bunch. But that's OK. I'll be back and I'll keep getting better/faster. But all that time chasing by myself gave me time to wonder which is the better metaphor when considering a group ride that you can't quite keep up with - is it a mother devouring its young, or simply Darwinism in action?
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:16 PM
  #2  
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 13,346

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 147 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 47 Posts
Oops. Misheard that one!

You say you were demoralized trying to keep up but then you spent the majority of the ride solo into the wind. Don't let it get you down. One of these days you'll be feeling great and pulling hard and everybody else will be wheezing to keep up, you'll see. At least you didn't abandon!

Maybe you need something like this:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...peed........#3
TrojanHorse is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:26 PM
  #3  
Climbers Apprentice
 
vesteroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not that I know a darn thing but how can a 20 mph double pace line group be the lowest of the b rides?

Our b group here states 14-16 mph average
vesteroid is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:33 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, Ca
Posts: 427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah, almost 18 mph average seems pretty fast for the "slow" group ride!
aramis is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:36 PM
  #5  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
The shop's classifications are (roughly):

C: 13+ mph no-drop
Bumble B: 17-18 mph
Honey B: 19-21 mph
Killer B: 22-23 mph
A: 24+ mph

Those are total ride averages, including traffic stops, so typical speed on the flats is a little higher than those numbers. In fact, on our ride last night the leader suggested that anyone who wanted to take a pull at the front should plan on keeping it at or above 19 to keep the average in line. I guess it's a fast bunch. The official shop-sponsored team each year tries to complete a century on the Speedway track during TdC in as much under 4 hours as they can. That is one scary paceline.

Last edited by CraigB; 04-06-12 at 01:40 PM.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:40 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, Ca
Posts: 427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by CraigB
The shop's classifications are (roughly):

C: 13+ mph no-drop
Bumble B: 17-18 mph
Honey B: 19-21 mph
Killer B: 22-23 mph
A: 24+ mph

Those are total ride averages, including traffic stops, so typical speed on the flats is a little higher than those numbers.
Well then it looks like you were actually right in the range. Curious as to the terrain.. mostly flat/rolling hills/steep climbs.. ?
aramis is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 01:46 PM
  #7  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Terrain was mostly flat in the first half, and *very* gently rolling in the last. I think my Garmin report showed something like less than 250 feet of climbing total in 26 miles.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 02:01 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, Ca
Posts: 427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by CraigB
Terrain was mostly flat in the first half, and *very* gently rolling in the last. I think my Garmin report showed something like less than 250 feet of climbing total in 26 miles.
ahh.. ok well the speed makes more sense, but in the wind and by yourself I think you're doing pretty darn well.

I'm just from Northern California and there isn't too much all flat around me.
aramis is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 02:08 PM
  #9  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
No one's going to mistake the terrain around here for "rugged," but at least it's not billiard-table flat like east central Illinois. I know, I lived in Champaign for 5 years.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 02:15 PM
  #10  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
On the plus side, Garmin showed the ride burned over 1900 calories. Not that I believe them.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 02:38 PM
  #11  
Watching and waiting.
 
jethro56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mattoon,Ill
Posts: 2,023

Bikes: Trek 7300 Trek Madone 4.5 Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CraigB
No one's going to mistake the terrain around here for "rugged," but at least it's not billiard-table flat like east central Illinois. I know, I lived in Champaign for 5 years.
We got some big Hills around here. Bob Hill is easily 300 pounds.
jethro56 is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 04:27 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
nkfrench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,846

Bikes: 2006 Specialized Ruby Pro aka "Rhubarb" / and a backup road bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 4 Posts
Something's not working out right with the numbers.
If the ride out is into headwinds 15-17mph and you can almost hang with guys riding 19.5mph ... then you come back around the loop (15-17mph tailwind) and average 17.7mph for the whole ride. So you would have ridden about 16mph coming back.
15-17mph tailwind can give a nice push, I'm guessing 2mph "free" speed or only about 14mph actual effort.
The only way that makes sense to me is if you got totally crushed when you couldn't draft on the last 1/2 mile going out, then you were losing too much momentum on the rolling climbs or the winds died/shifted.
Or you figured your average based on elapsed time not moving time.

Getting dropped is just one of those things that lets you know where you are in your abilities and what you brought to the ride that day. It's not fun, but it's not good or bad. It just is. Could be that there were some "A" riders looking for a soft ride that got caught up in it and cut loose. Maybe it is a hazing ritual. Welcome to their group.
nkfrench is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 04:48 PM
  #13  
not as fat as I was
 
Biggziff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 947

Bikes: Trek 7000, Trek 5500, Fuji Newest 1.0

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CraigB
Last night I went on my first group ride of the season from the LBS. Those around here last year may remember my season was spent working to get from the "C" flight "fun and fitness" group to the slowest of the three "B" groups, the so-called Bumble Bs (the next fastest group is the Honey Bs and the fastest is the Killer Bs; the As are simply called the "racer dudes and dudettes"). Well, I thought this year I'd start with the Bumbles and see how it goes.

Well, it was an interesting experience. We left the shop and headed north into a stiff 15-17 mph wind out of the northeast. For some reason the group never formed echelons, but a double pace line instead, which was probably just as well, since we only had half the road to work with. They kept a consistent pace of about 19.5 into this wind, and I sat at the back, dodging the half-dozen or so who got shelled off during the northerly stretch, but I finally lost the leaders in the wind at about 12.5 miles.

Fortunately they stopped to regroup at mile 13, the half-way point. I thought the leader talked about splitting into two, with each group trying to stay intact and work together, so when we started off again I didn't make any effort to stay with the front bunch, and kind of sat up waiting for the 6 or 8 behind to catch me, but after a mile or so I looked back and they were nowhere to be found. I guess rather than complete the loop they decided to turn around and go straight home.

So now I'm out there all by myself trying to bridge a gap of about a half mile to reach a group I couldn't stay with in the first place. Over the next 12 miles I did manage to reel in 4 or 5 stragglers, and finished within a few minutes of the lead group, but I was exhausted. 26 miles at 17.7 mph average (for me - I don't know how fast the leaders came in).

It's kind of demoralizing to be going 18.5 to 19 mph and feel like you're the slowpoke in the bunch. But that's OK. I'll be back and I'll keep getting better/faster. But all that time chasing by myself gave me time to wonder which is the better metaphor when considering a group ride that you can't quite keep up with - is it a mother devouring its young, or simply Darwinism in action?
I have to say that the more I read about these group rides, the less interest I have in riding in one. There seems to be no fraternity unless you are among the elite in the group you're in. If that's the rules, then that's the rules, but they should remove the term "group" from the ride....maybe just call them a mini race?

Good on you for wanting to continue and staying motivated under those circumstances. I'm not wired that way I guess.
__________________
humans can be so....rude
Biggziff is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 06:37 PM
  #14  
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
 
Juan Foote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jawja
Posts: 4,299

Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 960 Times in 686 Posts
Some of the benefits of riding a group that is well disciplined is the gain you get in speed for output due to the rest time you get not pulling, learning to maintain a proper speed while pulling, and the safety of riding with such a (properly taught) group at speed/close.
It really burns my ass when you get out to a "no drop" group ride with some low (or high as perspective may have it) advertized average speed, and then it turns into a hammer-fest and leaves new riders to that group off in the weeds somewhere to catch up at some regroup point by themselves. The whole point of making a group ride IS to ride with others. Even if you have a rider who gets shelled, there should be some person sweeping the group and making sure these folks get back safely. Heck, folks can ride alone from home.
Juan Foote is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:06 PM
  #15  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nkfrench
Something's not working out right with the numbers.
If the ride out is into headwinds 15-17mph and you can almost hang with guys riding 19.5mph ... then you come back around the loop (15-17mph tailwind) and average 17.7mph for the whole ride. So you would have ridden about 16mph coming back.
15-17mph tailwind can give a nice push, I'm guessing 2mph "free" speed or only about 14mph actual effort.
The only way that makes sense to me is if you got totally crushed when you couldn't draft on the last 1/2 mile going out, then you were losing too much momentum on the rolling climbs or the winds died/shifted.
Or you figured your average based on elapsed time not moving time.

Getting dropped is just one of those things that lets you know where you are in your abilities and what you brought to the ride that day. It's not fun, but it's not good or bad. It just is. Could be that there were some "A" riders looking for a soft ride that got caught up in it and cut loose. Maybe it is a hazing ritual. Welcome to their group.
Could be that the Garmin info was off. I didn't do any of my own calcs, but the total mileage should be pretty accurate, as it was the same as when I plotted the route in MapMyRide, and the average speed I quoted was the Garmin's moving average and not total average (which was something like 17.4 or thereabouts). It could be that the times I glanced down at the computer for current speed weren't representative of the whole ride, it's hard to say. I know in the second half, the segments that were west and south were with partial tailwinds, and I was going anywhere from 19-21, but there were some eastbound sections near the end where I was back into the headwind and things slowed considerably. That was also the part of the course with what little hills there were.

Here's the graph:

CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:08 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,428

Bikes: Cervelo RS, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Pro, Schwinn Typhoon, Nashbar touring, custom steel MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nkfrench
Something's not working out right with the numbers.
If the ride out is into headwinds 15-17mph and you can almost hang with guys riding 19.5mph ... then you come back around the loop (15-17mph tailwind) and average 17.7mph for the whole ride. So you would have ridden about 16mph coming back.
15-17mph tailwind can give a nice push, I'm guessing 2mph "free" speed or only about 14mph actual effort.
The only way that makes sense to me is if you got totally crushed when you couldn't draft on the last 1/2 mile going out, then you were losing too much momentum on the rolling climbs or the winds died/shifted.
Or you figured your average based on elapsed time not moving time.
You're not taking aerodynamics into account. My power meter shows that my power output often drops by 20-30% or more when drafting behind someone else. You're also assuming that the ride was 50% headwind and 50% tailwind. Given that the ride was a loop rather than an out-and-back, that might not be an accurate assumption. Depending on the terrain and wind direction, the OP may have been dealing headwinds on more than 50% of the course.
sstorkel is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:11 PM
  #17  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by punkncat
Some of the benefits of riding a group that is well disciplined is the gain you get in speed for output due to the rest time you get not pulling, learning to maintain a proper speed while pulling, and the safety of riding with such a (properly taught) group at speed/close.
It really burns my ass when you get out to a "no drop" group ride with some low (or high as perspective may have it) advertized average speed, and then it turns into a hammer-fest and leaves new riders to that group off in the weeds somewhere to catch up at some regroup point by themselves. The whole point of making a group ride IS to ride with others. Even if you have a rider who gets shelled, there should be some person sweeping the group and making sure these folks get back safely. Heck, folks can ride alone from home.
I agree, but to be clear, the only group that's considered no-drop is the C group. Though there were times I rode with them last season and the group still got decidedly stre-e-e-etched out.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:18 PM
  #18  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by jethro56
We got some big Hills around here. Bob Hill is easily 300 pounds.
And if I hit a Hill like that it would put a serious dent in my average speed, I'm sure.

Hey, are we gonna do a ride in your neck of the woods sometime before the corn is so tall you can't see the pickups barreling down on you from the right and left at the road intersections?
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:19 PM
  #19  
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,219

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1349 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times in 621 Posts
Originally Posted by CraigB
I agree, but to be clear, the only group that's considered no-drop is the C group. Though there were times I rode with them last season and the group still got decidedly stre-e-e-etched out.
You need one of their kits to keep up with them.

https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/h...rDeCure034.jpg
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Old 04-06-12, 08:23 PM
  #20  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
You need one of their kits to keep up with them.

https://i256.photobucket.com/albums/h...rDeCure034.jpg
Those look a little classier than this year's version, which is blue and green. There was a woman in one on our ride, and as she came up to the regroup stop she was so gassed from fighting the wind that she tombayed (as they like to say in the 50+ forum), going right over on her side. I felt so bad for her, especially in her team kit.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 01:19 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
linear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good ride report

Its early in the season yet up in the north, lots of fair weather riders just coming out.
I'll be back and I'll keep getting better/faster.
Thats sounds like the right way to go. It can get discouraging riding with a bunch of faster people but you do learn what it takes to get better and there is a satisfaction with that of course. One thing I have learned is to get an early start on building some miles. Way to hang in there CraigB.
linear is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 05:50 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Foothills of the beautiful Adirondack Mountains, NY
Posts: 501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Kudos to you for trying the B ride, not quitting and riding hard the entire time.

Last edited by lenny866; 04-08-12 at 03:25 PM.
lenny866 is offline  
Old 04-08-12, 08:54 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
1855Cru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 313

Bikes: 2015 Specialized Diverge Comp Carbon, 2011 Cervelo R3, 2011 Trek 2.1, 2011 Trek X-Caliber

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Craig,

I think you might want to look at this in another way. In my view this was a very successful first B ride. You were right there or thereabouts with the lead group for the first half of the ride. For the second half the group split in two and you clearly outpaced the second group. In chasing the lead group you reeled in several more riders so in my estimation you finished in the top third of all the riders that started the ride. A success for sure a few more rides and you will get into the rhythm of the group which I think is critical.

Well done!
1855Cru is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 05:15 AM
  #24  
Starting over
Thread Starter
 
CraigB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Well, assuming I can get out of work on time tonight, I'm going to try this again. I think they usually stick to pretty much the same routes most of the time, so it should be easy to compare. I guess the wind is the unknown variable. Anyway, we'll see how it goes.
CraigB is offline  
Old 04-12-12, 08:48 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
CJ C's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 919

Bikes: Wally World Huffy Cranbrook Cruiser (with siily wicker front basket)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
go get 'em Craig. keep us posted
CJ C is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.